Ubisoft: Watch Dogs Being Developed on PC/PS4/Wii U as lead platforms

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for AznbkdX
AznbkdX

4284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 AznbkdX
Member since 2012 • 4284 Posts

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Enjoy lots of pop-in and sub-HD textures...

StrongBlackVine

I'm more of a PC gamer anyways, so believe me when I say that I'm used to seeing that more often on consoles in comparison. ;)

Its no problem for me. If I wanted to get the "superior" version, then I definitely could.

So you will intentionally buy one the worst version when you could have the best for a cheaper price. You that enamored with that tablet controller?

Hey its called having a choice brother. :)

The controller is freaking fantastic. Its been a very long time since I cared for gimmicks, but the pad is one of the better ones for me.

For me I'm not the type of guy to say to ppl that they are getting the worst version because of the PC. Its there choice, and they will have fun with it regardless if they are really into it.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#52 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

Ubisoft and maybe Capcom seem to be the only 3rd parties that are interested in the WiiU.

I'll be getting it on the PS4 though.

Kingpin0114

Criterion and Indie developers also like the Wii U.

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#53 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts

[QUOTE="Kingpin0114"]

Ubisoft and maybe Capcom seem to be the only 3rd parties that are interested in the WiiU.

I'll be getting it on the PS4 though.

Nintendo_Ownes7

Criterion and Indie developers also like the Wii U.

And Warner Bros.
Avatar image for AznbkdX
AznbkdX

4284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#54 AznbkdX
Member since 2012 • 4284 Posts

[QUOTE="Kingpin0114"]

Ubisoft and maybe Capcom seem to be the only 3rd parties that are interested in the WiiU.

I'll be getting it on the PS4 though.

Nintendo_Ownes7

Criterion and Indie developers also like the Wii U.

There is one company in particular called Maestro Interactive that has some good stuff coming that I would love to see. It has a musical guy that worked for Retro in it as the owner.

They got some fantastic stuff like Fade Into Darkness (horror game with a twist), Cosmic Highway (F-Zero like game), and an older game Super Ubi Land (hard retro platformer).

If we got more ambitious guys like them coming over then I'm happy. :)

Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts
  Wii u version will probably be worst then the 360/ps3 versions just like AC3.
Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts

Darn,that means the game development will be affected by wiiU's abysmally weak hardware.

I was looking forward to watch dogs,but now I am not sure if I want to play it.

Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

I might get this one for the WiiU. They can do some seriously awesome stuff with the pad in this game if they try.

super600

Enjoy lots of pop-in and sub-HD textures...

The WiiU version will most likely run at 720P and 60fps if the devs know what they are doing.

Avatar image for rjdofu
rjdofu

9171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 rjdofu
Member since 2008 • 9171 Posts
[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Enjoy lots of pop-in and sub-HD textures...

omarissac

The WiiU version will most likely run at 720P and 60fps if the devs know what they are doing.

What so laughable about it?
Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts

Darn,that means the game development will be affected by wiiU's abysmally weak hardware.

I was looking forward to watch dogs,but now I am not sure if I want to play it.

call_of_duty_10
The op is mistaken, the wiiu is not a lead platform the pc is, how the heck is the wiiu the lead platform when the pc version they showed at e3 was running on more powerful hardware then ps4, hardware that's 10x more powerful then wiiu.
Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts
[QUOTE="omarissac"][QUOTE="super600"]

The WiiU version will most likely run at 720P and 60fps if the devs know what they are doing.

rjdofu

What so laughable about it?

The game is running on hardware that's more powerful then ps4, and you expect 720p/60fps, when almost all wiiu ports are inferior. the game will probably be 1080p/30fps on ps4.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

  Wii u version will probably be worst then the 360/ps3 versions just like AC3.omarissac

If Red Dead Redemption actually looked like that you may have a point lol.

Avatar image for AznbkdX
AznbkdX

4284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 AznbkdX
Member since 2012 • 4284 Posts

[QUOTE="omarissac"]  Wii u version will probably be worst then the 360/ps3 versions just like AC3.ActicEdge

If Red Dead Redemption actually looked like that you may have a point lol.

Or X for that matter as well haha.

Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts
ActicEdge

If Red Dead Redemption actually looked like that you may have a point lol.

That's DLC, and it's a direct feed pic, RDR does look like that, and that pic is the highest resolution pic i could find for X released from nintendo
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="omarissac"]  Wii u version will probably be worst then the 360/ps3 versions just like AC3.AznbkdX

If Red Dead Redemption actually looked like that you may have a point lol.

Or X for that matter as well haha.

That X gif is popular because when you watched the trailer you were like "cool Xenoblade like . .. OMG he JUMPED IN A DAMN MECH AND TOOK FLIGHT". It has nothing to do with the graphics because there were other more graphically impressive parts of that trailer.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

That's DLC, and it's a direct feed pic, RDR does look like that, and that pic is the highest resolution pic i could find for X released from nintendoomarissac

Red Dead Redemption does not look like that. There is only 1 offical screen of X from Nintendo and its not really big enough to go crazy over graphics. Its just meant to show scale. Not to mention RDR is finished and X isn't.

Avatar image for AznbkdX
AznbkdX

4284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#66 AznbkdX
Member since 2012 • 4284 Posts

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

If Red Dead Redemption actually looked like that you may have a point lol.

ActicEdge

Or X for that matter as well haha.

That X gif is popular because when you watched the trailer you were like "cool Xenoblade like . .. OMG he JUMPED IN A DAMN MECH AND TOOK FLIGHT". It has nothing to do with the graphics because there were other more graphically impressive parts of that trailer.

True but my point is that only shows the bias in the poster though. You are comparing two different things, one that is highly rendered with something that came off a youtube vid.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

Or X for that matter as well haha.

AznbkdX

That X gif is popular because when you watched the trailer you were like "cool Xenoblade like . .. OMG he JUMPED IN A DAMN MECH AND TOOK FLIGHT". It has nothing to do with the graphics because there were other more graphically impressive parts of that trailer.

True but my point is that only shows the bias in the poster though. You are comparing two different things, one that is highly rendered with something that came off a youtube vid.

I honestly dunno why anyone even cares. WiiU is not a powerful system. Its not going to largely out do the PS3 and 360, we all get it. Anyone however who played Xenoblade knows that Monolith is a very competent dev and with stronger hardware and the ability to have their game render in a higher resolution the oppurtunity for their art design to come out well on a TV is heightened. Frankly I can't wait to see how they top Satorl Marsh in X.

Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts

[QUOTE="omarissac"] That's DLC, and it's a direct feed pic, RDR does look like that, and that pic is the highest resolution pic i could find for X released from nintendoActicEdge

Red Dead Redemption does not look like that. There is only 1 offical screen of X from Nintendo and its not really big enough to go crazy over graphics. Its just meant to show scale. Not to mention RDR is finished and X isn't.

WTF RDR does look like that, i have the game and that's a direct feed pic, it's not a bull shot, so i have no idea what your talking about, and i know X is not finished but it's funny seeing nintendo fan grassping for straws saying it above current gen when it doesn't even have dynamic lighting in the trailer and we don't even have HD pics cause nintendo knows it will make the game look like crap and http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=46841825&postcount=836
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="omarissac"] That's DLC, and it's a direct feed pic, RDR does look like that, and that pic is the highest resolution pic i could find for X released from nintendoomarissac

Red Dead Redemption does not look like that. There is only 1 offical screen of X from Nintendo and its not really big enough to go crazy over graphics. Its just meant to show scale. Not to mention RDR is finished and X isn't.

WTF RDR does look like that, i have the game and that's a direct feed pic, it's not a bull shot, so i have no idea what your talking about, and i know X is not finished but it's funny seeing nintendo fan grassping for straws saying it above current gen when it doesn't even have dynamic lighting in the trailer and we don't even have HD pics cause nintendo knows it will make the game look like crap and http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=46841825&postcount=836

No RDR does not look like that. Be delusional if you want to. X isn't finished and its gonna use some tricks to achieve its goal. That neogaf post is crap, I read it, have no desire to tear apart a game that isn't done for minimalistic things that will potentially be changed/altered and even then ignores tons of positives to be overbearingly negative. X looks like a 7th gen game, the visuals aren't why people are interested in it. Nintendo lacks pictures because the game clearly is not finished. The HUD says tester for god sakes :|

Avatar image for AznbkdX
AznbkdX

4284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 AznbkdX
Member since 2012 • 4284 Posts

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

That X gif is popular because when you watched the trailer you were like "cool Xenoblade like . .. OMG he JUMPED IN A DAMN MECH AND TOOK FLIGHT". It has nothing to do with the graphics because there were other more graphically impressive parts of that trailer.

ActicEdge

True but my point is that only shows the bias in the poster though. You are comparing two different things, one that is highly rendered with something that came off a youtube vid.

I honestly dunno why anyone even cares. WiiU is not a powerful system. Its not going to largely out do the PS3 and 360, we all get it. Anyone however who played Xenoblade knows that Monolith is a very competent dev and with stronger hardware and the ability to have their game render in a higher resolution the oppurtunity for their art design to come out well on a TV is heightened. Frankly I can't wait to see how they top Satorl Marsh in X.

Just wanted to add an aside to the comment is all just to show the awkward bias in the screens. I myself don't give one flying **** on the graphics between consoles in general especially when they are not in the same specs as another.

Some ppl always feel the need to compare graphics even on weaker consoles to rather poor images of the WiiU. We know its weaker than the PS4, but that doesn't mean you should try to drag it down even to lower standards just to make it seem even worse for fans of the system.

Fanboys gonna fanboy though. I just like to make quips to certain nonsense is all. :P

I do agree though that Monolith is fantastic, and should easily be seen as capable ppl with lower specs even to fanboys eyes, but that's beside the point. Would love to see what they do with it.

Avatar image for XalonR
XalonR

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 XalonR
Member since 2012 • 100 Posts
Ok so next gen console how do sheep come into occasion.
Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#72 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="omarissac"] That's DLC, and it's a direct feed pic, RDR does look like that, and that pic is the highest resolution pic i could find for X released from nintendoomarissac

Red Dead Redemption does not look like that. There is only 1 offical screen of X from Nintendo and its not really big enough to go crazy over graphics. Its just meant to show scale. Not to mention RDR is finished and X isn't.

WTF RDR does look like that, i have the game and that's a direct feed pic, it's not a bull shot, so i have no idea what your talking about, and i know X is not finished but it's funny seeing nintendo fan grassping for straws saying it above current gen when it doesn't even have dynamic lighting in the trailer and we don't even have HD pics cause nintendo knows it will make the game look like crap and http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=46841825&postcount=836

it's been while since i played RDR and i really don't remember looking that great. Don't get me wrong game looks nice
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="omarissac"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Red Dead Redemption does not look like that. There is only 1 offical screen of X from Nintendo and its not really big enough to go crazy over graphics. Its just meant to show scale. Not to mention RDR is finished and X isn't.

k2theswiss

WTF RDR does look like that, i have the game and that's a direct feed pic, it's not a bull shot, so i have no idea what your talking about, and i know X is not finished but it's funny seeing nintendo fan grassping for straws saying it above current gen when it doesn't even have dynamic lighting in the trailer and we don't even have HD pics cause nintendo knows it will make the game look like crap and http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=46841825&postcount=836

it's been while since i played RDR and i really don't remember looking that great. Don't get me wrong game looks nice

RDR doesn't have bad graphics at all, that screen is just a total false representation of what it looks like.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

True but my point is that only shows the bias in the poster though. You are comparing two different things, one that is highly rendered with something that came off a youtube vid.

AznbkdX

I honestly dunno why anyone even cares. WiiU is not a powerful system. Its not going to largely out do the PS3 and 360, we all get it. Anyone however who played Xenoblade knows that Monolith is a very competent dev and with stronger hardware and the ability to have their game render in a higher resolution the oppurtunity for their art design to come out well on a TV is heightened. Frankly I can't wait to see how they top Satorl Marsh in X.

Just wanted to add an aside to the comment is all just to show the awkward bias in the screens. I myself don't give one flying **** on the graphics between consoles in general especially when they are not in the same specs as another.

Some ppl always feel the need to compare graphics even on weaker consoles to rather poor images of the WiiU. We know its weaker than the PS4, but that doesn't mean you should try to drag it down even to lower standards just to make it seem even worse for fans of the system.

Fanboys gonna fanboy though. I just like to make quips to certain nonsense is all. :P

I do agree though that Monolith is fantastic, and should easily be seen as capable ppl with lower specs even to fanboys eyes, but that's beside the point. Would love to see what they do with it.

I dunno. Personally I feel like only incompetent people and haters get into screen and list wars. If you can't make your point without pictures, you prob don't have much of a point. Monolith will deliver a solid game. That's all I want frankly.

Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts
RDR on ps3 looked looks very bad, on 360 it looks just like the pic. you want me to post more pics or videos.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

RDR on ps3 looked looks very bad, on 360 it looks just like the pic. you want me to post more pics or videos.omarissac

No one cares to see pictures. We all know what it "actually" looks like.

Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts

[QUOTE="omarissac"]RDR on ps3 looked looks very bad, on 360 it looks just like the pic. you want me to post more pics or videos.ActicEdge

No one cares to see pictures. We all know what it "actually" looks like.

Yup thats why many people on neogaf think it's the best looking game of this generation, but yea i know it looks amazing and techically it's more impressive then X and that's a fact based on the footage we have. the only reason it doesn't get as much love is cause the ps3 version was so inferior, so sony fans downplay it's graphics. anyway a pic is worth a 1000 words that's all i have to say. trailer of RDR http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhcpsLIh_4 looks so much better then X it's not even funny, lighting and detail is in a different league.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="omarissac"]RDR on ps3 looked looks very bad, on 360 it looks just like the pic. you want me to post more pics or videos.omarissac

No one cares to see pictures. We all know what it "actually" looks like.

Yup thats why many people on neogaf think it's the best looking game of this generation, but yea i know it looks amazing and techically it's more impressive then X and that's a fact based on the footage we have. the only reason it doesn't get as much love is cause the ps3 version was so inferior, so sony fans downplay it's graphics. anyway a pic is worth a 1000 words that's all i have to say. trailer of RDR http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhcpsLIh_4 looks so much better then X it's not even funny, lighting and detail is in a different league.

Yawn. Anything else?

Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts

[QUOTE="omarissac"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

No one cares to see pictures. We all know what it "actually" looks like.

ActicEdge

Yup thats why many people on neogaf think it's the best looking game of this generation, but yea i know it looks amazing and techically it's more impressive then X and that's a fact based on the footage we have. the only reason it doesn't get as much love is cause the ps3 version was so inferior, so sony fans downplay it's graphics. anyway a pic is worth a 1000 words that's all i have to say. trailer of RDR http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhcpsLIh_4 looks so much better then X it's not even funny, lighting and detail is in a different league.

Yawn. Anything else?

my post is not directed at you, it's for the silly people that think X is above current gen.
Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts
[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="omarissac"] Yup thats why many people on neogaf think it's the best looking game of this generation, but yea i know it looks amazing and techically it's more impressive then X and that's a fact based on the footage we have. the only reason it doesn't get as much love is cause the ps3 version was so inferior, so sony fans downplay it's graphics. anyway a pic is worth a 1000 words that's all i have to say. trailer of RDR http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afhcpsLIh_4 looks so much better then X it's not even funny, lighting and detail is in a different league.omarissac

Yawn. Anything else?

my post is not directed at you, it's for the silly people that think X is above current gen.

X is beyond anything the gimpbox360 can put out though...
Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Don't care but i do care for wiiu vs ps4 screenshots for the lolz.
Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#82 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

There is nothing even mentioned about the WiiU.

Avatar image for Celsius765
Celsius765

2417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 Celsius765
Member since 2005 • 2417 Posts

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

That X gif is popular because when you watched the trailer you were like "cool Xenoblade like . .. OMG he JUMPED IN A DAMN MECH AND TOOK FLIGHT". It has nothing to do with the graphics because there were other more graphically impressive parts of that trailer.

ActicEdge

True but my point is that only shows the bias in the poster though. You are comparing two different things, one that is highly rendered with something that came off a youtube vid.

I honestly dunno why anyone even cares. WiiU is not a powerful system. Its not going to largely out do the PS3 and 360, we all get it. Anyone however who played Xenoblade knows that Monolith is a very competent dev and with stronger hardware and the ability to have their game render in a higher resolution the oppurtunity for their art design to come out well on a TV is heightened. Frankly I can't wait to see how they top Satorl Marsh in X.

in some ways it already has its graphically more powerful and where's it too nearly half a year for those consoles to hit 3mil it took wii u 45 days. I dunno where wii u is headed but it'll be good hopefully. I'm hoping for good things from Sony too
Avatar image for CTR360
CTR360

9217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#84 CTR360
Member since 2007 • 9217 Posts
i byu the PS4 version i cant wait
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#85 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
We're probably gonna have a bunch of GRAW/Double Agent type scenarios where the next gen versions of the games are the more realized versions of those games. I expect the PS3/360 versions of Watchdogs to be some what watered down beyond just the graphics.
Avatar image for Quad4Life
Quad4Life

776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Quad4Life
Member since 2013 • 776 Posts

:)

Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#87 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

getting this for the 360.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

WiiU one of the lead platforms?

lolwut?

Something must be wrong here... :P

Avatar image for fernandmondego_
fernandmondego_

3170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 fernandmondego_
Member since 2005 • 3170 Posts
Well happy to know the game won't be bottlenecked or limited by the Xbox or PS3DropsofJupiter
Instead it's going to be bottle-necked by the Wii U:(
Avatar image for PcGamingRig
PcGamingRig

7386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 PcGamingRig
Member since 2009 • 7386 Posts

This is one of the big positives for PC games in the next gen of consoles. Easier porting.

PC games are more likely to get bigger enhancements and more ports simply because of the PC like architecture in the new consoles.

Games used to be made with PC in mind first and then ported to consoles but that changed with the different hardware in the PS3 & 360 and obviously a lot of people have consoles as well.

Because it is easier to port they can make it for PC and then just easily scale it down like the old days.

Avatar image for PcGamingRig
PcGamingRig

7386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 PcGamingRig
Member since 2009 • 7386 Posts

[QUOTE="DropsofJupiter"]Well happy to know the game won't be bottlenecked or limited by the Xbox or PS3fernandmondego_
Instead it's going to be bottle-necked by the Wii U:(

hopefully it will be like this gen in that sense. When all the new systems are out the Wii U will get an even more scaled down version than the PC, 720 & PS4.

Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts
[QUOTE="omarissac"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Yawn. Anything else?

DrTrafalgarLaw
my post is not directed at you, it's for the silly people that think X is above current gen.

X is beyond anything the gimpbox360 can put out though...

what ever makes you feel better.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#94 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42202 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"]

[QUOTE="Kingpin0114"]

Ubisoft and maybe Capcom seem to be the only 3rd parties that are interested in the WiiU.

I'll be getting it on the PS4 though.

OreoMilkshake

Criterion and Indie developers also like the Wii U.

And Warner Bros.

Well, TT games (LEGO developers) like it.
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#95 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
Good. PS3/360 versions would look worse anyway, so no point having them as lead platform, get the best out of next gen.
Avatar image for DropsofJupiter
DropsofJupiter

1449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 DropsofJupiter
Member since 2013 • 1449 Posts

There is nothing even mentioned about the WiiU.

sonic_spark
There's a link on the second page about Wii U specifically, I think
Avatar image for omarissac
omarissac

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 omarissac
Member since 2013 • 177 Posts
[QUOTE="sonic_spark"]

There is nothing even mentioned about the WiiU.

DropsofJupiter
There's a link on the second page about Wii U specifically, I think

people the PC is the lead platform. then it's being ported down to all platforms, there is a reason there was a title change inj the neogaf thread, the wiiu specs are very close to 360, there is no way in hell wiiu is the lead platform, the ps4 specs is a whole generation ahead of it. Wii U! 3 x OOE CPU at 1.2 ghz 200-352 Gflops GPU still unconfirmed but that's what neogaf, DF and beyond3d are thinking at the moment. 2GB DDR3 @ 12.8 GB/s 1GB reserved for the os. only 512mb more for games then 360 at the moment. 32MB eDRAM ) 360 3 x CPU at 3.2 ghz better cpu then wiiu. 240 Gflops GPU 512mb GDDR3 RAM @ 22.4GB/ 2x faster bandwidth then wiiu 10MB EDRAM faster edram then wii u
Avatar image for -RocBoys9489-
-RocBoys9489-

6336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 -RocBoys9489-
Member since 2008 • 6336 Posts

Alright, PC version=best version, confirmed

lostrib
Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts
[QUOTE="lostrib"]

Alright, PC version=best version, confirmed

-RocBoys9489-

Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#100 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

[QUOTE="DropsofJupiter"][QUOTE="sonic_spark"]

There is nothing even mentioned about the WiiU.

omarissac

There's a link on the second page about Wii U specifically, I think

people the PC is the lead platform. then it's being ported down to all platforms, there is a reason there was a title change inj the neogaf thread, the wiiu specs are very close to 360, there is no way in hell wiiu is the lead platform, the ps4 specs is a whole generation ahead of it. Wii U! 3 x OOE CPU at 1.2 ghz 200-352 Gflops GPU still unconfirmed but that's what neogaf, DF and beyond3d are thinking at the moment. 2GB DDR3 @ 12.8 GB/s 1GB reserved for the os. only 512mb more for games then 360 at the moment. 32MB eDRAM ) 360 3 x CPU at 3.2 ghz better cpu then wiiu. 240 Gflops GPU 512mb GDDR3 RAM @ 22.4GB/ 2x faster bandwidth then wiiu 10MB EDRAM faster edram then wii u

And the specs for the WiiU don;t tell the true stroy according to some of the tech experts on neogaf.