Uncharted 2 new pictures, console graphics king confirmed !!!!! NO 56k !!!!!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Vaasman"]That's true, but it will still be similar to the final product.It's like this shot from gears 2.Everyone can calm down now, these are bullshots. How do I know they're bullshots? Depth of field added in. Unless you like blurry enemies and what would be considered an awful draw distance were it real, then it's a bullshot. And if they're willing to do that, who knows how much else is fake.
I win.
EuroMafia
Gears 2 almost looks that good, but it's still obvious that they touched a few things up.
[QUOTE="noswear"]Hmmm, someone has not seen vids of Killzone 2.... Look at the AA in that game and then come back to discuss. Or don't and just admit that you fail at life. Either way, noswear FTL. Well, KZ2's AA is rather low if it has any at all. Just look at some of the screens. Even with jaggies, the game would still look excellent. It's a contender for console graphics king that's for sure.Wow, I had no idea the PS3 could do 16xAA (!)
...
Bullshots FTL.
Sgt_Hale
There are still quite a few jaggies in KZ2 (not bullshot, still looks great though).
That is a bullshot solely for the fact the AA is quite high, applied after the shot was taken (as it is for most promo shots). It wouldn't be too much to doubt these shots.
Nice response, so basically you have none, and basically dodging the question entirely. Thanks abunch, at least crazy player provided some small evidence from one dev.The shots look great and I can say confidently that when it comes out that it will look like those shoots despite all the hate it gets.
But by all means keep hating.
XturnalS
Hating? You've got me all wrong. This is what I posted in this very thread intially:
That does look pretty great. I'm not sure if I would go all the way and say it the console graphics king, but it certainly does look good.Agentfred
Anyway. I'm not sure what you're specifically looking for here, a written admission on the part of ND that these shots have been touched up perhaps? Well, obviously that isn't going to happen.
Now what I can tell you is that there has recently been a trend in game marketing in which developers touch up official screenshots before releasing them. There is a precedent for this, and it happens all the time with just about every single major game on the market. Again, I'm not picking on U2 specifically, I just point this out whenever I see it, which is with most games. I don't understand why everyone in this thread is taking this so personally.
Oh, and I can practically guarantee our answer will come when we start getting unofficial screenshots. Seeing how I've really failed to deliver any proof of my claim thus far, you probably don't believe me, which is understandable. Now, I've seen several poster already claim that U2 will meet the SSs just like the original did. However, the original Uncharted shots were also touched up, and the final product never lived up to them in terms of Anti-Aliasing. Don't believe me? See for yourself.
Official shot:
Unofficial, almost a year and a half later:
Now frankly, the second shot looks better. However, in terms of Anti-Aliasing, it's quite clear. The first shot has practically no aliasing to speak of, something that can't be said about the latter shot.
What I'm saying is this: These shots provided by ND are certainly good looking, but they've been touched up to look even better, as are most official screenshots from any developer. This is not hating on the game, the developer, or the PS3, this is simply a critical analysis.
[QUOTE="XturnalS"]Nice response, so basically you have none, and basically dodging the question entirely. Thanks abunch, at least crazy player provided some small evidence from one dev.The shots look great and I can say confidently that when it comes out that it will look like those shoots despite all the hate it gets.
But by all means keep hating.
agentfred
Hating? You've got me all wrong. This is what I posted in this very thread intially:
That does look pretty great. I'm not sure if I would go all the way and say it the console graphics king, but it certainly does look good.Agentfred
Anyway. I'm not sure what you're specifically looking for here, a written admission on the part of ND that these shots have been touched up perhaps? Well, obviously that isn't going to happen.
Now what I can tell you is that there has recently been a trend in game marketing in which developers touch up official screenshots before releasing them. There is a precedent for this, and it happens all the time with just about every single major game on the market. Again, I'm not picking on U2 specifically, I just point this out whenever I see it, which is with most games. I don't understand why everyone in this thread is taking this so personally.
Oh, and I can practically guarantee our answer will come when we start getting unofficial screenshots. Seeing how I've really failed to deliver any proof of my claim thus far, you probably don't believe me, which is understandable. Now, I've seen several poster already claim that U2 will meet the SSs just like the original did. However, the original Uncharted shots were also touched up, and the final product never lived up to them in terms of Anti-Aliasing. Don't believe me? See for yourself.
Official shot:
Unofficial, almost a year and a half later:
Now frankly, the second shot looks better. However, in terms of Anti-Aliasing, it's quite clear. The first shot has practically no aliasing to speak of, something that can't be said about the latter shot.
What I'm saying is this: These shots provided by ND are certainly good looking, but they've been touched up to look even better, as are most official screenshots from any developer. This is not hating on the game, the developer, or the PS3, this is simply a critical analysis.
Log in to comment