Which Console maker is the Greediest?

$ony.

MS 71% [137] Sony 10% [20] Nintendo 19% [36] Tony-Baxter

That's pretty much all that's needed to be said right there.

Microsoft, I guess.

Sony. $599 launch price with no Dualshock 3 or Backwards Compalibility? (cept for some 60gb units) That wasn't coolkumitekumite

[QUOTE="kumitekumite"]Sony. $599 launch price with no Dualshock 3 or Backwards Compalibility? (cept for some 60gb units) That wasn't coolTony-Baxter

Who cares

[QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"][QUOTE="kumitekumite"]Sony. $599 launch price with no Dualshock 3 or Backwards Compalibility? (cept for some 60gb units) That wasn't coolkumitekumite

[QUOTE="kumitekumite"][QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"] They were losing money off that price.Tony-Baxter

they all want as much money as they can possibly achieve... their stategies to go about getting that money is different for each company... don't believe that one company is more greedy than another- thats just really ignorant.

Microsoft by a landslide. Live Gold.

Microsoft then nintendo...kinect and 3DS is a gimmick and does not deliver the whole package. Games for 360 are mostly multiplats and time exclusive, wii games are aim for parents to spend just to make their children silence from whining while the hardcore gamers benefit little from ithippiesanta

Sony greedy to don't ignore it because you don't like Micorsoft.

I do like all three companies but lets be real here all of them all greedy duh

[QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"][QUOTE="kumitekumite"] yeah after the factkumitekumite

[QUOTE="kumitekumite"][QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"] Wasn't b/c included at launch?Tony-Baxter

I don't know, Sega couldn't do it with the Dreamcast, but somehow Sony does.

[QUOTE="Tony-Baxter"][QUOTE="kumitekumite"] the 20gb and 80gb didn't for some reason, but the 60gb did. but I think they learned from this mistake. there was an emulation thing going on for the 80gb i'm pretty sure though.kumitekumite

I don't know, Sega couldn't do it with the Dreamcast, but somehow Sony does.