Why all the Crysis 2 hate?

Because the graphics look completely disappointing on PC.abuabed

[QUOTE="abuabed"]Because the graphics look completely disappointing on PC.Snyper-007

Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.i5750at4Ghz

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.Snyper-007

Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.i5750at4Ghz

Because the graphicsabuabed

This.

Alot of pissed off hermits want more.

Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.i5750at4Ghz

And here I thought it was reasonable to compare a sequel and its predecessor.

Either way here's basically the break down for everyone.

PC gamers think they got a console port (So far nothing says otherwise)

PS3 gamers got a shoddy port. (Taken from IGN)

X360 gamers didn't get the graphics king they wanted (I suppose they don't really have anything to complain about).

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.Espada12

And here I thought it was reasonable to compare a sequel and its predecessor.

Either way here's basically the break down for everyone.

PC gamers think they got a console port (So far nothing says otherwise)

PS3 gamers got a shoddy port. (Taken from IGN)

X360 gamers didn't get the graphics king they wanted (I suppose they don't really have anything to complain about).

Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.i5750at4Ghz

LMAO. We want a game that will blow us away and mesmerizes us like Crysis 1 did with not just it's graphics but it's vast environments. We want a game that raises the bar again. Crysis 1 raised the bar from Far Cry. We expected Crysis 2 to raise the bar from Crysis 1. Judging by what's been released so far it looks like it's a step backwards. Why can't you understand that?

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.Xtasy26

LMAO. We want a game that will blow us away and mesmerizes us like Crysis 1 did with not just it's graphics but it's vast environments. We want a game that raises the bar again. Crysis 1 raised the bar from Far Cry. We expected Crysis 2 to raise the bar from Crysis 1. Judging by what's been released so far it looks like it's a step backwards. Why can't you understand that?

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.i5750at4Ghz

LMAO. We want a game that will blow us away and mesmerizes us like Crysis 1 did with not just it's graphics but it's vast environments. We want a game that raises the bar again. Crysis 1 raised the bar from Far Cry. We expected Crysis 2 to raise the bar from Crysis 1. Judging by what's been released so far it looks like it's a step backwards. Why can't you understand that?

Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.i5750at4Ghz

Also, the game doesn't run well on consoles, it look's ugly too. (on consoles) The controls aren't responsive on consoles. I can't see who can be pleased with it.

Graphics aren't impressive except that it looks good on low-end machines.

Gameplay sucks.

Multiplayer sucks.

Why all the hate when its not even out yet? for all we now it could out score Flopzone 3.Snyper-007

Due is F.E.A.R. 2: Destroying Crysis again.

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

LMAO. We want a game that will blow us away and mesmerizes us like Crysis 1 did with not just it's graphics but it's vast environments. We want a game that raises the bar again. Crysis 1 raised the bar from Far Cry. We expected Crysis 2 to raise the bar from Crysis 1. Judging by what's been released so far it looks like it's a step backwards. Why can't you understand that?

Xtasy26

I am talking about the graphics aspect and size of the levels. While come all these PC gamers aren't WOWED by it like they were with Crysis 1?

Because the graphics look completely disappointing on PC.abuabed

Looks great to me.

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]Because it turns out the most PC gamers use crysis as a benchmark more than a game.Espada12

And here I thought it was reasonable to compare a sequel and its predecessor.

Either way here's basically the break down for everyone.

PC gamers think they got a console port (So far nothing says otherwise)

PS3 gamers got a shoddy port. (Taken from IGN)

X360 gamers didn't get the graphics king they wanted (I suppose they don't really have anything to complain about).

[QUOTE="abuabed"]Because the graphics look completely disappointing on PC.Snyper-007

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"] Because I've played the game. And its a step forward in almost every way. i5750at4Ghz

I am talking about the graphics aspect and size of the levels. While come all these PC gamers aren't WOWED by it like they were with Crysis 1?

[QUOTE="Snyper-007"][QUOTE="abuabed"]Because the graphics look completely disappointing on PC.AzatiS

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

I am talking about the graphics aspect and size of the levels. While come all these PC gamers aren't WOWED by it like they were with Crysis 1?

GeneralShowzer

[QUOTE="Snyper-007"][QUOTE="abuabed"]Because the graphics look completely disappointing on PC.AzatiS

Because PC gamers were looking for a game to justify their $500 graphics card purchase and now they are disappoint.

the PC version is very bad

Graphics are worse than Crysis 1

its poorly optimized for dual cores (using over 90% at all times)

the AA doesnt work very well, its a jagfest

FOV has been dumbed down for consoles

Auto-Aim present on the PC Demo

Brown and Bloom, the textures are quite bad, the bloom hides it

DX9 only

Call of duty clone

Console port

Gamespy account needed

anymore to add?

Because PC gamers were looking for a game to justify their $500 graphics card purchase and now they are disappoint.

jjccjj92

The demo is boring.

Because PC gamers were looking for a game to justify their $500 graphics card purchase and now they are disappoint.

jjccjj92

[QUOTE="AzatiS"][QUOTE="Snyper-007"] How?GeneralShowzer

. [/QUOTE

] You are not a PC gaming owner of original Crysis , what to discuss with you here? But ok lets make it interesting. Let me do a question to you then...

HOW comes 3 years ago , consoles couldnt handle a game called CRYSIS!?

And how comes after 3 years they can easily handle , the NEWEST engine? Did you ever wonder that ?

Why you talking about DX10 , a DirectX more than 5 years old or something like its something awesome...!! lol... Just go play crysis man and then play crysis 2 demo maybe youll understand then

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="AzatiS"] BEcause instead of upgrade the amazing graphic engine of Crysis 1 and have another "benchmark" for DX11 cards they made a "lighter" engine for consoles port. LIGHTER than the one used 3 years ago. Thats not upgrade. Thats Downgrade. AzatiS

Because PC gamers were looking for a game to justify their $500 graphics card purchase and now they are disappoint.

jjccjj92

[QUOTE="AzatiS"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Yes. No DX10 features, No special motion blur, no advanced physics, no dynamic skyline, the water looks like crap, it's on such a smaller scale. It's a step down in every way, expect that Crysis 2 has these fancy effects up in your face, making the game a blury mess. GeneralShowzer

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="AzatiS"] You are not a PC gaming owner of original Crysis , what to discuss with you here? But ok lets make it interesting. Let me do a question to you then... HOW comes 3 years ago , consoles couldnt handle a game called CRYSIS!? And how comes after 3 years they can easily handle , the NEWEST engine? Did you ever wonder that ?AzatiS

PC gamers are just angry that it is not exclusive. rybe1025

The game on play looks bewond awful; is a mixture between the worst AA systemn ever (TAA) over the top-blinding HDR saturation, tinny FOV and huge weapon model covering your view; the abusive motion blur makes almost impossible to see your environment in the multiplayer when you run.

The game has less options than Pong.

The gameplay is Crysis nerfed: your supersuit makes you super-slow, and you are weaker than a standard Bad Company soldier.

The multiplayer fall from 32 to 12 players and the servers doesn't properly works; is almost a miracle to join in a match and seems that it's going worse along more and more people is playing the demo.

Legit complains? I have no problems with non-exclusives: BC 2 was my favourite game last year.

I dont know. it looks like a far better game than the first crysis.

I don't know why everyones complaining about the size of the levels. From what I played in Crysis 2, the levels are still large, they just don't feature tons of filler (running along a beach for 2 minutes staring at nothing but the same trees copy and pasted everywhere). City enviroment =/= Jungle enviroment. Ofcourse there's going to be parts where you're running through office blocks. :roll: Crysis 2s enviroments are FAR more interesting than Crysis 1s enviroments, and I've only played the first couple of levels of the Crysis 2 beta.

I don't know why everyones complaining about the size of the levels. From what I played in Crysis 2, the levels are still large, they just don't feature tons of filler (running along a beach for 2 minutes staring at nothing but the same trees copy and pasted everywhere).

DreamCryotank

Also, the aliens in Crysis 2 are awesome, especially the noises they make. :3

Crysis 2 (SP. dont care about MP) looks incredible. I hardly think anyone who say "it looks crap or it doesnot looks good" Should be an expert on what good game consist of.SNIPER4321