Uncharted: The Greatest Action Adventure Franchise Ever Made?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#51 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts
[QUOTE="glez13"]

[QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

No. Zelda.

KevinButlerVP

This. Zelda is the greatest action adventure franchise ever made.

the main reason ppl like Zelda so much is because it's a nostalgic franchise, it's really nothing special if you never played it a long time ago when it first came out

Yeah, but with that nostalgia is a heavy sense of lore in that world of Zelda, something you simply won't find in Uncharted. That being said, Uncharted is better than Zelda for me, but about series, I don't know.
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Uncharted is shooter first, adventure/platformer second. And no, Zelda, Metroid and Castlevania all have something to say about the claim UC is the "best" the action-adventure genre has to offer. [QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]Except you're wrong, and when Uncharted 3 drops and recieves more triple-A reviews across the board, you'll have to accept the franchise as more than a 'flash in the pan'. Games don't have to be unique to be fantastic or go down in gaming history.DarkLink77
The franchise may not be flash-in-the-pan, but each individual game seems to be. As soon as UC2 dropped, everyone stopped talking about UC. And as soon as UC3 drops, everyone is going to forget UC2 even exists. It is the same thing with a lot of franchises this generation, they get replaced so quickly with so many sequels, people tend to forget the ones that came before. It also says something to the lasting quality of many of these games as well. Being able to be so easily forgotten means that no one will really care to pick up UC2 10 years from now and play it again... it'll be dated within the genre by its successor, let alone everything else that comes out in that period in time. A flash-in-the-pan is defined as something that makes everyone exclaim "this is the greatest thing ever" and then forget about it once something greater comes along. Lasting franchises tend to have something unique about all their iterations that makes them stand out from the rest of the crowd. I'd say Mario and Zelda are good examples of this. They are both based on their own similar mechanic (Mario platforming, and Zelda action-adventure), but each iteration has done something completely different and unique. SMB, SMB2, SMB3, SMW, SMW2YI, SM64, SMS, SMG, SMG2; TLoZ, ZIIAoL, ALttP, OoT, MM, WW, TP, SS. All of them have either an art styIe and/or gameplay elements that make them unique. And both franchises have been around for 24-25 years... and still are extremely popular and see tons of people still going back more than two decades later and enjoying them still, or enjoying them for the first time. Games like Uncharted 2 are just improvements on what already worked in the first game with little altered in terms of content or styIe. What will really illustrate this, is the effect that UC3's release has on UC2 and the subsequent years as time passes. How many people do you really think will be playing UC2 10 years from now? Or UC?

Summed up with much more tact and precision than I can manage. This is what I'm saying. Excellent post, foxhound.

I think it's a bit unfair to expect Drake or the Uncharted franchise to compete on any level with Mario or Zelda. A lot of the games you listed are still 'being enjoyed for the first time today' cause they're 2D I'd guess, and hence timeless classics. Will the 3D mario and zelda games currently on the Wii be remembered so well? I think not. After OOT and SM64 (mainly IMO cause they were the first games to take the franchises 3D) do I see the rest as games that people will go back to in large numbers, 5 - 10 years from now? Naw. Because UC/UC2 are so cinematic (hell, they're both better than Indiana 4, in terms or dialogue/acting/script), and because they're just great to play and look at, they'll be remembered and replayed down the line to some extent, I'm sure. They're solid, entertaining, single-player games.

Edit - Also, remember we're on SW here. Just because the cows have forgotten about UC1 now, in favour of UC2...doesn't mean the original is a irrelevant as it may seem in this place - the obsession with graphics and looking better than Gears of war doesn't exist in the real world. The story remains worthwile, and the untweaked gameplay is perfectly tolerable.

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
Uncharted hasn't been around long enough to make statements like that. The franchise has not stood the test of time yet, for all we know it could age horribly. Already, Uncharted isn't even worth playing because Uncharted 2 surpassed it in every possible way.
Avatar image for T-razor1
T-razor1

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#54 T-razor1
Member since 2002 • 1164 Posts

[QUOTE="T-razor1"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] I won'y have to accept anything, actually, especially just because video game critics say so. Video game "journalism" is a joke. I couldn't care less what they think. I can pretty much guarantee that ten years from whenever they stop making Uncharted games, no one will care about the franchise. People will still care about Quake 3, Super Metroid, Ocarina of Time, System Shock 2, Deus Ex, etc, etc, etc. Those are timeless games. Uncharted is a flash in the pan. DarkLink77

I wouldn't go as far to say that they're a joke but I will say that my confidence in what most of them write was totally shaken with the release of KZ2. Anybody who was remotely intrerested in this game upon its release should know why.

Can you explain for those of us that weren't?

The controls were bad. There was lag/controller latency issues resulting in a about a 1/2 second delay between the time you moved the controller and the movement seen on screen. It also had poor hit detection most notably when aiming down the sights of your gun. I could recall numerous times capping enemies in the head from a distance and nothing happened. The game was basically broken when it was released and had no business scoring even an 8 much less a 9 with controls that were so busted. But no all the reviewers seemed to care about were the graphics which are nothing special.

Avatar image for MRBUCKMASTER
MRBUCKMASTER

758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 MRBUCKMASTER
Member since 2010 • 758 Posts
Zelda. But i have no say because Ive never played an uncharted game. :(
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] The franchise may not be flash-in-the-pan, but each individual game seems to be. As soon as UC2 dropped, everyone stopped talking about UC. And as soon as UC3 drops, everyone is going to forget UC2 even exists. It is the same thing with a lot of franchises this generation, they get replaced so quickly with so many sequels, people tend to forget the ones that came before. It also says something to the lasting quality of many of these games as well. Being able to be so easily forgotten means that no one will really care to pick up UC2 10 years from now and play it again... it'll be dated within the genre by its successor, let alone everything else that comes out in that period in time. A flash-in-the-pan is defined as something that makes everyone exclaim "this is the greatest thing ever" and then forget about it once something greater comes along. Lasting franchises tend to have something unique about all their iterations that makes them stand out from the rest of the crowd. I'd say Mario and Zelda are good examples of this. They are both based on their own similar mechanic (Mario platforming, and Zelda action-adventure), but each iteration has done something completely different and unique. SMB, SMB2, SMB3, SMW, SMW2YI, SM64, SMS, SMG, SMG2; TLoZ, ZIIAoL, ALttP, OoT, MM, WW, TP, SS. All of them have either an art styIe and/or gameplay elements that make them unique. And both franchises have been around for 24-25 years... and still are extremely popular and see tons of people still going back more than two decades later and enjoying them still, or enjoying them for the first time. Games like Uncharted 2 are just improvements on what already worked in the first game with little altered in terms of content or styIe. What will really illustrate this, is the effect that UC3's release has on UC2 and the subsequent years as time passes. How many people do you really think will be playing UC2 10 years from now? Or UC?Kan0nF0dder

Summed up with much more tact and precision than I can manage. This is what I'm saying. Excellent post, foxhound.

I think it's a bit unfair to expect Drake or the Uncharted franchise to compete on any level with Mario or Zelda. A lot of the games you listed are still 'being enjoyed for the first time today' cause they're 2D I'd guess, and hence timeless classics. Will the 3D mario and zelda games currently on the Wii be remembered so well? I think not. After OOT and SM64 (mainly IMO cause they were the first games to take the franchises 3D) do I see the rest as games that people will go back to in large numbers, 5 - 10 years from now? Naw. Because UC/UC2 are so cinematic (hell, they're both better than Indiana 4, in terms or dialogue/acting/script), and because they're just great to play and look at, they'll be remembered and replayed down the line to some extent, I'm sure. They're solid, entertaining, single-player games.

Edit - Also, remember we're on SW here. Just because the cows have forgotten about UC1 now, in favour of UC2...doesn't mean the original is a irrelevant as it may seem in this place - the obsession with graphics and looking better than Gears of war doesn't exist in the real world. The story remains worthwile, and the untweaked gameplay is perfectly tolerable.

They will be outdone by another franchise in a couple years just like Tomb Raider, and just like Tomb Raider, once that happens, no one will care. However, I do think people will be playing SMG and SMG2 years from now, unless Nintendo reinvents the platformer. Majora's Mask, and WInd Waker will be getting played as well. And BS on the edit. Uncharted is painful to play through NOW. I'm playing the first one, and I'm having to force myself through it.
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="T-razor1"]

I wouldn't go as far to say that they're a joke but I will say that my confidence in what most of them write was totally shaken with the release of KZ2. Anybody who was remotely intrerested in this game upon its release should know why.

T-razor1

Can you explain for those of us that weren't?

The controls were bad. There was lag/controller latency issues resulting in a about a 1/2 second delay between the time you moved the controller and the movement seen on screen. It also had poor hit detection most notably when aiming down the sights of your gun. I could recall numerous times capping enemies in the head from a distance and nothing happened. The game was basically broken when it was released and had no business scoring even an 8 much less a 9 with controls that were so busted. But no all the reviewers seemed to care about were the graphics which are nothing special.

Say what like about 'the heavy feel' for KZ2, can totally understand why you might dislike that, but leave the graphics hate out, just makes you look a silly, blind fanboy.
Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#58 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

Say what like about 'the heavy feel' for KZ2, can totally understand why you might dislike that, but leave the graphics hate out, just makes you look a silly, blind fanboy.Kan0nF0dder

Says the guy who wrote up that wall of text that could have ben summed up as:

"I love Uncharted, and i believe people are going to play this spectacular series in the future, i also think that Mario/Zelda titles on the Wii in the future will not be remembered"

They will be remembered, and they will be enjoyed. As for Uncharted, the first one is already irrelevant. 10 years from now, we'll be thinking of Uncharted as a good series, but just another drop in the ocean of 'that' generation of games.

Wile people are still going to play Mario, Zelda, Deus Ex, as they have ben playing and replaying, and re-replaying for years on end now. If you want proof, look at the past, end of.

Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts
[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Summed up with much more tact and precision than I can manage. This is what I'm saying. Excellent post, foxhound.DarkLink77

I think it's a bit unfair to expect Drake or the Uncharted franchise to compete on any level with Mario or Zelda. A lot of the games you listed are still 'being enjoyed for the first time today' cause they're 2D I'd guess, and hence timeless classics. Will the 3D mario and zelda games currently on the Wii be remembered so well? I think not. After OOT and SM64 (mainly IMO cause they were the first games to take the franchises 3D) do I see the rest as games that people will go back to in large numbers, 5 - 10 years from now? Naw. Because UC/UC2 are so cinematic (hell, they're both better than Indiana 4, in terms or dialogue/acting/script), and because they're just great to play and look at, they'll be remembered and replayed down the line to some extent, I'm sure. They're solid, entertaining, single-player games.

Edit - Also, remember we're on SW here. Just because the cows have forgotten about UC1 now, in favour of UC2...doesn't mean the original is a irrelevant as it may seem in this place - the obsession with graphics and looking better than Gears of war doesn't exist in the real world. The story remains worthwile, and the untweaked gameplay is perfectly tolerable.

They will be outdone by another franchise in a couple years just like Tomb Raider, and just like Tomb Raider, once that happens, no one will care. However, I do think people will be playing SMG and SMG2 years from now, unless Nintendo reinvents the platformer. Majora's Mask, and WInd Waker will be getting played as well. And BS on the edit. Uncharted is painful to play through NOW. I'm playing the first one, and I'm having to force myself through it.

Considering how many people bought NSMBWii - i.e more than both SMGs put together, nope they will be forgotten by the masses, who will play 2D platformers forever. Maybe you just don't like action-adventure games....I mean, I still care about Tomb Raider actually. Uncharted 1 should not be a chore.
Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts
[QUOTE="khoofia_pika"]

Another GamingBolt article. Lol, it almost looks like I'm promoting the site. :P But I can't help it, they've got some cool article over there.

This one has a video preview too.

http://gamingbolt.com/uncharted-the-greatest-action-adventure-franchise-ever-made

With one good game and one great game, I'd hardly call it the greatest franchise of anything yet.
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"] Say what like about 'the heavy feel' for KZ2, can totally understand why you might dislike that, but leave the graphics hate out, just makes you look a silly, blind fanboy.Lucianu

Says the guy who wrote up that wall of text that could have ben summed up as:

"I love Uncharted, and i believe people are going to play this spectacular series in the future, i also think that Mario/Zelda titles in the future will not be remembered"

They will be remembered, and they will be enjoyed. As for Uncharted, the first one is already irrelevant. 10 years from now, we'll be thinking of Uncharted as a good series, but just another drop in the ocean of 'that' generation of games.

Wile people are still going to play Mario, Zelda, Deus Ex, as they have ben playing and replaying, and re-replaying for years on end now. If you want proof, look at the past, end of.

...the hell? Your summing up is wrong, that is not what I said, certainly not in absolute terms. If you couldn't understand, then whatever, sorry.
Avatar image for Scootydowop
Scootydowop

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Scootydowop
Member since 2010 • 42 Posts
Nope. Imo, Uncharted isn't even the best action adventure franchise in Sony's stable. The Ico games thrash it brutally. When Naughty Dog learn how to design a game as complex as Majoras Mask, then they can think about being a contender. Until then, they're going for the crown in the kiddie pool of game design.
Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#63 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

...the hell? Your summing up is wrong, that is not what I said, certainly not in absolute terms. If you couldn't understand, then whatever, sorry.Kan0nF0dder

I think it's a bit unfair to expect Drake or the Uncharted franchise to compete on any level with Mario or Zelda. A lot of the games you listed are still 'being enjoyed for the first time today' cause they're 2D I'd guess, and hence timeless classics. Will the 3D mario and zelda games currently on the Wii be remembered so well? I think not.After OOT and SM64 (mainly IMO cause they were the first games to take the franchises 3D) do I see the rest as games that people will go back to in large numbers, 5 - 10 years from now? Naw. Because UC/UC2 are so cinematic (hell, they're both better than Indiana 4, in terms or dialogue/acting/script), and because they're just great to play and look at, they'll be remembered and replayed down the line to some extent, I'm sure. They're solid, entertaining, single-player games.

Edit - Also, remember we're on SW here. Just because the cows have forgotten about UC1 now, in favour of UC2...doesn't mean the original is a irrelevant as it may seem in this place - the obsession with graphics and looking better than Gears of war doesn't exist in the real world. The story remains worthwile, and the untweaked gameplay is perfectly tolerable.

Kan0nF0dder

Excuse me? And what's with this '..the hell?' expression, as if you don't remember what you wrote.

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#64 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts

[QUOTE="hiphops_savior"]Uncharted is a great series, no doubt, but it's nothing more than a child of Tomb Raider, Gears of War and Indiana Jones clobbered together for a cinematic experience that paces pretty well. In short, it has a little bit of everything, but nothing that truly revolutionizes the gaming industry. Greatest Action Adventure series ever 1. Zelda 2. Metroid 3. God of Warglez13

But, bu, but Metal Gear Solid :cry:

I consider the Metal Gear series in the Stealth genre. Action Adventure is simply far too general of a term to include games like the Metal Gear series.
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"] ...the hell? Your summing up is wrong, that is not what I said, certainly not in absolute terms. If you couldn't understand, then whatever, sorry.Lucianu

I think it's a bit unfair to expect Drake or the Uncharted franchise to compete on any level with Mario or Zelda. A lot of the games you listed are still 'being enjoyed for the first time today' cause they're 2D I'd guess, and hence timeless classics. Will the 3D mario and zelda games currently on the Wii be remembered so well? I think not.After OOT and SM64 (mainly IMO cause they were the first games to take the franchises 3D) do I see the rest as games that people will go back to in large numbers, 5 - 10 years from now? Naw. Because UC/UC2 are so cinematic (hell, they're both better than Indiana 4, in terms or dialogue/acting/script), and because they're just great to play and look at, they'll be remembered and replayed down the line to some extent, I'm sure. They're solid, entertaining, single-player games.

Edit - Also, remember we're on SW here. Just because the cows have forgotten about UC1 now, in favour of UC2...doesn't mean the original is a irrelevant as it may seem in this place - the obsession with graphics and looking better than Gears of war doesn't exist in the real world. The story remains worthwile, and the untweaked gameplay is perfectly tolerable.

Kan0nF0dder

Excuse me? And what's with this '..the hell?' expression, as if you don't remember what you wrote.

Exactly dude, reread what I wrote...note the phrases 'think not', 'to some extent' and 'tolerable'. Also my acceptance of mario and zelda being well remembered and replayed, just 2D more than 3D, particularly in the case of the more modern games on the Wii. And in future, don't edit my words down to skew my opinion.

Avatar image for T-razor1
T-razor1

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#66 T-razor1
Member since 2002 • 1164 Posts

[QUOTE="T-razor1"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Can you explain for those of us that weren't?Kan0nF0dder

The controls were bad. There was lag/controller latency issues resulting in a about a 1/2 second delay between the time you moved the controller and the movement seen on screen. It also had poor hit detection most notably when aiming down the sights of your gun. I could recall numerous times capping enemies in the head from a distance and nothing happened. The game was basically broken when it was released and had no business scoring even an 8 much less a 9 with controls that were so busted. But no all the reviewers seemed to care about were the graphics which are nothing special.

Say what like about 'the heavy feel' for KZ2, can totally understand why you might dislike that, but leave the graphics hate out, just makes you look a silly, blind fanboy.

See...now why do I have to be a silly fanboy? Your opinion is no better than mine. I think KZ2 graphics are overrated and if you can't handle someone saying that then tough. The problem here is that you're trying to pass off your opinion as fact. IMO the game is blurry, grainy, has poor textures and some low poly-structures in the environment. But somehow these qualities mixed in with a lovely color of gray equates to setting the bar in graphics.

Avatar image for xTheExploited
xTheExploited

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 xTheExploited
Member since 2007 • 12094 Posts
It can't be the greatest action adventure series of all time, its only had 2 games one of which was just meh.
Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#68 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

Maybe if Uncharted 1 wasn't just an ok game. Uncharted 2 is one of the best games this gen though.

The problem with it is, Zelda and Metroid are both AA's, and IMO, given their history, are far better than just 1 game (Uncharted 2).

If Uncharted was considered just an Action series, then I would probably say yea considering I don't care for Action games too much.

Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"][QUOTE="T-razor1"]

The controls were bad. There was lag/controller latency issues resulting in a about a 1/2 second delay between the time you moved the controller and the movement seen on screen. It also had poor hit detection most notably when aiming down the sights of your gun. I could recall numerous times capping enemies in the head from a distance and nothing happened. The game was basically broken when it was released and had no business scoring even an 8 much less a 9 with controls that were so busted. But no all the reviewers seemed to care about were the graphics which are nothing special.

T-razor1

Say what like about 'the heavy feel' for KZ2, can totally understand why you might dislike that, but leave the graphics hate out, just makes you look a silly, blind fanboy.

See...now why do I have to be a silly fanboy? Your opinion is no better than mine. I think KZ2 graphics are overrated and if you can't handle someone saying that then tough. The problem here is that you're trying to pass off your opinion as fact. IMO the game is blurry, grainy, has poor textures and some low poly-structures in the environment. But somehow these qualities mixed in with a lovely color of gray equates to setting the bar in graphics.

My bad, you're troll. For reference, I said nothing about 'setting the bar in graphics' that's your subconscious talking I guess. I've been playing better looking games than Killzone 2 for years. But your statement earlier implied it was nothing special for consoles, even at launch date, which is just plain wrong.
Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#70 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

Exactly dude, reread what I wrote...note the phrases 'think not', 'to some extent' and 'tolerable'. Also my acceptance of mario and zelda being well remembered and replayed, just 2D more than 3D, particularly in the case of the more modern games on the Wii. And in future, don't edit my words down to skew my opinion.Kan0nF0dder

You're crazy if you think i'm gonna re-read that wall of text, yet again.

My sum up is still as valid as it was before, since it's summarises your wall of text. You can add words that were irrelevant in that particular context, as much as you want. I don't know why it is so hard to comprehend what the intent of a summarization is.

Either way, i'm done, feel free to quote me and respond, like i know you are..

Avatar image for TacticalDesire
TacticalDesire

10713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 TacticalDesire
Member since 2010 • 10713 Posts

I like the Assassin's Creed series a lot so...hard to really say.

Avatar image for burgeg
burgeg

3599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#72 burgeg
Member since 2005 • 3599 Posts

[QUOTE="glez13"]

[QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

No. Zelda.

KevinButlerVP

This. Zelda is the greatest action adventure franchise ever made.

the main reason ppl like Zelda so much is because it's a nostalgic franchise, it's really nothing special if you never played it a long time ago when it first came out

Bull. My first Zelda was Twilight Princess. That games is also my second favourite game of all time. Zelda is a better franchise. One great(yet incredibly overrated at the same time) game doesn't make Uncharted the greatest Action Adventure franchise ever. Uncharted 1 was average at best.

Avatar image for T-razor1
T-razor1

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#73 T-razor1
Member since 2002 • 1164 Posts

[QUOTE="T-razor1"]

[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"] Say what like about 'the heavy feel' for KZ2, can totally understand why you might dislike that, but leave the graphics hate out, just makes you look a silly, blind fanboy.Kan0nF0dder

See...now why do I have to be a silly fanboy? Your opinion is no better than mine. I think KZ2 graphics are overrated and if you can't handle someone saying that then tough. The problem here is that you're trying to pass off your opinion as fact. IMO the game is blurry, grainy, has poor textures and some low poly-structures in the environment. But somehow these qualities mixed in with a lovely color of gray equates to setting the bar in graphics.

My bad, you're troll. For reference, I said nothing about 'setting the bar in graphics' that's your subconscious talking I guess. I've been playing better looking games than Killzone 2 for years. But your statement earlier implied it was nothing special for consoles, even at launch date,which is just plain wrong.

...and again you are passing off your opinion as fact. Do you not see what you're doing? Also the "you're a troll" comment was not needed. Done with you.

Avatar image for IceBlazerX
IceBlazerX

3286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#74 IceBlazerX
Member since 2010 • 3286 Posts
I agree. It's the best game of this gen.
Avatar image for rybe1025
rybe1025

6362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 rybe1025
Member since 2004 • 6362 Posts
Wow uncharted is going to new levels now of overhype. The only thing I think that was great about the game was the writing for the characters and even then there are better games at that. The story is pretty generic it is just some guy going after treasure, the enemies are crazy generic, there are better tps games, and so on.
Avatar image for DarkGamer007
DarkGamer007

6033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 DarkGamer007
Member since 2008 • 6033 Posts

[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]

I honestly don't understand people who hate Uncharted so much and give it no credit. At the very least people need to recognize it is one of the most if not THE MOST cinematic, immersive, and move like experiences ever in gaming. I can't think of another game that puts you IN THE MOVIE (feel) as much as it.

Wolfetan

Metal Gear Solid.

Enslaved: Odyssey to the West

Mafia II

Mass Effect

Mass Effect 2

Bioshock

Bioshock 2

Heavy Rain

Alan Wake

Just to name a few more. ;)

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21753 Posts

lol no. It'd be Zelda.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#79 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"] I think it's a bit unfair to expect Drake or the Uncharted franchise to compete on any level with Mario or Zelda. A lot of the games you listed are still 'being enjoyed for the first time today' cause they're 2D I'd guess, and hence timeless classics. Will the 3D mario and zelda games currently on the Wii be remembered so well? I think not. After OOT and SM64 (mainly IMO cause they were the first games to take the franchises 3D) do I see the rest as games that people will go back to in large numbers, 5 - 10 years from now? Naw. Because UC/UC2 are so cinematic (hell, they're both better than Indiana 4, in terms or dialogue/acting/script), and because they're just great to play and look at, they'll be remembered and replayed down the line to some extent, I'm sure. They're solid, entertaining, single-player games.

Edit - Also, remember we're on SW here. Just because the cows have forgotten about UC1 now, in favour of UC2...doesn't mean the original is a irrelevant as it may seem in this place - the obsession with graphics and looking better than Gears of war doesn't exist in the real world. The story remains worthwile, and the untweaked gameplay is perfectly tolerable.

Kan0nF0dder

They will be outdone by another franchise in a couple years just like Tomb Raider, and just like Tomb Raider, once that happens, no one will care. However, I do think people will be playing SMG and SMG2 years from now, unless Nintendo reinvents the platformer. Majora's Mask, and WInd Waker will be getting played as well. And BS on the edit. Uncharted is painful to play through NOW. I'm playing the first one, and I'm having to force myself through it.

Considering how many people bought NSMBWii - i.e more than both SMGs put together, nope they will be forgotten by the masses, who will play 2D platformers forever. Maybe you just don't like action-adventure games....I mean, I still care about Tomb Raider actually. Uncharted 1 should not be a chore.

And more people are going to play Super Mario Bros. 3 than all of them combined. That doesn't mean that the games will be forgotten. The masses will forget everything that wasn't Call of Duty. I like action-adventure games fine. The platforming in Uncharted is linear and boring, the story is not particularly engaging so far (dialogue is good, though) and the shooting is unsatisfying. Right now, it isn't much fun to play. That said, I will finish it and my opinion may change.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#80 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Uncharted is shooter first, adventure/platformer second. And no, Zelda, Metroid and Castlevania all have something to say about the claim UC is the "best" the action-adventure genre has to offer.
Except you're wrong, and when Uncharted 3 drops and recieves more triple-A reviews across the board, you'll have to accept the franchise as more than a 'flash in the pan'. Games don't have to be unique to be fantastic or go down in gaming history.Kan0nF0dder
The franchise may not be flash-in-the-pan, but each individual game seems to be. As soon as UC2 dropped, everyone stopped talking about UC. And as soon as UC3 drops, everyone is going to forget UC2 even exists. It is the same thing with a lot of franchises this generation, they get replaced so quickly with so many sequels, people tend to forget the ones that came before. It also says something to the lasting quality of many of these games as well. Being able to be so easily forgotten means that no one will really care to pick up UC2 10 years from now and play it again... it'll be dated within the genre by its successor, let alone everything else that comes out in that period in time. A flash-in-the-pan is defined as something that makes everyone exclaim "this is the greatest thing ever" and then forget about it once something greater comes along. Lasting franchises tend to have something unique about all their iterations that makes them stand out from the rest of the crowd. I'd say Mario and Zelda are good examples of this. They are both based on their own similar mechanic (Mario platforming, and Zelda action-adventure), but each iteration has done something completely different and unique. SMB, SMB2, SMB3, SMW, SMW2YI, SM64, SMS, SMG, SMG2; TLoZ, ZIIAoL, ALttP, OoT, MM, WW, TP, SS. All of them have either an art styIe and/or gameplay elements that make them unique. And both franchises have been around for 24-25 years... and still are extremely popular and see tons of people still going back more than two decades later and enjoying them still, or enjoying them for the first time. Games like Uncharted 2 are just improvements on what already worked in the first game with little altered in terms of content or styIe. What will really illustrate this, is the effect that UC3's release has on UC2 and the subsequent years as time passes. How many people do you really think will be playing UC2 10 years from now? Or UC?

This is probably the best post I have read on System Wars. Ever. People need to understand one thing about these 'blockbuster AAA' games that get so much hype and love from the gamers on this board (the very games that the VGA Awards guys said are the only ones that matter, by the way)- they will NOT be remembered or played ten years from now. No one will care. You know how we can still go back and play stuff like Doom, Wolf 3D, Metroid, Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Zelda, Mario, Super Smash Bros., Deus Ex, System Shock 2, Starcraft, Warcraft 3, Elder Scrolls: Morrowind, Grand Theft Auto III, Pokemon, Metal Gear Solid, Castlevania, Age of Empires etc? These games today, these Uncharteds, and Call of Duty(s) and Halos and Gears of Wars... these will have been forgotten by everybody, because there's nothing about them that stands the test of time. All that these games do is refine their game mechanics to hide some very linear and fairly basic level design. On the other hand, the games that I just listed above stand out because they are truly what move the genre forward, truly what represent the peak of their genres. Uncharted, a franchise with two games, one average, and one that was great but extremely overhyped, the best game of all time OVER stuff like Zelda, Castlevania and Metroid? Please, don't make me laugh.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#81 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
As a franchise not so much, but Uncharted 2 was definitely one of the best A/A games I've played.
Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

[QUOTE="glez13"]

[QUOTE="hiphops_savior"]Uncharted is a great series, no doubt, but it's nothing more than a child of Tomb Raider, Gears of War and Indiana Jones clobbered together for a cinematic experience that paces pretty well. In short, it has a little bit of everything, but nothing that truly revolutionizes the gaming industry. Greatest Action Adventure series ever 1. Zelda 2. Metroid 3. God of Warhiphops_savior

But, bu, but Metal Gear Solid :cry:

I consider the Metal Gear series in the Stealth genre. Action Adventure is simply far too general of a term to include games like the Metal Gear series.

...and Stealth is a subgenre of what genre?;)

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#83 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Uncharted is shooter first, adventure/platformer second. And no, Zelda, Metroid and Castlevania all have something to say about the claim UC is the "best" the action-adventure genre has to offer.
Except you're wrong, and when Uncharted 3 drops and recieves more triple-A reviews across the board, you'll have to accept the franchise as more than a 'flash in the pan'. Games don't have to be unique to be fantastic or go down in gaming history.Kan0nF0dder
The franchise may not be flash-in-the-pan, but each individual game seems to be. As soon as UC2 dropped, everyone stopped talking about UC. And as soon as UC3 drops, everyone is going to forget UC2 even exists. It is the same thing with a lot of franchises this generation, they get replaced so quickly with so many sequels, people tend to forget the ones that came before. It also says something to the lasting quality of many of these games as well. Being able to be so easily forgotten means that no one will really care to pick up UC2 10 years from now and play it again... it'll be dated within the genre by its successor, let alone everything else that comes out in that period in time. A flash-in-the-pan is defined as something that makes everyone exclaim "this is the greatest thing ever" and then forget about it once something greater comes along. Lasting franchises tend to have something unique about all their iterations that makes them stand out from the rest of the crowd. I'd say Mario and Zelda are good examples of this. They are both based on their own similar mechanic (Mario platforming, and Zelda action-adventure), but each iteration has done something completely different and unique. SMB, SMB2, SMB3, SMW, SMW2YI, SM64, SMS, SMG, SMG2; TLoZ, ZIIAoL, ALttP, OoT, MM, WW, TP, SS. All of them have either an art styIe and/or gameplay elements that make them unique. And both franchises have been around for 24-25 years... and still are extremely popular and see tons of people still going back more than two decades later and enjoying them still, or enjoying them for the first time. Games like Uncharted 2 are just improvements on what already worked in the first game with little altered in terms of content or styIe. What will really illustrate this, is the effect that UC3's release has on UC2 and the subsequent years as time passes. How many people do you really think will be playing UC2 10 years from now? Or UC?

This is probably the best post I have read on System Wars. Ever. People need to understand one thing about these 'blockbuster AAA' games that get so much hype and love from the gamers on this board (the very games that the VGA Awards guys said are the only ones that matter, by the way)- they will NOT be remembered or played ten years from now. No one will care. You know how we can still go back and play stuff like Doom, Wolf 3D, Metroid, Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Zelda, Mario, Super Smash Bros., Deus Ex, System Shock 2, Starcraft, Warcraft 3, Elder Scrolls: Morrowind, Grand Theft Auto III, Pokemon, Metal Gear Solid, Castlevania, Age of Empires etc? These games today, these Uncharteds, and Call of Duty(s) and Halos and Gears of Wars... these will have been forgotten by everybody, because there's nothing about them that stands the test of time. All that these games do is refine their game mechanics to hide some very linear and fairly basic level design. On the other hand, the games that I just listed above stand out because they are truly what move the genre forward, truly what represent the peak of their genres. Uncharted, a franchise with two games, one average, and one that was great but extremely overhyped, the best game of all time OVER stuff like Zelda, Castlevania and Metroid? Please, don't make me laugh.

Glad to have started that discussion for you, brah. :P Also, objection. Halo: CE is great, and I believe that people will be playing that game years from now. The others, probably not, but the original? Hell yeah.
Avatar image for enterawesome
enterawesome

9477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#84 enterawesome
Member since 2009 • 9477 Posts
It's only a two game series right now, I think that's a stretch. Still, Uncharted 2 was SUPERB and definately among the best this gen.
Avatar image for Razor-Lazor
Razor-Lazor

12763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 Razor-Lazor
Member since 2009 • 12763 Posts
No. 1 was good, not great. 2 was fantastic. 3's not even out yet.
Avatar image for FatCatPatRat
FatCatPatRat

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 FatCatPatRat
Member since 2010 • 550 Posts

The most overrated maybe. When people make whopping statements like this it rages me so.

The first game was good, not great. Its really only the second game that is acclaimed and I feel it is so overrated. I enjoyed it, but damn is it overrated.

Avatar image for tryagainlater
tryagainlater

7446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#87 tryagainlater
Member since 2005 • 7446 Posts

It needs another few entries in the series of similar quality to Uncharted 2 to be called the best action adventure franchise. Uncharted 2 is high up on the best action adventure game list though.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] The franchise may not be flash-in-the-pan, but each individual game seems to be. As soon as UC2 dropped, everyone stopped talking about UC. And as soon as UC3 drops, everyone is going to forget UC2 even exists. It is the same thing with a lot of franchises this generation, they get replaced so quickly with so many sequels, people tend to forget the ones that came before. It also says something to the lasting quality of many of these games as well. Being able to be so easily forgotten means that no one will really care to pick up UC2 10 years from now and play it again... it'll be dated within the genre by its successor, let alone everything else that comes out in that period in time. A flash-in-the-pan is defined as something that makes everyone exclaim "this is the greatest thing ever" and then forget about it once something greater comes along. Lasting franchises tend to have something unique about all their iterations that makes them stand out from the rest of the crowd. I'd say Mario and Zelda are good examples of this. They are both based on their own similar mechanic (Mario platforming, and Zelda action-adventure), but each iteration has done something completely different and unique. SMB, SMB2, SMB3, SMW, SMW2YI, SM64, SMS, SMG, SMG2; TLoZ, ZIIAoL, ALttP, OoT, MM, WW, TP, SS. All of them have either an art styIe and/or gameplay elements that make them unique. And both franchises have been around for 24-25 years... and still are extremely popular and see tons of people still going back more than two decades later and enjoying them still, or enjoying them for the first time. Games like Uncharted 2 are just improvements on what already worked in the first game with little altered in terms of content or styIe. What will really illustrate this, is the effect that UC3's release has on UC2 and the subsequent years as time passes. How many people do you really think will be playing UC2 10 years from now? Or UC?

This is probably the best post I have read on System Wars. Ever. People need to understand one thing about these 'blockbuster AAA' games that get so much hype and love from the gamers on this board (the very games that the VGA Awards guys said are the only ones that matter, by the way)- they will NOT be remembered or played ten years from now. No one will care. You know how we can still go back and play stuff like Doom, Wolf 3D, Metroid, Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Zelda, Mario, Super Smash Bros., Deus Ex, System Shock 2, Starcraft, Warcraft 3, Elder Scrolls: Morrowind, Grand Theft Auto III, Pokemon, Metal Gear Solid, Castlevania, Age of Empires etc? These games today, these Uncharteds, and Call of Duty(s) and Halos and Gears of Wars... these will have been forgotten by everybody, because there's nothing about them that stands the test of time. All that these games do is refine their game mechanics to hide some very linear and fairly basic level design. On the other hand, the games that I just listed above stand out because they are truly what move the genre forward, truly what represent the peak of their genres. Uncharted, a franchise with two games, one average, and one that was great but extremely overhyped, the best game of all time OVER stuff like Zelda, Castlevania and Metroid? Please, don't make me laugh.

Glad to have started that discussion for you, brah. :P Also, objection. Halo: CE is great, and I believe that people will be playing that game years from now. The others, probably not, but the original? Hell yeah.

Yes, thank you. It feels good to finally agree with you :P And yes, when I said Halo, I meant the current generation Halo games. Both the original Halo games will always be remembered- Combat Evolved for what it was, and Halo 2 because it essentially kickstarted the console online revolution. But games like Reach, Halo 3 and ODST? Not a chance, not a chance at all. Hell, in this generation alone, Halo 3 and ODST were outperformed by Modern Warfare and Black Ops (this is my opinion, please don't shoot me :()
Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#89 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] This is probably the best post I have read on System Wars. Ever. People need to understand one thing about these 'blockbuster AAA' games that get so much hype and love from the gamers on this board (the very games that the VGA Awards guys said are the only ones that matter, by the way)- they will NOT be remembered or played ten years from now. No one will care. You know how we can still go back and play stuff like Doom, Wolf 3D, Metroid, Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Zelda, Mario, Super Smash Bros., Deus Ex, System Shock 2, Starcraft, Warcraft 3, Elder Scrolls: Morrowind, Grand Theft Auto III, Pokemon, Metal Gear Solid, Castlevania, Age of Empires etc? These games today, these Uncharteds, and Call of Duty(s) and Halos and Gears of Wars... these will have been forgotten by everybody, because there's nothing about them that stands the test of time. All that these games do is refine their game mechanics to hide some very linear and fairly basic level design. On the other hand, the games that I just listed above stand out because they are truly what move the genre forward, truly what represent the peak of their genres. Uncharted, a franchise with two games, one average, and one that was great but extremely overhyped, the best game of all time OVER stuff like Zelda, Castlevania and Metroid? Please, don't make me laugh.

Glad to have started that discussion for you, brah. :P Also, objection. Halo: CE is great, and I believe that people will be playing that game years from now. The others, probably not, but the original? Hell yeah.

Yes, thank you. It feels good to finally agree with you :P And yes, when I said Halo, I meant the current generation Halo games. Both the original Halo games will always be remembered- Combat Evolved for what it was, and Halo 2 because it essentially kickstarted the console online revolution. But games like Reach, Halo 3 and ODST? Not a chance, not a chance at all. Hell, in this generation alone, Halo 3 and ODST were outperformed by Modern Warfare and Black Ops (this is my opinion, please don't shoot me :()

What're you talking about? We agree on lots of stuff. :P Must... resist... urge.... to shoot charizard.... for saying that... Call of Duty.... is better... than Halo.... Must resist..... Okay, I'm resisting, but it's hard and I vehemently disagree (CoD4 ruined the FPS genre, imo). That said, I agree with you on Halo and Halo 2 (though I'd argue that Halo 3 is a much better game than Halo 2 was). Uncharted, though? Standing the test of time? Yeah, right. :lol:
Avatar image for MattDistillery
MattDistillery

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 MattDistillery
Member since 2010 • 969 Posts

I would say Uncharted 2 is my 3rd favourite of the genre after Orcarina of Time and MGS2.

Avatar image for UC3Drake
UC3Drake

453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 UC3Drake
Member since 2010 • 453 Posts

Franchise? Lol no. 2 games isnt really a franchise.

Game? To me, yes, but Zelda isnt that far off :D.

Avatar image for Infinite_Access
Infinite_Access

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#92 Infinite_Access
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts

[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"][QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

No one hopes that the game they just bought will turn out to be fairly unspectacular. It just happens.

DarkLink77

Except you're wrong, and when Uncharted 3 drops and recieves more triple-A reviews across the board, you'll have to accept the franchise as more than a 'flash in the pan'. Games don't have to be unique to be fantastic or go down in gaming history.

I won'y have to accept anything, actually, especially just because video game critics say so. Video game "journalism" is a joke. I couldn't care less what they think. I can pretty much guarantee that ten years from whenever they stop making Uncharted games, no one will care about the franchise. People will still care about Quake 3, Super Metroid, Ocarina of Time, System Shock 2, Deus Ex, etc, etc, etc. Those are timeless games. Uncharted is a flash in the pan.

All those games... started with one.. or 2 games that people really liked... then the developers continued to make games that were good and lived up to the first. They all start with just a few games.

As I recall... metroid other M SUCKS. But people still say metroid is good because its a good franchise... and if you don't think nostalgia plays a role, I'm inclined to tell you you are wrong, but yes I know nostalgia isn't everything. Why won't people go back and play some of the greatest games from this generation??? They go back and play the best stuff from older generations.. .why not this one. Nostalgia.. plain and simple.

Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts
No....I hated UC1 and UC2 while awesome i think is quite overrated.
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]Exactly dude, reread what I wrote...note the phrases 'think not', 'to some extent' and 'tolerable'. Also my acceptance of mario and zelda being well remembered and replayed, just 2D more than 3D, particularly in the case of the more modern games on the Wii. And in future, don't edit my words down to skew my opinion.Lucianu

You're crazy if you think i'm gonna re-read that wall of text, yet again.

My sum up is still as valid as it was before, since it's summarises your wall of text. You can add words that were irrelevant in that particular context, as much as you want. I don't know why it is so hard to comprehend what the intent of a summarization is.

Either way, i'm done, feel free to quote me and respond, like i know you are..

LOL an incorrect summary is an incorrect summary. It's easy to make one if you don't even read what people post properly.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#95 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"] Except you're wrong, and when Uncharted 3 drops and recieves more triple-A reviews across the board, you'll have to accept the franchise as more than a 'flash in the pan'. Games don't have to be unique to be fantastic or go down in gaming history.Infinite_Access

I won'y have to accept anything, actually, especially just because video game critics say so. Video game "journalism" is a joke. I couldn't care less what they think. I can pretty much guarantee that ten years from whenever they stop making Uncharted games, no one will care about the franchise. People will still care about Quake 3, Super Metroid, Ocarina of Time, System Shock 2, Deus Ex, etc, etc, etc. Those are timeless games. Uncharted is a flash in the pan.

All those games... started with one.. or 2 games that people really liked... then the developers continued to make games that were good and lived up to the first. They all start with just a few games.

As I recall... metroid other M SUCKS. But people still say metroid is good because its a good franchise... and if you don't think nostalgia plays a role, I'm inclined to tell you you are wrong, but yes I know nostalgia isn't everything. Why won't people go back and play some of the greatest games from this generation??? They go back and play the best stuff from older generations.. .why not this one. Nostalgia.. plain and simple.

Or because those games are legitimately timeless. DOOM, for instance. 20 years old. Still a blast to play. Uncharted will not have that. It's not unique, it's not special. It's cinematic and has good production values. It's the equivalent of a summer popcorn flick. Sure it's fun in theaters, and maybe a few months later on DVD, but no one is going to care years later.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#96 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Glad to have started that discussion for you, brah. :P Also, objection. Halo: CE is great, and I believe that people will be playing that game years from now. The others, probably not, but the original? Hell yeah.

Yes, thank you. It feels good to finally agree with you :P And yes, when I said Halo, I meant the current generation Halo games. Both the original Halo games will always be remembered- Combat Evolved for what it was, and Halo 2 because it essentially kickstarted the console online revolution. But games like Reach, Halo 3 and ODST? Not a chance, not a chance at all. Hell, in this generation alone, Halo 3 and ODST were outperformed by Modern Warfare and Black Ops (this is my opinion, please don't shoot me :()

What're you talking about? We agree on lots of stuff. :P Must... resist... urge.... to shoot charizard.... for saying that... Call of Duty.... is better... than Halo.... Must resist..... Okay, I'm resisting, but it's hard and I vehemently disagree (CoD4 ruined the FPS genre, imo). That said, I agree with you on Halo and Halo 2 (though I'd argue that Halo 3 is a much better game than Halo 2 was). Uncharted, though? Standing the test of time? Yeah, right. :lol:

Really? Like? :P See, the thing is, Modern Warfare might have ruined the industry by ensuring that many clones would flood the market trying to replicate its success, but that game itself was excellent and top of the line. Seriously, it was a blast to play through. And nah, no way Halo 3 is better than Halo 2. Halo 2 had that great story that I actually cared about and an online mode that I'll remember forever. Halo 3? A campaign that seemed like an afterthought and an online mode that broke no new grounds. So I disagree with you. Again. (See what I mean? :P)
Avatar image for Infinite_Access
Infinite_Access

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#97 Infinite_Access
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts

[QUOTE="Infinite_Access"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] I won'y have to accept anything, actually, especially just because video game critics say so. Video game "journalism" is a joke. I couldn't care less what they think. I can pretty much guarantee that ten years from whenever they stop making Uncharted games, no one will care about the franchise. People will still care about Quake 3, Super Metroid, Ocarina of Time, System Shock 2, Deus Ex, etc, etc, etc. Those are timeless games. Uncharted is a flash in the pan. DarkLink77

All those games... started with one.. or 2 games that people really liked... then the developers continued to make games that were good and lived up to the first. They all start with just a few games.

As I recall... metroid other M SUCKS. But people still say metroid is good because its a good franchise... and if you don't think nostalgia plays a role, I'm inclined to tell you you are wrong, but yes I know nostalgia isn't everything. Why won't people go back and play some of the greatest games from this generation??? They go back and play the best stuff from older generations.. .why not this one. Nostalgia.. plain and simple.

Or because those games are legitimately timeless. DOOM, for instance. 20 years old. Still a blast to play. Uncharted will not have that. It's not unique, it's not special. It's cinematic and has good production values. It's the equivalent of a summer popcorn flick. Sure it's fun in theaters, and maybe a few months later on DVD, but no one is going to care years later.

Well... I would say you can't see into the future and don't know what people will be playing in 15/20 years... but thats no fun is it? I'm pretty sure there will be games added to your list of nostalgic experiences.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#98 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

Uncharted is shooter first, adventure/platformer second. And no, Zelda, Metroid and Castlevania all have something to say about the claim UC is the "best" the action-adventure genre has to offer. [QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]Except you're wrong, and when Uncharted 3 drops and recieves more triple-A reviews across the board, you'll have to accept the franchise as more than a 'flash in the pan'. Games don't have to be unique to be fantastic or go down in gaming history.foxhound_fox
The franchise may not be flash-in-the-pan, but each individual game seems to be. As soon as UC2 dropped, everyone stopped talking about UC. And as soon as UC3 drops, everyone is going to forget UC2 even exists. It is the same thing with a lot of franchises this generation, they get replaced so quickly with so many sequels, people tend to forget the ones that came before. It also says something to the lasting quality of many of these games as well. Being able to be so easily forgotten means that no one will really care to pick up UC2 10 years from now and play it again... it'll be dated within the genre by its successor, let alone everything else that comes out in that period in time. A flash-in-the-pan is defined as something that makes everyone exclaim "this is the greatest thing ever" and then forget about it once something greater comes along. Lasting franchises tend to have something unique about all their iterations that makes them stand out from the rest of the crowd. I'd say Mario and Zelda are good examples of this. They are both based on their own similar mechanic (Mario platforming, and Zelda action-adventure), but each iteration has done something completely different and unique. SMB, SMB2, SMB3, SMW, SMW2YI, SM64, SMS, SMG, SMG2; TLoZ, ZIIAoL, ALttP, OoT, MM, WW, TP, SS. All of them have either an art styIe and/or gameplay elements that make them unique. And both franchises have been around for 24-25 years... and still are extremely popular and see tons of people still going back more than two decades later and enjoying them still, or enjoying them for the first time. Games like Uncharted 2 are just improvements on what already worked in the first game with little altered in terms of content or styIe. What will really illustrate this, is the effect that UC3's release has on UC2 and the subsequent years as time passes. How many people do you really think will be playing UC2 10 years from now? Or UC?

I'm sorry but who gives a monkeys ass what this board talks about?

Ninja Gaiden Black was probably a forgotten game, and nowhere near anyones GOTY the year it came out. Yet look at it now. It not only holds up beautifully something a lot of 04s "big hitters" can't lay claim to, but it's still arguably the best game it's genre has to offer(hack n slash). So this board not name dropping it is hardly a sign that the game is a flash in the pan. Is Uncharted 2 destined for flavor of the year or gen, and probably going to lose it's appeal years later? potentially. Then again I would have probably guessed that with Resident Evil 4. Yet as a third person action game that game still stands tall because of some of the best level design/pacing work in the genre(hell gaming in general rarely lives up to the pacing of a RE4).

I'm not arguing whether Uncharted 2 is excellent or not, but this boards lack of name dropping of the game would hardly qualify as an argument even worth mentioning.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#99 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
As a franchise not so much, but Uncharted 2 was definitely one of the best A/A games I've played.FIipMode
Word Uncharted 2 was great.
Avatar image for tonitorsi
tonitorsi

8692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#100 tonitorsi
Member since 2006 • 8692 Posts

It will inevitably become the absolute best adventure game on the market.

Even if its still bombarded by hateful comments, Naughty God never disappoints. Uncharted 3 will be again GOTY in dozens of tons of sites and score the same if not better than UC2.

Uncharted will earn and don its place as the pantheon of both Action and Adventure genres. Quote me and come at me breh.