what ever happened to healthbars in fps

  • 77 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for EmperorZeruel
EmperorZeruel

4207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 EmperorZeruel
Member since 2007 • 4207 Posts

its been a while since i saw a new fps witha health bar. I know halflife 2 has it but i cant think of much more.

Avatar image for big_orc
big_orc

1158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 big_orc
Member since 2003 • 1158 Posts

crysis and STALKER:SoC

Avatar image for Norule04
Norule04

8985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Norule04
Member since 2004 • 8985 Posts

halo 2 killed it... and for the better looking for health packs is annoying.

Avatar image for aero250
aero250

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 aero250
Member since 2009 • 3613 Posts
Im not bothered about them.
Avatar image for Wanderer5
Wanderer5

25727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 Wanderer5
Member since 2006 • 25727 Posts

Team Fortress 2, and Bioshock have health bars.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#6 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator  Online
Member since 2004 • 50202 Posts
Halo 3 ODST doesn't have regenerating health so...
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#7 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

crysis and STALKER:SoC

big_orc
Also, Resistance Fall of Man.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#8 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
Halo 3 ODST doesn't have regenerating health so...Stevo_the_gamer
It reminds me of Halo CE, which is a good thing. I blame Halo 2 though, LOL.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

halo 2 killed it... and for the better looking for health packs is annoying.

Norule04

May i recommend you play some good games?

I dont think L4D without a health bar and med packs would be better.

Avatar image for Norule04
Norule04

8985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Norule04
Member since 2004 • 8985 Posts

[QUOTE="Norule04"]

halo 2 killed it... and for the better looking for health packs is annoying.

XaosII

May i recommend you play some good games?

I dont think L4D without a health bar and med packs would be better.

Are you implying halo 2 is a bad game?

and what makes you think I never played any 'good' games or in your case perhaps 'teh superior PC shooters'

Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

FEAR, Crysis, STALKER:SoC/CS...

Developers are catering to the ADD-riddled youth these days, so they decided to get rid of them. It takes away from any sort of gameplay strategy or exploration.

EDIT: although Crysis isn't exactly the best example. It does have a health bar, but it functions similarly to every other FPS.

Avatar image for gandaf007
gandaf007

892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 gandaf007
Member since 2009 • 892 Posts

Battlefield Heroes and The Conduit.

But then again, BFH isn't exactly a FPS... a TPS is more accurate... but it's a shooter...

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
Resistance. I like the Resistance health bar, it was like a combo of the two.
Avatar image for Dystopian-X
Dystopian-X

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Dystopian-X
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts
Better example, Left 4 Dead. Pure health bar goodness.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

[QUOTE="Norule04"]

halo 2 killed it... and for the better looking for health packs is annoying.

Norule04

May i recommend you play some good games?

I dont think L4D without a health bar and med packs would be better.

Are you implying halo 2 is a bad game?

and what makes you think I never played any 'good' games or in your case perhaps 'teh superior PC shooters'

Are you implying a 7.0 scoring game is worth playing in the face of so many AAA and AA shooters?

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#16 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

To everyone who said Resistance: Fall of Man(not Resistance 2), I agree with you.

Avatar image for maverick_41
maverick_41

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#17 maverick_41
Member since 2007 • 1195 Posts

I despise health bars in first person shooters. I am playing BioShock right now and it is very annoying.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
Silly games without their health bars these days. Where's the fun in that?
Avatar image for Communistsheep
Communistsheep

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Communistsheep
Member since 2009 • 1516 Posts
Halo 3 ODST doesn't have regenerating health so...Stevo_the_gamer
Actually it does, it has armor that does regen but when that one is gone, you only have a healthbar left. It's like having some extra armor in the beginning.
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

They went out of style.

Avatar image for Communistsheep
Communistsheep

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Communistsheep
Member since 2009 • 1516 Posts

[QUOTE="Norule04"]

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

May i recommend you play some good games?

I dont think L4D without a health bar and med packs would be better.

XaosII

Are you implying halo 2 is a bad game?

and what makes you think I never played any 'good' games or in your case perhaps 'teh superior PC shooters'

Are you implying a 7.0 scoring game is worth playing in the face of so many AAA and AA shooters?

Halo got 7.0? What if he played the console version?
Avatar image for murat8
murat8

10362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 murat8
Member since 2006 • 10362 Posts
actually the 3 main FPS games im playing right now all have health bars Team Fortress 2, Combat Arms, & Bioshock
Avatar image for Doom_HellKnight
Doom_HellKnight

12217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 Doom_HellKnight
Member since 2005 • 12217 Posts

Most developers seem to think that regenerating health is the way to go. Personally, I think it makes things too simple, but whatever.

I don't mind it where it works, for example in Halo, and at least Bungie actually created a valid reason for Master Chief's shift from Healthkit/Shields to regenerating health. But now we have games like Call of Duty 2+, and Rainbow Six Vegas that also use regenerating health, which as I said previously, makes things far too simple. Call of Duty 1 was the greatest game in the series, and this was one of the (many) reasons...

Avatar image for ThePistolGod
ThePistolGod

344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 ThePistolGod
Member since 2009 • 344 Posts



Developers are catering to the ADD-riddled youth these days, so they decided to get rid of them. It takes away from any sort of gameplay strategy or exploration.Saturos3091

I hate when people say this. Just because a game has regenerating health doesn't mean it's casual friendly and takes no strategy. It's a different type of shooter and requires a different sty1e of play.

Avatar image for ThePistolGod
ThePistolGod

344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 ThePistolGod
Member since 2009 • 344 Posts

[QUOTE="Norule04"]

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

May i recommend you play some good games?

I dont think L4D without a health bar and med packs would be better.

XaosII

Are you implying halo 2 is a bad game?

and what makes you think I never played any 'good' games or in your case perhaps 'teh superior PC shooters'

Are you implying a 7.0 scoring game is worth playing in the face of so many AAA and AA shooters?

Ah, how PC elitist hold onto this so dearly. People like to complain how all they talk about is Crysis > every console game interms of graphics but really, all they ever say is "LULZ BEST XBOX SHOOTER HALO 2 GOT A 7 ON THE PC!" ignoring the fact that it released 3 years later in the same year as games like BioShock, Call of Duty 4, Half Life 2: Episode 2, the almighty Crysis and oh, what else? Halo 3, the sequel.

Keep holding so dearly onto it. With such a "vast library of exclusives" you would think PC elitist would talk about that, instead it's always about how three year old port got a 7.0.

Avatar image for duxter1
duxter1

409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 87

User Lists: 0

#26 duxter1
Member since 2008 • 409 Posts

Far Cry 2 had a mixture of regenerating and healing urself, i prefer regenerating health though becuase your game could be saved when you are very low on health and you will have to load back to the last save

Avatar image for Trinexxx
Trinexxx

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Trinexxx
Member since 2008 • 883 Posts
Battlefield BC had health bars and it worked well. I wish 1943 did too.
Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

[QUOTE="Saturos3091"]

Developers are catering to the ADD-riddled youth these days, so they decided to get rid of them. It takes away from any sort of gameplay strategy or exploration.ThePistolGod

I hate when people say this. Just because a game has regenerating health doesn't mean it's casual friendly and takes no strategy. It's a different type of shooter and requires a different sty1e of play.

It does take a different sty1e of play. It depends on how it's done, and in most of the popular cases (CoD series, Halo series) it takes away from the strategy in combat situations. This isn't the case with all games though. Games like Crysis do the whole regenerating health thing a bit better, because in games like that there is a strategic depth thanks to the open environment, where enemies can come at you from all sides.

Avatar image for murat8
murat8

10362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#29 murat8
Member since 2006 • 10362 Posts
i got to say i prefer regen health online like in CoD it would be a lot harder to get a 30 streak without
Avatar image for L30KinG
L30KinG

1893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 L30KinG
Member since 2009 • 1893 Posts

battlefield: bad company

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

[QUOTE="Saturos3091"]

Developers are catering to the ADD-riddled youth these days, so they decided to get rid of them. It takes away from any sort of gameplay strategy or exploration.ThePistolGod

I hate when people say this. Just because a game has regenerating health doesn't mean it's casual friendly and takes no strategy. It's a different type of shooter and requires a different sty1e of play.

This. Regen health is popular now to make the games noob friendly, but it just takes away the old strategies, and replaces them with new ones, although these new ones can also be more noob friendly.

For me as long as the game doesn't have a mechanic that negates other mechanic (like the you never die gameplay of Bioshock that obliterates the difficulty setting and the health bar) I'm okay.

Avatar image for Androvinus
Androvinus

5796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#32 Androvinus
Member since 2008 • 5796 Posts
because its harder to design a game with a health bar. because you have to balance out damage checkpoints and health recover items very well
Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

To everyone who said Resistance: Fall of Man(not Resistance 2), I agree with you.

mitu123
yup, i liked the health bar in resistance: fall of man. it made the game more tactical. no clue why they changed it in resistance 2.
Avatar image for Ilikemyname420
Ilikemyname420

5147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Ilikemyname420
Member since 2007 • 5147 Posts

The health bars got layed off.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

because its harder to design a game with a health bar. because you have to balance out damage checkpoints and health recover items very wellAndrovinus

I almost forgot this.

Good point.

Regenerating health is a double win for developers. More noob friendly and less work = WIN X 2 for them.

Avatar image for AdmiralBison
AdmiralBison

3970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 AdmiralBison
Member since 2008 • 3970 Posts

[QUOTE="ThePistolGod"]

[QUOTE="Saturos3091"]

Developers are catering to the ADD-riddled youth these days, so they decided to get rid of them. It takes away from any sort of gameplay strategy or exploration.glez13

I hate when people say this. Just because a game has regenerating health doesn't mean it's casual friendly and takes no strategy. It's a different type of shooter and requires a different sty1e of play.

This. Regen health is popular now to make the games noob friendly, but it just takes away the old strategies, and replaces them with new ones, although these new ones can also be more noob friendly.

For me as long as the game doesn't have a mechanic that negates other mechanic (like the you never die gameplay of Bioshock that obliterates the difficulty setting and the health bar) I'm okay.

a regenerative health bar is not the main reason for a game to be "Noob Friendly". There are other factors to such as level design, checkpoints, enemy frequency, a.i. etc.

Regenerative health bars can also be used in games to create an overal faster pace of gameplay, as some games get you hunt for health.

example Fallout 3. your character doesn't have regenerative health bar, but you have a large inventory for storing health and more of a slwer pace item finding nature,

Does having many health packs on hand to instantly restore health to be considered "Noob friendly"??

It's obivous healthbars have not dissappeared, there are still games that come out using that mechanic it's just there are more games mow that use a different appraoch as well when it comes to vitality.

Regenerative, % numbers, no health indicators but show effects of injuries.

examples COD and Gears of War are a good example- there is no visible health bar, but forces you to be take cover more as you can only take so many hits and with little placde to store health packs.

Halo requires regenerative as you often fight lots of enemies and vehiclesl, tanks head on often in expansive levels.

Bioshock and Fallout 3 are more slower paced with the emphasis only searching, investigating, items and less on quick brute firepower.

Counter strike often makes healthbars without kevlar moot as it only takes a head shot and you're finished and 1-2 hits kills are often.

Then there are combinations of health bar, armour/kevlar and regenerative sheilds.

Avatar image for murat8
murat8

10362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#37 murat8
Member since 2006 • 10362 Posts
also single player should never IMO have regenerative health
Avatar image for AdmiralBison
AdmiralBison

3970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 AdmiralBison
Member since 2008 • 3970 Posts

also single player should never IMO have regenerative healthmurat8

LOL. Your tempting fate there and all off a sudden a whole sew of single player games will use regenerative health.

Avatar image for ps3wizard45
ps3wizard45

12907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#39 ps3wizard45
Member since 2007 • 12907 Posts

Far Cry 2 has a health bar :)

Avatar image for ThePistolGod
ThePistolGod

344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 ThePistolGod
Member since 2009 • 344 Posts

[QUOTE="ThePistolGod"]

[QUOTE="Saturos3091"]

Developers are catering to the ADD-riddled youth these days, so they decided to get rid of them. It takes away from any sort of gameplay strategy or exploration.Saturos3091

I hate when people say this. Just because a game has regenerating health doesn't mean it's casual friendly and takes no strategy. It's a different type of shooter and requires a different sty1e of play.

It does take a different sty1e of play. It depends on how it's done, and in most of the popular cases (CoD series, Halo series) it takes away from the strategy in combat situations. This isn't the case with all games though. Games like Crysis do the whole regenerating health thing a bit better, because in games like that there is a strategic depth thanks to the open environment, where enemies can come at you from all sides.

How does it take out strategy? I'm not sure about COD but a bait-n-switch is really popular in Halo. It's why people cry on here about it. "Waah you can just run and hide behind a wall when you have no shields" then the irony is how they say there is no strategy. A bait-n-switch is a really useful and effective strategy. Sure, maybe if all you care about it getting kills then yeah, Halo fails. However there are a lot of great strategies in Halo and despite what every Halo Hater or non-Halo player says, it takes skill and intelligence to play.

A game isn't casualized by regenerative health, its the other things about the game which someone already pointed out.

Avatar image for makincopies
makincopies

694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 makincopies
Member since 2009 • 694 Posts
mag has it
Avatar image for Ross_the_B0SS
Ross_the_B0SS

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Ross_the_B0SS
Member since 2008 • 1210 Posts

The only game I play a lot that has a health bar is Team Fortress 2. It works really well in that game. I like both so I don't really care if one is used more than the other.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#43 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Thank Halo for popularizing regenerating health, even when not contextually sound. It completely removes all challenge. The only type of regenerating health that "works" without removing the challenge is like that in The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape From Butcher Bay; where the player has health "squares" or "sections" that can regenerate up to a certain point, but have to be healed by limited resources back to full health.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

Thank Halo for popularizing regenerating health, even when not contextually sound. It completely removes all challenge. The only type of regenerating health that "works" without removing the challenge is like that in The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape From Butcher Bay; where the player has health "squares" or "sections" that can regenerate up to a certain point, but have to be healed by limited resources back to full health.

foxhound_fox

yeah its a little like that in RFOM1 its pretty good and it keeps it a little more balanced.

Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

FarCry 2 has a health bar. I think they are being removed because looking for health packs becomes boring and redundant, it also quickens the pace of the game.

Avatar image for ThePistolGod
ThePistolGod

344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 ThePistolGod
Member since 2009 • 344 Posts

Thank Halo for popularizing regenerating health, even when not contextually sound. It completely removes all challenge. The only type of regenerating health that "works" without removing the challenge is like that in The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape From Butcher Bay; where the player has health "squares" or "sections" that can regenerate up to a certain point, but have to be healed by limited resources back to full health.

foxhound_fox

Ok. But one headshot = kill is so much of a challenge?

If you're playing Halo like you play Counter Strike then yeah, it's stupid. That's why it's Halo and not Counter Strike. Each game is supposed to be played differently but what would anyone know. "All FPS are just point and shoot and they're all the same."

Having a health bar has it's pros and cons just like regenerating health does. Stop acting like health bars are completely flawless and are the only way a shooter should be played. Counter Strike wouldn't be a good game for regenerating health just like Halo wouldn't be good if it didn't have regenerating SHIELDS. You don't recover health in Halo, but hey, it's Halo. Who cares about it? Just bash it for no reason..

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#47 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Ok. But one headshot = kill is so much of a challenge?

If you're playing Halo like you play Counter Strike then yeah, it's stupid. That's why it's Halo and not Counter Strike. Each game is supposed to be played differently but what would anyone know. "All FPS are just point and shoot and they're all the same."

Having a health bar has it's pros and cons just like regenerating health does. Stop acting like health bars are completely flawless and are the only way a shooter should be played. Counter Strike wouldn't be a good game for regenerating health just like Halo wouldn't be good if it didn't have regenerating SHIELDS. You don't recover health in Halo, but hey, it's Halo. Who cares about it? Just bash it for no reason..

ThePistolGod


Regeneration, up to FULL health, without any consequence is an inherently detrimental aspect of any shooter. It removes any sort of challenge there might be in the game. Without a limiting of a player's resources, there is no cause for concern.

A good example of this is in a game like EFBB. When you have only a single square of health left, you are going to be a lot more cautious and much less aggressive in attacking enemies. When you have 7 squares, you will be a lot more reckless and much more aggressive. In EFBB, the only way to refill your health once you lose a square, is to visit a health machine that requires packs that give up to 4 square healing, but if you don't need 4 squares, you leave the ones you don't use behind in the machine and either sacrifice them or have to remember where they are and go back later.

By not limiting a player's resources, like in Halo, allowing them to just hide and regain full health (or in the case of Halo, shields), it completely removes the challenge of the game (you don't have to carefully seek out limited health packs or conserve health). There is no increased caution or anxiety as long as you can find a place to hide and regenerate. When playing an online game where you have a health bar (i.e. Counter Strike, Day of Defeat, etc.), you start out more aggressive and as your health dwindles, you become more cautious and defensive.

And to counter your whining about head-shots... shoot your enemy before they shoot you, or don't stick out your head where it can get shot.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

[QUOTE="XaosII"]

[QUOTE="Norule04"]

Are you implying halo 2 is a bad game?

and what makes you think I never played any 'good' games or in your case perhaps 'teh superior PC shooters'

Communistsheep

Are you implying a 7.0 scoring game is worth playing in the face of so many AAA and AA shooters?

Halo got 7.0? What if he played the console version?

Console FPS are always inferior to the majority of PC fps. Even the multiplats. His point still stands, although I wouldn't base an argument on a GS score alon since I personally would have given MGS4 a 6.0 at best.

Avatar image for Solid_Tango
Solid_Tango

8609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Solid_Tango
Member since 2009 • 8609 Posts
mgs4 has it :D
Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

Thank Halo for popularizing regenerating health, even when not contextually sound. It completely removes all challenge. The only type of regenerating health that "works" without removing the challenge is like that in The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape From Butcher Bay; where the player has health "squares" or "sections" that can regenerate up to a certain point, but have to be healed by limited resources back to full health.

foxhound_fox

Just like Resistence. I find this system much better than just regenerating health.