[QUOTE="ehussein1379"]OP - I assume your PC is 4+ years old?
CoD looks ancient on my top-end PC + 30" monitor, while BC2 looks incredible; possibly a hardware discrepancy is at work?
Beyond that, CoD is running on an extremely dated engine, and the devs have 'no interest' in upgrading it; their target audience is on console, so why would they anyway?
I'll admit that BF3 is a PC-only game basically, and the sales will suffer because of it, but the consoles still have a great game in the aging CoD engine and the ease of gameplay and constant reward system really 'gets' the console gamers.
brandontwb
I have no interest in flaunting my PC specs because it simply doesn't matter. It does play maxed on every single setting very smoothly at 1080p. I still think it looks like garbage and CoD looks much better. It's just how I think of the game when I look at it. As someone who's spent a lot of time designing maps, I pay attention to things that a lot of people perhaps ignore. A game doesn't need to be running on the latest engine to look better than something else btw.Ok i have read enought of your nonsense, now that you said the game looks like garbage im going to say you DEFINITELLY need an EYE exam. I still play it till this day on both 360 and PC maxed out , i think it looks better then BF3 maxed right now because im playing the beta at the moment and im not that impressed, i think its the metro map anyways. So please dont call its graphics garbage, Call of Dutys graphics were garbage after #4, all static environments, no physyx at all.
Log in to comment