Why does the New 3DS cost $200?

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#151  Edited By lamprey263  Online
Member since 2006 • 45464 Posts

@MirkoS77: well like I said in a previous post, you can get a brand new New 3DS XL for like $175 from GameStop (and therefor every other major retailer that price matches), so getting it with a $5 third party charger or $10 official Nintendo charger, that's still $15-20 under MSRP, and only $20-25 more than a standard 3DS XL. Which really isn't all that much more. That's just $20-25 for c-stick, enhanced bumper buttons, Amiibo capabilities, enhanced 3D, and ability to play n3DS designed games (just Xenoblade Chronicles for now). For now though it's still much about nothing, you can get a $80 2DS, or $160 3DS XL, it's not like the games on the 3DS market are locked behind a huge price barrier.

If you look at Nintendo's balance sheet the last 5 years their cash and short term investments went from 1.17 trillion-million Yen in 2011 to 795 billion-million in 2014, that's a 1/3% falloff of their cash, to simply say they could lose 250 million for the next 40 years is a bit simplistic way of looking at their finances.

SEE THEIR BALANCE SHEET

Their actual cash-cash went from ~813bm (billion-million) Yen to ~534bm Yen, staying at about 470bm Yen for three years. Their actual assets have shrunk as well. Their total assets went from about 1.5 trillion-million yen to 1.1 trillion-million yen, nearly a 1/3 falloff as well. That's not a company that can afford to lose that kind of money and assets like that at a steady pace for 40 years.

Avatar image for superbuuman
superbuuman

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#152  Edited By superbuuman
Member since 2010 • 6400 Posts

Easy answer because the market accept it, its selling at the price..and its a business so need to make profit & as a company gotta make profit to please shareholders. There is no defending to not include power adapter with it, its a dick move. :P

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#153  Edited By Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36103 Posts

Yeah, it's a bit overpriced, I'd say. Not as much as Apple products, though, so I'm not sure what exactly you're complaining about. Why is it overpriced? Because they can sell a huge amount of them at that price. The exact same reason Apple wants lots of money for crappy hardware. If you don't hate money, you will keep selling your product for the highest price people are willing to pay.

Judging from the huge amount of entertainment I've got from the 3DS, I'd say it was well worth it, though.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#154  Edited By MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17980 Posts

@lamprey263 said:

@MirkoS77: well like I said in a previous post, you can get a brand new New 3DS XL for like $175 from GameStop (and therefor every other major retailer that price matches), so getting it with a $5 third party charger or $10 official Nintendo charger, that's still $15-20 under MSRP, and only $20-25 more than a standard 3DS XL. Which really isn't all that much more. That's just $20-25 for c-stick, enhanced bumper buttons, Amiibo capabilities, enhanced 3D, and ability to play n3DS designed games (just Xenoblade Chronicles for now). For now though it's still much about nothing, you can get a $80 2DS, or $160 3DS XL, it's not like the games on the 3DS market are locked behind a huge price barrier.

If you look at Nintendo's balance sheet the last 5 years their cash and short term investments went from 1.17 trillion-million Yen in 2011 to 795 billion-million in 2014, that's a 1/3% falloff of their cash, to simply say they could lose 250 million for the next 40 years is a bit simplistic way of looking at their finances.

SEE THEIR BALANCE SHEET

Their actual cash-cash went from ~813bm (billion-million) Yen to ~534bm Yen, staying at about 470bm Yen for three years. Their actual assets have shrunk as well. Their total assets went from about 1.5 trillion-million yen to 1.1 trillion-million yen, nearly a 1/3 falloff as well. That's not a company that can afford to lose that kind of money and assets like that at a steady pace for 40 years.

You don't have to tell me that, I'm fully aware. It's an incredibly simplistic and false narrative that doesn't take many business realities into account written by some dope on a site that Nintendo fans love to cling to whenever people say they may be in trouble. I don't believe it for a second. They could find themselves in very serious financial straights within only a few generations if they don't watch it.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#156  Edited By SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

It's actually an even lower resolution than that - 800 x 240, which obviously makes it one of the lowest resolution if not the lowest resolution gaming device still on the market, aside from the 2DS (which is 400x240).

The ones with TN displays like mine are unfortunately behind the times, as well.

That said, it's still a nice system.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#157  Edited By deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

@emgesp said:

Can someone explain to me why a machine with such weak hardware costs this much?

- Its less graphically capable than the PS Vita

- Has a low res screen of 800 - 400 pixels

- Lack of features

In comparison you can purchase full fledged tablets for $99 that totally destroy the 3DS in both graphical performance, resolution and features. Sure, the 3DS has the benefit of physical controls and Nintendo IP, but still why is it so overpriced?

What features does it lack compared to a Vita or a tablet? All the basic features that the tablet or Vita you are talking about performs? The 3DS performs them too:

  • It has media capability via Netflix, Hulu, YouTube, and Nintendo Video (Vita no longer runs YouTube, does not have Hulu, and Netflix does not run on Vita TV)
  • It has a camera that can take 2D and 3D photographs and videos (Vita camera is limited to only 2D photos, and is the same VGA resolution as a 3DS camera)
  • It has a music player, and it even lets you record your own sound, and mix and match it somewhat (Vita does not have a recorder or sound mixer)
  • It lets you browse the internet (So does Vita)
  • It has physical controls (more inputs than the Vita, as a matter of fact)
  • It has online gaming (o does Vita)
  • It has geosynchronyous features (Which Vita lacks, because Near and Maps were both discontinued)

All of this, plus it also has a feature no other device on the market has via stereoscopic 3D? How does the 3DS lack features? What are these features? And what $99 tablet outdoes it in terms of features?

The New 3DS models fully justify their cost. With the older ones, maybe you had a point with them being overpriced, though even there, I'd argue the 3DS justifies itself with a good game library- but the New 3DS XL more than justifies its cost.

Avatar image for ktseymour
ktseymour

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 ktseymour
Member since 2005 • 1000 Posts

@emgesp said:

Can someone explain to me why a machine with such weak hardware costs this much?

- Its less graphically capable than the PS Vita

- Has a low res screen of 800 - 400 pixels

- Lack of features

In comparison you can purchase full fledged tablets for $99 that totally destroy the 3DS in both graphical performance, resolution and features. Sure, the 3DS has the benefit of physical controls and Nintendo IP, but still why is it so overpriced?

How else do you expect an Italian Plumber from the Bronx to retire in Japan? That place is expensive !

Avatar image for aigis
aigis

7355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#159 aigis
Member since 2015 • 7355 Posts

@iandizion713 said:
@MirkoS77 said:
@aigis said:
@MirkoS77 said:
@NathanDrakeSwag said:

NX will be sold with no power supply.

That's probably not even a joke. And the sad thing is, many here would immediately defend it.

its called innovation

Failing to include something necessary to the function of the core system is now seen as innovation? Huh, I learn something new evey day. I suppose in Nintendo apologist's eyes, it only could be.

Its called being environmentally friendly. The N3DS uses the same charger cable as the DS and 3DS which there are record setting numbers of adapters widely avaible at a much cheaper cost Nintendo could have provided. When i bought my N3DS i already had 2 cables ready from my previous systems. Nintendo were desperate to get that price down to $199.

Why not just market your referbs for less am I right

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#160  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@aigis: Cause retailers will get mad and not want to buy them for their stores when they cant make good money. Its same reason Nintendo can sell you a Refurbished Console that is basically brand new for $199 but retailers still want to sell for $299. Xbox One had to pull a bunch of strings to drop the price of their system. So did the 3DS. But when you have a console that doesnt sell as well, it can be hard. Would help if we were all Sony and had more power in dictating prices. Sony could drop the Vita price to $99 and stores wouldnt be able to do hardly anything cause Sony will threaten to lower support.

Avatar image for Solaryellow
Solaryellow

7364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 Solaryellow
Member since 2013 • 7364 Posts

Nintendo has a self inflated ego when it comes to its software and hardware based on how it prices its products. The 3DS is certainly a good and successful system with a healthy library but it is old yet priced as still being new. Newer version or not, it is still an enhanced version of an old console. The way Nintendo prices its products should not come across as a shock to anyone. Software (years after release) still sees full price. The failure known as the Wii U is still expensive so it should be expected a better selling console would also see a price close to what we've been used to seeing for years.

Avatar image for frank_castle
Frank_Castle

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#162  Edited By Frank_Castle
Member since 2015 • 1982 Posts

Because goofy sheep will gladly pay it

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7849 Posts

@charizard1605 said:
@emgesp said:

Can someone explain to me why a machine with such weak hardware costs this much?

- Its less graphically capable than the PS Vita

- Has a low res screen of 800 - 400 pixels

- Lack of features

In comparison you can purchase full fledged tablets for $99 that totally destroy the 3DS in both graphical performance, resolution and features. Sure, the 3DS has the benefit of physical controls and Nintendo IP, but still why is it so overpriced?

What features does it lack compared to a Vita or a tablet? All the basic features that the tablet or Vita you are talking about performs? The 3DS performs them too:

  • It has media capability via Netflix, Hulu, YouTube, and Nintendo Video (Vita no longer runs YouTube, does not have Hulu, and Netflix does not run on Vita TV)
  • It has a camera that can take 2D and 3D photographs and videos (Vita camera is limited to only 2D photos, and is the same VGA resolution as a 3DS camera)
  • It has a music player, and it even lets you record your own sound, and mix and match it somewhat (Vita does not have a recorder or sound mixer)
  • It lets you browse the internet (So does Vita)
  • It has physical controls (more inputs than the Vita, as a matter of fact)
  • It has online gaming (o does Vita)
  • It has geosynchronyous features (Which Vita lacks, because Near and Maps were both discontinued)

All of this, plus it also has a feature no other device on the market has via stereoscopic 3D? How does the 3DS lack features? What are these features? And what $99 tablet outdoes it in terms of features?

The New 3DS models fully justify their cost. With the older ones, maybe you had a point with them being overpriced, though even there, I'd argue the 3DS justifies itself with a good game library- but the New 3DS XL more than justifies its cost.

You have a point that it can do those things, but outside gaming it doesn't do those things as well as a Tablet. Watching movies on a 3.5 - 4" low res screen is not really practical, nor does the 3DS make for a good web browsing experience. With the exception of serious gaming, a tablet offers a superior experience with all those other features for around the same price. This is why handhelds are losing marketshare and will continue to do so. The N3DS should be priced at $99 tops. There is just too much competition these days to justify paying $200 for handheld that is really only good at gaming.

Avatar image for 93BlackHawk93
93BlackHawk93

8611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#164  Edited By 93BlackHawk93
Member since 2010 • 8611 Posts

Eww, mobile gaming...

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#165  Edited By deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

@emgesp said:
@charizard1605 said:
@emgesp said:

Can someone explain to me why a machine with such weak hardware costs this much?

- Its less graphically capable than the PS Vita

- Has a low res screen of 800 - 400 pixels

- Lack of features

In comparison you can purchase full fledged tablets for $99 that totally destroy the 3DS in both graphical performance, resolution and features. Sure, the 3DS has the benefit of physical controls and Nintendo IP, but still why is it so overpriced?

What features does it lack compared to a Vita or a tablet? All the basic features that the tablet or Vita you are talking about performs? The 3DS performs them too:

  • It has media capability via Netflix, Hulu, YouTube, and Nintendo Video (Vita no longer runs YouTube, does not have Hulu, and Netflix does not run on Vita TV)
  • It has a camera that can take 2D and 3D photographs and videos (Vita camera is limited to only 2D photos, and is the same VGA resolution as a 3DS camera)
  • It has a music player, and it even lets you record your own sound, and mix and match it somewhat (Vita does not have a recorder or sound mixer)
  • It lets you browse the internet (So does Vita)
  • It has physical controls (more inputs than the Vita, as a matter of fact)
  • It has online gaming (o does Vita)
  • It has geosynchronyous features (Which Vita lacks, because Near and Maps were both discontinued)

All of this, plus it also has a feature no other device on the market has via stereoscopic 3D? How does the 3DS lack features? What are these features? And what $99 tablet outdoes it in terms of features?

The New 3DS models fully justify their cost. With the older ones, maybe you had a point with them being overpriced, though even there, I'd argue the 3DS justifies itself with a good game library- but the New 3DS XL more than justifies its cost.

You have a point that it can do those things, but outside gaming it doesn't do those things as well as a Tablet. Watching movies on a 3.5 - 4" low res screen is not really practical, nor does the 3DS make for a good web browsing experience. With the exception of serious gaming, a tablet offers a superior experience with all those other features for around the same price. This is why handhelds are losing marketshare and will continue to do so. The N3DS should be priced at $99 tops. There is just too much competition these days to justify paying $200 for handheld that is really only good at gaming.

Sure, but tablets don't game as well as a New 3DS does.

So it evens out. On a $199 tablet, you pay for a mid range multimedia experience, and a low end gaming one; on a $199 3DS, you pay for a low end multimedia experience, and a high end gaming one. If you want to play games on a portable seriously, then a 3DS purchase is a no brainer over a tablet, and more than justifies itself.

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#166 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

I got the 3DS Xl several years ago for $149, and it was available many times for that price. So it actually is kind of bizarre they are sticking with $199 for the "new" 3DS.

But if people are foolish enough to pay that much for such low tech, I guess I don't blame Nintendo. It probably costs like $5 to make a 3DS these days LOL.

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#167 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

@charizard1605 said:
@emgesp said:
@charizard1605 said:
@emgesp said:

Can someone explain to me why a machine with such weak hardware costs this much?

- Its less graphically capable than the PS Vita

- Has a low res screen of 800 - 400 pixels

- Lack of features

In comparison you can purchase full fledged tablets for $99 that totally destroy the 3DS in both graphical performance, resolution and features. Sure, the 3DS has the benefit of physical controls and Nintendo IP, but still why is it so overpriced?

What features does it lack compared to a Vita or a tablet? All the basic features that the tablet or Vita you are talking about performs? The 3DS performs them too:

  • It has media capability via Netflix, Hulu, YouTube, and Nintendo Video (Vita no longer runs YouTube, does not have Hulu, and Netflix does not run on Vita TV)
  • It has a camera that can take 2D and 3D photographs and videos (Vita camera is limited to only 2D photos, and is the same VGA resolution as a 3DS camera)
  • It has a music player, and it even lets you record your own sound, and mix and match it somewhat (Vita does not have a recorder or sound mixer)
  • It lets you browse the internet (So does Vita)
  • It has physical controls (more inputs than the Vita, as a matter of fact)
  • It has online gaming (o does Vita)
  • It has geosynchronyous features (Which Vita lacks, because Near and Maps were both discontinued)

All of this, plus it also has a feature no other device on the market has via stereoscopic 3D? How does the 3DS lack features? What are these features? And what $99 tablet outdoes it in terms of features?

The New 3DS models fully justify their cost. With the older ones, maybe you had a point with them being overpriced, though even there, I'd argue the 3DS justifies itself with a good game library- but the New 3DS XL more than justifies its cost.

You have a point that it can do those things, but outside gaming it doesn't do those things as well as a Tablet. Watching movies on a 3.5 - 4" low res screen is not really practical, nor does the 3DS make for a good web browsing experience. With the exception of serious gaming, a tablet offers a superior experience with all those other features for around the same price. This is why handhelds are losing marketshare and will continue to do so. The N3DS should be priced at $99 tops. There is just too much competition these days to justify paying $200 for handheld that is really only good at gaming.

Sure, but tablets don't game as well as a New 3DS does.

So it evens out. On a $199 tablet, you pay for a mid range multimedia experience, and a low end gaming one; on a $199 3DS, you pay for a low end multimedia experience, and a high end gaming one. If you want to play games on a portable seriously, then a 3DS purchase is a no brainer over a tablet, and more than justifies itself.

I wouldn't say that a tablet is a "low end" gaming experience, there is obviously far more "trash" on a mobile or tablet platform. But there are some high end experiences as well, higher than the 3DS is capable of, actually.

You could argue that both the 3DS and the tablet experience are "low end" compared to PC or even console, and that the 3DS is currently the lowest. Albeit as a Nintendo machine it does have some nice exclusives that can make it worthwhile to many fans of those games, that still doesn't make it "high end". It's still pretty much low-end, low-tech - with the benefit of buttons.

Avatar image for R10nu
R10nu

1679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 R10nu
Member since 2006 • 1679 Posts
@iandizion713 said:

Tablets and the Vita are nothing like the N3DS. N3DS has more mechanical buttons, has a flip screen for increase protection, has superior face tracking, has way better touch controls. N3DS you can use a stylus, you cant on tablets or Vita, they have different touch tech. N3DS has two screens also. N3DS has better and lighter material. Plus N3DS has 3D and so much more. Theyre nothing a like.

You get more for your money with N3DS, its just a superior device.

This is among the most brain dead fanboy drivels i've read on these forums.

The reason N3DS comes with a stylus is because it uses a cheap-ass stone age resistive touchscreen as opposed to capacitive in tablets and Vita (which has 2 of those).

N3DSXL, being around the same size, is 50% heavier than Vita:

PCH-2000:

219 grams

New Nintendo 3DS:

253 grams (8.9 oz)

New Nintendo 3DS XL:

329 grams (11.6 oz)

Anyone owning both will tell you that 3DS feels like a cheap toy compared to Vita.

3DS family has got a shitty screen resolution, one of the screens doesn't even support touch, it has a stone age hardware, it uses pleb circle pad and a nub instead of proper analog sticks, leaving wi-fi on destroys your battery life, the d-pad is positioned awfully, it wastes a ton of space in its design.

It's like a console manifestation of fucking up and cutting corners, but somehow costs a premium.

It's overall a shit device that happens to have great games, so i'm willing to cope.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#169  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@R10nu: Two screens are better then one. And just because its old or different, doesnt mean its not better. 3DS has best touch screen aviable for gaming and can use a stylus. Its amazing. Screen size means nothing, plus N3DS has two. I didnt know Vita was lighter, im guessing cheaper plastic. Vita does feel like cheap plastic now that i think about it. But i agree Vita is very shat, not even Sony want to support that joke. But i wont diss your Vita much, its not worth my time, enjoy it.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7849 Posts
@charizard1605 said:
@emgesp said:

You have a point that it can do those things, but outside gaming it doesn't do those things as well as a Tablet. Watching movies on a 3.5 - 4" low res screen is not really practical, nor does the 3DS make for a good web browsing experience. With the exception of serious gaming, a tablet offers a superior experience with all those other features for around the same price. This is why handhelds are losing marketshare and will continue to do so. The N3DS should be priced at $99 tops. There is just too much competition these days to justify paying $200 for handheld that is really only good at gaming.

Sure, but tablets don't game as well as a New 3DS does.

So it evens out. On a $199 tablet, you pay for a mid range multimedia experience, and a low end gaming one; on a $199 3DS, you pay for a low end multimedia experience, and a high end gaming one. If you want to play games on a portable seriously, then a 3DS purchase is a no brainer over a tablet, and more than justifies itself.

I personally don't see it evening out because the 3DS only does one thing very well where as a Tablet does many more things even better. You are making it seem like gaming is objectively as important as a bunch of other features combined. Also, I wouldn't call gaming on a dedicated handheld a high end gaming experience. Consoles and PC offer true high end gaming experiences.

My 13 yr old Niece games on her Tablet and Laptop. She gave me her DS because she no longer has interest in a dedicated handheld that is only good at playing games. This is how a lot of other kids her age feel as well. I ask her all the time what kids want and Nintendo handhelds is never brought up. They want Phones, Tablets and XB1's/PS4's, The dedicated handheld gaming market is going to take a huge nose dive come next-gen.

Avatar image for skektek
skektek

6530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#171 skektek
Member since 2004 • 6530 Posts
@Blabadon said:

Just remember, it doesn't come with a charger.

@emgesp said:

In comparison you can purchase full fledged tablets for $99 that totally destroy the 3DS in both graphical performance, resolution and features. Sure, the 3DS has the benefit of physical controls and Nintendo IP

2) There is no fully fledged tablet at $99

If you shop around you can get a new Kindle Fire for $35. It can play Dead Trigger 2 just fine, certainly a very capable tablet for the price.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#172  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@emgesp: Thats cause tablet games are so easy, kids love easy stuff. Im sure if you asked them if they want to trade in their hard chores for easier ones theyll accept too. Mines love playing games on tablet, but they rarely play games on them, they mainly watch Youtube and stuff. The oldest only games on his 3DS XL but has a few daily staregty games he plays on tablet. Whats funny is he finds games that are like Nintendo games. He played this one game that was a cheap Mario Kart copy, another thats a Pokemon copy, another Pokemon copy where they sing music and their singing evolves.

But give him a real Pokemon or Nintendo game and hes hooked. He beat Kirby Triple Deluxe first, then beat Pokemon Omega Ruby, then beat Paper Mario Sticker Star, now hes playing Paper Jam, Mystery Dungeon and A Link Between Worlds. Hell probally finish one this month. Guess how many tablet games hes beat? 0. He still likes some tablet games, same way he still likes some free games on his 3DS. But he rarely plays them free 3DS games either.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7849 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@emgesp: Thats cause tablet games are so easy, kids love easy stuff. Im sure if you asked them if they want to trade in their hard chores for easier ones theyll accept too. Mines love playing games on tablet, but they rarely play games on them, they mainly watch Youtube and stuff. The oldest only games on his 3DS XL but has a few daily staregty games he plays on tablet. Whats funny is he finds games that are like Nintendo games. He played this one game that was a cheap Mario Kart copy, another thats a Pokemon copy, another Pokemon copy where they sing music and their singing evolves.

But give him a real Pokemon or Nintendo game and hes hooked. He beat Kirby Triple Deluxe first, then beat Pokemon Omega Ruby, then beat Paper Mario Sticker Star, now hes playing Paper Jam, Mystery Dungeon and A Link Between Worlds. Hell probally finish one this month. Guess how many tablet games hes beat? 0. He still likes some tablet games, same way he still likes some free games on his 3DS. But he rarely plays them free 3DS games either.

Yes, there will still be people interested in dedicated Nintendo handhelds, but overall that market is shrinking. The 3DS at best will only get back 50% of the original DS's install base. That's a huge drop off. I highly doubt the NX will see similar numbers unless its something truly special and most importantly not too expensive at launch.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#174  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@emgesp: Theyll get there. Theyre close to 60 million already and still have Pokemon Sun/Moon coming. Tablets and Phones are great and good competition. But Nintendo has nothing to worry about when 60 million people are still buying your console even with the amazing Tablet, Phones, PC domination. When a console is not wanted, Nintendo pulls it fast. Just look at Nintendos attempt at VR, the public didnt want it and Nintendo replaced it with something else later.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8

22399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#175 deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
Member since 2007 • 22399 Posts

@skektek said:
@Blabadon said:

Just remember, it doesn't come with a charger.

@emgesp said:

In comparison you can purchase full fledged tablets for $99 that totally destroy the 3DS in both graphical performance, resolution and features. Sure, the 3DS has the benefit of physical controls and Nintendo IP

2) There is no fully fledged tablet at $99

bullshit qualifiers

When you use terms like "for the price", "Just Fine", and "If you shop around", that immediately undercuts your argument.

Avatar image for shellcase86
shellcase86

6890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 shellcase86
Member since 2012 • 6890 Posts

@emgesp said:
@lamprey263 said:
@emgesp said:

So that's your reasoning? Overprice your hardware because it has unique software you can't get anywhere else?

Over-priced? They have options. 2DS, 3DS, 3DS XL, n3DS & n3DS XL, you can get a 2DS for as low as $90 new at retailers ($80 deal at Walmart right now), or one can get 3DS XLs for as little as $160 from GameStop (which they have for NES edition XLs and remaining Persona Q LE XLs). New 3DS has new enhanced 3D that head tracks, faster processor, c-stick, Amiibo capabilities, better shoulder buttons, etc, but isn't essential, but if you want more then pay more. They have very reasonable tiers available.

That still doesn't change the fact that for what you get the N3DS is overpriced, especially given that you have to pay extra for a charger.

At most the N3DS should cost $129.99 with charger and even that is pushing. $210 is a joke for what it offers in terms of hardware/features.

Agreed.

Just bought my kid a 3DS XL. Was outraged when I read beforehand that a charger is not included. There is no reason a charger should not be included aside from the obvious money grab. Even Microsoft isn't that bad (they've actually gotten a lot better recently IMO).

Lost a ton of respect for Nintendo. I only got my kid a 3DS because it's the one thing he has been asking for for a long time now, and he totally deserves it. However, as a consumer and gamer I feel I could never support such a company going forward.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#177  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@shellcase86: Yeah, reading the box does help though. The same place you buy the Console sells the adapter for super cheap. The console would have cost over $199 with the charger and youd be paying a lot extra for just a cheap adapter that you can buy almost anywhere and that most already have. I would just email Nintendo and let them know you didnt like it not having a charger. Thats what some are doing.

Avatar image for aigis
aigis

7355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#178  Edited By aigis
Member since 2015 • 7355 Posts

@iandizion713: The real thing here is that when you buy an electronic device you expect to be able to power it, not having one is as professional as ebay resellers

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#179  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@aigis: Its true, ive already emailed Nintendo about my complaint of a missing adapter. But it still wont stop me from buying a N3DS XL and using my adapter i already have. Matter of fact, i had 3 3DS adapters before i ever even had a 3DS. Then i bought a 3DS and got another. My N3DS didnt have an adapter, but since i already had 4 and they are so cheap at the store, i didnt care. I knew it didnt have one before i bought it. And even when i went to buy it in big words all over the box it warns of needing an adapter.

Avatar image for aigis
aigis

7355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#180  Edited By aigis
Member since 2015 • 7355 Posts

@iandizion713: I wouldnt be bothered by having extras though, maybe backups if one breaks or goes missing and others for when you are out somewhere. What I would be most concerned about is for a first time buyer who wouldnt have the charger. Its just not a smart move on Nintendo's part, it makes them look cheap

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#181  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@aigis: I think its kinda a smart move to get to that magic price number. $199 sounds a whole lot better then $219. And i rather them drop the cheap adapter then drop an important feature like the extra processor, the extended battery life, the C-Stick, NFC rader, extra triggers, etc.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7849 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@emgesp: Theyll get there. Theyre close to 60 million already and still have Pokemon Sun/Moon coming. Tablets and Phones are great and good competition. But Nintendo has nothing to worry about when 60 million people are still buying your console even with the amazing Tablet, Phones, PC domination. When a console is not wanted, Nintendo pulls it fast. Just look at Nintendos attempt at VR, the public didnt want it and Nintendo replaced it with something else later.

The 3DS needs to sell 77 million units to reach 50% of the DS's install base. I highly doubt the 3DS will sell another 17 million units by the end of its lifetime.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#183  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@emgesp: I think theyll get close which will be amazing. Then NX i think will break 77 million.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#184 lamprey263  Online
Member since 2006 • 45464 Posts

@shellcase86 said:

Just bought my kid a 3DS XL. Was outraged when I read beforehand that a charger is not included. There is no reason a charger should not be included aside from the obvious money grab. Even Microsoft isn't that bad (they've actually gotten a lot better recently IMO).

Lost a ton of respect for Nintendo. I only got my kid a 3DS because it's the one thing he has been asking for for a long time now, and he totally deserves it. However, as a consumer and gamer I feel I could never support such a company going forward.

But 3DS XLs still come with an AC adapter.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7849 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@emgesp: I think theyll get close which will be amazing. Then NX i think will break 77 million.

Even if they get close to 50% that's still a huge drop off, not as bad as the Wii U, but still pretty big.

As far as the NX goes, like I said before it needs to be something truly special to even reach 3DS numbers, let alone break them.

There will be less people interested in dedicated handhelds come next gen, so the NX better be something more akin to a Tablet with physical buttons and perhaps some interesting gimmick.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#186  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@emgesp: I think there will be more due to more countries getting into gaming. Hopefully China will like NX.

Avatar image for aigis
aigis

7355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#187 aigis
Member since 2015 • 7355 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@aigis: I think its kinda a smart move to get to that magic price number. $199 sounds a whole lot better then $219. And i rather them drop the cheap adapter then drop an important feature like the extra processor, the extended battery life, the C-Stick, NFC rader, extra triggers, etc.

I dont think the lack of charger goes into those features though, they could bundle if they wanted to

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7849 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@emgesp: I think there will be more due to more countries getting into gaming. Hopefully China will like NX.

I have no idea what the gaming landscape is like in China, so its always a possibility. We'll just have to wait and see.

Avatar image for Pittfan666
Pittfan666

8638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#189 Pittfan666
Member since 2003 • 8638 Posts

You can get them refurbed for $170 on Nintendo Store if price is an issue. Otherwise my work friend got the system it seemed pretty neat for $200.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#190 iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@aigis: Those features cost money, they also are key upgrade points for people who already have a 3DS. Its all just business.

Avatar image for aigis
aigis

7355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#191 aigis
Member since 2015 • 7355 Posts

@iandizion713: I'd argue most people who own a 3ds already were content with their model (there will always be a few upgrading), but more people who are coming in fresh will want the newest model

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#192  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@aigis: The N3DS is not the only model avaible. You can buy many models. But yeah, new comers should use their DS adapter. Those who dont have adapter, just buy one, there cheap and are sold right beside it.

Avatar image for cdragon_88
cdragon_88

1848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#193 cdragon_88
Member since 2003 • 1848 Posts

The hardware is overpriced. The software is what saves it. I'm more than ready for a new Handheld from Nintendo that actually has HD resolutions. Hell even the PS Vita resolution is too low for my tastes.

Avatar image for shellcase86
shellcase86

6890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 shellcase86
Member since 2012 • 6890 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

@shellcase86: Yeah, reading the box does help though. The same place you buy the Console sells the adapter for super cheap. The console would have cost over $199 with the charger and youd be paying a lot extra for just a cheap adapter that you can buy almost anywhere and that most already have. I would just email Nintendo and let them know you didnt like it not having a charger. Thats what some are doing.

Good point. I'll levee my grievance with Nintendo.

Avatar image for R10nu
R10nu

1679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 R10nu
Member since 2006 • 1679 Posts

@iandizion713 said:

I didnt know Vita was lighter, im guessing cheaper plastic. Vita does feel like cheap plastic now that i think about it.

So you didn't hold it in your hands to know that it's lighter, but it "feels" like cheap plastic. Uh-huh.

We're not discussing your feels or fantasies here, sheep.

I dare you to find a single portable device out there with screen resolution as low as N3DS that costs as much as $200, which isn't some rare vintage laptop.

Only Ninty fans are stupid enough not only to not call Ninty out on thier preposterous bullshit, but to defend it as well, like it's their firstborn's buttcheeks.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#196 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38071 Posts

It's MS' fault.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#197  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@R10nu said:
@iandizion713 said:

I didnt know Vita was lighter, im guessing cheaper plastic. Vita does feel like cheap plastic now that i think about it.

So you didn't hold it in your hands to know that it's lighter, but it "feels" like cheap plastic. Uh-huh.

We're not discussing your feels or fantasies here, sheep.

I dare you to find a single portable device out there with screen resolution as low as N3DS that costs as much as $200, which isn't some rare vintage laptop.

Only Ninty fans are stupid enough not only to not call Ninty out on thier preposterous bullshit, but to defend it as well, like it's their firstborn's buttcheeks.

I held it in my hands, just didnt know the Vita Slim was lighter. I cant find nothing like N3DS, she is one of a kind beauty. If i could find something better, trust me, id playing it. But until then, i be ballin on my N3DS. Nintendo fans arent stupid though, they are some of the best fans in the world.

Avatar image for shellcase86
shellcase86

6890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 shellcase86
Member since 2012 • 6890 Posts

@lamprey263 said:
@shellcase86 said:

Just bought my kid a 3DS XL. Was outraged when I read beforehand that a charger is not included. There is no reason a charger should not be included aside from the obvious money grab. Even Microsoft isn't that bad (they've actually gotten a lot better recently IMO).

Lost a ton of respect for Nintendo. I only got my kid a 3DS because it's the one thing he has been asking for for a long time now, and he totally deserves it. However, as a consumer and gamer I feel I could never support such a company going forward.

But 3DS XLs still come with an AC adapter.

True. But how absurd is that? How many other companies sell you an electronic piece of mobile equipment with no darn way to charge/power the thing included? Why the hassle? Inexcusable.

Avatar image for iandizion713
iandizion713

16025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#199  Edited By iandizion713
Member since 2005 • 16025 Posts

@shellcase86: How many companies makes their cables backward compatible to reduce their carbon footprint on the environment. Nintendo is not every company, they are unique. They can make decisions that may not make the most sense, but they always have good intent.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#200 lamprey263  Online
Member since 2006 • 45464 Posts

@shellcase86 said:
@lamprey263 said:
@shellcase86 said:

Just bought my kid a 3DS XL. Was outraged when I read beforehand that a charger is not included. There is no reason a charger should not be included aside from the obvious money grab. Even Microsoft isn't that bad (they've actually gotten a lot better recently IMO).

Lost a ton of respect for Nintendo. I only got my kid a 3DS because it's the one thing he has been asking for for a long time now, and he totally deserves it. However, as a consumer and gamer I feel I could never support such a company going forward.

But 3DS XLs still come with an AC adapter.

True. But how absurd is that? How many other companies sell you an electronic piece of mobile equipment with no darn way to charge/power the thing included? Why the hassle? Inexcusable.

Cell phone companies do it, charge you up the ass for the phone, then charge you for every accessory (screen protector, case, car charger). And that stuff is way more expensive by comparison. This is a $10 charger with a $5 third party charger option. If I had to guess the real reason behind the decision has more to do with they wanted it to release at a nice round number like $200 without it eating into their profit margins, nothing too sinister as people expect. This is going to be a handheld that'll cost more. Has better specs, better batteries, better 3D features. Like I said above too, if that $5 bugs you, wait for one of their numerous sales. They have the New 3DS on sale now for $175 at GameStop, $5 more for a third party charger, that's $180 all together and $20 under MSRP.

Now, I don't want to pretend Nintendo isn't cheap in their own way, they are, cheap as hell. Refuse to be flexible on pricing. Really picky about their publishing decisions and limited production of everything. If anything grinds my gears more its that.