Nintendo has a new console coming out in a couple of months, you would think they would be showing it off at every show they can? Especially after an unimpressive E3. Same with Microsoft.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Nintendo has a new console coming out in a couple of months, you would think they would be showing it off at every show they can? Especially after an unimpressive E3. Same with Microsoft.
Not worth the money investment, as they see it. Nintendo might have a reason to with Wii U, but I suppose that's an approach left to the marketing division; I assume they're going to let word of mouth run the campaign, plus Nintendo hasn't revealed either price or launch date, which may get be delayed for the region (current rumor).
And really, MS doesn't have anything to really show beyond Forza, Halo, and perhaps Gears. There just isn't enough to show to warrant the cost (besides, most of the big games being shown will be handled by the respective publishers who are attending).
they're busy innovating and not losing money. sony on the other hand.....mems_1224
Yeah, Sonys strategy of getting the most out of their console isnt as profitable as Microsofts strategy of getting the most out of their customers :P
[QUOTE="mems_1224"]they're busy innovating and not losing money. sony on the other hand.....crimsonman1245
Yeah, Sonys strategy of getting the most out of their console isnt as profitable as Microsofts strategy of getting the most out of their customers :P
more money for the company-more features for customers. sony hasn't grasped that whole making money thing yet. they'll get it one day[QUOTE="4dr1el"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]sony hasn't grasped that whole making money thing yet. they'll get it one daymems_1224
Yeah... that why they already won 2 gens... how many did MS won?
every gen. Feel free to join the real world at anytime.[QUOTE="4dr1el"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]sony hasn't grasped that whole making money thing yet. they'll get it one daymems_1224
Yeah... that why they already won 2 gens... how many did MS won?
every gen.[QUOTE="mems_1224"]sony hasn't grasped that whole making money thing yet. they'll get it one day4dr1el
Yeah... that why they already won 2 gens... how many did MS won?
Sony didn't win because of themselves though, it was the popular choice, and Sony had terrible FP games.[QUOTE="OhJayDubya"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] every gen. mems_1224Feel free to join the real world at anytime. most pcs run on windows. pc wins every gen. u mad?
ahah
you're getting deperate in search of arguments if you're gonna use such a flawed logic like that... also, as hermits say, PC dont have gens
try harder. Your damage control isnt workin
most pcs run on windows. pc wins every gen. u mad?[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="OhJayDubya"] Feel free to join the real world at anytime.4dr1el
ahah
you're getting deperate in search of arguments if you're gonna use such a flawed logic like that... also, as hermits say, PC dont have gens
try harder. Your damage control isnt workin
prove me wrong. dont most pcs run on windows? and hasn't the pc always been the best system? therefore MS has won every gen because the pc games for the most part only run on windows.[QUOTE="4dr1el"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]sony hasn't grasped that whole making money thing yet. they'll get it one dayStatusShuffle
Yeah... that why they already won 2 gens... how many did MS won?
Sony didn't win because of themselves though, it was the popular choice, and Sony had terrible FP games.yeah, thats why the PS2 is regarded by many as the best console ever made. If it was because of "popular choice" then the wii would be loved by the majority of the "core" market, something it isnt, while the PS2 is. PS2 was great, both in quality as in quantity and only a moron would deny that.
also what the fvck at the last remark... "terrible FP games"? Who cares if it had the best RPGs, Platformers, Hack'n'slash, puzzle games, adventure games etc etc? Also FPS sucks a55 so I couldnt give two fvcks if the PS2 had terrible FPS or not. The FPS craze only started this gen and, as you see, many gamers are tired of the genre already
Sony didn't win because of themselves though, it was the popular choice, and Sony had terrible FP games.[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"][QUOTE="4dr1el"]
Yeah... that why they already won 2 gens... how many did MS won?
4dr1el
yeah, thats why the PS2 is regarded by many as the best console ever made. If it was because of "popular choice" then the wii would be loved by the majority of the "core" market, something it isnt, while the PS2 is. PS2 was great, both in quality as in quantity and only a moron would deny that.
also what the fvck at the last remark... "terrible FP games"? Who cares if it had the best RPGs, Platformers, Hack'n'slash, puzzle games, adventure games etc etc? Also FPS sucks a55 so I couldnt give two fvcks if the PS2 had terrible FPS or not. The FPS craze only started this gen and, as you see, many gamers are tired of the genre already
the ps2 was not quality lol. DRE was almost as bad as RROD except the internet wasn't as big as it is today snes>ps2[QUOTE="4dr1el"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] most pcs run on windows. pc wins every gen. u mad?mems_1224
ahah
you're getting deperate in search of arguments if you're gonna use such a flawed logic like that... also, as hermits say, PC dont have gens
try harder. Your damage control isnt workin
prove me wrong. dont most pcs run on windows? and hasn't the pc always been the best system? therefore MS has won every gen because the pc games for the most part only run on windows.Most =/= all
PC gaming =/= windows
best = subjective
MS hasnt won sh1t
I wont even argue such idiotic logic with you. (and you say you arent a 360 fanboy lewl). I'm pretty sure some hermits are coming to rape you
prepare your anus
prove me wrong. dont most pcs run on windows? and hasn't the pc always been the best system? therefore MS has won every gen because the pc games for the most part only run on windows.[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="4dr1el"]
ahah
you're getting deperate in search of arguments if you're gonna use such a flawed logic like that... also, as hermits say, PC dont have gens
try harder. Your damage control isnt workin
4dr1el
Most =/= all
PC gaming =/= windows
best = subjective
MS hasnt won sh1t
I wont even argue such idiotic logic with you. (and you say you arent a 360 fanboy lewl). I'm pretty sure some hermits are coming to rape you
prepare your anus
most games run on windows. yes or no? MS wins. deal with it.[QUOTE="4dr1el"][QUOTE="StatusShuffle"] Sony didn't win because of themselves though, it was the popular choice, and Sony had terrible FP games.mems_1224
yeah, thats why the PS2 is regarded by many as the best console ever made. If it was because of "popular choice" then the wii would be loved by the majority of the "core" market, something it isnt, while the PS2 is. PS2 was great, both in quality as in quantity and only a moron would deny that.
also what the fvck at the last remark... "terrible FP games"? Who cares if it had the best RPGs, Platformers, Hack'n'slash, puzzle games, adventure games etc etc? Also FPS sucks a55 so I couldnt give two fvcks if the PS2 had terrible FPS or not. The FPS craze only started this gen and, as you see, many gamers are tired of the genre already
the ps2 was not quality lol. DRE was almost as bad as RROD except the internet wasn't as big as it is today snes>ps2If you had two inches of a brain you would notice I was talking about the softaware not hardware (games define a console. not its power). Also, dont know bout others but my phat PS2 still works fine.
to the "snes>PS2", subjective
fact is, the PS2 is often regarded as one of the 3 best consoles ever being often in the 1st place on most polls/tops
the ps2 was not quality lol. DRE was almost as bad as RROD except the internet wasn't as big as it is today snes>ps2[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="4dr1el"]
yeah, thats why the PS2 is regarded by many as the best console ever made. If it was because of "popular choice" then the wii would be loved by the majority of the "core" market, something it isnt, while the PS2 is. PS2 was great, both in quality as in quantity and only a moron would deny that.
also what the fvck at the last remark... "terrible FP games"? Who cares if it had the best RPGs, Platformers, Hack'n'slash, puzzle games, adventure games etc etc? Also FPS sucks a55 so I couldnt give two fvcks if the PS2 had terrible FPS or not. The FPS craze only started this gen and, as you see, many gamers are tired of the genre already
4dr1el
If you had two inches of a brain you would notice I was talking about the softaware not hardware (games define a console. not its power). Also, dont know bout others but my phat PS2 still works fine.
to the "snes>PS2", subjective
fact is, the PS2 is often regarded as one of the 3 best consoles ever being often in the 1st place on most polls/tops
:lol: no[QUOTE="4dr1el"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] prove me wrong. dont most pcs run on windows? and hasn't the pc always been the best system? therefore MS has won every gen because the pc games for the most part only run on windows.mems_1224
Most =/= all
PC gaming =/= windows
best = subjective
MS hasnt won sh1t
I wont even argue such idiotic logic with you. (and you say you arent a 360 fanboy lewl). I'm pretty sure some hermits are coming to rape you
prepare your anus
most games run on windows. yes or no? MS wins. deal with it.[QUOTE="4dr1el"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]the ps2 was not quality lol. DRE was almost as bad as RROD except the internet wasn't as big as it is today snes>ps2mems_1224
If you had two inches of a brain you would notice I was talking about the softaware not hardware (games define a console. not its power). Also, dont know bout others but my phat PS2 still works fine.
to the "snes>PS2", subjective
fact is, the PS2 is often regarded as one of the 3 best consoles ever being often in the 1st place on most polls/tops
:lol: noyup
most games run on windows. yes or no? MS wins. deal with it.[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="4dr1el"]
Most =/= all
PC gaming =/= windows
best = subjective
MS hasnt won sh1t
I wont even argue such idiotic logic with you. (and you say you arent a 360 fanboy lewl). I'm pretty sure some hermits are coming to rape you
prepare your anus
4dr1el
Sony didn't win because of themselves though, it was the popular choice, and Sony had terrible FP games.[QUOTE="StatusShuffle"][QUOTE="4dr1el"]
Yeah... that why they already won 2 gens... how many did MS won?
4dr1el
yeah, thats why the PS2 is regarded by many as the best console ever made. If it was because of "popular choice" then the wii would be loved by the majority of the "core" market, something it isnt, while the PS2 is. PS2 was great, both in quality as in quantity and only a moron would deny that.
also what the fvck at the last remark... "terrible FP games"? Who cares if it had the best RPGs, Platformers, Hack'n'slash, puzzle games, adventure games etc etc? Also FPS sucks a55 so I couldnt give two fvcks if the PS2 had terrible FPS or not. The FPS craze only started this gen and, as you see, many gamers are tired of the genre already
Your last statement is totally false by the vast amounts of billions FPS games make. Which they also made last gen as well. Also it had debatable the best Jrpgs, not rpgs, and it was because it was the popular choice. People jumped from the PS1, it's the only real reason it did well. it had sub-par online, it had none before, crap FP, lying and trying to evadedd lawsuits regarding doing nothing about some of its faulty PS2's, was harder to make games for than the competition, etc. Thinking it's not because it was the popular choice is sad even for you.[QUOTE="4dr1el"][QUOTE="StatusShuffle"] Sony didn't win because of themselves though, it was the popular choice, and Sony had terrible FP games.StatusShuffle
yeah, thats why the PS2 is regarded by many as the best console ever made. If it was because of "popular choice" then the wii would be loved by the majority of the "core" market, something it isnt, while the PS2 is. PS2 was great, both in quality as in quantity and only a moron would deny that.
also what the fvck at the last remark... "terrible FP games"? Who cares if it had the best RPGs, Platformers, Hack'n'slash, puzzle games, adventure games etc etc? Also FPS sucks a55 so I couldnt give two fvcks if the PS2 had terrible FPS or not. The FPS craze only started this gen and, as you see, many gamers are tired of the genre already
Your last statement is totally false by the vast amounts of billions FPS games make. Which they also made last gen as well. Also it had debatable the best Jrpgs, not rpgs, and it was because it was the popular choice. People jumped from the PS1, it's the only real reason it did well. it had sub-par online, it had none before, crap FP, lying and trying to evadedd lawsuits regarding doing nothing about some of its faulty PS2's, was harder to make games for than the competition, etc. Thinking it's not because it was the popular choice is sad even for you.If people jumped from the PS1 to the PS2 because "it was the popular choice" then why didnt they jump to the PS3 aswell?
And no, it also had the best overall RPGs cause last gen JRPGs>WRPGs
they're busy innovating and not losing money. sony on the other hand.....mems_1224
Nintendo wont be there but a few 3rd Party devs are going to be there with Wii U games. Supposedly Ubisoft is going to be showing off a new build of Zombi U too, so thats something atleast
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment