Which has produced better visuals, PS2 or Wii?

Wow we got some blind fanboys here:

SMG look better then any PS2 game, plus it look much better then these pics when seen in motion.

Wanderer5

[QUOTE="gearsofhalogeek"]

i have a wii and havent seen anything that graphically matches ico or shadow of the collosus. StarkJJ

Shadow of the Colossus had terrible jaggie graphics and animation. The only time the graphics were acceptable was during the monotonous boss battles. That game is sooooo horribly overrated. What a bad game to mention when talking about graphics...shudders...

It still was beautiful, through SMG still look better.

My ps2 pics i posted look betterkaangonultas

:roll: SMG has better textures, and look more beautiful then GOW II, MGS 3, and SHIII.

[QUOTE="kaangonultas"]

My ps2 pics i posted look betterWanderer5

:roll: SMG has better textures, and look more beautiful then GOW II, MGS 3, and SHIII.

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"][QUOTE="kaangonultas"]

My ps2 pics i posted look betterkaangonultas

:roll: SMG has better textures, and look more beautiful then GOW II, MGS 3, and SHIII.

:roll:At least it look great on many different setting, and it also has better lighting effects. Plus did I forget to mention that SMG has way better looking water then any of those games? I could just go on, to show that SMG look better, but I know you wouldn't listen.

[QUOTE="kaangonultas"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"][QUOTE="kaangonultas"]

My ps2 pics i posted look betterWanderer5

:roll: SMG has better textures, and look more beautiful then GOW II, MGS 3, and SHIII.

:roll:At least it look great on many different setting, and it also has better lighting effects. Plus did I forget to mention that SMG has way better looking water then any of those games?

hey he said it not me, i said it has no discernable difference and anyone thats actually looked at both games side by side can see no difference in the graphics (if there are any differences they are minimal) anyone that says differently is a blatant fanboy.

that all may be true, but side by side the naked eye cant tell the difference between any of that (sure you can tell a difference between mario 64 and SMS, but graphically SMG did not make as big of a jump from SMS as SMS did with SM64.

and i stand by my statement anyone that says they can see a drastic difference in graphics between SMS and SMG are blatant fanboys.

GOW2 AND MGS3 's water EFFECTS are again better than SMG'S.They have alot more reflections .kaangonultas

:lol: In your dreams. You obviously haven't seen the water effects in SMG.

[QUOTE="kaangonultas"]GOW2 AND MGS3 's water EFFECTS are again better than SMG'S.They have alot more reflections .Wanderer5

:lol: In your dreams. You obviously haven't seen the water effects in SMG.

LOL lame fanboys saying stuff about SMG and its graphics. Miyamoto is well known to always produce the best graphics from any system. If he was given a PS3, he would produce the best. If the PC, the best.

This same method of making games, hideo kojima also follows. Just look at MGS4. It looks brilliant.

I favor the PS2 considering the scale of some things, but the Wii is definitely more powerful than PS2.Aidenfury19

IYO? I took two of the most visually advanced games on the systems.

Wii:

PS2:

TheMysticHorse

this is a joke right? this better be a joke, because if it isnt, in gonna jump off a cliff so that i wont have to see dumb @$#% like this again.

three words, super mario galaxy. see that, i just failed ur two pics, and retarded point of view with just three words. dont do that again

wii has better grafics!!!

ps2 grafics are crap since xbox1 came in 2001

wii version

GC version

wii version

GC version

ps2

ps2

wii

ps2

wii

just a few examples