Why Fallout: New Vegas will be better than Fallout 3

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]But yeah, not Killing Children shouldn't be an Option for an Argument about how "Failout 3 Suks!!!!1111!". Killing Children is rather Pointless.gmc2u_64

It's just stupid and really not worth it.

Honestly there's a few kids in F3 that could do with a bit of being exterminated.

[QUOTE="Mograine"]

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"] Come on, it wasn't THAT bad...

gmc2u_64

Bittercup's greeting:
"Hi, my name is Bittercup"
Your options to interact with her:
"Bittercup? That must be the dumbest name I have ever heard!"
"Nice to meet you, Bittercup."

Or something very similar. You can't seriously say this is above pitiful.

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"] Indeed. Besides, as you well said, it would only mean unnecessary trouble for Bethesda to add something that's considered a huge taboo by most societies and that would add absolutely nothing to the game.Filthybastrd

It's just stupid and really not worth it.

Honestly there's a few kids in F3 that could do with a bit of being exterminated.

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

[QUOTE="Mograine"]

Bittercup's greeting:
"Hi, my name is Bittercup"
Your options to interact with her:
"Bittercup? That must be the dumbest name I have ever heard!"
"Nice to meet you, Bittercup."

Or something very similar. You can't seriously say this is above pitiful.

DragonfireXZ95

[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"] Besides, their KIDS. What would Kids do to deserve to get their heads blown off by a Shotgun?

It's just stupid and really not worth it.

DragonfireXZ95

Honestly there's a few kids in F3 that could do with a bit of being exterminated.

Look, if they included Child Killing & Sex in Fallout 3, it would be Media-Suicide (It could've been Banned in Quite-a-few Countries).

gmc2u_64

its not just a matter of including them really. it was the issue of choice. the actions in fallout 3 had no consequences really. small choices made in FO1 and 2 resulted in game enders often (not direct game overs but it basically made it impossible to beat) child killing was one thing, it really wasnt inconsquencial like most people portray it.

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]Look, if they included Child Killing & Sex in Fallout 3, it would be Media-Suicide (It could've been Banned in Quite-a-few Countries).

washd123

its not just a matter of including them really. it was the issue of choice. the actions in fallout 3 had no consequences really. small choices made in FO1 and 2 resulted in game enders often (not direct game overs but it basically made it impossible to beat) child killing was one thing, it really wasnt inconsquencial like most people portray it.

[QUOTE="washd123"]

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]Look, if they included Child Killing & Sex in Fallout 3, it would be Media-Suicide (It could've been Banned in Quite-a-few Countries).

gmc2u_64

its not just a matter of including them really. it was the issue of choice. the actions in fallout 3 had no consequences really. small choices made in FO1 and 2 resulted in game enders often (not direct game overs but it basically made it impossible to beat) child killing was one thing, it really wasnt inconsquencial like most people portray it.

what was it?

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

[QUOTE="washd123"]

its not just a matter of including them really. it was the issue of choice. the actions in fallout 3 had no consequences really. small choices made in FO1 and 2 resulted in game enders often (not direct game overs but it basically made it impossible to beat) child killing was one thing, it really wasnt inconsquencial like most people portray it.

washd123

what was it?

If (For some reason) Bethesda DID include Child Killing & Sex, they would've gained nothing but trouble (Media Harrasing, Banned from Countries, etc) just to please a Few Diehard "Fans". Is it REALLY worth it just to have Pointless Features? Is it?

gmc2u_64

yeah it was actually. especially since the overall game quality suffered. you missed my point. tis not as black and white and simply saying you can kill children. the issue at hand was choice with meaningful consequences something FO3 was severely lacking.

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

If (For some reason) Bethesda DID include Child Killing & Sex, they would've gained nothing but trouble (Media Harrasing, Banned from Countries, etc) just to please a Few Diehard "Fans". Is it REALLY worth it just to have Pointless Features? Is it?

washd123

yeah it was actually. especially since the overall game quality suffered. you missed my point. tis not as black and white and simply saying you can kill children. the issue at hand was choice with meaningful consequences something FO3 was severely lacking.