This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="lasseeb"][QUOTE="lawlessx"]
Clearly you didn't research the battlefield series before creating this thread
Clearly you are wrong. I even own BF and COD games myself. Both of them have the same boring gameplay every year with new graphics, weapons, maps.Then why do you buy them if you know this :|
that's kind of an unnerving question.... What if he bought it then learned it. Jeez[QUOTE="-supercharged-"]DICE said BF3 will have some of the biggest maps in the series.Well BF3 isn't a Bad Company game and hopefully the maps won't be so huge and boring this time.
mitu123
[QUOTE="NerubianWeaver"]Nothing substantial. People just overpraise the BF series and join the Cod hate bandwagon but CoD is still the best online Fps this gen. lasseebI agree. But COD is far from the best online FPS this gen. Not even Battlefield is. The games are all so similar, with 5 hours uninteresting campaigns.
Proof he's never played battlefield before. He probably played Bad Company but nothing before that.
FPS in general don't change.If you think the Battlefield series doesn't change just like CoD doesn't change every year then
you are extremely new to the FPS scene. CoD died after CoD2 (fact), and if you don't believe that then
like I said, you are new to the FPS scene.
So, please close this thread, there's way to much ignorance, stupidity and trolling going around.
Stream_Beta
Halo 3, 2007, Halo Wars 2008, Halo ODST , 2009, , Halo Reach 2010, Halo Remake , 2011, Halo 4 2012 . Plus the many halo map packs. Yea. Halo is not milked at all... You sir FAIL. And don't get me started on COD....[QUOTE="ShadowNinja87"][QUOTE="vashkey"] A Halo game has not come out every year... There are more Battlefield games than Halo games and Halo is an older series. :roll:
vashkey
Halo Wars was in 2009 and you didn't prove anything. There wasn't a Halo game in 2002, 2003, 2006 or 2008.
There are six Halo games and Halo is a nine year old game franchise.
Battlefiled is eight years old franchise and there are eight Battlefield games... If you choose to ignore all the expansion packs and free to play online games.
Lets see...
2011 -Battlefield 3
2010 -Bad Company 2
2009 -1943
2008 -Bad Company
2007 -Battlefield 2: Modern Combat(not an expansion, it's a stand alone console title)
2006 -Battlefield 2142
2005 -Battlefield 2
2004- Vietnam
Thats eight straight years of releases, and thats not even counting expansions and free to play. Stop being such a fanboy. I'm not even defending CoD here but Battlefield fans criticizing CoD and especially Halo of being milked are hypocrits. Get off your high horse. Want to talk about failing?
BF2: Modern Combat was in 2005, so It's not eight straight years of releases.
But, still there are alot of games under the Battlefield name.
New? Nothing earth-shattering, but it seems a bit more refreshing because a full retail Battlefield doesn't get released every single year. Call of Duty/Modern Warfare games do.... and we're at the point now where that dilutes the impact of the franchise.
Halo 3, 2007, Halo Wars 2008, Halo ODST , 2009, , Halo Reach 2010, Halo Remake , 2011, Halo 4 2012 . Plus the many halo map packs. Yea. Halo is not milked at all... You sir FAIL. And don't get me started on COD....[QUOTE="ShadowNinja87"][QUOTE="vashkey"] A Halo game has not come out every year... There are more Battlefield games than Halo games and Halo is an older series. :roll:
vashkey
Halo Wars was in 2009 and you didn't prove anything. There wasn't a Halo game in 2002, 2003, 2006 or 2008.
There are six Halo games and Halo is a nine year old game franchise.
Battlefiled is eight years old franchise and there are eight Battlefield games... If you choose to ignore all the expansion packs and free to play online games.
Lets see...
2011 -Battlefield 3
2010 -Bad Company 2
2009 -1943
2008 -Bad Company
2007 -Battlefield 2: Modern Combat(not an expansion, it's a stand alone console title)
2006 -Battlefield 2142
2005 -Battlefield 2
2004- Vietnam
Thats eight straight years of releases, and thats not even counting expansions and free to play. Stop being such a fanboy. I'm not even defending CoD here but Battlefield fans criticizing CoD and especially Halo of being milked are hypocrits. Get off your high horse. Want to talk about failing?
LOL wut? There was no BF game in 2007, and that's a 2005 game on PS2 and Xbox, 2006 on 360.DICE said BF3 will have some of the biggest maps in the series.[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="-supercharged-"]
Well BF3 isn't a Bad Company game and hopefully the maps won't be so huge and boring this time.
McStrongfast
[QUOTE="slipknot0129"]If you've never played a battlefield game how can you make comments like that?Demos and renting it. Its not as good as call of duty games. So thats why im never buying a battlefield game. If I wanted something different than call of duty then I would buy a game like aliens vs predator for multiplayer.Just the name. I havent ever bought a battlefield game and dont plan on starting now.
kraken2109
This all depends what you define as different. I'd consider multiplayer sandbox, objective and team based multipayer as different, especially one with a strategic layer and larger focus on tactics and player cooperation in the midst of a larger scale conflict, and the unique moments that all these variables generate, in the central Battlefield series, as different.If I wanted something different than call of duty then I would buy a game like aliens vs predator for multiplayer.
slipknot0129
[QUOTE="vashkey"]
[QUOTE="ShadowNinja87"] Halo 3, 2007, Halo Wars 2008, Halo ODST , 2009, , Halo Reach 2010, Halo Remake , 2011, Halo 4 2012 . Plus the many halo map packs. Yea. Halo is not milked at all... You sir FAIL. And don't get me started on COD.... Red2k-
Halo Wars was in 2009 and you didn't prove anything. There wasn't a Halo game in 2002, 2003, 2006 or 2008.
There are six Halo games and Halo is a nine year old game franchise.
Battlefiled is eight years old franchise and there are eight Battlefield games... If you choose to ignore all the expansion packs and free to play online games.
Lets see...
2011 -Battlefield 3
2010 -Bad Company 2
2009 -1943
2008 -Bad Company
2007 -Battlefield 2: Modern Combat(not an expansion, it's a stand alone console title)
2006 -Battlefield 2142
2005 -Battlefield 2
2004- Vietnam
Thats eight straight years of releases, and thats not even counting expansions and free to play. Stop being such a fanboy. I'm not even defending CoD here but Battlefield fans criticizing CoD and especially Halo of being milked are hypocrits. Get off your high horse. Want to talk about failing?
BF2: Modern Combat was in 2005, so It's not eight straight years of releases.
But, still there are alot of games under the Battlefield name.
Well 1943 was only $15 so it's not even a full game, BC1 never made it to the PC (neither did 1943), Vietnam. BF2, and BF2142 never made it to the consoles.
It's completely fragmented. No platform has seen early Battlefield releases.
Also the differences between Battlefield games is massive unlike CoD games. BF1943 compared to BF2142... hell you might as well compare conquest to Search and Destroy in CoD.
When you're playing an intense 64 player conquest match on PC and are suppressing the enemy and covering your squad, while watching your friendly tank have a battle with another, and see a jet zoom over and take out the friendly tank, all while playing 1080p 60FPS w/ destructible environments, you'll understand.-RocBoys9489-Ohhhh yeah!!!!!!
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment