Which company made the best contribution to gaming this gen?(poll).

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts
Microsoft, cause dey make Windowz.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
no its not strectching the truth at all. from wikipedia (you can lol at wiki, but prove what it says is wrong first) " Although Sony, unlike Sega with its Dreamcast, placed little emphasis on online gaming during its first few years, that changed upon the launch of the online-capable Xbox. Sony released the PlayStation Network Adapter in late 2002 to compete with Microsoft"Sony knew they had to up their game when XBL came around, hence why the network adapter was released after XBOX. if there was no original xbox or xbox 360, the PSN would probably be just a shadow of what it is today. competition causes innovation dude.sts106mat
I hate to do this because you will come after me even more now. ""The machine is also equipped with one Type III PC card slot. In 2001, Sony will ship a PC Card Ethernet adapter so that the PS2 can connect directly to the Internet via a cable modem, Sonys Kutaragi said. At the same time, the vendor will sell a highcapacity hard drive for the PS2, he added. Though it is unclear what kinds of network services Sony is planning, Kutaragi said that he sees the PS2 as a new distribution system for music and movies. Sony Music Entertainment Japans CEO Shigeo Maruyama told IDG News Service that his company is readying Internet music services for the PS2, but he would not provide details."" http://articles.cnn.com/1999-09-14/tech/9909_14_ps2.idg_1_ken-kutaragi-sony-officials-ps2/3?_s=PM:TECH CNN September 1999............ Where in hell was the xbox on September 1999,hell that date was when the DC came out,now before you go into your usual denial,my link is from 1999 the xbox plans were first announce march 2000,and that was when the console was suppose to move 300 million polygons,when the Raven CG which was basically a lie was shown,in fact the xbox games were seen for the first time on january 2001 at Ces if i am not mistaken,which was also when MS claimed that developers were getting Toy Story graphics out of the xbox something that sony has been blame for without been true. Oh by the way it also confirm between MS and sony who had the HDD idea first,is the reason the PS2 since launch was born with the hole in the back,you can deny it all you want,Wiki is a joke compare to the 1999 link i gave you,Sony announce a network adapter before the xbox was even announce.
Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#103 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

Sony

And seriously? Microsoft is winning? I thought people here mostly hated them. :?

Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts

Sony

And seriously? Microsoft is winning? I thought people here mostly hated them. :?

Demonjoe93
PC gaming, bro.
Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#105 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

[QUOTE="Demonjoe93"]

Sony

And seriously? Microsoft is winning? I thought people here mostly hated them. :?

C_Rule

PC gaming, bro.

I guess that makes sense then. Whenever I think of Microsoft in gaming I think of Xbox. :P

Avatar image for brennanhuff
brennanhuff

957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 brennanhuff
Member since 2011 • 957 Posts

Since I care the most about online the vote goes to Microsoft.

Avatar image for hippiesanta
hippiesanta

10301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#107 hippiesanta
Member since 2005 • 10301 Posts
Sony, because they are the leader (exclusive), not follower (what sony have MS have @multiplats). I got nothing to say on nintendo.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#108 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

iD and Valve.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
That's the fact Jack and I didn't need wiki to explain it since I lived it and for the record: Ghost Recon > Socom by light-years. :PSecretPolice
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/tomclancysghostrecon/review.html?tag=summary%3Bread-review Ghost Recon 8.4 http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/socomusnavyseals/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B9 Socom 8.9 According to this site not it wasn't and it came 2 months after Socom so there is not excuse. His post was a joke,you don't develop games from 1 day to another,much less on the extremely difficult PS2,even less early on its life,socom was on the making for more than 2 years,it online component were not done from one day to another. But proving him wrong is far more easy. ""Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3 has the unique distinction of being the very first online game available for the PlayStation 2. As of this writing, Sony's own online adapter isn't available, but Neversoft has included support for USB modems and USB Ethernet adapters."" http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/sports/tonyhawksproskater3/review.html?tag=summary%3Bread-review&page=3 THPS 3 was release on October 2001,the xbox wasn't even out,but THPS3 was already online ready,even that the network adapter in US did not make it until summer 2002. Hell online play on the xbox when it was first announce was vague reference to online play,rather than claiming to have a service like xbox live,and in no part they mention anything about a fee for online gaming,hell that was the time where DVD playing was suppose to be free and out of the box,but as the console progress they change their plans,which is why Live arrive on 2002.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45634 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]That's the fact Jack and I didn't need wiki to explain it since I lived it and for the record: Ghost Recon > Socom by light-years. :Ptormentos
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/tomclancysghostrecon/review.html?tag=summary%3Bread-review Ghost Recon 8.4 http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/socomusnavyseals/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B9 Socom 8.9 According to this site not it wasn't and it came 2 months after Socom so there is not excuse. His post was a joke,you don't develop games from 1 day to another,much less on the extremely difficult PS2,even less early on its life,socom was on the making for more than 2 years,it online component were not done from one day to another. But proving him wrong is far more easy. ""Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3 has the unique distinction of being the very first online game available for the PlayStation 2. As of this writing, Sony's own online adapter isn't available, but Neversoft has included support for USB modems and USB Ethernet adapters."" http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/sports/tonyhawksproskater3/review.html?tag=summary%3Bread-review&page=3 THPS 3 was release on October 2001,the xbox wasn't even out,but THPS3 was already online ready,even that the network adapter in US did not make it until summer 2002. Hell online play on the xbox when it was first announce was vague reference to online play,rather than claiming to have a service like xbox live,and in no part they mention anything about a fee for online gaming,hell that was the time where DVD playing was suppose to be free and out of the box,but as the console progress they change their plans,which is why Live arrive on 2002.

The score variance must be from the higher standards placed on the Xbox :o no, seriously, but I dunno, like most things, it comes down to preference and for me, the first GR was phenom in it's realistic feeling for it's time and I probably spent more time on-line with it then any other game last gen. tho PSO & NFL 2K comes pretty close.

The stuff about on-line, IMO, it was SEGA with the DC that originally pushed Sony to do more and MS with XBL the further pushed Sony. See, I was just agreeing that Sony needs pushing from competition so it's all good. :P

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="sts106mat"] The argument isn't about who was first, if it was wouldn't Sega have been there. fact is xbl was a much better service than psn, if MS hadn't inovated and made live better with 360 Sony probably wouldn't have bothered. I don't think MS or Sony have contributed more than Nintendo. at the end of the day it doesn't matter what the answer is, we wouldn't be here without Sony, ninty or ms

The argument wasn't about who was first.? ""Sony knew they had to up their game when XBL came around, hence why the network adapter was released after XBOX." The why you quote such a lame article from Wiki. The network adapter was release on Japan before the xbox was even launch,THPS3 was release on October 2001 and was online ready before the xbox was even launch,explain to me how Never soft had an online game,before the xbox was even launch,if the network adapter was a response to the xbox.? Actually on Snes and Genesis there was the Xband. Actually no is not,it has some features the PS3 lack,but PSN also has features live also lack,and when you take $60 into account is even worst,not been able to fully use your games out of the box if you don't pay is a joke. Like i already accepted in the post you firstly quote,several features would probably would not be here,and that can't be deny,from that to claim what you claim was stretching the truth. Nintendo sell you $50 dollars games now because of sony,funny they did not learn hardware wise,because at $250 the wii was to expensive,and look at the 3DS as reference of what happen when companies like Nintendo try to abuse their user base with over priced hardware.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
The score variance must be from the higher standards placed on the Xbox :o no, seriously, but I dunno, like most things, it comes down to preference and for me, the first GR was phenom in it's realistic feeling for it's time and I probably spent more time on-line with it then any other game last gen. tho PSO & NFL 2K comes pretty close.The stuff about on-line, IMO, it was SEGA with the DC that originally pushed Sony to do more and MS with XBL the further pushed Sony. See, I was just agreeing that Sony needs pushing from competition so it's all good. :PSecretPolice
lol Higher standards placed on the xbox..lol The Saturn also by sega was actually online before the DC,but before that the genesis and Snes with the Xband. Feature wise MS actually did push sony,but saying sony would have not evolve or something like it is a joke,the PS2 was online before xbox live with voice chat,on of the main features on xbox live.
Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#114 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

What, no "other" option?

I personally would have chosen Take Two. Bioshock redefined single player shooters with an amazing story and tons to explore.

Rockstar ended up releasing 3 games that helped change and elevate gaming. GTA IV was a masterpiece with the highest scores in gaming this gen, and shaped what we expect and want from DLC.

Red Dead Redemption became the best Western game ever and again had a flurry of high scores and sales, with an emphasis on story that is very much moving gaming forward.

Finally, LA Noire gave us a new type of adventure game and introduced faces that broke the uncanny valley.

Of course since Take Two isn't here, I'll pick Sony. Heavy Rain did a lot for story based gaming and the Uncharted games are some mega hits, plus they do have a HUGE amount of games to their name.

Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#116 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts
[QUOTE="tormentos"]MS has done so many bad thins this gen no one can consider them as having best contributed to this gen. Support a $10 dollar price increase at the start of the generation without justification,then doing the same with xbox live. XBL $60 dollars a year. RROD Over priced peripherals. Stagnation of prices by refusing to lower the price of the console accordingly to its age and pass the savings to the consumer. Horrible xbox live policy's that force developer to charge for content even if they don't want to,if they refuse MS hold the DLC for ever. Ads on a service which you pay for. Some of the reasons why MS should not even been consider.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Microsoft gave the worst contributions: made DLC popular, worst quality hardware ever, charging for online, weak first party and buying and closing down studios, timed exclusivity, overly expensive accessories, etc Sony at least gave people a strong first party with great new Ips.

We're all totally shocked that you guys took this (and every) opportunity to bash MS.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="dommeus"] We're all totally shocked that you guys took this (and every) opportunity to bash MS.

Don't single me out is a thread about who has contribute more to gaming this generation,this is system war,if you or any one else want only to read pro xbox 360 comments i suggest you tell the dude who made the thread to make one similar about the xbox 360 and MS contribution on the MS 360 room. Other wise don't point finger dude every one here is pro or against something.
Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#118 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts
I say Sony. They have taken more chances with their exclusive titles and have broken new ground with a bunch of them: 1) Uncharted has set a new bar for action/adventure gaming. 2) Little Big Planet introduced Play/Create/Share and pushed user generated content to a new level which is now in more of their games like Mod Nation Racers and Infamous 2. 3) Infamous opened up the traditional super hero action formula into an open world experience. 4) Motorstorm took the traditional offroad racing formula to a whole new level. 5) MAG is doing battles on a scale not seen outside of WOW. 6) Heavy Rain and Valkyria Chronicles are ground breaking their own right. 7) They have brought MMO's to consoles with DCU Online and FF14 (even though it isnt very good). 8 ) Their online is free and allows them to share online experiences like Portal 2 with Valve. I could keep going. But you get the picture. They have done far more than just the same formulas with better graphics.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="sts106mat"] All of that is ok, like I said though MS emphasis on xbl forced Sony to up their game. They still aren't at the same level, trophies came after achievements, still no party chat etc, MS definitely innovated this Gen as well dude. notice i haven,t said they made the best contribution either

That is right and no one can't deny that either Trophies came after achievements. No not party chat,do to how the PS3 was build. But what about Home.? Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it doesn't count,youtube upload.? How are any of those tied to MS,hell wasn't MS making an arcade type thing where your avatar could walk.? and select what machine you want to play.? Can't you do that at Home already.? They had do some innovation,but sadly they had do so questionable things as well,which work only on their best interest and not in the consumer one which is you.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="dommeus"][QUOTE="tormentos"]MS has done so many bad thins this gen no one can consider them as having best contributed to this gen. Support a $10 dollar price increase at the start of the generation without justification,then doing the same with xbox live. XBL $60 dollars a year. RROD Over priced peripherals. Stagnation of prices by refusing to lower the price of the console accordingly to its age and pass the savings to the consumer. Horrible xbox live policy's that force developer to charge for content even if they don't want to,if they refuse MS hold the DLC for ever. Ads on a service which you pay for. Some of the reasons why MS should not even been consider.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Microsoft gave the worst contributions: made DLC popular, worst quality hardware ever, charging for online, weak first party and buying and closing down studios, timed exclusivity, overly expensive accessories, etc Sony at least gave people a strong first party with great new Ips.

We're all totally shocked that you guys took this (and every) opportunity to bash MS.

So the truth is bashing now? :|
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

lol Higher standards placed on the xbox..lol tormentos

Protip: when something is followed by "no, seriously" it means it's a joke.

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts
[QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"]I say Sony. They have taken more chances with their exclusive titles and have broken new ground with a bunch of them: 1) Uncharted has set a new bar for action/adventure gaming. 2) Little Big Planet introduced Play/Create/Share and pushed user generated content to a new level which is now in more of their games like Mod Nation Racers and Infamous 2. 3) Infamous opened up the traditional super hero action formula into an open world experience. 4) Motorstorm took the traditional offroad racing formula to a whole new level. 5) MAG is doing battles on a scale not seen outside of WOW. 6) Heavy Rain and Valkyria Chronicles are ground breaking their own right. 7) They have brought MMO's to consoles with DCU Online and FF14 (even though it isnt very good). 8 ) Their online is free and allows them to share online experiences like Portal 2 with Valve. I could keep going. But you get the picture. They have done far more than just the same formulas with better graphics.

Thank you, for providing me with so much entertainment.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="waltefmoney"][QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"]I say Sony. They have taken more chances with their exclusive titles and have broken new ground with a bunch of them: 1) Uncharted has set a new bar for action/adventure gaming. 2) Little Big Planet introduced Play/Create/Share and pushed user generated content to a new level which is now in more of their games like Mod Nation Racers and Infamous 2. 3) Infamous opened up the traditional super hero action formula into an open world experience. 4) Motorstorm took the traditional offroad racing formula to a whole new level. 5) MAG is doing battles on a scale not seen outside of WOW. 6) Heavy Rain and Valkyria Chronicles are ground breaking their own right. 7) They have brought MMO's to consoles with DCU Online and FF14 (even though it isnt very good). 8 ) Their online is free and allows them to share online experiences like Portal 2 with Valve. I could keep going. But you get the picture. They have done far more than just the same formulas with better graphics.

Thank you, for providing me with so much entertainment.

No thanks Sony..:lol:
Avatar image for I_am_a_PS3_FB
I_am_a_PS3_FB

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 I_am_a_PS3_FB
Member since 2009 • 400 Posts

Sony definitely.

Microsoft just rips off ideas and throws money at things until they get a crappy product and then they release it a year ahead of the competition and hope for the best. luckily xbox is dead now, Playstation is the future of gaming. microsoft should stick to making pendrives and stuff..

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

No thanks Sony..:lol:tormentos

Are you saying Sony brainwashed him? That's a heavy accusation.

Avatar image for dommeus
dommeus

9433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#126 dommeus
Member since 2004 • 9433 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="dommeus"][QUOTE="tormentos"] [QUOTE="kuraimen"]Microsoft gave the worst contributions: made DLC popular, worst quality hardware ever, charging for online, weak first party and buying and closing down studios, timed exclusivity, overly expensive accessories, etc Sony at least gave people a strong first party with great new Ips.

We're all totally shocked that you guys took this (and every) opportunity to bash MS.

So the truth is bashing now? :|

In a thread about which company has made the BEST contribution to gaming, you both decided to slate MS. So yes, that is bashing.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="dommeus"] In a thread about which company has made the BEST contribution to gaming, you both decided to slate MS. So yes, that is bashing.

Yes which is my opinions which is no better than yours. That is the problem while MS has done some contribution,many of it has been bad,were ever you think i am right or not,that is a fact starting by their disregard of the consumer with the RROD problem,which took them nearly 2 years to actually take serious.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"]No thanks Sony..:lol:I_am_a_PS3_FB

Are you saying Sony brainwashed him? That's a heavy accusation.

Thats kinda funny :) I think my 2nd grade cousin couldve understood that..

but then.. I'm not calling you dumb or anything.. I mean not that I wouldnt.. but then.. you are kind of on the dim side arent you?

Which is why i ignore him i know some of the people who quote me love to turn things i say upside down.
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Thats kinda funny :) I think my 2nd grade cousin couldve understood that..

but then.. I'm not calling you dumb or anything.. I mean not that I wouldnt.. but then.. you are kind of on the dim side arent you?

I_am_a_PS3_FB

Holy crap, a guy can't make a joke around here without having cows insult him.

Avatar image for I_am_a_PS3_FB
I_am_a_PS3_FB

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 I_am_a_PS3_FB
Member since 2009 • 400 Posts

[QUOTE="I_am_a_PS3_FB"]

Thats kinda funny :) I think my 2nd grade cousin couldve understood that..

but then.. I'm not calling you dumb or anything.. I mean not that I wouldnt.. but then.. you are kind of on the dim side arent you?

waltefmoney

Holy crap, a guy can't make a joke around here without having cows insult him.

Who got a insulted? and I dont see how a cow could insult anyone I mean.. I dont know many people who get insulted when a cow goes "moo"

I was just pointing out that since what tormentos said was perfectly clear, you obvious hesitancy to understand exactly what he meant.. could be interpreted as a lower intelligence level. so in retrospect I think those werent the perfect choice of words for my part, as you appear to be insulted, rest assured that this was not my intention.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="dommeus"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="dommeus"] We're all totally shocked that you guys took this (and every) opportunity to bash MS.

So the truth is bashing now? :|

In a thread about which company has made the BEST contribution to gaming, you both decided to slate MS. So yes, that is bashing.

To make an argument for the best you have to consider the worst option, otherwise there's no way to compare or decide which is "best" :|
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Who got a insulted? and I dont see how a cow could insult anyone I mean.. I dont know many people who get insulted when a cow goes "moo"

I was just pointing out that since what tormentos said was perfectly clear, you obvious hesitancy to understand exactly what he meant.. could be interpreted as a lower intelligence level. so in retrospect I think those werent the perfect choice of words for my part, as you appear to be insulted, rest assured that this was not my intention.

I_am_a_PS3_FB

Of course it wasn't. I mean, it's not like you're here to troll or anything and it's not like I made it perfectly obvious I was joking.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#134 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Nintendo. The only company to actually make positive, consumer-oriented changes.
Avatar image for I_am_a_PS3_FB
I_am_a_PS3_FB

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 I_am_a_PS3_FB
Member since 2009 • 400 Posts

[QUOTE="I_am_a_PS3_FB"]

Who got a insulted? and I dont see how a cow could insult anyone I mean.. I dont know many people who get insulted when a cow goes "moo"

I was just pointing out that since what tormentos said was perfectly clear, you obvious hesitancy to understand exactly what he meant.. could be interpreted as a lower intelligence level. so in retrospect I think those werent the perfect choice of words for my part, as you appear to be insulted, rest assured that this was not my intention.

waltefmoney

Of course it wasn't. I mean, it's not like you're here to troll or anything and it's not like I made it perfectly obvious I was joking.

Of course not, trolling..? big 'no no' for me ! its way below me to be honest :)

So back to topic I suppose?

Avatar image for I_am_a_PS3_FB
I_am_a_PS3_FB

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 I_am_a_PS3_FB
Member since 2009 • 400 Posts

TBH I think EA doesnt even deserve to be on that list ! sure they had some good games, but their contribution this gen is marginal at best !

Avatar image for Haiyama
Haiyama

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Haiyama
Member since 2011 • 206 Posts

I say Sony. They have taken more chances with their exclusive titles and have broken new ground with a bunch of them: 1) Uncharted has set a new bar for action/adventure gaming. 2) Little Big Planet introduced Play/Create/Share and pushed user generated content to a new level which is now in more of their games like Mod Nation Racers and Infamous 2. 3) Infamous opened up the traditional super hero action formula into an open world experience. 4) Motorstorm took the traditional offroad racing formula to a whole new level. 5) MAG is doing battles on a scale not seen outside of WOW. 6) Heavy Rain and Valkyria Chronicles are ground breaking their own right. 7) They have brought MMO's to consoles with DCU Online and FF14 (even though it isnt very good). 8 ) Their online is free and allows them to share online experiences like Portal 2 with Valve. I could keep going. But you get the picture. They have done far more than just the same formulas with better graphics.-ArchAngeL-777-

Besides number 8, everything else is...... :lol:

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Of course not, trolling..? big 'no no' for me ! its way below me to be honest :)

So back to topic I suppose?

I_am_a_PS3_FB

Of course not. Someone with a username like "I_am_a_PS3_FB" trolling? That's ridiculous.

Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#139 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

valve

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#140 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

I revise my vote. iD, Valve, Blizzard, Black Isle, Nintendo, and Mythic Entertainment.

Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#141 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts

[QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"]I say Sony. They have taken more chances with their exclusive titles and have broken new ground with a bunch of them: 1) Uncharted has set a new bar for action/adventure gaming. 2) Little Big Planet introduced Play/Create/Share and pushed user generated content to a new level which is now in more of their games like Mod Nation Racers and Infamous 2. 3) Infamous opened up the traditional super hero action formula into an open world experience. 4) Motorstorm took the traditional offroad racing formula to a whole new level. 5) MAG is doing battles on a scale not seen outside of WOW. 6) Heavy Rain and Valkyria Chronicles are ground breaking their own right. 7) They have brought MMO's to consoles with DCU Online and FF14 (even though it isnt very good). 8 ) Their online is free and allows them to share online experiences like Portal 2 with Valve. I could keep going. But you get the picture. They have done far more than just the same formulas with better graphics.Haiyama

Besides number 8, everything else is...... :lol:

Glad I could give everyone a good laugh :lol: For those of us who dont want to play the next COD wannabe shooter, these have been significant strides for console gaming. What is everyone else doing on that list that is so special: 1) Activision hasnt done squat except buy Blizzard and COD and then destroy Infinity Ward in the process. 2) EA is consumed with taking down COD so bad they are altering the formulas of all their shooters to be COD clones...that is when they arent putting out the annual sports game milkage and pushing down original concepts like Mirror's Edge. 3) Microsoft already had Live, Halo, Forza, and Fable from last gen, so they dont count as this gen advances. So I guess Kinect and Gears of War are their contributions? Windows Vista maybe? Oh wait...Windows 7 fixed that right? LOL 4) Nintendo gave us the motion control craze which I cant tell is a blessing or a curse at this point. I know 360 has sold out to it which is why I dont own one. Thank God the Move isnt Sony's sole focus. I dont know what else to say. Sony's only bad move was pricing. Everything else they have done is a solid advancement...even the BluRay.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

lol, can you even imagine what this gen would have been like without ms?

we'd be all hyped up for this falls release of lair 3, haze 3, genji 4 and a patch that finishes gt5.

tormentos

Yeah like the generation of the PS1 where MS wasn't here,oh wait what about the PS2 one,where the PS2 by far had the best games. If MS wasn't here just like Sega is not any more,sony would keep doing great games,just like they did with the PS2 and PS1.

i'm just saying ms actually showed up for the first 3 years of the gen which is something sony did not do.

it seemed to me sony had no intention of trying to put any effort into this gen until they got schooled by ms.

if sony had no competiton i doubt they would ever have tried to pull out of the tailspin.

Avatar image for p4s2p0
p4s2p0

4167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 p4s2p0
Member since 2010 • 4167 Posts

For home consoles I have to say wii they got their mojo back. Sony for portables which I never liked before psp, now its all I play.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

lol @ the current poll leader.

Cashing for online play, payable DLC and Kinect sure were great contributions :lol:

Avatar image for p4s2p0
p4s2p0

4167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 p4s2p0
Member since 2010 • 4167 Posts

lol @ the current poll leader.

Cashing for online play, payable DLC and Kinect sure were great contributions :lol:

nameless12345
I laughed too only contribution I want from microsoft is a stable console not breaking so much, been waitng 10yrs lol.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

lol, can you even imagine what this gen would have been like without ms?

we'd be all hyped up for this falls release of lair 3, haze 3, genji 4 and a patch that finishes gt5.

Yeah like the generation of the PS1 where MS wasn't here,oh wait what about the PS2 one,where the PS2 by far had the best games. If MS wasn't here just like Sega is not any more,sony would keep doing great games,just like they did with the PS2 and PS1.

ps1 was against the n64 and lost ps2 was such a crappy piece of hardware. no way you can defend that and cry about the RROD
Avatar image for I_am_a_PS3_FB
I_am_a_PS3_FB

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 I_am_a_PS3_FB
Member since 2009 • 400 Posts

[QUOTE="I_am_a_PS3_FB"]

Of course not, trolling..? big 'no no' for me ! its way below me to be honest :)

So back to topic I suppose?

waltefmoney

Of course not. Someone with a username like "I_am_a_PS3_FB" trolling? That's ridiculous.

Utterly Preposterous in fact! It borders on lunacy.. Its a assault on common sense to suggest otherwise..

SO back to topic I suppose?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#148 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50148 Posts
Bethesda comes to mind. :3
Avatar image for I_am_a_PS3_FB
I_am_a_PS3_FB

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 I_am_a_PS3_FB
Member since 2009 • 400 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

lol, can you even imagine what this gen would have been like without ms?

we'd be all hyped up for this falls release of lair 3, haze 3, genji 4 and a patch that finishes gt5.

mems_1224

Yeah like the generation of the PS1 where MS wasn't here,oh wait what about the PS2 one,where the PS2 by far had the best games. If MS wasn't here just like Sega is not any more,sony would keep doing great games,just like they did with the PS2 and PS1.

ps1 was against the n64 and lost ps2 was such a crappy piece of hardware. no way you can defend that and cry about the RROD

Yep, say that to my 9 year old PS2, its so unreliable ! It still hasnt broken.. However special mention must be given to the Xbox line of consoles as they manage to break every 3 years without fail and cause millions and millions of dollars losses to its users..

So yep :) Nothing more reliable than a Xbox .. No sir nothing at all..

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="mems_1224"] waa waaa waaa xbl costs money. who cares? you dont want to use the service dont. RROD, doesn't matter. PS2s last gen were built a lot worse and broke a lot too, no one holds that against sony over priced peripherals? like what? you didnt provide any examples why would they change the price when its already cheaper than ps3??? :| again, who cares? most dlc is a rip off anyways ads? who cares? they aren't even noticeable and take less than a second to skip all your arguments dont matter, you're just grasping for straws. happy now? :|tormentos
See now your at least trying Kudos for that. I care and many do and don't play online because they don't like to pay for it,saying who cares doesn't actually fix the problem,and is not actually a valid point you can use against people complaining about paying for live. The PS2 wasn't even close to the xbox 360,which doesn't had only 1 problem RROD are more than 10 hardware related problems,and the worst problem the PS2 suffer last gen DRE,is also suffer by the original xbox and the crappy thompsom drivers but unlike sony MS wasn't force to fix them on court because the hardware sold so bad,it was't as wide spread as the PS2,5% of 152 million units is allot,by the way the xbox 360 also suffer from DRE and is not cover by the 3 year RROD warranty. 20GB HDD for $99 when on PC they were $40. $99 dollar wifi adapter when on PC there were like $20 or less. $50 dollar controller without motion,or build in rechargeable battery. The HDD practice still continues today. http://www.gamestop.com/xbox-360/accessories/xbox-360-250gb-internal-hard-drive/83934 $129 for a 250 GB HDD. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152291 When for my PC i can buy one for $89 and the HDD is a whooping 1 Terabyte,hell i don't know but if my PS3 hold one that big i can have that for $89. So your argument to most of what i say is who cares..Thanks dude for proving my point.

to the people that play a lot of online games with friends live is worth it. psn isn't as user friendly i went through 4 ps2s. 3 because of DRE and one because the disc tray stopped working. ive only got 1 RROD on my xbox a year after i got it in 07 and since then have had no trouble. ps2s were equally crappy, the internet just wasnt as big none of those peripherals are essential, so not that big of a deal. and charging kits for controllers are like $10-15 online. no biggie. at least on xbox the charging cable is more than a footlong so i can play and charge at the same time. also i can just turn off my console and still charge my controller. cant do that on ps3 and cant play and charge at the same time with that short cable.