Who says CRYSIS aint possible on Consoles???

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Latina_Chick

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Latina_Chick

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

again no, any duo core is much more powerfull then the 360 Triple core.

and owning a QuadCore these days isnt that smart, most games wont use 25% of the cpu potential and in 1year it will be outdated.

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Mizarus

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

again no, any duo core is much more powerfull then the 360 Triple core.

and owning a QuadCore these days isnt that smart, most games wont use 25% of the cpu potential and in 1year it will be outdated.

Why is it not smart when it costs the same as the 3.0 GHZ Duo core?

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="anshul89"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]Stranglehold is more destructable than Crysis thats why its minimum system requirements is Core 2 duo, 2gb ram, 7800GTXMizarus

My bro made this thread and I am not a guy.

you are still funny tho, there are more physics involved on a single crysis tree falling down then in any aspect of the whole stranglehold game.

Its the same person >.> someone is getting scared cause they're getting scared of the massive flamage their getting for thinking Crysis would run on any home console its like FF7 on the Atari

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Mizarus

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

again no, any duo core is much more powerfull then the 360 Triple core.

and owning a QuadCore these days isnt that smart, most games wont use 25% of the cpu potential and in 1year it will be outdated.

Crysis and AlanWake will be optimized for quadcores

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Mizarus

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

again no, any duo core is much more powerfull then the 360 Triple core.

and owning a QuadCore these days isnt that smart, most games wont use 25% of the cpu potential and in 1year it will be outdated.

Proove it!

[QUOTE="Mizarus"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Meu2k7

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

again no, any duo core is much more powerfull then the 360 Triple core.

and owning a QuadCore these days isnt that smart, most games wont use 25% of the cpu potential and in 1year it will be outdated.

Why is it not smart when it costs the same as the 3.0 GHZ Duo core?

well i didnt know it was the the same price, where your from NA? over here where i live its like 5times the price.

[QUOTE="Mizarus"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Latina_Chick

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

again no, any duo core is much more powerfull then the 360 Triple core.

and owning a QuadCore these days isnt that smart, most games wont use 25% of the cpu potential and in 1year it will be outdated.

Proove it!

No i wont waste my time googling for specifc benches, and 3dMarks just to make you happy when i already know iam right and i dont need to proove anything to you to feel better about my self.

about the quadcore getting old we all know it, and about most games that wont use its potential any pc experienced gamer knows that games dont take full advantage of duocores yet let alone quad

[QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Mizarus"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Mizarus

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

again no, any duo core is much more powerfull then the 360 Triple core.

and owning a QuadCore these days isnt that smart, most games wont use 25% of the cpu potential and in 1year it will be outdated.

Why is it not smart when it costs the same as the 3.0 GHZ Duo core?

well i didnt know it was the the same price, where your from NA? over here where i live its like 5times the price.

UK, there was a price drop cut in half matching the E6850.... everywhere.

UK, there was a price drop cut in half matching the E6850.... everywhere.

Meu2k7

unfourntly iam from Brazil, we get really salty prices with almost 90% Taxes and dolar being 1USD = 2BR(Brazilian Real)

luckly enough i might go to london later this year and il take advantage of that.

"Who says CRYSIS aint possible on Console?" Crytek muscleserge

They admitted thatthey made a mistake

as with all ea games, they will get ported to other platforms so ea can make more money.

That said, it doubt the game will look anywhere near as good on consoles.

[QUOTE="muscleserge"]"Who says CRYSIS aint possible on Console?" Crytek Latina_Chick

They admitted thatthey made a mistake

the article you posted is older then the one I posted.....

I even have a very new video interview.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVsT4D2_VTI&mode=related&search=

I think the world of crysis is too big. If they would've made it a bit more linear it would work.Nah...don't do that. I'll wait for the next gen .turgore

I guess you arent aware it was the big open world that gave farcry so much of its acclaim.....

This thread keeps coming backLatina_Chick

Thats because you dont understand that every game thats on PC and (insert console name here) has the colsole version gimped, consoles dont have enough RAM, ya bioshock is on both but it looks better and runs better on PC, and yes, I have played both.

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Latina_Chick

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

If the PPC core was so powerful, then why would MAC start using C2D in all the new mac lines?

bioshock look better run better on pc? cant be that much better it didnt score even 1 tenth of a point higher on gamespot 9.0 9.0justinpate

it doesnt work that way....everyone expects a PC game too look better then a console game.....higher res and more AA and AF is a given.

splinter cell double agent didnt look better on pc then the xbox 360 version even at the highest pc settings the gamespot review says so

why do you think halo 2 on the pc needs 1 gigabyte of system ram because consoles dont need nearly as much ram as pcs do so dont be so quick to say oh xbox 360 512 ram could never handle crysis because 512 console ram is really worth alot more if its not ram in a computerjustinpate

Halo 2 on the PC looked far better then the console version.....

again...crytek themselves says the consoles lack ram.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVsT4D2_VTI&mode=related&search=

halo 2 xbox 64mb ram halo 2 pc 1 gigabyte ramjustinpate

splinter cell double agent didnt look better on pc then the xbox 360 version even at the highest pc settings the gamespot review says so

justinpate

that was a bad port....the PC version lacked HDR.

splinter cell double agent didnt look better on pc then the xbox 360 version even at the highest pc settings the gamespot review says so

justinpate

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]This thread keeps coming backshadow_hosi

Thats because you dont understand that every game thats on PC and (insert console name here) has the colsole version gimped, consoles dont have enough RAM, ya bioshock is on both but it looks better and runs better on PC, and yes, I have played both.

No not Everygame, some of em looks better on Xbox 360as example justcause, Hitman bloodmoney, Carbon, etc. Xbox360 still has the best looking game avaiable right now Cuz Crysis isnt out yet who knows maybe there will be a huge downgrade!

[QUOTE="shadow_hosi"]

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]This thread keeps coming backLatina_Chick

Thats because you dont understand that every game thats on PC and (insert console name here) has the colsole version gimped, consoles dont have enough RAM, ya bioshock is on both but it looks better and runs better on PC, and yes, I have played both.

No not Everygame, some of em looks better on Xbox 360as example justcause, Hitman bloodmoney, Carbon, etc. Xbox360 still has the best looking game avaiable right now Cuz Crysis isnt out yet who knows maybe there will be a huge downgrade!

[QUOTE="justinpate"]

splinter cell double agent didnt look better on pc then the xbox 360 version even at the highest pc settings the gamespot review says so

muscleserge

Yes, yesI know u have a poor 6800 ultra

[QUOTE="shadow_hosi"]

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]This thread keeps coming backLatina_Chick

Thats because you dont understand that every game thats on PC and (insert console name here) has the colsole version gimped, consoles dont have enough RAM, ya bioshock is on both but it looks better and runs better on PC, and yes, I have played both.

No not Everygame, some of em looks better on Xbox 360as example justcause, Hitman bloodmoney, Carbon, etc. Xbox360 still has the best looking game avaiable right now Cuz Crysis isnt out yet who knows maybe there will be a huge downgrade!

those are very early games.....

crysis wont get downgraded....PC games are scalable....they dont get downgraded.

GEOW is coming out on the PC anyway at around the same time as crysis....and looks by far better then the console version....not only running at a higher res, more AA, DX10...ETC...but they also removed the DOF effect in order to have a much more crisp, visible backound.

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"][QUOTE="shadow_hosi"]

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]This thread keeps coming backmuscleserge

Thats because you dont understand that every game thats on PC and (insert console name here) has the colsole version gimped, consoles dont have enough RAM, ya bioshock is on both but it looks better and runs better on PC, and yes, I have played both.

No not Everygame, some of em looks better on Xbox 360as example justcause, Hitman bloodmoney, Carbon, etc. Xbox360 still has the best looking game avaiable right now Cuz Crysis isnt out yet who knows maybe there will be a huge downgrade!

Did u read the review? I dont think so. I am sure gamespot has a better graphics card than urs

[QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="justinpate"]

splinter cell double agent didnt look better on pc then the xbox 360 version even at the highest pc settings the gamespot review says so

Latina_Chick

Yes, yesI know u have a poor 6800 ultra

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.WhySoCry

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

If the PPC core was so powerful, then why would MAC start using C2D in all the new mac lines?

May be Its desined for consoles. Ur IQ level is extremely low

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"][QUOTE="shadow_hosi"]

[QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]This thread keeps coming backmuscleserge

Thats because you dont understand that every game thats on PC and (insert console name here) has the colsole version gimped, consoles dont have enough RAM, ya bioshock is on both but it looks better and runs better on PC, and yes, I have played both.

No not Everygame, some of em looks better on Xbox 360as example justcause, Hitman bloodmoney, Carbon, etc. Xbox360 still has the best looking game avaiable right now Cuz Crysis isnt out yet who knows maybe there will be a huge downgrade!

Did u read the review? I dont think so. I am sure gamespot has a better graphics card than urs

Gamespot review

[QUOTE="justinpate"]why do you think halo 2 on the pc needs 1 gigabyte of system ram because consoles dont need nearly as much ram as pcs do so dont be so quick to say oh xbox 360 512 ram could never handle crysis because 512 console ram is really worth alot more if its not ram in a computercobrax75

Halo 2 on the PC looked far better then the console version.....

again...crytek themselves says the consoles lack ram.

OMG! how old are u guys? 11? Its an Xbox game!

^of what game?muscleserge

Bloodmoney,carbon,mostwanted,justcause,etc

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"][QUOTE="Latina_Chick"]

[QUOTE="WhySoCry"]The X360's cpu is a joke. It's 3 PPC cores stuck together on a die.Latina_Chick

Atleast its better than ur cheap core2 duo, thanks god I have a Quadcore

If the PPC core was so powerful, then why would MAC start using C2D in all the new mac lines?

May be Its desined for consoles. Ur IQ level is extremely low

[QUOTE="muscleserge"]^of what game?Latina_Chick

Bloodmoney,carbon,mostwanted,justcause,etc

[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="justinpate"]why do you think halo 2 on the pc needs 1 gigabyte of system ram because consoles dont need nearly as much ram as pcs do so dont be so quick to say oh xbox 360 512 ram could never handle crysis because 512 console ram is really worth alot more if its not ram in a computerLatina_Chick

Halo 2 on the PC looked far better then the console version.....

again...crytek themselves says the consoles lack ram.

OMG! how old are u guys? 11? Its an Xbox game!

which is obviously why the PC version would have higher requirements.....

your at least several pages behind here.