Do you think system wars would explode? Would Halo reach fans gloat nonstop over it?
butteman12
as a halo fan no I wouldn't gloat it if the game got an 8.5. and system wars would think thats the right score for a cod game
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Do you think system wars would explode? Would Halo reach fans gloat nonstop over it?
butteman12
as a halo fan no I wouldn't gloat it if the game got an 8.5. and system wars would think thats the right score for a cod game
All the CoD fanboys I know would just dismiss it as an awful Treyarch game and not buy it. If it got a 9+ score, they would praise it like crazy..
[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Not really, just look at Starcraft. You really don't see many people ragging on Starcraft at all.DragonfireXZ95Yes you do.... I don't really remember seeing anyone rag on Starcraft, even in these forums. Got any examples laying around somewhere? lol
That's because in SW Starcraft 2 is under the official protection of the Hermits.
[QUOTE="dercoo"]
Its MW2 with a better campaign,better online, and zombies. I don't see how it could get lower score than MW2.
super600
Unless there are a huge amount of mysterious glitches and killstreaks that break the game it won't get under a 9.0. But, then their's that combat training mode and that may lower the game's score depending if it's used well.
do you really expect a game such as COD to have the amount of bug and glitches of a say stalker or fallout game?why people always treat 8.5 as a bad score?BrunoBRSbecause they usually say it for games that are hyped AAA
that charismatic fellow that posts all of the eloquently presented black ops threads will be disappointed to say the least
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]I will feel insulted that COD scored the same as Fallout New Vegas.argetlam00
You should feel more insulted that MW2 scored higher.
....We do , we do! It's beyond ludicrous.[QUOTE="BeyondPain"]It'll be ragged on regardless of its score. There's always people who hate the big franchises..DragonfireXZ95Not really, just look at Starcraft. You really don't see many people ragging on Starcraft at all.
You can't rag on StarCraft. DOW fanboys try to but you just can't. It's like ragging on the original Mario or Baldur's Gate.
Besides, the people who know of StarCraft enough to talk about ti are PC gamers and PC gamers are typically more mature.
We are on the 4th Cod this generation jedikevin2Actually 6th... Call of Duty 2, Call Of Duty 3, Call Of Duty 4, Call Of Duty: World At War, Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, and Call Of Duty: Black Ops.
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]why people always treat 8.5 as a bad score?lightleggybecause they usually say it for games that are hyped AAA then stop looking at the game with the eyes of someone that hyped it and just enjoy the game for what it is. your sig describes the situation pretty well. people call great games a "flop" just because it isn't greatER as they thought it was. if GabuEx's profile wasn't glitched (it likes to auto-set to private), i'd link you to a really nice editorial.
From the amount of hate that the game is currently getting, wouldn't an 8.5 be a kick in the balls to activision/CoD haters? Yeah pretty sure it would... Oh wait.. System wars = Hypocricy central. All those that hate the game now would end up saying "hahahahah flop, game was AAA material!"Do you think system wars would explode? Would Halo reach fans gloat nonstop over it?
butteman12
I reckong 8.5 is fine but for WaW it's ridculous considering how average WaW was besides the zombie mode
By the time WAW came out, people were already sick of World War II games. Treyarch gets to do Cold War to modern day settings now. It's a totally different ball game. Zombie mode is just a bonus.I reckong 8.5 is fine but for WaW it's ridculous considering how average WaW was besides the zombie mode
OB-47
Most people here will act as though that's a more suitable score, despite not playing the game. The game is the most unfairly hated game I have ever seen here at System Wars, there are flaws in the Call of Duty titles but to the extent the hate is taken? No, the games are not that bad, and some of them are incredible such as Call of Duty 2 and 4, and to some extent the original(although I'm not as big a fan as many are.)rolo107
I couldn't agree more. It is cool to hate on it, like it is cool to hate on Apple. I find it funny how cod4 was unbalanced, hated, and noob friendly before MW2 came out and now it is considered an awsome game that is perfectly balanced and has no flaws. COD games are better than a lot of shooters on the market. The new modes that are being added look fun to play.
[QUOTE="rolo107"]Most people here will act as though that's a more suitable score, despite not playing the game. The game is the most unfairly hated game I have ever seen here at System Wars, there are flaws in the Call of Duty titles but to the extent the hate is taken? No, the games are not that bad, and some of them are incredible such as Call of Duty 2 and 4, and to some extent the original(although I'm not as big a fan as many are.)15strong
I couldn't agree more. It is cool to hate on it, like it is cool to hate on Apple. I find it funny how cod4 was unbalanced, hated, and noob friendly before MW2 came out and now it is considered an awsome game that is perfectly balanced and has no flaws. COD games are better than a lot of shooters on the market. The new modes that are being added look fun to play.
I second this.I swear review sites were paid to give MW2 good rep, if black ops is less well received I WILL explode. lonewolf604
This^
IGN gave Mw2 a 9.5 in graphics.....Anybody who believes mw2 deserved that 9.5 for graphics is an idiot. Damn, games that use UE3 look 2x times better.
Let me revise the PC Modern Warfare 2 score for IGN.
_____________________
Presentation- 5.0
Campaign is amazingly short and VERY repetive compared to the average FPS. Multiplayer uses a cheap matchmaking system+a worthless anti-cheat. No mod tools. Overall we have A LOT less then what we got on previous COD title's.
_____________________
Graphics- 7.5
Uses a 3 year old engine with hardly any upgrades. No plans for future DX10 or 11 support. I would give it an 8.9 three years ago.
_____________________
Sound- 6.0
The fact that 40% of the sound is from cod2 with barely any improvement from cod4...I'd say none. Even World at War sounds better ecpecially with 7.1 sorround sound. I want that realistic battle sound that new and upcoming shooters have. This isn't 2005. PFFT WaW gets an 8.5.
_____________________
Gameplay- 5.5
Matchmaking limits the amount of players in a game. Laggy+a 0 ping advantage for the host. Overpowered killstreaks and unbalanced weapons. Killstreaks and perks dumb down skill to even play this game. Spawn system SUCKS. I really don't want to spawn next to enemy.. Cod4 was kinda a new experiece so I would give it an 9.0 back then. Cod2 had a GREAT spawn system. What happen?
_____________________
Lasting Appeal- 4.0
I don't even know why would anybody even continue to play this game after a few weeks. To the 70,000 people on Steam who play this excuse for a video game- Please die in a hole and please buy a console in Video game hell.
_____________________
Overall- 5.6 Worst overhyped and overrated game to date.
[QUOTE="super600"][QUOTE="dercoo"]
Its MW2 with a better campaign,better online, and zombies. I don't see how it could get lower score than MW2.
lightleggy
Unless there are a huge amount of mysterious glitches and killstreaks that break the game it won't get under a 9.0. But, then their's that combat training mode and that may lower the game's score depending if it's used well.
do you really expect a game such as COD to have the amount of bug and glitches of a say stalker or fallout game?Didn't mw2 have a lot of glitches?
I wouldn't be surprised if the game gets a 7.5. In fact, I'm expecting that. The game is not going to offer ANYTHING new. It will be the same short campaign and the same broken multiplayer.
I wouldn't be surprised if the game gets a 7.5. In fact, I'm expecting that. The game is not going to offer ANYTHING new. It will be the same short campaign and the same broken multiplayer.
Heirren
Wouldn't MortgageMan explode into a billion pieces if it scored that low. I'm excepting close to a 9.0 for the game, but I'm not going to buy the game at all because of my hate for Activision.
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
I wouldn't be surprised if the game gets a 7.5. In fact, I'm expecting that. The game is not going to offer ANYTHING new. It will be the same short campaign and the same broken multiplayer.
super600
Wouldn't MortgageMan explode into a billion pieces if it scored that low. I'm excepting close to a 9.0 for the game, but I'm not going to buy the game at all because of my hate for Activision.
I honestly don't see it getting a 9, unless it actually deserves it. IMO, the game will have to drastically improve upon MW2 in order for that to happen. Later in the lifespan of consoles, critics tend to dislike redundancy.
[QUOTE="BeyondPain"]It'll be ragged on regardless of its score. There's always people who hate the big franchises..BrownesqueIt has nothing to do with it being big, although that's kind of like sand in an open wound. The series is bad, and that's why I hate it. It is the cancer that is killing first person shooters. They're all homogenized now, they all blindly borrow elements from COD4 now, and they all copy the basic gameplay template from COD2 now. The result is basically a bunch of games where you grind levelups by sprinting around a few hundred foot square map looking down your ironsights and spraying bullets at targets or if they get too close you spam the knife button. Then you call in the chopper. Rinse, repeat. What is so awesome about this. What is the point that Gamestop needs to be running midnight release parties and these games need to be getting 8-9/10s like candy.
I get your point, having said that they're really not bad games. Yeah, they're overrated by the fans of the series, but they're also criticized to much by haters of the series. Its a series of solid games that at this point are just repetitive. They're deserving of maybe an 8.0 score since they are technically sound with decent gameplay, but hardly bring anything new to the table. So while I don't think the COD series is all that great (I'm not even buying Black Ops) I find a hard time saying its a flatout terrible series. The games really are not bad. They just aren't great either.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment