This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Verge_6"]ANOTHER trolling account? Sheesh, what's the d-...oh, Saturday. Right.dopepackmack420
want upclose face detail comparison?
marcus has much more detail in his face than, drake does in his who torso. You can't even see veins on Drake or scars like marus on gears of war.
That's because Drake is obviously not a steroid freak, ex-con marine from the future, lol.:lol: You must be good buddies with Greg Splicer. Anyway, THE GAME IS NOT COMPLETE, and it still looks incredible, regardless....end of story. Try ungluing the fanboy goggles and troll horns from your head. It might give you a whole new perspective on things.;)
[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]ANOTHER trolling account? Sheesh, what's the d-...oh, Saturday. Right.ironcreed
want upclose face detail comparison?
marcus has much more detail in his face than, drake does in his who torso. You can't even see veins on Drake or scars like marus on gears of war.
That's because Drake is obviously not a steroid freak, ex-con marine from the future, lol.:lol: You must be good buddies with Greg Splicer. Anyway, THE GAME IS NOT COMPLETE, and it still looks incredible, regardless....end of story. Try ungluing the fanboy goggles and troll horns from your head. It might give you a whole new perspective on things.;)
GEARS OF WAR STILL LOOKED MORE IMPRESSIVE 2 YEARS AGO TROLL!
CANT YOU ACCEPT GRAPHICS SUCK?
Sorry people, but it's fact xbox360 already has games out graphically superior to any ps3 game shown at gamersday.
especially overhyped uncharted even perfect dark zero's jungle levels look better.
dopepackmack420
k enough abut the graphics side
wanna talk about the technology side behind uncharted ?
[QUOTE="legalize3"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"]good job of comparing a finished game to a unfinished game
dopepackmack420
gears of war unfinished still looked better.
ya right
it had 3000 different animations
animations=not graphics
gears of war has more detailed levels, better physics, more detailed models, better textures.
Physics? The game has no physics...at all. The only two instances I can think of for physics are when tossing a grenade (yay...) and when driving that vehicle in that one level. After that, there're NO physics to be found whatsoever. Gears is a fairly static game.
[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"]Sorry people, but it's fact xbox360 already has games out graphically superior to any ps3 game shown at gamersday.
especially overhyped uncharted even perfect dark zero's jungle levels look better.
legalize3
k enough abut the graphics side
wanna talk about the technology behind uncharted ?
Does it matter if it doesn't make the end-result better than what's already been seen?
[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"]good job of comparing a finished game to a unfinished game
Michael85
gears of war unfinished still looked better.
ya right
it had 3000 different animations
animations=not graphics
gears of war has more detailed levels, better physics, more detailed models, better textures.
Physics? The game has no physics...at all. The only two instances I can think of for physics are when tossing a grenade (yay...) and when driving that vehicle in that one level. After that, there're NO physics to be found whatsoever. Gears is a fairly static game.
hmm, kicking bodie's around? collision detection plus ragdoll physics?
[QUOTE="mohammadnb"]What Do you think Now ? and It's still unfinished game
dopepackmack420
LOL @ BACKGROUND TEXTURE, HIS HAIR OMG LMFAO,QUAKE 4 CHARACTER MODELS MORE DETAILED LMFAO!
WHERE'S THE PORES IN THE SKIN? SCARS VEINS?
hey you mentioned hair
wonder why most of those xbox360 games doesnt have hair
[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="mohammadnb"]What Do you think Now ? and It's still unfinished game
legalize3
LOL @ BACKGROUND TEXTURE, HIS HAIR OMG LMFAO,QUAKE 4 CHARACTER MODELS MORE DETAILED LMFAO!
WHERE'S THE PORES IN THE SKIN? SCARS VEINS?
hey you mentioned hair
wonder why most of those xbox360 games doesnt have hair
tomb raider has better hair than any ps3 game.
the textures in uncharted=unimpressive whole graphicss, the thing that makes it look slightly good is overuse of bright lighting in parts lol.dopepackmack420are u for real . ign ,1up , and every one else that has played the game says the texture work is great .
[QUOTE="Michael85"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"]good job of comparing a finished game to a unfinished game
dopepackmack420
gears of war unfinished still looked better.
ya right
it had 3000 different animations
animations=not graphics
gears of war has more detailed levels, better physics, more detailed models, better textures.
Physics? The game has no physics...at all. The only two instances I can think of for physics are when tossing a grenade (yay...) and when driving that vehicle in that one level. After that, there're NO physics to be found whatsoever. Gears is a fairly static game.
hmm, kicking bodie's around? collision detection plus ragdoll physics?
Kicking bodies is horrible physics, you walk into a dead person in real life, their arms and legs won't swing around like they do in gears
[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="Michael85"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"]good job of comparing a finished game to a unfinished game
ChopperDave1
gears of war unfinished still looked better.
ya right
it had 3000 different animations
animations=not graphics
gears of war has more detailed levels, better physics, more detailed models, better textures.
Physics? The game has no physics...at all. The only two instances I can think of for physics are when tossing a grenade (yay...) and when driving that vehicle in that one level. After that, there're NO physics to be found whatsoever. Gears is a fairly static game.
hmm, kicking bodie's around? collision detection plus ragdoll physics?
Kicking bodies is horrible physics, you walk into a dead person in real life, their arms and legs won't swing around like they do in gears
umm, if i was kicking someone i just killed in real life, they'd flop around and crap, they wouldnt flop after they've been dead awhile because people stiffen up, but it's realistic, that was taking from painkiller that had it also lol.
[QUOTE="ironcreed"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]ANOTHER trolling account? Sheesh, what's the d-...oh, Saturday. Right.dopepackmack420
want upclose face detail comparison?
marcus has much more detail in his face than, drake does in his who torso. You can't even see veins on Drake or scars like marus on gears of war.
That's because Drake is obviously not a steroid freak, ex-con marine from the future, lol.:lol: You must be good buddies with Greg Splicer. Anyway, THE GAME IS NOT COMPLETE, and it still looks incredible, regardless....end of story. Try ungluing the fanboy goggles and troll horns from your head. It might give you a whole new perspective on things.;)
GEARS OF WAR STILL LOOKED MORE IMPRESSIVE 2 YEARS AGO TROLL!
CANT YOU ACCEPT GRAPHICS SUCK?
Err, thats ones opinion...NOT FACTS. Many disagree with you. If anything DF is damn impressive animation and grahics wise. give credit where credits due. Geez, suck it up....uncharted looks Awesome. Besides both are different art styles.
[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="ironcreed"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]ANOTHER trolling account? Sheesh, what's the d-...oh, Saturday. Right.-Maddog-
want upclose face detail comparison?
marcus has much more detail in his face than, drake does in his who torso. You can't even see veins on Drake or scars like marus on gears of war.
That's because Drake is obviously not a steroid freak, ex-con marine from the future, lol.:lol: You must be good buddies with Greg Splicer. Anyway, THE GAME IS NOT COMPLETE, and it still looks incredible, regardless....end of story. Try ungluing the fanboy goggles and troll horns from your head. It might give you a whole new perspective on things.;)
GEARS OF WAR STILL LOOKED MORE IMPRESSIVE 2 YEARS AGO TROLL!
CANT YOU ACCEPT GRAPHICS SUCK?
Err, thats ones opinion...NOT FACTS. Many disagree with you. If anything DF is damn impressive animation and grahics wise. give credit where credits due. Geez, suck it up....uncharted looks Awesome. Besides both are different art styles.
no no, the artstyle of uncharted is freaking horrible, it reminds me of this jungle snes game i had.
gears of war is more graphically impressive that's a fact..
[QUOTE="ironcreed"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]ANOTHER trolling account? Sheesh, what's the d-...oh, Saturday. Right.dopepackmack420
want upclose face detail comparison?
marcus has much more detail in his face than, drake does in his who torso. You can't even see veins on Drake or scars like marus on gears of war.
That's because Drake is obviously not a steroid freak, ex-con marine from the future, lol.:lol: You must be good buddies with Greg Splicer. Anyway, THE GAME IS NOT COMPLETE, and it still looks incredible, regardless....end of story. Try ungluing the fanboy goggles and troll horns from your head. It might give you a whole new perspective on things.;)
GEARS OF WAR STILL LOOKED MORE IMPRESSIVE 2 YEARS AGO TROLL!
CANT YOU ACCEPT GRAPHICS SUCK?
With all due respect, YOU are the only one trolling here. Do you even know what trolling is? Try looking in the mirror for a better definition. What, are we supposed to say that Uncharted looks horrible just because YOU think so?:lol: Sorry, but it is looking fantastic, and I think the majority of people who are not fanboys like yourself would agree. You have already lost by the absurdity of your very statements, sorry. Keep it up though, as you are on a troll....I mean a roll, lol.
Xbox360 Fanboys have blinders on
messiah1
the lighting on drake model is what makes it look slightly good, if we did side by side comparison of gears of war model detail drake would lose straight up even that wall texture sucks where's the parallax mapping? why is the log covered in moss just green with no detail?
[QUOTE="legalize3"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"]good job of comparing a finished game to a unfinished game
dopepackmack420
gears of war unfinished still looked better.
ya right
it had 3000 different animations
animations=not graphics
gears of war has more detailed levels, better physics, more detailed models, better textures.
the physics arent even close to drake and the level detail neither, drake has bigger levels by far and the game has vehicles i think as well.[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="legalize3"]good job of comparing a finished game to a unfinished game
Chris-Hansen
gears of war unfinished still looked better.
ya right
it had 3000 different animations
animations=not graphics
gears of war has more detailed levels, better physics, more detailed models, better textures.
the physics arent even close to drake and the level detail neither, drake has bigger levels by far and the game has vehicles i think as well.lol, dude drake looks like socom 2 graphics in high res, it's nothing impressive nothing at all.
gears of war has much bigger levels,
[QUOTE="messiah1"]Xbox360 Fanboys have blinders on
dopepackmack420
the lighting on drake model is what makes it look slightly good, if we did side by side comparison of gears of war model detail drake would lose straight up even that wall texture sucks where's the parallax mapping? why is the log covered in moss just green with no detail?
dude the game is unfinished, gears has ugly textures as well and it is finished, some ground textures on that game look like a ps2 game, just to use your style nasos ;) rememeber when you said painkiller looked better than MGS4 ?you dont even change your posting style dude, do you think we dont know its you ?[QUOTE="messiah1"]Xbox360 Fanboys have blinders on
dopepackmack420
the lighting on drake model is what makes it look slightly good, if we did side by side comparison of gears of war model detail drake would lose straight up even that wall texture sucks where's the parallax mapping? why is the log covered in moss just green with no detail?
ya man i agree with you....
gears of war still in development looked better in model detail, textures and parallax mapping then the finished gears of war game ...
Quote from gamespot:
The game looks beautiful, thanks in no small part to the entirely new graphics engine it's running on. The characters are among the most detailed and lifelike we've seen to date
http://au.gamespot.com/ps3/action/untitlednaughtydoggameworkingtitle/news.html?sid=6170902&om_act=convert&om_clk=multimodule&tag=multimodule;picks;title;1
Haters=OWNED! Suck it up, lemmings the game looks amazing and as good as gears if not better then your precious Gears in some areas.
dude, ok, we know 360 is technically more powerful than PS3, but it isn't a big enough difference to truly show in games. if gears looks better than uncharted, it isn't because 360 is superior over PS3 in power, there's a million other possible reasons that have nothing to do with the strength of the system. also, when you make a post like this, try to bring some hard facts, because you're opening yourself to massive cow flaming.Gears of war use's unreal engine 3.0 which is a graphics engine that wasnt made ground up to take advantage of xbox360 hardware features.
Uncharted uses a graphics engine built ground up for ps3 hardware and the graphics still arent as good.
the character models less detailed, the textures very little parallax mapping etc.
imagine uncharted for 360 would of looked even better than ps3 version alot better.
dopepackmack420
lol, dude drake looks like socom 2 graphics in high res, it's nothing impressive nothing at all.are you serious ? from what weve heard of the demo and from the devs gears barely has levels at all compared to drake.gears of war has much bigger levels,
dopepackmack420
Hands down, you are the weakest link! Good-bye!Gears of war use's unreal engine 3.0 which is a graphics engine that wasnt made ground up to take advantage of xbox360 hardware features.
Uncharted uses a graphics engine built ground up for ps3 hardware and the graphics still arent as good.
the character models less detailed, the textures very little parallax mapping etc.
imagine uncharted for 360 would of looked even better than ps3 version alot better.
dopepackmack420
[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"]dude, ok, we know 360 is technically more powerful than PS3, but it isn't a big enough difference to truly show in games. if gears looks better than uncharted, it isn't because 360 is superior over PS3 in power, there's a million other possible reasons that have nothing to do with the strength of the system. also, when you make a post like this, try to bring some hard facts, because you're opening yourself to massive cow flaming.where did u get that bullcrap info fromGears of war use's unreal engine 3.0 which is a graphics engine that wasnt made ground up to take advantage of xbox360 hardware features.
Uncharted uses a graphics engine built ground up for ps3 hardware and the graphics still arent as good.
the character models less detailed, the textures very little parallax mapping etc.
imagine uncharted for 360 would of looked even better than ps3 version alot better.
Forock
Quote from gamespot:
The game looks beautiful, thanks in no small part to the entirely new graphics engine it's running on. The characters are among the most detailed and lifelike we've seen to date
http://au.gamespot.com/ps3/action/untitlednaughtydoggameworkingtitle/news.html?sid=6170902&om_act=convert&om_clk=multimodule&tag=multimodule;picks;title;1
Haters=OWNED! Suck it up, lemmings the game looks amazing and as good as gears if not better then your precious Gears in some areas.
-Maddog-
AMONG=GEARS OF WAR=BEST NEXT TO CRYSIS LOL.
that's the only thing that looks slightly alright on uncharted is character models but they look cartoony, lack the attention to detail gears of war has.
I know this is SW, but why are we arguing over which game looks better they are both amazing and jaw dropping. although i will say that gears had much smaller maps and you could interact with most things in the enviornment, but Uncharted has massive maps. both are great and will be great. personally i think drake will be longer because i felt geow was a bit shortPeterTimpa
LMFAO, uncharted's maps are smaller than gears of war
[QUOTE="PeterTimpa"]I know this is SW, but why are we arguing over which game looks better they are both amazing and jaw dropping. although i will say that gears had much smaller maps and you could interact with most things in the enviornment, but Uncharted has massive maps. both are great and will be great. personally i think drake will be longer because i felt geow was a bit shortdopepackmack420
LMFAO, uncharted's maps are smaller than gears of war
u played it?
[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"]lol, dude drake looks like socom 2 graphics in high res, it's nothing impressive nothing at all.are you serious ? from what weve heard of the demo and from the devs gears barely has levels at all compared to drake.gears of war has much bigger levels,
Chris-Hansen
gears of war has no loading screen's plus it's level's are much bigger than that of what ive seen from uncharted now.
[QUOTE="Verge_6"]ANOTHER trolling account? Sheesh, what's the d-...oh, Saturday. Right.dopepackmack420
trolling? GET YOURSELF SOME EYE'S, a trained eyeed person can clearly see uncharted's graphics arent as good as gears of war texture wise or shader.
Everyone knows it does not look as good but it is a different feel and different devs so it does not work like you think. Either way I really dont care.
incharted has larger environments, an awesome foliage system, great textures on everything, character models are good aswell, the damage on them is pretty cooland some kick ass water effects. and tomb raider looks fricking sick for a ps2 gameAsadMahdi59
umm, kick ass water effects? lmfao laugh my ass off, unreal tournament 2003 has better water effects, that was first game i seen where you make trails through water.
the foliage looks like it's taken out of socom 2 jungle levels, the texture's dont look as good even tomb raider.
Gears of war use's unreal engine 3.0 which is a graphics engine that wasnt made ground up to take advantage of xbox360 hardware features.
Uncharted uses a graphics engine built ground up for ps3 hardware and the graphics still arent as good.
the character models less detailed, the textures very little parallax mapping etc.
imagine uncharted for 360 would of looked even better than ps3 version alot better.
dopepackmack420
[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="PeterTimpa"]I know this is SW, but why are we arguing over which game looks better they are both amazing and jaw dropping. although i will say that gears had much smaller maps and you could interact with most things in the enviornment, but Uncharted has massive maps. both are great and will be great. personally i think drake will be longer because i felt geow was a bit shortanshuk20002
LMFAO, uncharted's maps are smaller than gears of war
u played it?
from the demo the world looked huge gears of war maps have a direct path you need to follow and uncharted is wide open its almost looks like a semi-sandbox game[QUOTE="dopepackmack420"]Gears of war use's unreal engine 3.0 which is a graphics engine that wasnt made ground up to take advantage of xbox360 hardware features.
Uncharted uses a graphics engine built ground up for ps3 hardware and the graphics still arent as good.
the character models less detailed, the textures very little parallax mapping etc.
imagine uncharted for 360 would of looked even better than ps3 version alot better.
kemar7856
wrong
every developer on planet has already confirmed xbox360 is more powerful.
[QUOTE="anshuk20002"][QUOTE="dopepackmack420"][QUOTE="PeterTimpa"]I know this is SW, but why are we arguing over which game looks better they are both amazing and jaw dropping. although i will say that gears had much smaller maps and you could interact with most things in the enviornment, but Uncharted has massive maps. both are great and will be great. personally i think drake will be longer because i felt geow was a bit shortPeterTimpa
LMFAO, uncharted's maps are smaller than gears of war
u played it?
from the demo the world looked huge gears of war maps have a direct path you need to follow and uncharted is wide open its almost looks like a semi-sandbox gameno, uncharted you follow linear path, set by dev's no exploring, i seen video, you can only walk in small area's.
gears of war much better levels more exploring.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment