Uncharted 3 is Definitely Console Graphics King (Extreme 56k)

Damn, nice looking game. Gears 3 looks about the same, but cutscenes are better in Uc3.

sold. uncharted 3>gears3 and killzone 3

My vote goes to Rayman Origins. Easily one of the best this gen and I don't care if you think 2D isn't worthy of that.

laus_basic

The engine looks very dated, too many jaggies and the image quality is mediocre imo, the picture looks very confusing

Gears 3 looks way better and cleaner

Damn, nice looking game. Gears 3 looks about the same, but cutscenes are better in Uc3.

gamecubepad

GEars 3 looks a lot better in game

Uncharted 3 uses pre-rendered cut scenes, so it could look lile Avatar, but it is not real time

The engine looks very dated, too many jaggies and the image quality is mediocre imo, the picture looks very confusing

loosingENDS

No, it looks banana-fana-tastic. Such incredible lighting, texture quality, and animation.

GEars 3 looks a lot better in game

Uncharted 3 uses pre-rendered cut scenes, so it could look lile Avatar, but it is not real time

loosingENDS

Gears 3 uses a mix of real-time and prerendered cutscenes as well. DF noted that there was poor compression quality on the Gears 3 pre-rendered scenes.

[QUOTE="laus_basic"]

My vote goes to Rayman Origins. Easily one of the best this gen and I don't care if you think 2D isn't worthy of that.

jettpack

Glad to see people with a taste of the more imaginative out there!

hey question TC, how do you take screenshot for consoles? such as PS3?

Do we need this thread once a day? It´s clearly a matter of opinion, o think Gears 3 looks just as good.

hey question TC, how do you take screenshot for consoles? such as PS3?

GameFan1983

actually the second stream of screens looks HOLYCOW-worthy.... must be bias to say U3 looks anything less than stunning and anything less than 2011 competitor for graphics king. to my eyes looks best i ve seen .

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

The engine looks very dated, too many jaggies and the image quality is mediocre imo, the picture looks very confusing

gamecubepad

No, it looks banana-fana-tastic. Such incredible lighting, texture quality, and animation.

GEars 3 looks a lot better in game

Uncharted 3 uses pre-rendered cut scenes, so it could look lile Avatar, but it is not real time

loosingENDS

Gears 3 uses a mix of real-time and prerendered cutscenes as well. DF noted that there was poor compression quality on the Gears 3 pre-rendered scenes.

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

loosingENDS

Shaders = no.

Resolution = they both run at 720p you twit.

AA = both are jaggy messes

Vegetation = UC3 easily. There's no contest there.

Overall image quality = UC3 for because it isn't grey and brown for 99% of the game.

"Technically" cannot be an opinion btw. Those are facts.

Hmm this is uncharted graphics king thread 200 vs Gears of war 3 graphics king thread 40....seems sort of odd how the uncharted folks seem to be trying to prove something to themselves.

Hmm this is uncharted graphics king thread 200 vs Gears of war 3 graphics king thread 40....seems sort of odd how the uncharted folks seem to be trying to prove something to themselves.

WilliamRLBaker

Indeed

It is probably that Gears 3 looks a lot better, the image quality is day and night better imo

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

ChubbyGuy40

Shaders = no.

Resolution = they both run at 720p you twit.

AA = both are jaggy messes

Vegetation = UC3 easily. There's no contest there.

Overall image quality = UC3 for because it isn't grey and brown for 99% of the game.

"Technically" cannot be an opinion btw. Those are facts.

Well, i disagree with everything, vegetation looks leaps ahead in Gears 3, in Uncharetd 3 i can barely make out anything due to the jaggies and confusing image quality

Also Gears looks leaps cleaner in shaders and overall

There is no comparisson imo at all

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Indeed

It is probably that Gears 3 looks a lot better

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

loosingENDS

Shaders = no.

Resolution = they both run at 720p you twit.

AA = both are jaggy messes

Vegetation = UC3 easily. There's no contest there.

Overall image quality = UC3 for because it isn't grey and brown for 99% of the game.

"Technically" cannot be an opinion btw. Those are facts.

There is no comparisson imo at all

But there must be,because you just compared them.

The screens above further prove to me that both UC3 and GEOW3 are both similar in different ways. They are both awesome to see up on a screen.

They both look almost exactly the same. I think UC3 looks slightly better if only due to art direction. Which is a design choice; muted colors are a valid design choice folks.

The screens above further prove to me that both UC3 and GEOW3 are both similar in different ways. They are both awesome to see up on a screen.

Innovazero2000

I see nothing similar between the crisp and clean image quality of Gears 3 and the fuzzy confusing look of Uncharted 3 images TBH

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Indeed

It is probably that Gears 3 looks a lot better, the image quality is day and night better imo

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

loosingENDS

Shaders = no.

Resolution = they both run at 720p you twit.

AA = both are jaggy messes

Vegetation = UC3 easily. There's no contest there.

Overall image quality = UC3 for because it isn't grey and brown for 99% of the game.

"Technically" cannot be an opinion btw. Those are facts.

Well, i disagree with everything, vegetation looks leaps ahead in Gears 3, in Uncharetd 3 i can barely make out anything due to the jaggies and confusing image quality

Also Gears looks leaps cleaner in shaders and overall

There is no comparisson imo at all

This comparison only further proves UC3's lighting, texture, shaders and geometry count are way ahead of Gears3's. I can't believe you are so blind to the obvious.

This comparison only further proves UC3's lighting, texture, shaders and geometry count are way ahead of Gears3's. I can't believe you are so blind to the obvious.

gpuking

Well, looking at your previous post, you seem to be just as blind as him!

Both games look equally fantastic considering their different art directions.

OMG...MY EYEYS!!111

Deadly jaggs right there,

No GOW3 still smashes that, looks like that game won't topped in absolute best graphics for consoles this gen

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Shaders = no.

Resolution = they both run at 720p you twit.

AA = both are jaggy messes

Vegetation = UC3 easily. There's no contest there.

Overall image quality = UC3 for because it isn't grey and brown for 99% of the game.

"Technically" cannot be an opinion btw. Those are facts.

stvee101

There is no comparisson imo at all

But there must be,because you just compared them.

it's sad and those are small screens, this is native resolution 1080x720. Those screens would probably look alot worse at narive res, Oh and this is actualgameplay not cut screen.

more screens...

See the hilt of the sword on the left? The textrues not beling loaded is the only proof that what is being shownis real-time, nothing else on consoles compares

actually UC3 and GeOW3 are about on par with each other but...

God of War 3> Uncharted 3 & Gears 3.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

The engine looks very dated, too many jaggies and the image quality is mediocre imo, the picture looks very confusing

gamecubepad

No, it looks banana-fana-tastic. Such incredible lighting, texture quality, and animation.

GEars 3 looks a lot better in game

Uncharted 3 uses pre-rendered cut scenes, so it could look lile Avatar, but it is not real time

loosingENDS

Gears 3 uses a mix of real-time and prerendered cutscenes as well. DF noted that there was poor compression quality on the Gears 3 pre-rendered scenes.

I think most people care about real-time game-play quality over cut-scenes anyway and GeoW3 has it in spades. This does not mean that GeoW3 is the superior game though, both games do what they do differently but people need to take this into consideration when comparing graphics between these two instead of carrying on ignorantly about it.

it's sad and those are small screens, this is native resolution 1080x720. Those screens would probably look alot worse at narive res, Oh and this is actualgameplay not cut screenmore screens...

See the hilt of the sword on the left? The textrues not beling loaded is the only proof that what is being shownis real-time, nothing else on consoles compares

actually UC3 and GeOW3 are about on par with each other but...

God of War 3> Uncharted 3 & Gears 3.

casharmy

GoW3 wins just for not having terrible jaggies and having increadible art design.

Well, looking at your previous post, you seem to be just as blind as him!

Both games look equally fantastic considering their different art directions.

PAL360

I have both Uncharted 3 is just in another league,dude Uncharted 3 does port better textures,geometry,physics,animations,lighting and environment effects like water and fire than Gears 3,uncharted is not just good looking,the atention to detail is way pass Gears of war,glase water and spinning textures fire effects.

I can't believe some say Gears 3 have better plants,when you just have to see the forest level.

No UC3 is not graphics king and this has already ben proven. making endless threads will not change that. Heck, Crysis 2 is better than this.Aquaunitpatrol

No is not and is a mess with graphics glitchs all over the place.

The engine looks very dated, too many jaggies and the image quality is mediocre imo, the picture looks very confusing

Gears 3 looks way better and cleaner

GEars 3 looks a lot better in game

Uncharted 3 uses pre-rendered cut scenes, so it could look lile Avatar, but it is not real time

loosingENDS

Dated.? Jagies are you talking about Uncharted 3.? Or about Gears 3.?

Gears has many jagies all over thye place thanks to no having AA.

Image quality in Uncharted 3 is unmatch by any game on consoles.

You basically have a hate thing against Uncharted 3,you are consistenly lieing about a game now i am sure you have not play a single second,and if you did play Uncharted 3 you should stop mkaing things up.

Gears 3 doesn't look better in any part either cutscene which on Uncharted 3 are basically the same as the in game graphics,or gameplay is one of the biggest things about Uncharted,the cut scenes that transition to gameplay without actually changing to load the actual graphics.

In Uncharted 3 you are seeing a cut scene and all of the sudden the cut scene end,leading you into gameplay without actually changing or loading anything,the cut scenes look as good as the gameplay it self.

Is evident that you haven't play Uncharted 3,the game is so abode Gears is almost everyhing that i don't know why people pretend Gears 3 look better,come on i know Gearst look great,but it just doesn't have the level ot detail Uncharted 3 has,you just have to play both games to see it.

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

No, it looks banana-fana-tastic. Such incredible lighting, texture quality, and animation.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

GEars 3 looks a lot better in game

Uncharted 3 uses pre-rendered cut scenes, so it could look lile Avatar, but it is not real time

loosingENDS

Gears 3 uses a mix of real-time and prerendered cutscenes as well. DF noted that there was poor compression quality on the Gears 3 pre-rendered scenes.

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

You just proved you clearly havent played Uncharted 3 or you are just being biased. Gears 3 has no AA at all and is a jaggy mess DF comfirmed it while uncharted uses a superior MLAA yet you concluded gears 3 has beter AA :( Uncharted 3 vegetation clearly is crisp and better than what Gears 3 vegetation. Uncharted 3 has the best lighting yet, best water effect, dinamic texture rendering, better particle effect, incredible animation, no install, no load screen. and better stereoscopic 3D than Gears 3 and yet you concluded that Gears 3 is better technicaly :( . Noting on console comes close to Uncharted 3 vissualy. Seriously you have to play it!monkeysmoke

That is what i told him,how can he say Uncharted 3 has to many jagies and bad image quality. lol

The only explanation he hasn't touch the game what so ever,it just take 5 minutes of gameplay to actulally see how ahead Ucnarted 3 is to Gears 3,just 5 minutes in both games.

Still going with Killzone 3.ferret-gamer

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]Still going with Killzone 3.The_Djoker

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

Gears 3 uses a mix of real-time and prerendered cutscenes as well. DF noted that there was poor compression quality on the Gears 3 pre-rendered scenes.

monkeysmoke

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

And UC3 has better water effects, textures and particle effects??? This is not meant to be offensive but, it looks to me like someone has had too much kool-aid. The hyperbole in this thread can get so ridicules at times that it almost seems as bad as N4G.

There is one point that I won't argue though, UC3 could very well be the cut-scene king!

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

o0HAPPY0o

And UC3 has better water effects, textures and particle effects??? This is not meant to be offensive but, it looks to me like someone has had too much kool-aid. The hyperbole in this thread can get so ridicules at times that it almost seems as bad as N4G.

There is one point that I won't argue though, UC3 could very well be the cut-scene king!

Do you know what motion blur is? Gears 3 has so much of it and makes up for the many faults and jaggies it has. Uncharted 3 does everything WITHOUT the motion blur, that itself is much more impressive. We shall once again make comparisons once the motion blur patch becomes available for Uncharted 3.

On a side note, the cruise level and the huge dynamic ocean is more technically impressive than anything Gears 3 has. That itself is astonishing.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

Gears 3 uses a mix of real-time and prerendered cutscenes as well. DF noted that there was poor compression quality on the Gears 3 pre-rendered scenes.

monkeysmoke

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

^This is spot on. Exactly.

looks good but those images are shrunk making jaggies harder to see..daveg1

At this point who really cares? GeoW3 looks phenomenal as well as U3 ... both games have their advantages and disadvantages. Get with the times bro! This ain't 2007.

[QUOTE="monkeysmoke"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

The point is that noone cares for cut scenes, just how the game looks when actually playing and Gears 3 looks leaps better in shaders, resolution, AA, vegetation and overall image quality

Also far more are happening on screen at once

So, artistically U3 looks good, but technically is way behind Gears 3 imo

Blazerdt47

^This is spot on. Exactly.

Makes me wonder how do u know ifs got better water effects etc etc , you actually dont know jack about that, which is funny - all on sw seems to know about how each engines does their tricks and such .. some places in uc3 doesnt look that good same goes for gears.. gears better in some areas uc3 better in some areas - that doesnt make "superior" god i hate that word.. too me gears comes as close as uc3 imo, its only matter what you like and prefer..

The game's graphics actually really surprised me. I didn't think they could improve upon UC2, but UC3 looks alot better.