Which game (in YOUR opinion) should have gotten a higher rating?
For me its MGS. It only got a 8.5!:(
Serously, MGS4 got a 10 but they give MGs a 8.5!:evil:
BTW,im new:)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Which game (in YOUR opinion) should have gotten a higher rating?
For me its MGS. It only got a 8.5!:(
Serously, MGS4 got a 10 but they give MGs a 8.5!:evil:
BTW,im new:)
Left 4 Dead, anyone thats played it will agree that it deserved at least a 9.5, it has the best replayability this gen.godofwar2610I played it and the frame rate drops in the game spoiled it too much. I do not know if this is the same with PC version but 360 version as soon as several zombies came upon screen it became intolerable. Heres a actual game which deserved higher... FFTA2
Left 4 Dead, anyone thats played it will agree that it deserved at least a 9.5, it has the best replayability this gen.godofwar2610objection, it launched as a 4 map game :| and the competitive MP was what a 2 map game. That was very little content for "best replayability this gen" Sure the game was something new, different, refreshing, and easily the best coop experience out there but best replayability this gen? not so much.
Yep, I agree... They should actually take two points off PDZ and give those to Ratchet:TOD, as it is equal with Mario for best platformer this gen.. Also Unchartered should have scored a 9. MGS a 9.5........ Motorstorm a 9, Resistance 1 a 9, also Dead Rising is a 9, Crackdown also deserved higher, and a couple of others I'm forgetting.Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction
identity crysis...
ImaPirate0202
[QUOTE="godofwar2610"]Left 4 Dead, anyone thats played it will agree that it deserved at least a 9.5, it has the best replayability this gen.jg4xchampobjection, it launched as a 4 map game :| and the competitive MP was what a 2 map game. That was very little content for "best replayability this gen" Sure the game was something new, different, refreshing, and easily the best coop experience out there but best replayability this gen? not so much.
amount of content =/= amount of replayability
YOU FAIL!
objection, it launched as a 4 map game :| and the competitive MP was what a 2 map game. That was very little content for "best replayability this gen" Sure the game was something new, different, refreshing, and easily the best coop experience out there but best replayability this gen? not so much.[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="godofwar2610"]Left 4 Dead, anyone thats played it will agree that it deserved at least a 9.5, it has the best replayability this gen.whatisazerg
amount of content =/= amount of replayability
YOU FAIL!
Left 4 Dead is good....But damn it is WAY too shallow to be a 9.5. I'd say the game got it's deserved score on here. It is good and belongs in my collection...But it has a plethorea of negatives that stop it being a aaa game this gen.....For starters the graphics are about on par with Haze..... It offers too little or next to nothing for the solo player experience to mention the two biggest flaws. It's positives is that it's a fun quick pick up and play, then throw away, fast paced arcade experience. But 9.5 on GS.....Please.[QUOTE="whatisazerg"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] objection, it launched as a 4 map game :| and the competitive MP was what a 2 map game. That was very little content for "best replayability this gen" Sure the game was something new, different, refreshing, and easily the best coop experience out there but best replayability this gen? not so much. Harry_Balzac
amount of content =/= amount of replayability
YOU FAIL!
Left 4 Dead is good....But damn it is WAY too shallow to be a 9.5. I'd say the game got it's deserved score on here. It is good and belongs in my collection...But it has a plethorea of negatives that stop it being a aaa game this gen.....For starters the graphics are about on par with Haze..... It offers too little or next to nothing for the solo player experience to mention the two biggest flaws. It's positives is that it's a fun quick pick up and play, then throw away, fast paced arcade experience. But 9.5 on GS.....Please.I'm not saying what the game deserved for a score.... but claiming the game doesn't have great replayability and then saying the reason why is because it was low on content, simply doesn't make any sense.
Left 4 Dead is good....But damn it is WAY too shallow to be a 9.5. I'd say the game got it's deserved score on here. It is good and belongs in my collection...But it has a plethorea of negatives that stop it being a aaa game this gen.....For starters the graphics are about on par with Haze..... It offers too little or next to nothing for the solo player experience to mention the two biggest flaws. It's positives is that it's a fun quick pick up and play, then throw away, fast paced arcade experience. But 9.5 on GS.....Please.[QUOTE="Harry_Balzac"][QUOTE="whatisazerg"]
amount of content =/= amount of replayability
YOU FAIL!
whatisazerg
I'm not saying what the game deserved for a score.... but claiming the game doesn't have great replayability and then saying the reason why is because it was low on content, simply doesn't make any sense.
Actually I would say that it makes a lot of sense
Left 4 Dead is good....But damn it is WAY too shallow to be a 9.5. I'd say the game got it's deserved score on here. It is good and belongs in my collection...But it has a plethorea of negatives that stop it being a aaa game this gen.....For starters the graphics are about on par with Haze..... It offers too little or next to nothing for the solo player experience to mention the two biggest flaws. It's positives is that it's a fun quick pick up and play, then throw away, fast paced arcade experience. But 9.5 on GS.....Please.[QUOTE="Harry_Balzac"][QUOTE="whatisazerg"]
amount of content =/= amount of replayability
YOU FAIL!
whatisazerg
I'm not saying what the game deserved for a score.... but claiming the game doesn't have great replayability and then saying the reason why is because it was low on content, simply doesn't make any sense.
I think it does in this day and age. Nobody in there right mind would deny the game is fun.....But due to it's limited content and overly simplistic mission structure (or lack therof) it simply is not as replayable as other games that have more content, hence more new stuff to discover on no. 2,3 and so on, playthroughs. If the game had more complexity, and new stuff to discover on 2 and so playthroughs, then more people would be compelled to give it a crack. If you love the game though, then obviously it is just a game that really suits your gaming needs....which is fair enough....I love zombies, and 1st person shooters....and the combo is a great idea....I just thought Valve fell way short of what potentially could have offered me the perfect solution to all the messed up Evil Dead videogame attempts that have come before. To me Dead Rising is a very replayable game, as there is so much you might not see on 1st and 2nd playthroughs....Whereas L4D being a run from point a to point b killing as many zombies as you can along the way......kind of doesn't offer the freedom in it's enviroments to allow too much discovery.Super Mario Galaxy
Metroid Prime 3
Zelda Twilight Princess
Street Fighter 4
Little Big Planet
Metal Gear Solid
Zelda Majoras Mask
[QUOTE="whatisazerg"]
[QUOTE="Harry_Balzac"] Left 4 Dead is good....But damn it is WAY too shallow to be a 9.5. I'd say the game got it's deserved score on here. It is good and belongs in my collection...But it has a plethorea of negatives that stop it being a aaa game this gen.....For starters the graphics are about on par with Haze..... It offers too little or next to nothing for the solo player experience to mention the two biggest flaws. It's positives is that it's a fun quick pick up and play, then throw away, fast paced arcade experience. But 9.5 on GS.....Please.macca404
I'm not saying what the game deserved for a score.... but claiming the game doesn't have great replayability and then saying the reason why is because it was low on content, simply doesn't make any sense.
Actually I would say that it makes a lot of sense
YOu and the other guy supporting the "low content = low replayability" argument.... need to look up the meaning of "REPLAY"ability.
Ratchet and clank review got me really mad.it should of gotten a 9.0Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction
identity crysis...
ImaPirate0202
Vampire: the Masquerade Bloodlines and Deus Ex. No one who's played either of them can say with credibility that their scores were justified.
zelda majoras mask
zone of the enders second runner
zelda tp
mario kart 64
metal gear solid
SMG (9,5 was not enough, considering gta4 and mgs4 got 10 lol)
metroid prime 3 corruption
madworld
Which game (in YOUR opinion) should have gotten a higher rating?
For me its MGS. It only got a 8.5!:(
Serously, MGS4 got a 10 but they give MGs a 8.5!:evil:
BTW,im new:)
welcome to system wars... where no logic resides within these threads! imo , uncharted shoulda got 9 , ratchet 8Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment