[QUOTE="ArchoNils2"]DLC usually has their own budget and wouldn't be part of the final game if it wasn't for DLC. Sure you can say "we never know", but I'm pretty sure we would see about the same content in our games even if there isn't DLC, but instead of DLC we would see more expansion packs. Oh and I take DLC any day over re-releasing the same game with a few extras like Copcom likes to do it. Seriously, only RE5 gold is Move compatible? 3 versions of Street Fighter 4? wthDarsanderI would take DLC over re-releases as well. And on paper, I would had also taken DLC over expansions, but look Expansion: a new single player story mode, a bunch of new maps, new characters/armies to play with and old ones get updates and enw weapons. $20-$40 vs $10 for several batches of maps (used to be given away for free in patches as a 'thank you for still playing our game'. $5-15 for new each new character or army. $1-5 for different attires for each character $20-$40 for a new story a new story mode.
Sure it's more expensive if you want everything, but usually there's always stuff you don't really care about. I can see the devs / publisher trying to cash in on DLC, especially to compensate used game sales. IMO the price of new games should be lowered and they should focus more on those micro transactions. I'm actually fine with stuff like online passes. The best added content are still mods, to bad the consoles do not support something like that :S
Log in to comment