ME3, I read some negative things about the endings of ME3 before finishing the game--I thought to myself, "so far the game hasn't been that bad (very average and not as good as the previous), folks are probably just wanting too much. All I need is just an ending to close the series." F'n bullshit. M'fers can't even close the series but instead offer the same exact endings whatever choice you made and top that off with the fact that it made no sense at all whatsoever--my team was with me, then disappeared while running down the mountain assault with me, then at the end they were in the Normandy unscratched by the blast which turned me into a burnt cookie. What? Oh did I mentioned that the game ended with them on a mystery island with no explanation of what the fvck they are doing there or how they were going to survive after the relays are all gone? That's not closure and again, made no sense whatsoever. I refuse to go back and play the extended edition--that shit would have never been implemented if not for all the crybabies crying after that sh!t ending was made. The original ending was the original vision from the devs.
Arkham Knight. This game tries so hard to justify itself with the batmobile. It's like the saying goes, you live by the sword, you die by the sword. In this case, the batmobile was the sword and a dull one at that. Why drive when you can just fly across the city? Don't ask me, I don't know the answer to that one either. That piece of sh!t was overused in every aspect of the game--even forced into the "puzzles" of the game mechanics. Oh did I mentioned that they SPOILERS changed the red hood's name for no apparent reason to Arkham Knight just so the audience wouldn't try to guess who the guy was though it was so apparent and everyone and their mothers already knew before the *gasp* reveal that just made folks cringe? And no, Arkham Knight from my knowledge was not an original character from DC but created by Rocksteady--great job guys, you guys created a new guy who was already a guy who did the same exact thing he did by another name. Oh, and lastly, did I mentioned the piss poor PC port of the game that ran like shit and stutter like crazy? How about the original 30 FPS lock? The list goes on.
Expansion packs becoming DLC. I remember back in the day when expansion packs were released on the PC that provided a great experience with a wealth of new features and improvements over the original. These days, DLC is all about a quick cash grab. Expansion pack? F no, how about a ONE mission DLC for 5 bucks because why bundle 10 missions for $30 when you can sell it for $50 all together. How about offering a season pass for $40 bucks but barely providing any real information on what is actually going to be in there for the pass?
Ubisoft becoming a piece of sh!t. I use to love this company. The original Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six, Assassin's Creed 2, Prince of Persia, Splinter Cell, and others. Those were the glory days. These days, its all stripped basic gameplay from other games packaged into a different skin and call it a different game. Did you guys know that the Division uses the cover system created so many years ago by splinter Cell and can also be found in Ghost Recon Future Solider? How about Ghost Recon Wildland stripping all it's gameplay from FS and place it into a so called "rpg mechanic". F games, let's just look cool and hip with our games by offering 20 cool beanies as a game reward item to make our players look cooler because we are so hip and in style. Does anyone actually watch any of these Ubisoft gameplay trailers and the players are talking like they are actually in the game like "watch your step" in the division trailer? WTF? Then all of a sudden they remember they are playing a game and speak out of terms. Oh, did I mention that they put up a model as their spokeswoman in their conferences and let her cuss like crazy? I mean cussing is cool right? RIGHT? Fvck yea it is, that's why I've been cussing this whole time with this "fuckin'" post. I'm cool too.
Pay to play. So, let me get this straight, I have to pay your fvckin' company just so I can play online on your servers--oh wait, that's right, y'all dont provide any dedicated servers. Oh but Microsoft has---sh!t--that's what they have. Games aren't require to be on MS servers, so games could choose to go P2P like the majority. So, basically, I'm paying you to just show me your fvckin' store page? No, REALLY, wtf am I paying for in PSN and Xbox Live or Nintendo's new crap offering for that matter? Again, for reals--like for reals for reals--what am I paying for? What have you even done to justify that price--hell Steam (I hate Steam as well for DRM) is free on the PC and does all the sh!t that you do and has not a single cent attached to it. So really, please i'll ask one last time and explain to me exactly what am I paying for?
Log in to comment