who got shafted the most this gen: sheep, lemmings, or cows?

  • 142 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#101 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

Sheep... but they didn't seem to notice at all.

fadersdream

But Sheep not only had Wii (Which had some great first party games) but they also have the DS (Which had some great first and 3rd party games)

Avatar image for hippiesanta
hippiesanta

10301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#102 hippiesanta
Member since 2005 • 10301 Posts
I would say lems and sheep equally. Casual became their king, with one dropping exclusives to practically zip.ispeakfact
This is the real answer!
Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#103 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
i change my answer to hermits. they miss out on playing games with friends locally and stay in their rooms all day.
Avatar image for GamerwillzPS
GamerwillzPS

8531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 GamerwillzPS
Member since 2012 • 8531 Posts

Lems because Microsoft screwed them over by focusing on Kinect, so all Lems got is Halo, Gears and Forza.

Also Microsoft is forcing Lems to pay £40 to play online. They are basically paying for nothing.

Avatar image for Inotian
Inotian

274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Inotian
Member since 2012 • 274 Posts

This is actually a toughie. I'd say Lems, since Sheep at least had the DS to fall back on.

Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
Nengo_Flow

10644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Nengo_Flow
Member since 2011 • 10644 Posts
06- spring 08 = cows ever since then, Lems but yeah sheeps really got the short end of the stick, crap online, waititng for ever for 1 or 2 games a year, barely any 3rd party support
Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts

[QUOTE="fadersdream"]

Sheep... but they didn't seem to notice at all.

Nintendo_Ownes7

But Sheep not only had Wii (Which had some great first party games) but they also have the DS (Which had some great first and 3rd party games)

That would be great if the Wii played DS games but it doesn't. Handheld gaming is irrelevant when discussing the main "system wars". Sure the DS is great, but the DS being great doesn't save the Wii from being terribad since they're 2 completely different systems. Just because someone owns a Wii doesn't mean they own a DS. Handheld gaming should always be considered a completely separate entity from console gaming. ANYONE can own a DS whether they have a Wii, 360, PS3, or PC. Most people don't stay "loyal" from which console they own to their handheld as well. If so, that's just fanboyish and sad.
Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#108 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

[QUOTE="fadersdream"]

Sheep... but they didn't seem to notice at all.

Nintendo_Ownes7

But Sheep not only had Wii (Which had some great first party games) but they also have the DS (Which had some great first and 3rd party games)

So we're including PSP in this now? What about Live Arcade? Even so, I felt the Handhelds really didn't do anything to move the genre forward. More people can name facebook apps than can name 3DS games. Quality Vs. Quantity. If someone says there were this many games then somebody says how many were good? If someone says there was this one great game somebody says why so few? . Rules get too ambiguous here.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697

7110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#109 deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
Member since 2002 • 7110 Posts

I would say Sheep and Lems.

  1. Sheep - all the BS talk about Wii getting more 3rd Party suport NEVER happened :lol: At the end, Wii sales have slowed signigicantly and the hype train has derailed :lol:
  2. Lemmings - the RROD - buyinga 360 multiple times and top of that paying for Live, the most severely SHAFTED of the group. The only redeeming qualities are 3rd party support and very few exclusives. At the end of the day, desperate Lemmings end up making countless Alt New Accounts 24/7 just to bash Sony because out of FEAR, JELLY, FEAR and JELLY, because Sony has gained momentum and had a slow start, and astoshingly gained excellent 3rd party support and exclusives.
Avatar image for Myounage
Myounage

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Myounage
Member since 2006 • 254 Posts
PC gamers, because keyboard and mouse are sooo yesterdayhippiesanta
Which is why, whenever a company tries cross-platform multiplayer, the PC gamers never lose right? Even when they use cash tourney console players against average PC players?
Avatar image for Myounage
Myounage

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Myounage
Member since 2006 • 254 Posts
i change my answer to hermits. they miss out on playing games with friends locally and stay in their rooms all day.ZumaJones07
>Got 1080P games >Free multiplayer better than XBL >Entire genres that are exclusive (Halo Wars and Civ Rev are so watered down compared to real strategy games that they don't count) >The highest quality exclusives >Significantly shorter loading times in almost all games >Shooter controls that don't need annoying aim-assist >No aim-assist in any multiplayer game Sure.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

true story.

the other day my buddy rented starhawk and was all excited to play it.

he puts it in and it asked him for his online pass or cash so he could play it.

my question to sw is, why does ms get called out for charging for online yet sony does the same stuff and nobody acts like it is any big deal?

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#116 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

true story.

the other day my buddy rented starhawk and was all excited to play it.

he puts it in and it asked him for his online pass or cash so he could play it.

my question to sw is, why does ms get called out for charging for online yet sony does the same stuff and nobody acts like it is any big deal?

Riverwolf007

The big difference is if you buy a PS3 game new and a 360 game new, you can only play the PS3 game online without extra fees.

Avatar image for Raymundo_Manuel
Raymundo_Manuel

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Raymundo_Manuel
Member since 2010 • 4641 Posts

true story.

the other day my buddy rented starhawk and was all excited to play it.

he puts it in and it asked him for his online pass or cash so he could play it.

my question to sw is, why does ms get called out for charging for online yet sony does the same stuff and nobody acts like it is any big deal?

Riverwolf007

Because PS3 fans like DRM

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

true story.

the other day my buddy rented starhawk and was all excited to play it.

he puts it in and it asked him for his online pass or cash so he could play it.

my question to sw is, why does ms get called out for charging for online yet sony does the same stuff and nobody acts like it is any big deal?

Bigboi500

The big difference is if you buy a PS3 game new and a 360 game new, you can only play the PS3 game online without extra fees.

charging for online play is charging.

for those of us that rent games there seems to be little difference.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#119 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

true story.

the other day my buddy rented starhawk and was all excited to play it.

he puts it in and it asked him for his online pass or cash so he could play it.

my question to sw is, why does ms get called out for charging for online yet sony does the same stuff and nobody acts like it is any big deal?

Riverwolf007

The big difference is if you buy a PS3 game new and a 360 game new, you can only play the PS3 game online without extra fees.

charging for online play is charging.

for those of us that rent games there seems to be little difference.

For those of us that buy games new, there is a big difference.

Avatar image for BibiMaghoo
BibiMaghoo

4018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#120 BibiMaghoo
Member since 2009 • 4018 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

true story.

the other day my buddy rented starhawk and was all excited to play it.

he puts it in and it asked him for his online pass or cash so he could play it.

my question to sw is, why does ms get called out for charging for online yet sony does the same stuff and nobody acts like it is any big deal?

Raymundo_Manuel

Because PS3 fans like DRM

Yeah man, it's not like any 360 games have onlines passes aswell as require a gold fee. Silly Cows :lol:
Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#121 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts

Well, 360 owners got shafted hardest IMO.

Out of PC, PS3, and 360 the 360 uses the least dedicated servers for its AAA games. That means the actual nuts and bolts of multiplayer is the lowest quality on Xbox. And you pay for it too. They were also forced to pay for DLC everyone else got for free because Microsoft thought they should (COD4, Left 4 Dead, TF2).

Owning a 360 and being proud of it means you're proud to have bought into a closed platform where the company running it has no problem going between you and the developer, taking free content the developer wanted to give to you, and then slapping a price sticker on it. Lemmings have it worst, just as hermits have it best.

Myounage

but it has teh crossgamechat , so its worth the payment :D

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

true story.

the other day my buddy rented starhawk and was all excited to play it.

he puts it in and it asked him for his online pass or cash so he could play it.

my question to sw is, why does ms get called out for charging for online yet sony does the same stuff and nobody acts like it is any big deal?

BibiMaghoo

Because PS3 fans like DRM

Yeah man, it's not like any 360 games have onlines passes aswell as require a gold fee. Silly Cows :lol:

lol, you are totally right but still charging is charging.

i can totally see why it is a stupid argument and all but at the very base the accusation has always been ms holding multiplayer hostage and i see little difference in both companies tactics of pay us money or you don't get to pay. (ms just charges more)

also i have never been against online passes because i think devs get screwed pretty badly over the used market but once again i have to say that once all is said and done charging is charging.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Myounage"]

Well, 360 owners got shafted hardest IMO.

Out of PC, PS3, and 360 the 360 uses the least dedicated servers for its AAA games. That means the actual nuts and bolts of multiplayer is the lowest quality on Xbox. And you pay for it too. They were also forced to pay for DLC everyone else got for free because Microsoft thought they should (COD4, Left 4 Dead, TF2).

Owning a 360 and being proud of it means you're proud to have bought into a closed platform where the company running it has no problem going between you and the developer, taking free content the developer wanted to give to you, and then slapping a price sticker on it. Lemmings have it worst, just as hermits have it best.

AmnesiaHaze

but it has teh crossgamechat , so its worth the payment :D

lol, you call it teh crossgame chat while i call it grabbing four friends and being able to squad up drag them from a game of bf43 to a game of co-op halo to a team match in dirt 3 all the while never breaking up the party and keeping us all on the same side and getting in more actual game time in as opposed to messing around joining and rejoining each other.

maybe it is silly to care about it but i like it and makes gaming so much simpler, faster and streamlined.

the sw myth that we are talking about cute purses and boys while we all play a bunch of seperate games is nothing but bullshyt.

Avatar image for BibiMaghoo
BibiMaghoo

4018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 BibiMaghoo
Member since 2009 • 4018 Posts

[QUOTE="BibiMaghoo"][QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]

Because PS3 fans like DRM

Riverwolf007

Yeah man, it's not like any 360 games have onlines passes aswell as require a gold fee. Silly Cows :lol:

lol, you are totally right but still charging is charging.

i can totally see why it is a stupid argument and all but at the very base the accusation has always been ms holding multiplayer hostage and i see little difference in both companies tactics of pay us money or you don't get to pay. (ms just charges more)

also i have never been against online passes because i think devs get screwed pretty badly over the used market but once again i have to say that once all is said and done charging is charging.

I think it's usefull when discussing this to remember that third party publishers introduced online passes to both consoles. Even so, such a thing has existed for an age on PC with CD keys. With a game that uses dedicated servers for an online component, I have no issue with it at all. With a single player game, or a game that uses p2p servers, I find it greedy and loathe the practice, but ultimatly understandable. They are after your money after all. I don't think online passes can be used in any way though, to balance the cost of XBL against the first party online pass games of the PS3. Each game purchased new has that pass, so it is only an additional cost if buying the game used. This applies to the 360 also, but still carries the cost of live on top of it.
Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#125 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

Of course there is a difference. Charging is charging?

Sony is charging for the game, as is anyone who is selling a game. The online pass is there way of charging people for the game, as a used game buyer or renter hasn't bought anything from them.

I don't like online passes, nor do I particularly like any of the tactics used by these companies to attack used games, but the online pass is pretty easy to justify. That being said, games that use p2p online such as Uncharted 3 shouldn't be using these things, as the online isn't even a service at that point.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="BibiMaghoo"] Yeah man, it's not like any 360 games have onlines passes aswell as require a gold fee. Silly Cows :lol: BibiMaghoo

lol, you are totally right but still charging is charging.

i can totally see why it is a stupid argument and all but at the very base the accusation has always been ms holding multiplayer hostage and i see little difference in both companies tactics of pay us money or you don't get to pay. (ms just charges more)

also i have never been against online passes because i think devs get screwed pretty badly over the used market but once again i have to say that once all is said and done charging is charging.

I think it's usefull when discussing this to remember that third party publishers introduced online passes to both consoles. Even so, such a thing has existed for an age on PC with CD keys. With a game that uses dedicated servers for an online component, I have no issue with it at all. With a single player game, or a game that uses p2p servers, I find it greedy and loathe the practice, but ultimatly understandable. They are after your money after all. I don't think online passes can be used in any way though, to balance the cost of XBL against the first party online pass games of the PS3. Each game purchased new has that pass, so it is only an additional cost if buying the game used. This applies to the 360 also, but still carries the cost of live on top of it.

yeah but i am bringing the whole thing up because it specifically affected my buddy when i went to hang out with him a few days ago.

this is not one of the normal sw hypothetical arguments.

this was a real world kind of thing in which my buddy was all hyped to play starhawk rented it and could not play it.

i think sw has a tendency to give hypothetical doom and gloom shyt a priority while ignoring actual real world consequences.

in the situation that i ran into the entirety of the problem was here was a game sitting in the system and to play it it required a fee to be paid.

ms being worse and xbl being a rip was not a part of it, no matter what sort of gyp xbl is we were sitting there with an unplayable game.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

Of course there is a difference. Charging is charging?

Sony is charging for the game, as is anyone who is selling a game. The online pass is there way of charging people for the game, as a used game buyer or renter hasn't bought anything from them.

I don't like online passes, nor do I particularly like any of the tactics used by these companies to attack used games, but the online pass is pretty easy to justify. That being said, games that use p2p online such as Uncharted 3 shouldn't be using these things, as the online isn't even a service at that point.

Pug-Nasty

i think it is justified also but when we look at big games with passes i notice a pile of sony 1st party does it while what is left of the ms 1st party (lol) does not do it.

does ms get any credit for this or are they still just as evil while we turn a blind eye to resistence, uncharted, socom, ratchet and clank, twisted metal and whichever else that are all huge titles for sony and all have passes.

(also i'm just doing this from memory so if some of those are not 1st party then my bad just point them out)

Avatar image for Raymundo_Manuel
Raymundo_Manuel

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Raymundo_Manuel
Member since 2010 • 4641 Posts

[QUOTE="Raymundo_Manuel"]

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

true story.

the other day my buddy rented starhawk and was all excited to play it.

he puts it in and it asked him for his online pass or cash so he could play it.

my question to sw is, why does ms get called out for charging for online yet sony does the same stuff and nobody acts like it is any big deal?

BibiMaghoo

Because PS3 fans like DRM

Yeah man, it's not like any 360 games have onlines passes aswell as require a gold fee. Silly Cows :lol:

You're right, I should have specified fanboys given the fact that it is Sony themselves pushing the DRM.

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#130 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"]

[QUOTE="Myounage"]

Well, 360 owners got shafted hardest IMO.

Out of PC, PS3, and 360 the 360 uses the least dedicated servers for its AAA games. That means the actual nuts and bolts of multiplayer is the lowest quality on Xbox. And you pay for it too. They were also forced to pay for DLC everyone else got for free because Microsoft thought they should (COD4, Left 4 Dead, TF2).

Owning a 360 and being proud of it means you're proud to have bought into a closed platform where the company running it has no problem going between you and the developer, taking free content the developer wanted to give to you, and then slapping a price sticker on it. Lemmings have it worst, just as hermits have it best.

but it has teh crossgamechat , so its worth the payment :D

lol, you call it teh crossgame chat while i call it grabbing four friends and being able to squad up drag them from a game of bf43 to a game of co-op halo to a team match in dirt 3 all the while never breaking up the party and keeping us all on the same side and getting in more actual game time in as opposed to messing around joining and rejoining each other.

maybe it is silly to care about it but i like it and makes gaming so much simpler, faster and streamlined.

the sw myth that we are talking about cute purses and boys while we all play a bunch of seperate games is nothing but bullshyt.

- i for example never liked to use mic when playing games , i also dont plan starting to use it anytime soon - i prefer games that not always matchmake me in the same team with friends , i often enjoy even more playing against them - at the end its not even that hard at all to invite friends into games with regular invites i can understand that you see some value in that though if it makes your playing experience more comfortable , but imo there is no justification to pay that much for such features , microsoft could easily offer it for free without getting broke , the fact they didnt just shows how much they value their customers , also charging for dlc the devs give away for free elsewhere speaks for itself
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"] but it has teh crossgamechat , so its worth the payment :D

AmnesiaHaze

lol, you call it teh crossgame chat while i call it grabbing four friends and being able to squad up drag them from a game of bf43 to a game of co-op halo to a team match in dirt 3 all the while never breaking up the party and keeping us all on the same side and getting in more actual game time in as opposed to messing around joining and rejoining each other.

maybe it is silly to care about it but i like it and makes gaming so much simpler, faster and streamlined.

the sw myth that we are talking about cute purses and boys while we all play a bunch of seperate games is nothing but bullshyt.

- i for example never liked to use mic when playing games , i also dont plan starting to use it anytime soon - i prefer games that not always matchmake me in the same team with friends , i often enjoy even more playing against them - at the end its not even that hard at all to invite friends into games with regular invites i can understand that you see some value in that though if it makes your playing experience more comfortable , but imo there is no justification to pay that much for such features , microsoft could easily offer it for free without getting broke , the fact they didnt just shows how much they value their customers , also charging for dlc the devs give away for free elsewhere speaks for itself

well dude... everything in the long run is a rip off.

hell, if i wanted to boil the water out of the creek behind my house i could stop getting ripped off by the water company.

(btw, those ****ers don't even read the meter anymore, they just send a bill based on what month it is and what typical water usage is and what they claim is typical useage is a load of crap)

Avatar image for Far_RockNYC
Far_RockNYC

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Far_RockNYC
Member since 2012 • 1244 Posts

Sheeps by far , the Wii will go down as the most successful POS in gaming history.

Avatar image for speedfog
speedfog

4966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#133 speedfog
Member since 2009 • 4966 Posts

Cows, such a nice start... Very good service... Best multip versions... Non mediocre exclusives... (sarcasm?)

Oh yeah and they have good movies.

Avatar image for WithoutGraceXII
WithoutGraceXII

1797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#134 WithoutGraceXII
Member since 2007 • 1797 Posts
If you only went with one platform, I'd say sheep easily. There are dozens of pc/360/ps3 multiplats the Wii missed out on. Some of the best games this gen.
Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#135 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

Of course there is a difference. Charging is charging?

Sony is charging for the game, as is anyone who is selling a game. The online pass is there way of charging people for the game, as a used game buyer or renter hasn't bought anything from them.

I don't like online passes, nor do I particularly like any of the tactics used by these companies to attack used games, but the online pass is pretty easy to justify. That being said, games that use p2p online such as Uncharted 3 shouldn't be using these things, as the online isn't even a service at that point.

Riverwolf007

i think it is justified also but when we look at big games with passes i notice a pile of sony 1st party does it while what is left of the ms 1st party (lol) does not do it.

does ms get any credit for this or are they still just as evil while we turn a blind eye to resistence, uncharted, socom, ratchet and clank, twisted metal and whichever else that are all huge titles for sony and all have passes.

(also i'm just doing this from memory so if some of those are not 1st party then my bad just point them out)

Well, I don't think it's completely justified, since players are left with no way to quality check an online game before purcahsing it unless there is a demo, which there usually isn't.

The problem with all these attempts from the games industry to secure more money for their work is their level of service is usually a hair above dogsh!t.

On solution to these online codes could very well be a few hours of playtime before the code is needed. They could tie it to the console itself rather than online account.

Avatar image for dracolich55
dracolich55

2343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 dracolich55
Member since 2010 • 2343 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

All fanboys got shafted this gen because they were too stupid by being fanboys.

Though I will say that 360 fanboys are definately the most upset and jealous.

OB-47

That's only at this stage. Remember Sony fans in the first few years?

Sheep got shafted pretty hard the whole gen, Lems started getting shafted pretty hard since 09 and Cows got shafted 2006-2008.
Avatar image for Blake135
Blake135

3994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Blake135
Member since 2008 • 3994 Posts

[QUOTE="OB-47"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

All fanboys got shafted this gen because they were too stupid by being fanboys.

Though I will say that 360 fanboys are definately the most upset and jealous.

dracolich55

That's only at this stage. Remember Sony fans in the first few years?

Sheep got shafted pretty hard the whole gen, Lems started getting shafted pretty hard since 09 and Cows got shafted 2006-2008.

Agree with this, nice to see Nintendo making up for it with the WiiU and 3DS.

Avatar image for NYrockinlegend
NYrockinlegend

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#139 NYrockinlegend
Member since 2008 • 2025 Posts
Sheep. As the gen went on, the Wii started losing momentum and got few good exclusives and was completely cut off from the third party supply of games for the PS3/360/PC. Now, the Wii has essentially been abandoned by Nintendo. In a way, though, they all got shafted. PS3 is still in last place in sales and market share. 360 however keeps getting sequels of the same exclusives and Kinect stuff and app updates. Now lems are basically playing major damage control due to a disappointing E3 conference with the exception of Halo and a few other small highlights and not receiving many exclusives outside of the usual Gears, Halo, and Forza. But they deny their butthurt with defending the Kinect stuff as well as sports stuff saying we don't like playing sports or games that lots of ppl enjoy. Yeah we do(I love playing soccer and rugby), but we also want GAMES.:roll:
Avatar image for AdmiralBison
AdmiralBison

3970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 AdmiralBison
Member since 2008 • 3970 Posts
I feel it's lems since MS shifted focus from core to casual Kinect(lol) garbage. Heil68
No because MS has managed,to expand to the casual demographs with Kinect but still keeps getting core games from third party devs. Sony couldn't do this with Move(lol)
Avatar image for Kiro0
Kiro0

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Kiro0
Member since 2009 • 1176 Posts

Definitely Nintendo fans. The Wii just had so little for a serious gamer. I was a Nintendo fan until this gen. The Wii had so few games that it was like opening a treasure chest by the time I got a PS3.

Avatar image for Jestersmiles
Jestersmiles

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#142 Jestersmiles
Member since 2011 • 242 Posts

Ancient Aliens