Why get excited over another Paper Mario game that was made for the Gamecube?

why no Rainbow Six Wii?ChiefFreeman

well if Nintendo is all about "fun", then they should use some of their creativity and combine it with a beautiful looking game. Something without mushrooms or silly little childish characters.ChiefFreeman

yes, to me it is a big deal.  Nintendo doesn't care about visuals at all.ChiefFreeman

well if Nintendo is all about "fun", then they should use some of their creativity and combine it with a beautiful looking game. Something without mushrooms or silly little childish characters.ChiefFreeman

You can have too much guns and mature themes in your life.  I get plenty of it when I flip on the news. 

why no Rainbow Six Wii?ChiefFreeman

[QUOTE="ChiefFreeman"]why no Rainbow Six Wii?ShakeNBake1491

Heavenly Sword started out as a Xbox game and nobody seems to care. Two Human started out as a PS1 game, then a gamecube game and nobody cares. So why are people complaining about Super Paper Mario going from gamecube to Wii. Hell it didn't stop Eternal Darkness from going AAA.Blackbond

I like multiplayer games, preferably shooters where teamwork is involved. Nintendo doesnt offer that.ChiefFreeman

Why don't you write them a letter?

I like multiplayer games, preferably shooters where teamwork is involved. Nintendo doesnt offer that.ChiefFreeman

I like multiplayer games, preferably shooters where teamwork is involved.  Nintendo doesnt offer that.ChiefFreeman

yes, to me it is a big deal. Nintendo doesn't care about visuals at all.ChiefFreeman

This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online.  They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system.   I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii.  Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games?  Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom.   Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me.   They still don;t have enough variety.   I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.ChiefFreeman

This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online. They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system. I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii. Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games? Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom. Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me. They still don;t have enough variety. I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.ChiefFreeman

Online now? how many thimes are you going to change the subject? 

[QUOTE="ChiefFreeman"]yes, to me it is a big deal. Nintendo doesn't care about visuals at all.Mu5uk0

yes, the LAST game made for a Nintendo console that wowed me.   

This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online. They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system. I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii. Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games? Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom. Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me. They still don;t have enough variety. I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.ChiefFreeman

[QUOTE="ChiefFreeman"]This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online. They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system. I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii. Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games? Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom. Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me. They still don;t have enough variety. I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.goblaa

Online now? how many thimes are you going to change the subject?

My complaint never varied.   I stated I have a preferance for shooters, which happen to appeal to a more mature crowd.  Nintendo lacks these types of games for their consoles.   they also usually showcase their graphics, which also appeal to me.   Nintendo doesn;t try to use their creativity, or sway a third party developer to use their own creativity to make both a unique playing, as well as gorgeous looking game for their consoles anymore. 

[QUOTE="goblaa"]

[QUOTE="ChiefFreeman"]This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online. They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system. I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii. Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games? Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom. Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me. They still don;t have enough variety. I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.ChiefFreeman

Online now? how many thimes are you going to change the subject?

My complaint never varied.   I stated I have a preferance for shooters, which happen to appeal to a more mature crowd.  Nintendo lacks these types of games for their consoles.   they also usually showcase their graphics, which also appeal to me.   Nintendo doesn;t try to use their creativity, or sway a third party developer to use their own creativity to make both a unique playing, as well as gorgeous looking game for their consoles anymore. 

[QUOTE="goblaa"]

[QUOTE="ChiefFreeman"]This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online. They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system. I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii. Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games? Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom. Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me. They still don;t have enough variety. I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.ChiefFreeman

Online now? how many thimes are you going to change the subject?

My complaint never varied. I stated I have a preferance for shooters, which happen to appeal to a more mature crowd. Nintendo lacks these types of games for their consoles. they also usually showcase their graphics, which also appeal to me. Nintendo doesn;t try to use their creativity, or sway a third party developer to use their own creativity to make both a unique playing, as well as gorgeous looking game for their consoles anymore.

[QUOTE="goblaa"]

[QUOTE="ChiefFreeman"]This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online. They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system. I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii. Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games? Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom. Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me. They still don;t have enough variety. I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.ChiefFreeman

Online now? how many thimes are you going to change the subject?

My complaint never varied. I stated I have a preferance for shooters, which happen to appeal to a more mature crowd. Nintendo lacks these types of games for their consoles. they also usually showcase their graphics, which also appeal to me. Nintendo doesn;t try to use their creativity, or sway a third party developer to use their own creativity to make both a unique playing, as well as gorgeous looking game for their consoles anymore.

My problem isn't that super paper mario doesn't look as good as a traditional wii game, its that the game graphics themselves look like it could be done on the ds. I mean, truely compare this game to super mario world. Ds games are 30-40$ and wii games are 50$. Oh well, hopefully it'll be a fun game anyways.hazuki

Paper mario could be done on the Dreamcast.ChiefFreeman

This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online. They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system. I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii. Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games? Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom. Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me. They still don;t have enough variety. I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.ChiefFreeman

Shooter:

Strategy:

Paper mario could be done on the Dreamcast.ChiefFreeman

[QUOTE="ChiefFreeman"]Paper mario could be done on the Dreamcast.web966

Should we just ignore him and let him play in his shooter only world that for some reason does not include PC?  The TC apparently jusct came here to stir up controversy and to try and challenge our ideas of a quality game with his opinion of how gaming should be.  

This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online.  They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system.   I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii.  Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games?  Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom.   Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me.   They still don;t have enough variety.   I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.ChiefFreeman

[QUOTE="goblaa"]

[QUOTE="ChiefFreeman"]This game might be okay, but my main gripe with Nintendo is their poor online. They goofed up with the cube, and now they only have a marginal online system. I have heard nothnig about player support for the Wii. Where is mention of 16 player online or 32 player online games? Even the weaker Ps2 did it with Socom. Nintendo doesn't try hard to create their own, or lobby for a developer to make a truly great shooter/strategy game for their consoles anymore, and that really burns me. They still don;t have enough variety. I still can't shed the kid image of Nintendo.ChiefFreeman

Online now? how many thimes are you going to change the subject?

My complaint never varied.   I stated I have a preferance for shooters, which happen to appeal to a more mature crowd.  Nintendo lacks these types of games for their consoles.   they also usually showcase their graphics, which also appeal to me.   Nintendo doesn;t try to use their creativity, or sway a third party developer to use their own creativity to make both a unique playing, as well as gorgeous looking game for their consoles anymore. 

[QUOTE="ChiefFreeman"]there's nothing "next gen" about it though. goblaa

And? I guess by that logic GoW2 should recieve no attention either. 

Paper mario could be done on the Dreamcast.ChiefFreeman

No, it couldn't.  You're really getting desparate now, aren't you?