Why are non-scripted open-world games not possible on the PS3? (or have issues)

lol @ gta iv i own both versions and the 360 version is more brighter and better , come at me when they fix the darkness issue and other issues such as controls the ds3 is not a good controller due to the triggers

Borderlands?

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="White_Dreams"] No open world games perform well too, and games being linear is just the nature of gaming right now.White_Dreams

Delta is wrong. The PS3 is actually superior in RAM. Here read this if you want to be educated on the systems:

Xbox 360 vs. PlayStation 3: The Hardware Throwdown - IGN

"512 MB GDDR3 RAM (shared with GPU) 256 MB XDR RAM 700 MHz speed 3.2 GHz speed 22.4 Gbps bandwidth 25.6 Gbps bandwidth

The verdict: Once again, the Xbox's total amount of RAM is slightly misleading, as the system RAM and video RAM are shared. The PS3's XDR RAM is also far more fast and efficient than the Xbox's GDDR3 RAM, running at a speed of 3.2 GHz compared to 700 MHz.

Final bandwidth numbers prove PS3 is the victor in this category.

Winner: PlayStation 3"

[QUOTE="White_Dreams"][QUOTE="delta3074"]The PS3 also has less useable RAM for developers because the PS3's operating system overhead is bigger than the 360's and the split memory architecture was a misake for obvious reasons.Stevo_the_gamer

[QUOTE="White_Dreams"][QUOTE="delta3074"]The PS3 also has less useable RAM for developers because the PS3's operating system overhead is bigger than the 360's and the split memory architecture was a misake for obvious reasons.ShadowMoses900

Delta is wrong. The PS3 is actually superior in RAM. Here read this if you want to be educated on the systems:

Xbox 360 vs. PlayStation 3: The Hardware Throwdown - IGN

"512 MB GDDR3 RAM (shared with GPU) 256 MB XDR RAM 700 MHz speed 3.2 GHz speed 22.4 Gbps bandwidth 25.6 Gbps bandwidth

The verdict: Once again, the Xbox's total amount of RAM is slightly misleading, as the system RAM and video RAM are shared. The PS3's XDR RAM is also far more fast and efficient than the Xbox's GDDR3 RAM, running at a speed of 3.2 GHz compared to 700 MHz.

Final bandwidth numbers prove PS3 is the victor in this category.

Winner: PlayStation 3"

The PS3 has tons of open world games that run great. The few exceptions run poorly on the 360 too. I don't know how anyone can say that the PS3 doesn't pull off good open world games, because that just isn't true.

The PS3 has tons of open world games that run great. The few exceptions run poorly on the 360 too. I don't know how anyone can say that the PS3 doesn't pull off good open world games, because that just isn't true.

Jethawk11

Because Betesda developes games mainly on the Xbox and when they port their already bug infested game to another console it goes noodle soup on them and Sony QA are just like...... f*** it

Because Betesda developes games mainly on the Xbox and when they port their already bug infested game to another console it goes noodle soup on them and Sony QA are just like...... f*** it

fusionhunter

[QUOTE="fusionhunter"]

Because Betesda developes games mainly on the Xbox and when they port their already bug infested game to another console it goes noodle soup on them and Sony QA are just like...... f*** it

StatusShuffle

[QUOTE="fusionhunter"]

Because Betesda developes games mainly on the Xbox and when they port their already bug infested game to another console it goes noodle soup on them and Sony QA are just like...... f*** it

StatusShuffle

[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"][QUOTE="fusionhunter"]

Because Betesda developes games mainly on the Xbox and when they port their already bug infested game to another console it goes noodle soup on them and Sony QA are just like...... f*** it

White_Dreams

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="White_Dreams"] I know it has less ram to use yes, nothing shoddy though.White_Dreams

[QUOTE="White_Dreams"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Having split ram was pretty shoddy.Stevo_the_gamer

Infamous 1/2, RnC, Prototype 2 runs better on ps3 aswell.

Maneil99

RnC is not open-world.