What's the beef with installations?

  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts
I mean i own a ps3 and a 360 and as much as i love throwing in a game and being able to play it the installations arn't so bad for ps3, i mean if it means making the game run smoother, have more stability and make it an overall better expierience i don't see the problem. I mean why do people diss it so much?
Avatar image for tmntPunchout
tmntPunchout

3770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 tmntPunchout
Member since 2007 • 3770 Posts
It's a reason to bash the PS3.. no matter how little it affects actual PS3 owners.
Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts

It's like load times, back in the day you wouldn't wait for a game to load and then the PS1 came along flourishing it's 3D technology, real voice overs and... loading times due to CD.

Everyone hated it for a while but it got cool and everyone just moved on.

Avatar image for therealmcc0y
therealmcc0y

2115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 therealmcc0y
Member since 2007 • 2115 Posts

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

ReverseCycology

You dont need to buy a bigger hd. The ones people have already is enough

Avatar image for omgimba
omgimba

2645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 omgimba
Member since 2007 • 2645 Posts
I have no problem with it as longas I dont run out of space.. 60 Gbyte hdd for the PS3 should be enough I guess.
Avatar image for Iwmyk
Iwmyk

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Iwmyk
Member since 2006 • 146 Posts
As I said in the other thread, it speeds up load times and it prolonges the life of your console if you play games that has to load alot like GTA and have to use the laser all the time when loading, the laser tracks and laser will take quite a beating. That killed my ps2 laser tracks when I played San Andreas.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#8 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

My beef is that in most cases they are mandatory.

Optional installs are great, IMO. Mandatory installations are something that leave a terrible taste in my mouth.

Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

ReverseCycology

You don't know that. All you've got is the GTA4 comparision. Where is the alternate MGS4 where you can compare? It is really in the developers hands how well the load times work, and how well the pop up is altered.

Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

therealmcc0y

You dont need to buy a bigger hd. The ones people have already is enough

I don't know about you, but managing a HDD is a LOT to ask for more people. Installations aren't a big deal to most of us, but I can see it causing frustration to some of the mainstream.
Avatar image for Mau-Justice
Mau-Justice

4907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Mau-Justice
Member since 2008 • 4907 Posts
It doesn't bother me...But isn't this the entire purpose of Consoles? Soon they will be selling us PC stacks as consoles. In the case of PS3, they pretty much are...
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#12 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

ReverseCycology

But the bottom line is - it's not that big o' deal.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#13 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

carljohnson3456

But the bottom line is - it's not that big o' deal.

Not yet, but its not exactly a great precedence to set either.

Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

carljohnson3456

But the bottom line is - it's not that big o' deal.

For now, just wait.

Avatar image for vicmackey39
vicmackey39

2416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 vicmackey39
Member since 2008 • 2416 Posts

You only have a limited amount of hard drive space (be it 20, 40, 60 or 80 gigs) and by the end of the generation you will have tons of games. Do you not want to use your hard drive for other things such as PSN downloads?

Also the 360 plays a lot of the same games and none of them need an installation

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#16 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

And another thing, alot of people say, "Ah, if the 360 has to use multiple discs that's not that big of a deal" but then they act like a 10 minute install is the worse thing in the world.

I dont mind installations myself. Even with GTA 4, my most anticipated game of all time, it didnt really bother me at all. I mean sure, I would have liked to go ahead and played the game, but I dont think it's a reason to not own a PS3 or even a reason to freak out about on System Wars... oh right, this is System Wars. Duh. No wonder installations are a "big deal". :lol:

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

My beef is that in most cases they are mandatory.

Optional installs are great, IMO. Mandatory installations are something that leave a terrible taste in my mouth.

SpruceCaboose
Agreed, I'd rather deal with longer load times for some of my less-played games or games that have short load times to begin with than have to upgrade my HDD and/or sit around waiting for a game to install.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#18 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

My beef is that in most cases they are mandatory.

Optional installs are great, IMO. Mandatory installations are something that leave a terrible taste in my mouth.

PBSnipes

Agreed, I'd rather deal with longer load times for some of my less-played games or games that have short load times to begin with than have to upgrade my HDD and/or sit around waiting for a game to install.

Thank you. That is all I am saying. Give the end user the choice, don't force them into something that they may not want.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#19 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

You only have a limited amount of hard drive space (be it 20, 40, 60 or 80 gigs) and by the end of the generation you will have tons of games. Do you not want to use your hard drive for other things such as PSN downloads?

Also the 360 plays a lot of the same games and none of them need an installation

vicmackey39

You can delete game installations after you're done with a game, or you could just upgrade your HDD.

The 360 plays alot of the same game without the need of an installation probably because the HDD isnt standard for the 360. Devs like Rockstar have even mentioned how Microsoft needs to figure out a solution to the lack of HDD problem. His exact words were, "Our games arent getting any smaller".

If the 360 had HDD as standard, I bet there would be more installations.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#20 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

ReverseCycology

But the bottom line is - it's not that big o' deal.

For now, just wait.

Mark it down in System Wars history folks, Reverse told me to "Just Wait" :lol:

Why should I wait? I can see right now it's not that big 'o deal. Either upgrade your HDD or delete some stuff. If it comes to being a big deal that's the two solutions. How is that a big deal?

Avatar image for tmntPunchout
tmntPunchout

3770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 tmntPunchout
Member since 2007 • 3770 Posts
K thanks for making a poll, now how do I delete my thread? I should've just asked you to make a poll instead >
Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

You only have a limited amount of hard drive space (be it 20, 40, 60 or 80 gigs) and by the end of the generation you will have tons of games. Do you not want to use your hard drive for other things such as PSN downloads?

Also the 360 plays a lot of the same games and none of them need an installation

vicmackey39

Bingo. A person could've bought a 20 gig PS3 and bought 5 games which happens to have the mandatory 5 gig installs. 5 X 5 = 25, the 20 gigs couldn't handle it.

And sure you could delete these installs after you're finish with the game, but the luxury of having a Console is you could always just pop in and play the game whenever you want, but thats not the case with the PS3, you have to do the installing process again.

Avatar image for vicmackey39
vicmackey39

2416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 vicmackey39
Member since 2008 • 2416 Posts

You can delete game installations after you're done with a game, or you could just upgrade your HDD.

carljohnson3456

So your solution is spend more money on a hard drive or install your game every time you want to play it.

The 360 plays alot of the same game without the need of an installation probably because the HDD isnt standard for the 360. Devs like Rockstar have even mentioned how Microsoft needs to figure out a solution to the lack of HDD problem. His exact words were, "Our games arent getting any smaller".

If the 360 had HDD as standard, I bet there would be more installations.

carljohnson3456

But it doesn't and there wont. Devs can piss and moan all they want but in practical terms it means cows have to install games to play them and lemmings don't,and these are often the same games

I'm hearing a lot of talk about how Microsoft were stupid not to make the hard drive mandatory but as far asw i can tell it's cows that are getting done over

Avatar image for tm0054
tm0054

557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 tm0054
Member since 2005 • 557 Posts
It would be nice if optional installs were standard for the PS3 and 360. if installing a game would quiet the 360 DVD drive (which can sometimes sound like hair dryer) then I'd be all for it.
Avatar image for akif22
akif22

16012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#25 akif22
Member since 2003 • 16012 Posts

i don't like them .. they should be optional

i only have a 40gb hdd for my PS3 .. it'll fill up pretty fast, and i don't want to have to keep juggling with installs, because i play a lot of games, and keep switching between them a lot

also, it takes too much time .. prob less than 10 minutes each time, but that time would seem to go so slow during the install of a massive game like MGS4 or something .. it'll teach me patience though, i guess

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#26 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"]

You can delete game installations after you're done with a game, or you could just upgrade your HDD.

vicmackey39

So your solution is spend more money on a hard drive or install your game every time you want to play it.

The 360 plays alot of the same game without the need of an installation probably because the HDD isnt standard for the 360. Devs like Rockstar have even mentioned how Microsoft needs to figure out a solution to the lack of HDD problem. His exact words were, "Our games arent getting any smaller".

If the 360 had HDD as standard, I bet there would be more installations.

carljohnson3456

But it doesn't and there wont. Devs can piss and moan all they want but in practical terms it means cows have to install games to play them and lemmings don't,and these are often the same games

I'm hearing a lot of talk about how Microsoft were stupid not to make the hard drive mandatory but as far asw i can tell it's cows that are getting done over

Look, I'm not say it's a great, but I dont see the big deal. If it cuts down on load times, and apparently reduces pop-in, I'm fine with it. I guess that's just me, I have a 60 GB with 35 GB left, with 3 or 4 demos I can delete as well as tons of game trailers. I'm not hurting for HDD space, so I guess I dont see the big deal.

All I know is I'm not getting done over by anybody.

Avatar image for Paul_Phoenicks
Paul_Phoenicks

1015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Paul_Phoenicks
Member since 2002 • 1015 Posts
Game installations take your PS3 (and PC as well) and turn that large hard drive you thought you had into something much smaller. Looking at the PS3: if Sony wants the console to be everything to everybody, with game saves, game demos, Store games, downloadable content, movies, music, and so much more to download onto the hard drive, that 60 GB drive will fill up even faster if I know that playing games will also involve large installations. My Xbox 360 has a 20 GB hard drive and, realistically, that 20 GB hard drive is about the same size as a 60 GB PS3 drive, when game installations are factored in. When I can play a Devil May Cry 4 or a Grand Theft Auto IV on my Xbox 360, get the same experience (or with GTAIV, the promise of more), and save 5 GB each for other media, I see that as a problem for the PS3. I shouldn't have to upgrade my hard drive or buy a larger HD-equipped PS3 - it's almost like Sony is tricking people into buying the deluxe models of the PS3.
Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

Since we're talking about the "solution" can be getting a bigger hard drive, I was wondering if this hard drive is good and compatible with the PS3.

500GB HDD for $80 after rebate

This install "problem" might not look like a big deal now, but it kinda just reminds me of people buying trucks and not worrying about gas prices. Look at those truck drivers now, most of them will be spending the holidays at home because of the redonkalous price of gas, ha.

Anyway, is that hard drive any good?

Avatar image for vicmackey39
vicmackey39

2416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 vicmackey39
Member since 2008 • 2416 Posts

Look, I'm not say it's a great, but I dont see the big deal. If it cuts down on load times, and apparently reduces pop-in, I'm fine with it. I guess that's just me, I have a 60 GB with 35 GB left, with 3 or 4 demos I can delete as well as tons of game trailers. I'm not hurting for HDD space, so I guess I dont see the big deal.

All I know is I'm not getting done over by anybody.

carljohnson3456

It's a big deal because Sony's competitor is managing the same level of quality in their releases without the need for an additional hardrive or any sort of installation.

You can't just look at hings in a vacuum and say to yourself that "it's all good". Cows should not be happy about this just as lemmings should not be happy about paying 50 bucks a year for online gaming

you're a conhsumer not KAz Hirai

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#30 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"]

Look, I'm not say it's a great, but I dont see the big deal. If it cuts down on load times, and apparently reduces pop-in, I'm fine with it. I guess that's just me, I have a 60 GB with 35 GB left, with 3 or 4 demos I can delete as well as tons of game trailers. I'm not hurting for HDD space, so I guess I dont see the big deal.

All I know is I'm not getting done over by anybody.

vicmackey39

It's a big deal because Sony's competitor is managing the same level of quality in their releases without the need for an additional hardrive or any sort of installation.

You can't just look at hings in a vacuum and say to yourself that "it's all good". Cows should not be happy about this just as lemmings should not be happy about paying 50 bucks a year for online gaming

you're a conhsumer not KAz Hirai

Dont tell me I'm a consumer and not Kaz, I'm fully aware. Is installations costing me anything? No. Is it affecting me? No. You've called the PS3 a crap console so I'm not shocked you're sitting here trying to tell me I shouldnt be happy about it. I'm not happy about it by any means, but I'm not upset about it like you and Reverse would have me beleive I should. You all can speak for the entire PS3 20 GB community but it's not affecting you so why do you care so much? Why does Reverse? Maybe because you're both lemmings?

Dont act like I'm blind, I own a 360 too and actually prefer the PS3 because I am a consumer, not Bill Gates. My 360 has died on me twice and like you said, paying for online is ridiculous. Yet I get called a fanboy because the 360 has turned me off for those two reasons. You could have probably even called me a lemming when I first got a 360, because I was all about it. Funny you and Reverse never come in here and complain about the failure rates or (well you for the first time) about Live's fee, but constantly bash the PS3 for stuff like mandatory installs. Go figure that.

Avatar image for bayareahusla
bayareahusla

461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 bayareahusla
Member since 2008 • 461 Posts
i think its so funny that 10min install takes forever but waiting over a month to get your RROD xbox doesnt bother anyone
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#32 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Thank the console manufacturers for not waiting an extra year for better technology to come out and make console installations a non-issue (like a fast Blu-ray drive, better processors and cheaper RAM).
Avatar image for KodiakGTS
KodiakGTS

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 KodiakGTS
Member since 2003 • 1262 Posts
i think its so funny that 10min install takes forever but waiting over a month to get your RROD xbox doesnt bother anyonebayareahusla


Have you ever had a RROD Xbox? I've had two, and it was only a week to week and a half turnaround each time.
Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

i think its so funny that 10min install takes forever but waiting over a month to get your RROD xbox doesnt bother anyonebayareahusla

Haven't heard a rrod bash lately, I guess it's a slow day today, anyway, the problem with the install is not just the time of installing it, it's the space wasted and the hassle to delete it and re-installing the game everytime you want to play the game, and also these "improvements" are not that big of a jump.

Avatar image for Shafftehr
Shafftehr

2889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Shafftehr
Member since 2008 • 2889 Posts
I remember what Cows were saying at the release of the original XBOX. They called it the "PCbox," saying that "It'd probably make you patch and install your games" and they repeatedly and vocally voiced that this was not the direction they wanted console gaming to look at. This was a HUGE and frequently vocalized gripe for several years of the XBOX's life, until it was obvious that there would be no installations, and the patching was so benign that it wasn't a bother.

Fast forward to now... Cows bend over backwards to justify installations. Heck, they even rabidly defend installing new hard-drives to their consoles. Talk about a total 180...

For me, console gaming means simplicity. Installing, if the procedure is very simple, I can understand... But the installs have to be reasonable enough in ****that I won't have to do something like install a new hard drive - ever. And that means I don't want to be stuck with a substantial install every time I play a game if I use my hard drive for anything but games. With 4GB installs, and with Sony initially releasing a 20GB hard drive, I'd say Sony has dropped the ball. Until hard drives are minimum 100GB out of the box, I don't want to install games on a console.

So my final answer? In principle, I don't mind installs on consoles. In practice, I think Sony has went about it in an arse backwards way, releasing a console that would require installs, then releasing crap little hard drives and expecting people to upgrade their console hardware later in life when they realize how badly they screwed up.
Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

i think its so funny that 10min install takes forever but waiting over a month to get your RROD xbox doesnt bother anyonebayareahusla

Tell me about it, I just got RROD for the third time. It's FAR worse than something minor like mandatory installations. Typical of System Wars though, making a mountain out of a molehill.

Avatar image for bayareahusla
bayareahusla

461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 bayareahusla
Member since 2008 • 461 Posts
i had the RROD twice before i sold it and i do feel sorry for the guy i sold it to
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#38 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

i had the RROD twice before i sold it and i do feel sorry for the guy i sold it tobayareahusla

:lol: Me and Floppy was talking about the same thing the other day, because I said I'm thinking about selling my 360 but I would feel bad for the person who bought it, lol.

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#39 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

My beef is that in most cases they are mandatory.

Optional installs are great, IMO. Mandatory installations are something that leave a terrible taste in my mouth.

SpruceCaboose
I agree. ppl should have the option of not having to install. after all eventually you'll want to play an older game just for a few min but you wouldn't want to do that if the install will take as along as you might play for.
Avatar image for The_Crucible
The_Crucible

3305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 The_Crucible
Member since 2007 • 3305 Posts

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

ReverseCycology

Don't get it twisted.

Consoles are STILL, even with installs, more convenient for the masses than PC's. ANY PS3 owner can play ANY PS3 game. No one without HDD. No one without the right graphics card. No one with too slow of a processor. If you own a PS3, you can play the game. End of story.

I think the mandatory part of it is what people dislike. That I agree with.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

It's like load times, back in the day you wouldn't wait for a game to load and then the PS1 came along flourishing it's 3D technology, real voice overs and... loading times due to CD.

Everyone hated it for a while but it got cool and everyone just moved on.

thrones

For one the Sega CD was the first CD base console, not the PS1. Second, load times were never cool, I dont know where you came up with that. Ever since CD console came out NO ONE likes load times, Sony found away to get around load times and people still complain about it, mainly only the 360 fans complain about it because most PS3 fans dont have a problem with it. I guess you cant make everybody happy.

Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

The_Crucible

Don't get it twisted.

Consoles are STILL, even with installs, more convenient for the masses than PC's. ANY PS3 owner can play ANY PS3 game. No one without HDD. No one without the right graphics card. No one with too slow of a processor. If you own a PS3, you can play the game. End of story.

I think the mandatory part of it is what people dislike. That I agree with.

Thats the thing, if the PS3 didn't have a HDD, then no one can play games with the mandatory installs.

So you can't play the game, not end of story.

Avatar image for crunchUK
crunchUK

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 crunchUK
Member since 2007 • 3050 Posts
i remember buying a console...
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#44 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Crucible"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

ReverseCycology

Don't get it twisted.

Consoles are STILL, even with installs, more convenient for the masses than PC's. ANY PS3 owner can play ANY PS3 game. No one without HDD. No one without the right graphics card. No one with too slow of a processor. If you own a PS3, you can play the game. End of story.

I think the mandatory part of it is what people dislike. That I agree with.

Thats the thing, if the PS3 didn't have a HDD, then no one can play games with the mandatory installs.

So you can't play the game, not end of story.

Dude they could still make the games without installations they just do it mainly to reduce load times. Anybody remember how some of the games at the beginning of the PS3's life cycle without installs took forever to load? Not Reverse, because either he's never played those games or doesnt have a PS3.

The games can be played without the installs, it just benefits to install. Faster load times, less pop-ins.

Avatar image for Golden_Boy187
Golden_Boy187

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Golden_Boy187
Member since 2007 • 787 Posts
Installs take up more time then switching from disk to disk
Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"][QUOTE="The_Crucible"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

carljohnson3456

Don't get it twisted.

Consoles are STILL, even with installs, more convenient for the masses than PC's. ANY PS3 owner can play ANY PS3 game. No one without HDD. No one without the right graphics card. No one with too slow of a processor. If you own a PS3, you can play the game. End of story.

I think the mandatory part of it is what people dislike. That I agree with.

Thats the thing, if the PS3 didn't have a HDD, then no one can play games with the mandatory installs.

So you can't play the game, not end of story.

Dude they could still make the games without installations they just do it mainly to reduce load times. Anybody remember how some of the games at the beginning of the PS3's life cycle without installs took forever to load? Not Reverse, because either he's never played those games or doesnt have a PS3.

The games can be played without the installs, it just benefits to install. Faster load times, less pop-ins.

Then why are they mandatory?

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#47 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"][QUOTE="The_Crucible"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

ReverseCycology

Don't get it twisted.

Consoles are STILL, even with installs, more convenient for the masses than PC's. ANY PS3 owner can play ANY PS3 game. No one without HDD. No one without the right graphics card. No one with too slow of a processor. If you own a PS3, you can play the game. End of story.

I think the mandatory part of it is what people dislike. That I agree with.

Thats the thing, if the PS3 didn't have a HDD, then no one can play games with the mandatory installs.

So you can't play the game, not end of story.

Dude they could still make the games without installations they just do it mainly to reduce load times. Anybody remember how some of the games at the beginning of the PS3's life cycle without installs took forever to load? Not Reverse, because either he's never played those games or doesnt have a PS3.

The games can be played without the installs, it just benefits to install. Faster load times, less pop-ins.

Then why are they mandatory?

Oh, I'm sorry, I guess I was meaning theoretically... theoretically, the devs could make the games without mandatory installs.

I was thinking "theoretically" the same way you were thinking "theoretically" that the PS3 couldnt play these games without an HDD... well, every PS3 has an HDD, so it was a moot point.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Crucible"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

ReverseCycology

Don't get it twisted.

Consoles are STILL, even with installs, more convenient for the masses than PC's. ANY PS3 owner can play ANY PS3 game. No one without HDD. No one without the right graphics card. No one with too slow of a processor. If you own a PS3, you can play the game. End of story.

I think the mandatory part of it is what people dislike. That I agree with.

Thats the thing, if the PS3 didn't have a HDD, then no one can play games with the mandatory installs.

So you can't play the game, not end of story.

Whats your point, without a hard drive you cant get online with Burnout on the 360.

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Crucible"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Here's the thing, these installs only reduce like 3 to 5 seconds of load times, and reduce like 2 to 4 pop ins. I don't think it's worth it at all. I mean sure you could buy a bigger hard drive for cheap but come on only people in these forums will actually do that.

The main draw for video gaming Consoles is that it gave you the convenience that the PC might not. The PS3 might even make console gamers into PC gamers now, since they're getting use to doing the things you could do with a PC with their PS3.

ReverseCycology

Don't get it twisted.

Consoles are STILL, even with installs, more convenient for the masses than PC's. ANY PS3 owner can play ANY PS3 game. No one without HDD. No one without the right graphics card. No one with too slow of a processor. If you own a PS3, you can play the game. End of story.

I think the mandatory part of it is what people dislike. That I agree with.

Thats the thing, if the PS3 didn't have a HDD, then no one can play games with the mandatory installs.

So you can't play the game, not end of story.

Whats your point, without a hard drive you cant get online with Burnout on the 360.

Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts

I mean i own a ps3 and a 360 and as much as i love throwing in a game and being able to play it the installations arn't so bad for ps3, i mean if it means making the game run smoother, have more stability and make it an overall better expierience i don't see the problem. I mean why do people diss it so much?Animal-Mother

Actually, it isn't being dissed nearly as much as it was. I guess for teh MGS4, a mandatory install is fine, but not for other games...I had previously read NOTHING but complaints on this, then people find out there is a mandatory install for MGS4, and only a few complaints, and then a bunch of damage control from cows saying that it is fine because it is MGS4.