What member of SW would make the best reviewer at GS? (replace a current one)

  • 102 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

9001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#101 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 9001 Posts

Anyone on here, even LoosingENDs would be a good candidate to replace the person who did the review for Iron Front: Liberation 1944.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]Review scores are broken since game reviewers don't do aynthign consistent. There has been no critiquing of triple A or independent games. And insane critiquing of B tier games it is revolting. I have never seen an industry that is so null of any constructive criticism except video game journalism. They need to understand that I don't have any ability to trust their opinions after all the stuff they pulled this generation.Zeviander
Consistent with what... pleasing you with a constant stream of opinions you can find agreeable?

No. Critiquing a game. If you don't believe that big triple A and independent games are showered with praise and less criticism than that of b tier developers, I would find this true. They aren't consistent on anything because bioware/epic/ valve (well their games are at least consistent)/bungie/bethsesda/naughty dog/nintendo/rockstar are going to get the 9s even if they don't earn it. Every god damn game they make even if they insulted gamers and called them homophobic. Even after calling gamers sexist and entitled. You had articles agreeing with them. Just think about how crazy bioware fanatics are. When they were telling you that you were a homophobic for finding a gay character in the game hitting on you akward (well an alien hiting on you was weird in mass effect 3 does that make me alienphobic finding that uncomfortable?). Or saying that the ending of mass effect 3 sucked that you are entitled. I have never seen a group of game journalist that would unanimously agree to all those things said. In all honesty, each and every one of those statements said were pretty outrageous and childish remarks. I can't say that I would have written any article exonerating bioware pr disasters but gamespot did with all their might. This has nothing to do with me agreeing with them. THis actually has to do with the fact that I have little faith in game journalist ability to actually critique games. At this point, I could give you a rough score of every game before it releases. Isn't that pathetic?