Wait a second, Dark Souls was a terrible game!

  • 164 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Second_Hokage
Second_Hokage

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Second_Hokage
Member since 2011 • 1104 Posts
It had the worst learning curve of any game ever released, the fighting mechanics were always in favor of the enemy, you had little health, your stamina was always down, and leveling up did nothing to improve them much, 2 hits and you still die. And dont get me started on getting Cursed...The game did not want you to have fun, and wanted to frustrate us because we won WW2... Tell me you didnt contemplate destroying the disk during the Ornstein and Smough fight? Exactly! PC players, have fun punching a hole into your $300 LED monitor.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#2 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

loved the fighting engine hated the game.

i'm not going to eat a turd just because there are a few M&Ms in there someplace.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Wait a second, you're wrong!

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

"Waaaaaaah, it was too hard!"

The game was great. It offered a great amount of difficulty, but preperation and knowing the enemy's attacks really helped.

Avatar image for Second_Hokage
Second_Hokage

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Second_Hokage
Member since 2011 • 1104 Posts

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

Wasdie
If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.
Avatar image for Easyle
Easyle

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Easyle
Member since 2010 • 2034 Posts
The game was ok, but due to its adherence to its masochism like no real checkpoints and some cheap tactics, it never succeeded in what was advertised for me.
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

Second_Hokage
If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.

when did you start gaming? late 90s? 2002?
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#9 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

Second_Hokage

If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.

So every game out there should be a casual and easy experiance so you can sit back and sip ice tea while the game pretty much plays itself?

Oh no, there was finally some variety on the consoles!

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts
I thought both Souls games were pretty overrated and not very difficult at all... I really have problems seeing why so many people had so many problems with the difficulty... if you think before you act it's pretty hard to die in either game.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#11 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Second_Hokage"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

lawlessx

If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.

when did you start gaming? late 90s? 2002?

I'm guessing somewhere towards the end of last generation with Halo or CoD being one of his first games.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

Second_Hokage

If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.

Some people actually want a challenge when they play games. just because you don't, does not make game that are difficult terrible. Dark Souls was obviously too intense for you. Try simpler games like Angry Birds or Tic Tac Toe. Those have low learning curves and are relaxing

Avatar image for Mattizzle815
Mattizzle815

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#13 Mattizzle815
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts

Sorry tc but you just suck and or have no patience... Go back to playing cod

Avatar image for carlisledavid79
carlisledavid79

10522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 carlisledavid79
Member since 2006 • 10522 Posts
Demon's was a lot harder than Dark. Both fantastic games, best rpgs ive played in a long time.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Second_Hokage"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

Wasdie

If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.

So every game out there should be a casual and easy experiance so you can sit back and sip ice tea while the game pretty much plays itself?

Oh no, there was finally some variety on the consoles!

todays games have too many options for that to be any real problem.

i just replayed through red dead and turning off the lock-on makes that game go from a walk in the park to an actual challenge.

if games are too easy then most of the time it is operator error if there is a difficulty option.

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
Dark Souls much like Demon's Souls isn't as hard as people make it out to be. Gamers today are just getting soft since alot of developers are scaling back difficulty and challenge to lure in more gamers. The games are great at what they do. The games just aren't for you.
Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts
Aww is Dark Souls too hard for the TC???
Avatar image for Second_Hokage
Second_Hokage

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Second_Hokage
Member since 2011 • 1104 Posts

when did you start gaming? late 90s? 2002?

Yup, but how is that an issue? I have beaten numerous games in their highest difficulty, when its fair challenge. Not, let me throw in 8 frogs who will curse you and you cannot block while im laughing right now, ahahahahhaa... Thats exactly what i though bandai was thinking. I did beat the game, but it doesnt deserve any praises.
Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

Haven't played Dark Souls yet, but I completed Demons Souls. I really enjoyed it, primarily due its atmosphere.

The most frustrating thing about it wasn't so much the difficulty of the enemies, but being pushed back and forced to replay entire levels - some of which weren't particularly fun (like the swamp world...ergh...).

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
Demon's was a lot harder than Dark. Both fantastic games, best rpgs ive played in a long time.carlisledavid79
Yeah, Demon's felt harder on the first playthrough. Being cursed in Dark was easily remedied and O & S weren't hard at all with the right gear.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#21 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="Second_Hokage"] If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.Riverwolf007

So every game out there should be a casual and easy experiance so you can sit back and sip ice tea while the game pretty much plays itself?

Oh no, there was finally some variety on the consoles!

todays games have too many options for that to be any real problem.

i just replayed through red dead and turning off the lock-on makes that game go from a walk in the park to an actual challenge.

if games are too easy then most of the time it is operator error if there is a difficulty option.

Changing a game's difficulty isn't the same as the core mechanics of the game having a natural difficulty to them.

Changing your core mechanics so it can scale to easier difficulties and to broaden the playerbase could have negative impact on the whole game on all difficulties.

Imagine if they had an "arcade" mode to ArmA, the changes they would have to make to the core would break the whole game, and most developers aren't going to spend the time to make two different versions of the same game.

Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#22 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

Wasdie

Yeah, we all hate hard games. Gimme CoD!

Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

[QUOTE="Second_Hokage"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

Wasdie

If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.

So every game out there should be a casual and easy experiance so you can sit back and sip ice tea while the game pretty much plays itself?

Oh no, there was finally some variety on the consoles!

They could have implemented an offline 'easy' mode to introduce the game and the challenge to newcomers, or just have an actual easy mode and split the community so players of different difficulties don't interact with each other. That way they may sell more copies and keep the normal fans happy.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Second_Hokage
when did you start gaming? late 90s? 2002?

Yup, but how is that an issue? I have beaten numerous games in their highest difficulty, when its fair challenge. Not, let me throw in 8 frogs who will curse you and you cannot block while im laughing right now, ahahahahhaa... Thats exactly what i though bandai was thinking. I did beat the game, but it doesnt deserve any praises.

Yeah the frogs spit poisonous gas, you cant block air particles, so you should roll away. If you die and get back to the same part, use arrows to bait them out (although I can't recall a section that has 5 frogs all in the same spot. I only know of one with 3 down in the sewers)

Avatar image for Easyle
Easyle

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Easyle
Member since 2010 • 2034 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="Second_Hokage"] If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.dommeus

So every game out there should be a casual and easy experiance so you can sit back and sip ice tea while the game pretty much plays itself?

Oh no, there was finally some variety on the consoles!

They could have implemented an offline 'easy' mode to introduce the game and the challenge to newcomers, or just have an actual easy mode and split the community so players of different difficulties don't interact with each other. That way they may sell more copies and keep the normal fans happy.

Be quiet, person of common sense! Back to pit where you belong.
Avatar image for xOMGITSJASONx
xOMGITSJASONx

2634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 xOMGITSJASONx
Member since 2009 • 2634 Posts

Dark Souls was a great game.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

from my expriance demon souls is a better game.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#28 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="Second_Hokage"] If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.dommeus

So every game out there should be a casual and easy experiance so you can sit back and sip ice tea while the game pretty much plays itself?

Oh no, there was finally some variety on the consoles!

They could have implemented an offline 'easy' mode to introduce the game and the challenge to newcomers, or just have an actual easy mode and split the community so players of different difficulties don't interact with each other. That way they may sell more copies and keep the normal fans happy.

An "easy" mode could require some major changes to the core mechanics that make Dark Souls unique. Such changes don't happen easily, especially when the team isn't all that large and not running on a massive budget.

You can't just take your game an make an "easy" mode without a considerable amount of design changes, programing, and testing.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So every game out there should be a casual and easy experiance so you can sit back and sip ice tea while the game pretty much plays itself?

Oh no, there was finally some variety on the consoles!

Wasdie

todays games have too many options for that to be any real problem.

i just replayed through red dead and turning off the lock-on makes that game go from a walk in the park to an actual challenge.

if games are too easy then most of the time it is operator error if there is a difficulty option.

Changing a game's difficulty isn't the same as the core mechanics of the game having a natural difficulty to them.

Changing your core mechanics so it can scale to easier difficulties and to broaden the playerbase could have negative impact on the whole game on all difficulties.

Imagine if they had an "arcade" mode to ArmA, the changes they would have to make to the core would break the whole game, and most developers aren't going to spend the time to make two different versions of the same game.

well i always wished i could have played demons souls but i field calls from clients at all times of the day and night so the first time i answered the phone and couldn't pause the game and got smashed and had to start over i was done.

people want to make this out as a difficulty problem but it was not that.

it was a playability problem.

Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts
The curse was the dumbest thing to ever grace a good game.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
Fighting mechanics are precise, how about you learn a little patience? The trick to the game is treat every enemy like they can own your arse and they often can and will. RESPECT them and block and pace yourself accordingly. The minute you get cocky, impatient, and just run head first without thinking the game will kick your butt like a sensei teaching his student. Timing and patience and strategy are key. It's also possible to level up to such a degree that every enemy in the game is a piece of cake but by then you EARNED it and that's why it's even more awesome.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
lol, the game was so much softer on you than demon's souls. game's awesome, deal with it. it actually has a learning curve, for a change.
Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts

[QUOTE="dommeus"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So every game out there should be a casual and easy experiance so you can sit back and sip ice tea while the game pretty much plays itself?

Oh no, there was finally some variety on the consoles!

Wasdie

They could have implemented an offline 'easy' mode to introduce the game and the challenge to newcomers, or just have an actual easy mode and split the community so players of different difficulties don't interact with each other. That way they may sell more copies and keep the normal fans happy.

An "easy" mode could require some major changes to the core mechanics that make Dark Souls unique. Such changes don't happen easily, especially when the team isn't all that large and not running on a massive budget.

You can't just take your game an make an "easy" mode without a considerable amount of design changes, programing, and testing.

Well, you could just tone down damage taken and up damage dealt, lower stamina drain whilst blocking and swinging and stuff. I dunno, not huge changes necessarily, just things that favour the player.
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts

Wait a seccond, TC is terrible at games!

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#35 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

Wasdie
Lol, WTF you on about?
The game was ok, but due to its adherence to its masochism like no real checkpoints and some cheap tactics, it never succeeded in what was advertised for me.Easyle
I'm hoping someone will mod a quick save or something into the PC version, I hate crappy save systems.
Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]lol, the game was so much softer on you than demon's souls. game's awesome, deal with it. it actually has a learning curve, for a change.

How so? I haven't played Dark Souls, but I finished Demons Souls.
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

SaltyMeatballs
Lol, WTF you on about?
The game was ok, but due to its adherence to its masochism like no real checkpoints and some cheap tactics, it never succeeded in what was advertised for me.Easyle
I'm hoping someone will mod a quick save or something into the PC version, I hate crappy save systems.

Quick-saves doesn't suit Dark Souls. I hear Risk vs. Reward is a factor, and adding quick-save would make it worse.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

SaltyMeatballs

Lol, WTF you on about?
The game was ok, but due to its adherence to its masochism like no real checkpoints and some cheap tactics, it never succeeded in what was advertised for me.Easyle
I'm hoping someone will mod a quick save or something into the PC version, I hate crappy save systems.

The bonfires are your save/checkpoint systems. You get a certain amount of Estus Flasks at each bonfire, and you don't get to replenish them until another bonfire

It would be incredibly lame if you could just kill an enemy, save, kill another enemy, save, etc

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="Second_Hokage"] If you like frustrating yourself, then go for it. Since when are video games suppost to be painful to play? Its suppost to be a relaxing and enjoying experience.dommeus

So every game out there should be a casual and easy experiance so you can sit back and sip ice tea while the game pretty much plays itself?

Oh no, there was finally some variety on the consoles!

They could have implemented an offline 'easy' mode to introduce the game and the challenge to newcomers, or just have an actual easy mode and split the community so players of different difficulties don't interact with each other. That way they may sell more copies and keep the normal fans happy.

EASY MODE? Yeah...look what happened to Ninja Gaiden when they decided to make it easier for casuals....no thanks. Can't we have our own damn game without it being casualized? If you can't handle dark souls then play something stupid easy.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#40 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="dommeus"] They could have implemented an offline 'easy' mode to introduce the game and the challenge to newcomers, or just have an actual easy mode and split the community so players of different difficulties don't interact with each other. That way they may sell more copies and keep the normal fans happy.dommeus

An "easy" mode could require some major changes to the core mechanics that make Dark Souls unique. Such changes don't happen easily, especially when the team isn't all that large and not running on a massive budget.

You can't just take your game an make an "easy" mode without a considerable amount of design changes, programing, and testing.

Well, you could just tone down damage taken and up damage dealt, lower stamina drain whilst blocking and swinging and stuff. I dunno, not huge changes necessarily, just things that favour the player.

so basically, make the game more boring by making every enemy last longer because you deal less damage? son, balancing is much more than just switching values.
Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

So it wasn't a "hold X to win" game like everything else.

What, does it need more iron sights, auto aim, killstreaks, and perks for you to stand a chance?

SaltyMeatballs
Lol, WTF you on about?
The game was ok, but due to its adherence to its masochism like no real checkpoints and some cheap tactics, it never succeeded in what was advertised for me.Easyle
I'm hoping someone will mod a quick save or something into the PC version, I hate crappy save systems.

Quick Save would ruin the game, or have PC gamers been so hand held with casual auto-quick saving experiances they fergot how to do challenging checkpoints?
Avatar image for FireEmblem74
FireEmblem74

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 FireEmblem74
Member since 2010 • 277 Posts
you actually find dark souls hard? LMao :lol:
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#43 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="dommeus"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]lol, the game was so much softer on you than demon's souls. game's awesome, deal with it. it actually has a learning curve, for a change.

How so? I haven't played Dark Souls, but I finished Demons Souls.

dark souls has stronger bosses (from my experience) and they're not so easily exploitable like in demon's souls. plus the healing items you carry are limited, so farming for them is impossible. however, demon's souls takes much longer to traverse an area, and the average enemy is tougher. i honestly prefer the way dark souls handled it better.
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

lol, the game was so much softer on you than demon's souls. game's awesome, deal with it. it actually has a learning curve, for a change.BrunoBRS

I wouldint say its softer then demon souls mainly cause since its open you dont have a clue where you are going and I ran into 1 or 2 cheap tatics from the game. As in putting you in a tiny as corner with a monster thats waiting for you at the front door with a very long weapon and has speed and 3 or more rat friends waiting to trap you in the corner. Theres a difference between cheap and challenging and its seems to be more difficult then demon souls dark souls went to cheap tatics that involve luck rather then any type of skill. Thats one of the reasons I feel demon souls comes out the better game.

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21753 Posts

I agree it's terrible, but I got too bored with it before I could get frustrated. I knew I should have gotten NHL 12 in that buy 2 get 1 free amazon deal instead. :(

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
[QUOTE="dommeus"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]lol, the game was so much softer on you than demon's souls. game's awesome, deal with it. it actually has a learning curve, for a change.

How so? I haven't played Dark Souls, but I finished Demons Souls.

I heard whichever game you play first feels harder to you I guess it's cause by then you're already used to the games mechanics. When I started dark souls I didn't risk losing my souls as much as I did when playing demons soul's.
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts

I agree it's terrible, but I got too bored with it before I could get frustrated. I knew I should have gotten NHL 12 in that buy 2 get 1 free amazon deal instead. :(

Renegade_Fury
You think FIFA number 1231 is a better game? :lol:
Avatar image for dzaric
dzaric

1068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 dzaric
Member since 2003 • 1068 Posts

you actually find dark souls hard? LMao :lol: FireEmblem74

Oh look at me, im so hardcore I beat Battletoads while juggling grenades and was having my appendix removed! :roll:

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25262 Posts

What is wrong with having to work to gain success, it is nice that success isnt handed to us on a silver platter.

Besides there are console games out there this gen that are way harder than Dark Souls.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
My proudest moment was in demons souls when after over 70 hours of play I became so powerful every bad guy and boss were a joke. I earned it and it was awesome!!