Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Double Agent Review!!! 360 version = Superior GFX!!!

  • 99 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for tango90101
tango90101

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 tango90101
Member since 2006 • 5977 Posts
[QUOTE="tango90101"][QUOTE="Subcritical"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"]

Quote:

Graphically, the game looks good, but falls short of the detailed display Sam saw on Xbox 360 last year. Players who ran through the paces in Microsoft-land will notice a slower framerate and the loss of a few small details (things like a smaller quantity of fights during the prison riot, different textures on character close-ups and no goggle-toggle when tossing on Sam's specs).

There are other areas where Sam and company suffer from a bout of PS3 hiccups too. In some instances, for example, snow falls everywhere but the top left-hand corner of the screen; Sam's hands occasionally clip into walls while he hacks at a wire; and the camera will sometime flip out as our hero climbs across a pipe. These miniscule glitches are forgivable, however, and it's actually quite fun to pull enemies into icy ponds, crack safes and hide in the shadows. Plus, the PS3 gets two additional multiplayer maps and a female spy that the 360 never saw.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/778/778514p1.html

Subcritical

So what do you have to say to the fact that the Xbox 360 can barely run Quake 4?  Is it not as powerful as you thought?  The game engine for Quake 4 is 3 years old, and the Xbox 360 can barely run it!!

actually you're wrong.. q4 was a rushed port from pc....  it wasn't even made for a consolel.

you really need to do more reading about this stuff...:lol:

 

Actually no, I'm not wrong.  Maybe Splinter Cell: Double Agent was a rush port for the PS3?  OH yeah, you don't want to figure that into the discussion, and that is what I was getting at with my post. 

Just because a given game runs like turd on a platform doesn't necessarily mean that the hardware is at fault, now does it?

so you're saying if a ps3 game runs great it's the ps3 fault.

if the game chuggs along, it's the devleopers fault..

sweet...this way you can never blame the ps3...  :roll:

face it; the 360 is simply a better gaming machine... even sony never said otherwise...;)

Avatar image for Subcritical
Subcritical

2286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#102 Subcritical
Member since 2004 • 2286 Posts
[QUOTE="Subcritical"][QUOTE="tango90101"][QUOTE="Subcritical"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"]

Quote:

Graphically, the game looks good, but falls short of the detailed display Sam saw on Xbox 360 last year. Players who ran through the paces in Microsoft-land will notice a slower framerate and the loss of a few small details (things like a smaller quantity of fights during the prison riot, different textures on character close-ups and no goggle-toggle when tossing on Sam's specs).

There are other areas where Sam and company suffer from a bout of PS3 hiccups too. In some instances, for example, snow falls everywhere but the top left-hand corner of the screen; Sam's hands occasionally clip into walls while he hacks at a wire; and the camera will sometime flip out as our hero climbs across a pipe. These miniscule glitches are forgivable, however, and it's actually quite fun to pull enemies into icy ponds, crack safes and hide in the shadows. Plus, the PS3 gets two additional multiplayer maps and a female spy that the 360 never saw.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/778/778514p1.html

tango90101

So what do you have to say to the fact that the Xbox 360 can barely run Quake 4?  Is it not as powerful as you thought?  The game engine for Quake 4 is 3 years old, and the Xbox 360 can barely run it!!

actually you're wrong.. q4 was a rushed port from pc....  it wasn't even made for a consolel.

you really need to do more reading about this stuff...:lol:

 

Actually no, I'm not wrong.  Maybe Splinter Cell: Double Agent was a rush port for the PS3?  OH yeah, you don't want to figure that into the discussion, and that is what I was getting at with my post. 

Just because a given game runs like turd on a platform doesn't necessarily mean that the hardware is at fault, now does it?

so you're saying if a ps3 game runs great it's the ps3 fault.

if the game chuggs along, it's the devleopers fault..

sweet...this way you can never blame the ps3...  :roll:

face it; the 360 is simply a better gaming machine... even sony never said otherwise...;)

And the vice-versa can be said about the Xbox.  Brilliant logic  :P

Avatar image for Not-A-Stalker
Not-A-Stalker

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Not-A-Stalker
Member since 2006 • 5165 Posts
Who expected Ubisoft to do an actual good port to a Sony platform? When was the last time an Ubisoft port was actually good on a PS platform? Never?