Which game looks better? (Crysis or Killzone: Shadow Fall)

Because of newer technology, Killzone.

For a joke someone should post a pic of Far Cry 1 and pretend its Crysis, see how many people believe :P

Crysis looks better from a technical standpoint but Killzone has better art design which isn't saying much because it has shit art design.

I pick Killzone because vanilla Crysis looks rough as hell these days

But modded Crysis looks tasty (My own screenshots BTW)

PC is a valid gaming platform with it's own exclusive benefits i.e. create gaming content (not just game play videos) and share.

I think we can all take a wild guess as to what benefits most pc gamers take advantage of. Actually, publishers already did. Thats why Crysis is now a console game.

KZSF>vanilla crysis. Modded crysis>KZSF

Obviously modded crysis looks better. Can people post pics of vanilla crysis? It would be fairer since the poll is comparing Crysis (2007).

@trugs26: I posted a couple of vanilla Crysis images at page 2.

@jun_aka_pekto: Thanks. It is as I suspected, KZ looks better. Btw, those Crysis (2007) images are on max settings?

Vanilla? Yup. Very High at 1080p, DX10. I only have 4xAA though. KZS is more well-rounded when it comes to looks while Crysis looks both very good and very bad in places.

Oh Of course. Crysis doesn't look that good at all anymore, unless you mod it. Then it looks really good in screenshots.

KZ looks better still on a machine that would be a fraction of the one running that modded crysis

Killzone is blurry and low textures and low textures. IT DOES NOT RUN BETTER AND DOES NOT LOOK BETTER

You brainwashed Zaibach

KZ's textures aint blurry, whut? you posted tons of sharp and awesomely better than crysis pics in your op, you crazy, FFL

@Zaibach: I've played both modded Cryrsis 1 and KZSF recently. The textures are not bad at all in KZSF. Modded Crysis 1 has textures that are on par with KZSF, even better on some places and worse in others. What really brings down Crysis 1 (with mods) are the indoor environments. But modded Crysis 1 wins big over KZSF in outdoor level density, scale (enourmus playable areas in comparison) and draw distance.

The only things that are really better (from a technical stand point) in KZSF are character animations and much better indoor environments. Lighting and particle effects look good in both and it's hard to say which one does it best. I can understand however that many people prefer the futuristic look and cinematic style in KSZF.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPESh3i-fP8

even at the quality of youtube you can tell that without mods its nothing special

I think it's sad Shadowfall can't beat a 7 year old modded game

Reminds me of how Killzone 3 couldn't beat Modded Doom 3 & Half Life 2

Apparently some folks did not get the memo. Crysis is factually the most graphically overstated game in gaming history. The game was mediocre and its graphics is average at best by today's standards. Compare this inferior technology to modern day games and acting as if the most superior version visually of the series; Crysis 3 does not exist, demonstrates a level of disconnect that is downright disturbing. Factually Killzone Shadow Fall is superior to Crysis. Arguing to the contrary is being in deep sad denial. At the very least have the intellectual decency to compare it to Crysis 3.

It actually