Why does Square enix like sony so much?

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Korrigan777
Korrigan777

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Korrigan777
Member since 2007 • 763 Posts

http://www.psu.com/Square-Enix-talks-FFVII-remake;-new-PS3-project-News--a0001210-p0.php

"It's not certain if this new game is in the FFXIII series or a completely new title from Kitase, Nomura and Tabata--but PlayStation 3 owners should be very excited."

Coming from a die-hard Square-enix fanboy(soon ps3 and maybe 360 owner), i find this news perplexing.

Looking at their upcoming line-up on the ps3i used to think FFXIII being exclusive made sense seeing as FF usually sells most in japan, and the game requires an actual next gen console (wiiiii:roll:),but then i thought, surely if they just released the ps3 version in japan and gave european and US gamers ps3and 360 versions they'dsell at least 2 million more copies?

and then there's the game that'scoming out further off but isset to be probably quite as explosive; FFXIIIVersus.

If Squeenix don't announce versus as multiplat at TGS why do you think wouldbe the reason?

I thought that maybe these "exclusives" were a helping hand for sony. Imean a lot of squeenix fanboys probably own a ps2, andif they switch to360 that'd damage sonya little in PAL and definitely in US. "Why buy it on ps3 when i can get it on a cheaper system" this is me assuming Sonywon't do an actualprice cut by XIII's release. Highly unlikely :) so kind of a moot point?

All this doesn't bother me seeing as i'm getting a ps3 for XIII and tons of other games. But i can imagine for some people XIII is their sole reason for getting one and they're probably hoping it goes multiplat. Mgs also.

btw on a side note another FFXIII game that was rumoured to be in the making was thought to be an MMORPG. if this turns out to be true it'll most definitely turn out to be a PS3/360/PC game.

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#2 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts
Tradition, a long working relationship, and behind-closed-door contracts.
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts

The Japanese call it Kiritsu a bond amongst corporations; an unspoken union, or honor, something that is severely lacking in N American. This is also part of the reasons why Sony was able to buy up so much of Hollywood which at one time was strictly an American enterprise.

Square Enix remembers when Sony helped them through finances during their Final Fantasy Spirit Within fiasco, which nearly bankrupted Square as a company. Sony invested in Square and helped distributed the movie when no one else would. This is one of the key reasons for their Kiritsu.

Avatar image for Korrigan777
Korrigan777

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Korrigan777
Member since 2007 • 763 Posts

The Japanese call Kiritsu a bond amongst corporations.An unspoken union, or honor, something that is severely lacking in N American. This also part of the reason why Sony was able to buy up so much of Hollywood which at one time was strictly an American enterprise.

Square Enix remembers when Sony helped them through finances during their Final Fantasy Spirit Within fiasco, which nearly bankrupted Square as a company. Sony invested in Square and helped distributed the movie when no one else would. This is one of the key reasons for their Kiritsu.

pimperjones

you think this bond can live through the fact that FFXIIi is probably costing squeenix an arm and a leg?

just a question :)no sarcasm or rudeness intended

Avatar image for Caviglia
Caviglia

1344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Caviglia
Member since 2006 • 1344 Posts
Let us just say it involves hefty sums of cash, ignore the whole nonsense about honour.
Avatar image for BION1CK
BION1CK

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 BION1CK
Member since 2007 • 144 Posts

If you look at their TGS line up, most of the stuff is on DS and mobile phones. They may have jumped into bed with Sony last gen, but DS is now their main port of call. They go where the money is, simple as that.

Imo, Square Enix are not what they used to be, most of the talent from Square left along time ago, Enix are still doing ok, but Square haven't released a good game imo since FFX.

Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts
[QUOTE="pimperjones"]

The Japanese call Kiritsu a bond amongst corporations.An unspoken union, or honor, something that is severely lacking in N American. This also part of the reason why Sony was able to buy up so much of Hollywood which at one time was strictly an American enterprise.

Square Enix remembers when Sony helped them through finances during their Final Fantasy Spirit Within fiasco, which nearly bankrupted Square as a company. Sony invested in Square and helped distributed the movie when no one else would. This is one of the key reasons for their Kiritsu.

Korrigan777

you think this bond can live through the fact that FFXIIi is probably costing squeenix an arm and a leg?

just a question :)no sarcasm or rudeness intended

To the Japanese kiritsu is above profit, many companies in Japan forfit profit in order to maintain this bond. There is an old oriental proverb "30 years in the west nile and 30 years in the east nile" meaning with time situations change and one must learn that no matter how strong you are you will one day find yourself on the wrong end of the nile and will require help from comerades. This is why Japanese companies maintain this Kiritsu, something Microsoft must also learn in time.

P.S I've lived and worked in Japan in the past and understand this beyond most on this site.

Avatar image for mubarakibnumar
mubarakibnumar

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 mubarakibnumar
Member since 2005 • 586 Posts
If SE is stupid enough to invest too much in sony right now they will go out of business without a doubt.
Avatar image for Onizuka36
Onizuka36

8295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Onizuka36
Member since 2005 • 8295 Posts

Two things:

1) The PS3 is capable of handling the beautifulgraphics Final Fantasyis known for (that rules out the Wii)

2) The Xbox 360 doesn't sell in Japan

The PS3 is the only system that can handle graphically superior games that will sell well in Japan (which is where the majority of their games sell best)

Avatar image for Korrigan777
Korrigan777

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Korrigan777
Member since 2007 • 763 Posts

just to make it clear, i don't want FFXIIi or Versus to go mulitplat as Squeenix previously said they wanted to get a lot out of the ps3

the results of their experiments, will be interesting to see.

if i were a 360 owner i'd hope for a game built from the ground taking into account the specific strengths of the 360; not some port.

devs on either side of this war have said there are games that will sport features impossible for the opposing console to achieve.

Avatar image for Storm_Winds
Storm_Winds

2061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Storm_Winds
Member since 2004 • 2061 Posts
Might have to do something with Sony owning 9% of SE.
Avatar image for coreygames
coreygames

5027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 coreygames
Member since 2005 • 5027 Posts
They like what SONY did for the PS1 and stuck with it.
Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4969 Posts
They dont. Tis may shcok you but Square Enix is putting most of its eggs into the Nintendo Ds basket. Pay attention.
Avatar image for daqua_99
daqua_99

11170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#14 daqua_99
Member since 2005 • 11170 Posts

Square stays true to Sony because of the history.

Why would Square go to MS ... Square is a Japanese company and the 360 is selling like crap in the land of the rising sun.

Square won't go to Nintendo (or put their entire hopes on Nintendo) due to the history which they have (bad one might we add).

Avatar image for stika
stika

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 stika
Member since 2005 • 2628 Posts

Square stays true to Sony because of the history.

Why would Square go to MS ... Square is a Japanese company and the 360 is selling like crap in the land of the rising sun.

Square won't go to Nintendo (or put their entire hopes on Nintendo) due to the history which they have (bad one might we add).

daqua_99

i didnt know nintendo and square had a bad history

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#16 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts

They dont. Tis may shcok you but Square Enix is putting most of its eggs into the Nintendo Ds basket. Pay attention.mojito1988

No.

DQIX is a big game, but FFXIII and FF versus XIII are much bigger investments due to production cost.

Avatar image for _koolgirl_
_koolgirl_

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 _koolgirl_
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts

http://www.psu.com/Square-Enix-talks-FFVII-remake;-new-PS3-project-News--a0001210-p0.php

"It's not certain if this new game is in the FFXIII series or a completely new title from Kitase, Nomura and Tabata--but PlayStation 3 owners should be very excited."

Coming from a die-hard Square-enix fanboy(soon ps3 and maybe 360 owner), i find this news perplexing.

Looking at their upcoming line-up on the ps3i used to think FFXIII being exclusive made sense seeing as FF usually sells most in japan, and the game requires an actual next gen console (wiiiii:roll:),but then i thought, surely if they just released the ps3 version in japan and gave european and US gamers ps3and 360 versions they'dsell at least 2 million more copies?

and then there's the game that'scoming out further off but isset to be probably quite as explosive; FFXIIIVersus.

If Squeenix don't announce versus as multiplat at TGS why do you think wouldbe the reason?

I thought that maybe these "exclusives" were a helping hand for sony. Imean a lot of squeenix fanboys probably own a ps2, andif they switch to360 that'd damage sonya little in PAL and definitely in US. "Why buy it on ps3 when i can get it on a cheaper system" this is me assuming Sonywon't do an actualprice cut by XIII's release. Highly unlikely :) so kind of a moot point?

All this doesn't bother me seeing as i'm getting a ps3 for XIII and tons of other games. But i can imagine for some people XIII is their sole reason for getting one and they're probably hoping it goes multiplat. Mgs also.

btw on a side note another FFXIII game that was rumoured to be in the making was thought to be an MMORPG. if this turns out to be true it'll most definitely turn out to be a PS3/360/PC game.

Korrigan777

I have learned to accept FF at this point more than likely won't be Muliplatform. FF is built off an engine built specifically for PS3, I assume the sequel is as well.

However, I find it highly promising that SE bought the UE3 engine and is making games like Last Remnant multiplatform.

That fact alone shows that SE is looking at other options, not only are they making a multiplat game but they are using an outside engine to do it.

Avatar image for coreygames
coreygames

5027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 coreygames
Member since 2005 • 5027 Posts
[QUOTE="daqua_99"]

Square stays true to Sony because of the history.

Why would Square go to MS ... Square is a Japanese company and the 360 is selling like crap in the land of the rising sun.

Square won't go to Nintendo (or put their entire hopes on Nintendo) due to the history which they have (bad one might we add).

stika

i didnt know nintendo and square had a bad history

Yeah, that's fresh news to me.
Avatar image for Korrigan777
Korrigan777

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Korrigan777
Member since 2007 • 763 Posts

They dont. Tis may shcok you but Square Enix is putting most of its eggs into the Nintendo Ds basket. Pay attention.mojito1988

no i know and i'm well aware of that.

But if you read my post you'dknow i was mainly focusing on the console war.

You assuming they dont like Sony because of the DS games is kinda silly

They're most ambitious titles are coming out on ps3, and that's what gamers should concern themselves with

hell why not abandon Versus on ps3and make it a Wii exclusive?

in recent interviews They've reiterated wanting to use the ps3's strengths.something along the lines of, "with each generation we've always wanted to get as much out of our chosen system as possible"

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#20 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts

I have learned to accept FF at this point more than likely won't be Muliplatform. FF is built off an engine built specifically for PS3, I assume the sequel is as well.

However, I find it highly promising that SE bought the UE3 engine and is making games like Last Remnant multiplatform.

That fact alone shows that SE is looking at other options, not only are they making a multiplat game but they are using an outside engine to do it.

_koolgirl_

The White Engine is actually open-platform.

That doesn't mean FFXIII will be multiplat, but they could in principle port it. But if the XIII team makes extensive use of Blu-ray, it may pose a technical hurdle.

Avatar image for No_Talent_Dev
No_Talent_Dev

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 No_Talent_Dev
Member since 2007 • 505 Posts
It's a Japanese thing
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="daqua_99"]

Square stays true to Sony because of the history.

Why would Square go to MS ... Square is a Japanese company and the 360 is selling like crap in the land of the rising sun.

Square won't go to Nintendo (or put their entire hopes on Nintendo) due to the history which they have (bad one might we add).

stika

i didnt know nintendo and square had a bad history

Yeah it was bad, Chrystal Chronicles was the first Final Fantasy for Nintendo since the SNES. I remember seeing Final Fantasy 7 in a magazine that was being developed for the N64, and man am I glad they went with the PS1 cause that game looked like it was made for 5 year olds.

Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4969 Posts
[QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="daqua_99"]

Square stays true to Sony because of the history.

Why would Square go to MS ... Square is a Japanese company and the 360 is selling like crap in the land of the rising sun.

Square won't go to Nintendo (or put their entire hopes on Nintendo) due to the history which they have (bad one might we add).

coreygames

i didnt know nintendo and square had a bad history

Yeah, that's fresh news to me.

They have never had a bad history with nintendo, thats just some fanboy turning tricks again.

Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4969 Posts
Look at the release lists. There are more games comming forNintendo than for sony.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="coreygames"][QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="daqua_99"]

Square stays true to Sony because of the history.

Why would Square go to MS ... Square is a Japanese company and the 360 is selling like crap in the land of the rising sun.

Square won't go to Nintendo (or put their entire hopes on Nintendo) due to the history which they have (bad one might we add).

mojito1988

i didnt know nintendo and square had a bad history

Yeah, that's fresh news to me.

They have never had a bad history with nintendo, thats just some fanboy turning tricks again.

Yes they did have a bad history after the SNES.

Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts

Look at the release lists. There are more games comming forNintendo than for sony.mojito1988

Oh god here comes the Nintendo defense squad.

Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4969 Posts
[QUOTE="mojito1988"][QUOTE="coreygames"][QUOTE="stika"][QUOTE="daqua_99"]

Square stays true to Sony because of the history.

Why would Square go to MS ... Square is a Japanese company and the 360 is selling like crap in the land of the rising sun.

Square won't go to Nintendo (or put their entire hopes on Nintendo) due to the history which they have (bad one might we add).

Ragnarok1051

i didnt know nintendo and square had a bad history

Yeah, that's fresh news to me.

They have never had a bad history with nintendo, thats just some fanboy turning tricks again.

Is that why Square is making more games for nintendo than any other group now?

Yes they did have a bad history after the SNES.

Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4969 Posts

They had a transition with the N64 being cart based. They NEVER stopped working for nintendo on the GBA and then the cube and now Bigtime on the DS and the Wii. I would not call that a bad relationship

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

They had a transition with the N64 being cart based. They NEVER stopped working for nintendo on the GBA and then the cube and now Bigtime on the DS and the Wii. I would not call that a bad relationship

mojito1988

No I remember reading it, FF7 was an N64 game and they dropped it. Thats why there were no N64 games and only Chrystal Chronicles on the Cube.

Avatar image for _koolgirl_
_koolgirl_

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 _koolgirl_
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts
[QUOTE="_koolgirl_"]

I have learned to accept FF at this point more than likely won't be Muliplatform. FF is built off an engine built specifically for PS3, I assume the sequel is as well.

However, I find it highly promising that SE bought the UE3 engine and is making games like Last Remnant multiplatform.

That fact alone shows that SE is looking at other options, not only are they making a multiplat game but they are using an outside engine to do it.

fuzzysquash

The White Engine is actually open-platform.

That doesn't mean FFXIII will be multiplat, but they could in principle port it. But if the XIII team makes extensive use of Blu-ray, it may pose a technical hurdle.

Oh really?? I did not know that, I got the impression (just from people talking on here mind you) that the White Engine was an engine built for PS3 and only PS3.

In a way that is interesting, so they have an in house open-platform engine, yet they chose to buy UE3 technology? Are they having problems with their own engine? Why would they do that? (real question, not sarcasm)

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="_koolgirl_"]

I have learned to accept FF at this point more than likely won't be Muliplatform. FF is built off an engine built specifically for PS3, I assume the sequel is as well.

However, I find it highly promising that SE bought the UE3 engine and is making games like Last Remnant multiplatform.

That fact alone shows that SE is looking at other options, not only are they making a multiplat game but they are using an outside engine to do it.

_koolgirl_

The White Engine is actually open-platform.

That doesn't mean FFXIII will be multiplat, but they could in principle port it. But if the XIII team makes extensive use of Blu-ray, it may pose a technical hurdle.

Oh really?? I did not know that, I got the impression (just from people talking on here mind you) that the White Engine was an engine built for PS3 and only PS3.

In a way that is interesting, so they have an in house open-platform engine, yet they chose to buy UE3 technology? Are they having problems with their own engine? Why would they do that? (real question, not sarcasm)

No the White Engine is used for FF13 and UE3 is being used for Last Remnant

Avatar image for TalesofRaGnArOk
TalesofRaGnArOk

3189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 TalesofRaGnArOk
Member since 2007 • 3189 Posts

Um, Im pretty sure that SE is more with Nintendo, since there making like 5 or more games for the DS, and like 3 for the Wii

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#34 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts

Oh really?? I did not know that, I got the impression (just from people talking on here mind you) that the White Engine was an engine built for PS3 and only PS3.

In a way that is interesting, so they have an in house open-platform engine, yet they chose to buy UE3 technology? Are they having problems with their own engine? Why would they do that? (real question, not sarcasm)

_koolgirl_

I don't know, I suspect that White Engine is for their premier titles, whereas UE3 is meant for second-tier titles like The Last Remnant.

As for why Square hasn't announced any White Engine-based games for 360, only Square knows. But I'm assuming they'd like to keep their options open.

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#35 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts

No the White Engine is used for FF13 and UE3 is being used for Last Remnant

Ragnarok1051

Yes, but the engine is still open-platform

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

No the White Engine is used for FF13 and UE3 is being used for Last Remnant

fuzzysquash

Yes, but the engine is still open-platform

I didn't say anything about it being closed platform, just what each one was being used for.

Avatar image for _koolgirl_
_koolgirl_

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 _koolgirl_
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts
[QUOTE="_koolgirl_"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="_koolgirl_"]

I have learned to accept FF at this point more than likely won't be Muliplatform. FF is built off an engine built specifically for PS3, I assume the sequel is as well.

However, I find it highly promising that SE bought the UE3 engine and is making games like Last Remnant multiplatform.

That fact alone shows that SE is looking at other options, not only are they making a multiplat game but they are using an outside engine to do it.

Ragnarok1051

The White Engine is actually open-platform.

That doesn't mean FFXIII will be multiplat, but they could in principle port it. But if the XIII team makes extensive use of Blu-ray, it may pose a technical hurdle.

Oh really?? I did not know that, I got the impression (just from people talking on here mind you) that the White Engine was an engine built for PS3 and only PS3.

In a way that is interesting, so they have an in house open-platform engine, yet they chose to buy UE3 technology? Are they having problems with their own engine? Why would they do that? (real question, not sarcasm)

No the White Engine is used for FF13 and UE3 is being used for Last Remnant

I know that. What I asked was, if the White Engine is open platform, why did they not use it for Last Remnanat? Why did they buy an outside engine unless they are aving problems their own (White Engine)
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="_koolgirl_"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="_koolgirl_"]

I have learned to accept FF at this point more than likely won't be Muliplatform. FF is built off an engine built specifically for PS3, I assume the sequel is as well.

However, I find it highly promising that SE bought the UE3 engine and is making games like Last Remnant multiplatform.

That fact alone shows that SE is looking at other options, not only are they making a multiplat game but they are using an outside engine to do it.

_koolgirl_

The White Engine is actually open-platform.

That doesn't mean FFXIII will be multiplat, but they could in principle port it. But if the XIII team makes extensive use of Blu-ray, it may pose a technical hurdle.

Oh really?? I did not know that, I got the impression (just from people talking on here mind you) that the White Engine was an engine built for PS3 and only PS3.

In a way that is interesting, so they have an in house open-platform engine, yet they chose to buy UE3 technology? Are they having problems with their own engine? Why would they do that? (real question, not sarcasm)

No the White Engine is used for FF13 and UE3 is being used for Last Remnant

I know that. What I asked was, if the White Engine is open platform, why did they not use it for Last Remnanat? Why did they buy an outside engine unless they are aving problems their own (White Engine)

Idk, maybe they just wanted to use different one, get a different outcome

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#39 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts
[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

No the White Engine is used for FF13 and UE3 is being used for Last Remnant

Ragnarok1051

Yes, but the engine is still open-platform

I didn't say anything about it being closed platform, just what each one was being used for.

oh, my bad

Avatar image for Pangster007
Pangster007

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#40 Pangster007
Member since 2004 • 4426 Posts
The built up fanbase on Sony systems in two generations; they expected the PS3 to be just as successful as the PS1 and PS2. Also note that these are RPGs, they take time to make, and planningand development goes right from an early stage.
Avatar image for mubarakibnumar
mubarakibnumar

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 mubarakibnumar
Member since 2005 • 586 Posts
The thing is SE like all the other ignorant top developers never gave the Wii a chance in the beginning even though they had the DS as a case study(DS has the same business model as the Wii). The average cost of making a PS3 game from the ground up is around $17 million. SE decided to use their own engine(White engine) in order to minimise cost(They thought that consumers will choose the ps3 as their premier consoles) BUT unfortunately for them the ps3 is selling woefully and its software sales are even worse.

The main reason we are seeing so many remakes of games(DQIV,V,VI,FFIII,FFIV) on the DS is because SE is trying to recoup some of the money they invested on the White engine and ps3 games.

I think the reason we havent heard of any new game announcement for the ps3 from SE is because they are waiting for more people to get the ps3 before they make more games.

Avatar image for fuzzysquash
fuzzysquash

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#42 fuzzysquash
Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts

I think the reason we havent heard of any new game announcement for the ps3 from SE is because they are waiting for more people to get the ps3 before they make more games.

mubarakibnumar

or maybe because TGS isn't here yet? :|

There are rumors that SE is planning to announce a new PS3 game in a few days at the show.

Avatar image for joeychew
joeychew

4580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 joeychew
Member since 2003 • 4580 Posts
long term relationship, PS3 is Japan console.
Avatar image for mubarakibnumar
mubarakibnumar

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 mubarakibnumar
Member since 2005 • 586 Posts
[QUOTE="mubarakibnumar"]

I think the reason we havent heard of any new game announcement for the ps3 from SE is because they are waiting for more people to get the ps3 before they make more games.

fuzzysquash

or maybe because TGS isn't here yet? :|

There are rumors that SE is planning to announce a new PS3 game in a few days at the show.

SE hasnt announced a new exclusive game for the ps3 since FF13 VS.

Honestly if developers keep on investing their bread and butter on the ps3 they will go out of business.

Avatar image for Korrigan777
Korrigan777

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Korrigan777
Member since 2007 • 763 Posts
[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="mubarakibnumar"]

I think the reason we havent heard of any new game announcement for the ps3 from SE is because they are waiting for more people to get the ps3 before they make more games.

mubarakibnumar

or maybe because TGS isn't here yet? :|

There are rumors that SE is planning to announce a new PS3 game in a few days at the show.

SE hasnt announced a new exclusive game for the ps3 since FF13 VS.

Honestly if developers keep on investing their bread and butter on the ps3 they will go out of business.

you should work for Square-enix, obviously you know everything they're planning, and know each possible opportunity for them to offset their losses

:roll:

Avatar image for mubarakibnumar
mubarakibnumar

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 mubarakibnumar
Member since 2005 • 586 Posts
[QUOTE="mubarakibnumar"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="mubarakibnumar"]

I think the reason we havent heard of any new game announcement for the ps3 from SE is because they are waiting for more people to get the ps3 before they make more games.

Korrigan777

or maybe because TGS isn't here yet? :|

There are rumors that SE is planning to announce a new PS3 game in a few days at the show.

SE hasnt announced a new exclusive game for the ps3 since FF13 VS.

Honestly if developers keep on investing their bread and butter on the ps3 they will go out of business.

you should work for Square-enix, obviously you know everything they're planning, and know each possible opportunity for them to offset their losses

:roll:

Look its simple logic. SE cant spend much more than they gain because they are not running a voluntary business. Believe it or not but the ps3 has the worst software attach ratio of all the three next gen consoles. People are not buying enought software for their ps3's-what do you think will happen if any developer invests on a userbase that has only one game that has sold over a million units?

Avatar image for bulletmath
bulletmath

1339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 bulletmath
Member since 2007 • 1339 Posts

thier main platform at the moment is the DS

The PS3 is geting a bit of love but the wii and POSP dont seem to be getting much

Avatar image for Arnalion
Arnalion

3316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Arnalion
Member since 2006 • 3316 Posts

Two things:

1) The PS3 is capable of handling the beautifulgraphics Final Fantasyis known for (that rules out the Wii)

2) The Xbox 360 doesn't sell in Japan

The PS3 is the only system that can handle graphically superior games that will sell well in Japan (which is where the majority of their games sell best)

Onizuka36

Graphics doesn't have anything to do with it. Do you remember that they released FF games on both PS1 and PS2?

Avatar image for NeoStar9
NeoStar9

1761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 NeoStar9
Member since 2003 • 1761 Posts
[QUOTE="daqua_99"]

Square stays true to Sony because of the history.

Why would Square go to MS ... Square is a Japanese company and the 360 is selling like crap in the land of the rising sun.

Square won't go to Nintendo (or put their entire hopes on Nintendo) due to the history which they have (bad one might we add).

stika

i didnt know nintendo and square had a bad history

 
I think the bad history between Square and Nintendo comes from the supposed backstabing by Square to Nintendo during the time of the PlayStation 1 and Nintendo 64. i remember reading, and perhaps others might have come across the same thing, that when Square jumped ship to the PlayStation Nintendo didn't really put up much of a fight and that kinda insulted Square to some degree. Also that Sony had made a LOT of promises to Square if they could get others to develop on the PS1. Which leads to why a number of companies, mainly RPG ones I believe pulled their support from Nintendo. Then Square went on to publicly bad mouth Nintendo for a while.

I don't believe their bad relationship had to do with Nintendo still using carts as the could hold as much info as the cds at the time. Not all N64 games were the same size remember, they range from small to large. I think the above is also the reason why we didn't see a Square game on a Nintendo console for so long due to the bad blood that form due to Square's actions. I also seem to recall reading that due to that Square had a hard time getting games on the GBA and then the Nintendo DS. They had to make a Cube game in order to be allowed a DS kit. Which could be why FFCC on the Cube seem so below par. They might have been going through the motions since the real money was rereleasing all of their old Final Fantasy games on the Nintendo DS and GBA. I think before they were allowed to that Square actually made a public apology for their actions that caused the rift between the two companies. I do recall being pointed to an article that talked about that. It was said during an announcement of something else Square was announucing at the time.

How solid this all is I'm not sure. However it makes more sense to me that is what would have caused the rift between the two companies in the past and would explain why some companies decided to pull support the way they did. It just being that Nintendo still wanted to use carts just doesn't work for me. Could the cost of having to pay Nintendo for the carts been more then the losses they would have and most likely did get hit with due to the people pirating games on the PS1 due to them being on CDs? I don't think so.
Avatar image for mubarakibnumar
mubarakibnumar

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 mubarakibnumar
Member since 2005 • 586 Posts


I think the bad history between Square and Nintendo comes from the supposed backstabing by Square to Nintendo during the time of the PlayStation 1 and Nintendo 64. i remember reading, and perhaps others might have come across the same thing, that when Square jumped ship to the PlayStation Nintendo didn't really put up much of a fight and that kinda insulted Square to some degree. Also that Sony had made a LOT of promises to Square if they could get others to develop on the PS1. Which leads to why a number of companies, mainly RPG ones I believe pulled their support from Nintendo. Then Square went on to publicly bad mouth Nintendo for a while.

I don't believe their bad relationship had to do with Nintendo still using carts as the could hold as much info as the cds at the time. Not all N64 games were the same size remember, they range from small to large. I think the above is also the reason why we didn't see a Square game on a Nintendo console for so long due to the bad blood that form due to Square's actions. I also seem to recall reading that due to that Square had a hard time getting games on the GBA and then the Nintendo DS. They had to make a Cube game in order to be allowed a DS kit. Which could be why FFCC on the Cube seem so below par. They might have been going through the motions since the real money was rereleasing all of their old Final Fantasy games on the Nintendo DS and GBA. I think before they were allowed to that Square actually made a public apology for their actions that caused the rift between the two companies. I do recall being pointed to an article that talked about that. It was said during an announcement of something else Square was announucing at the time.

How solid this all is I'm not sure. However it makes more sense to me that is what would have caused the rift between the two companies in the past and would explain why some companies decided to pull support the way they did. It just being that Nintendo still wanted to use carts just doesn't work for me. Could the cost of having to pay Nintendo for the carts been more then the losses they would have and most likely did get hit with due to the people pirating games on the PS1 due to them being on CDs? I don't think so.

All this is in the past. If SE wants to make money then their only alternative is to fully support the DS and Wii.