Why I don't like Microsoft as a company

  • 146 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Zodetak
Zodetak

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Zodetak
Member since 2008 • 69 Posts

I fully respect the Xbox360 as a console, what i don't like is how it came to be, and why its here. Please take the time to read

http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/01/Why-you-should-use-OpenGL-and-not-DirectX

This article shows microsofts business strategies and propaganda. I know it wraps around directx and opengl, but if you read the entire thing you'll understand the cycles that microsoft uses.

Avatar image for tutt3r
tutt3r

2865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 tutt3r
Member since 2005 • 2865 Posts

I don't understand why people don't realize every major company does this

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
Woe is Microsoft.
Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts
microsoft doesnt even create games for their own console, that's the sadest **** ever. every console maker in history made games for their own console.
Avatar image for Zodetak
Zodetak

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Zodetak
Member since 2008 • 69 Posts

I don't understand why people don't realize every major company does this

tutt3r

When its completely obvious, and its what the company started with. Its different.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

I don't understand why people don't realize every major company does this

tutt3r
That's not true, Microsoft is special in that way. They are the FUD king ever since they displaced IBM of that position. Other companies simply don't go as far as Microsoft goes.
Avatar image for Zodetak
Zodetak

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Zodetak
Member since 2008 • 69 Posts
Hey you actually read the entire article.....respect, lol
Avatar image for deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
deactivated-59f03d6ce656b

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
Member since 2009 • 2944 Posts
[QUOTE="tutt3r"]

I don't understand why people don't realize every major company does this

kuraimen
That's not true, Microsoft is special in that way. They are the FUD king ever since they displaced IBM of that position. Other companies simply don't go as far as Microsoft goes.

Yes they do, every large company lies to make themselves look better.
Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts
The first game i know that support 3D exceleration aka graphics that arent pixelated on pc , was quake 1# GL quake....which used open gl. open gl does own direct x i wish more dev's besides john carmack used it, seems me dev's dont really know how to use open gl though these days.
Avatar image for Zodetak
Zodetak

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Zodetak
Member since 2008 • 69 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="tutt3r"]

I don't understand why people don't realize every major company does this

Person0

That's not true, Microsoft is special in that way. They are the FUD king ever since they displaced IBM of that position. Other companies simply don't go as far as Microsoft goes.

Yes they do, every large company lies to make themselves look better.

Yes I realize sony dose this to, but its microsofts plain, its cycled around lieing and propaganda

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
Great article sadly it will probably go into deaf ears. I have always thought that an open environment with open standards for game development would be awesome for the PC gaming industry and will strongly push it but PC gamers still think of Microsoft as gods and they keep defending them with all their might not realizing that they are basically the cancer of the computer industry! and they should be erradicated! I never give money to that crap of a company. Thanks for the article
Avatar image for garrett_daniels
garrett_daniels

610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 garrett_daniels
Member since 2003 • 610 Posts
This article shows microsofts business strategies and propaganda. I know it wraps around directx and opengl, but if you read the entire thing you'll understand the cycles that microsoft uses.Zodetak
If you read that post's comments you'll discover that the blogger is totally wrong about several crucial points, most notably his claims that Vista/DirectX 10 "FUD" put an end to OpenGL PC games (they were already non-existent years before the first whisper of either DirectX 10 or Vista) and that OpenGL is better for cross-platform development because it can be re-used on the PS3 and Wii (their APIs are derived in part from OpenGL but desktop OpenGL code simply can't be carried straight across without extensive modification). His entire article is founded on such fallacious statements, which is presumably why he has not corrected these things despite any number of replies pointing them out to him. Microsoft didn't win against OpenGL through propaganda or other questionable tactics; Microsoft won by making a demonstrably better product.
Avatar image for luigigreen
luigigreen

4888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#13 luigigreen
Member since 2005 • 4888 Posts
[QUOTE="yodogpollywog"]microsoft doesnt even create games for their own console, that's the sadest **** ever. every console maker in history made games for their own console.

Microsoft Game Studios? http://games.ign.com/objects/656/656057.html
Avatar image for Raymundo_Manuel
Raymundo_Manuel

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Raymundo_Manuel
Member since 2010 • 4641 Posts

Great article sadly it will probably go into deaf ears. I have always thought that an open environment with open standards for game development would be awesome for the PC gaming industry and will strongly push it but PC gamers still think of Microsoft as gods and they keep defending them with all their might not realizing that they are basically the cancer of the computer industry! and they should be erradicated! I never give money to that crap of a company. Thanks for the articlekuraimen

You obviously don't know any PC gamers

Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts
[QUOTE="luigigreen"][QUOTE="yodogpollywog"]microsoft doesnt even create games for their own console, that's the sadest **** ever. every console maker in history made games for their own console.

Microsoft Game Studios?

Game's developed Xbox 360 Aegis Wing Crimson Skies: High Road to Revenge
Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts
[QUOTE="luigigreen"][QUOTE="yodogpollywog"]microsoft doesnt even create games for their own console, that's the sadest **** ever. every console maker in history made games for their own console.

Microsoft Game Studios?

ROFL look at the list of games they actually made for 360. that's a complete joke dude.
Avatar image for Funconsole
Funconsole

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Funconsole
Member since 2009 • 3223 Posts
Not picking on you or anything, but people really need to understand EVERY company does things like this in one way or another. That's why they are a company and make money whereas you dont
Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

I like the stuff they make, so I guess I'm a Microsoft fan. Hell, I bought Win7 Ultimate day one.

Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts

Interesting read, but that's what happens and it happens a lot..But to get a proper feel of the situation you need to read from various sources and from both sides of the coin.However I must sidetrack and start a mini rant.....

This line from the article: "It's common geek wisdom that standards-based websites, for instance, trounce Silverlight, Flash, or ActiveX." is incorrect and annoys me. I'm pretty sure the writerwas hinting that HTML based websites are "better" or "beat" websites that use Flash, etc....

There are things you simply can't do in HTML (and even HTML 5) that you can do in Flash or Silverlight...

HTML is a markup language, once the page is loaded that's it, you can't "inject" new code or variables.. With Flash for instance you don't have that problem.

Also, HTML 5 won't allow me to store variables and convert them to numbers, compute on those numbers and then deliver customized responses based on those numbers. HTML 5 won't allow me to program "If...Then" paths based on user feedback and decision making. I mean the lists goes on but you get the point.

/end mini rant

Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts

I like the stuff they make, so I guess I'm a Microsoft fan. Hell, I bought Win7 Ultimate day one.

psn8214
I preordered it 3 months before and participate in almost all their betas. I love Microsoft sooo much... Microsoft is baws.
Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

[QUOTE="psn8214"]

I like the stuff they make, so I guess I'm a Microsoft fan. Hell, I bought Win7 Ultimate day one.

hexashadow13

I preordered it 3 months before and participate in almost all their betas. I love Microsoft sooo much... Microsoft is baws.

I had the Release Candidate installed on my netbook for, like, forever! I love Windows too! :P

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="Zodetak"]This article shows microsofts business strategies and propaganda. I know it wraps around directx and opengl, but if you read the entire thing you'll understand the cycles that microsoft uses.garrett_daniels
If you read that post's comments you'll discover that the blogger is totally wrong about several crucial points, most notably his claims that Vista/DirectX 10 "FUD" put an end to OpenGL PC games (they were already non-existent years before the first whisper of either DirectX 10 or Vista) and that OpenGL is better for cross-platform development because it can be re-used on the PS3 and Wii (their APIs are derived in part from OpenGL but desktop OpenGL code simply can't be carried straight across without extensive modification). His entire article is founded on such fallacious statements, which is presumably why he has not corrected these things despite any number of replies pointing them out to him. Microsoft didn't win against OpenGL through propaganda or other questionable tactics; Microsoft won by making a demonstrably better product.

And some of those posts are also totally wrong there's a guy saying that there are no tools for developers on OpenGl when there clearly are and he is also saying that it will take 500 years to make something equivalent to the UE3 when companies like idSoftware do all games on OpenGL including the highly anticipated and graphical monster that is going to be Rage. So yeah those commenters are probably part of the FUD sponsored campaign by M$.
Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts
[QUOTE="magicalclick"]

[QUOTE="karasill"]

Interesting read, but that's what happens and it happens a lot..But to get a proper feel of the situation you need to read from various sources and from both sides of the coin.However I must sidetrack and start a mini rant.....

This line from the article: "It's common geek wisdom that standards-based websites, for instance, trounce Silverlight, Flash, or ActiveX." is incorrect and annoys me. I'm pretty sure the writerwas hinting that HTML based websites are "better" or "beat" websites that use Flash, etc....

There are things you simply can't do in HTML (and even HTML 5) that you can do in Flash or Silverlight...

HTML is a markup language, once the page is loaded that's it, you can't "inject" new code or variables.. With Flash for instance you don't have that problem.

Also, HTML 5 won't allow me to store variables and convert them to numbers, compute on those numbers and then deliver customized responses based on those numbers. HTML 5 won't allow me to program "If...Then" paths based on user feedback and decision making. I mean the lists goes on but you get the point.

/end mini rant

I agree.

HTML doesn't even have a basic Grid control. HTML is a document and the commitee has no intention of changing that mentality. Poeple can all go blah about open standard, but, IMO, HTML is the one that slowing everyone's down. Hack, just look at everyone moving away from web browsers, you know people don't want to see another HTML document anymore.

HTML was good, but, not anymore. It was a "legacy" open standard. And legacy = poor, open or not, it is still old and weak.

Glad someone agrees with me :)
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

Interesting read, but that's what happens and it happens a lot..But to get a proper feel of the situation you need to read from various sources and from both sides of the coin.However I must sidetrack and start a mini rant.....

This line from the article: "It's common geek wisdom that standards-based websites, for instance, trounce Silverlight, Flash, or ActiveX." is incorrect and annoys me. I'm pretty sure the writerwas hinting that HTML based websites are "better" or "beat" websites that use Flash, etc....

There are things you simply can't do in HTML (and even HTML 5) that you can do in Flash or Silverlight...

HTML is a markup language, once the page is loaded that's it, you can't "inject" new code or variables.. With Flash for instance you don't have that problem.

Also, HTML 5 won't allow me to store variables and convert them to numbers, compute on those numbers and then deliver customized responses based on those numbers. HTML 5 won't allow me to program "If...Then" paths based on user feedback and decision making. I mean the lists goes on but you get the point.

/end mini rant

karasill

Eh I'm pretty sure you need to store variables and make "if then else" clauses on the fly to do something like this. And no you don't need flash.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyfu4OwjUEI&feature=player_embedded

Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts
[QUOTE="yodogpollywog"][QUOTE="luigigreen"] Microsoft Game Studios? magicalclick
ROFL look at the list of games they actually made for 360. that's a complete joke dude.

To be fair, MS OWNS, Lion Head, Rare, Forza in house team, and more. And the point of Xbox is not about MS killing its business partners such as EA, Activition, and etc.

How a console is done is, u have quality exlusive games and then third party support. if all u have is multiplatform game's there's no point in even buying ur platform.
Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

[QUOTE="karasill"]

Interesting read, but that's what happens and it happens a lot..But to get a proper feel of the situation you need to read from various sources and from both sides of the coin.However I must sidetrack and start a mini rant.....

This line from the article: "It's common geek wisdom that standards-based websites, for instance, trounce Silverlight, Flash, or ActiveX." is incorrect and annoys me. I'm pretty sure the writerwas hinting that HTML based websites are "better" or "beat" websites that use Flash, etc....

There are things you simply can't do in HTML (and even HTML 5) that you can do in Flash or Silverlight...

HTML is a markup language, once the page is loaded that's it, you can't "inject" new code or variables.. With Flash for instance you don't have that problem.

Also, HTML 5 won't allow me to store variables and convert them to numbers, compute on those numbers and then deliver customized responses based on those numbers. HTML 5 won't allow me to program "If...Then" paths based on user feedback and decision making. I mean the lists goes on but you get the point.

/end mini rant

Eh I'm pretty sure you need to store variables and make "if then else" clauses on the fly to do something like this. And no you don't need flash.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyfu4OwjUEI&feature=player_embedded

HTML 5 is not a real language. And no you can't just make code on the fly or request new code. HTML doesn't work like that. If that game were made in Flash it would have been better, considering Flash now has access to your computer's GPU. Also, does that game run on other browsers?
Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

I dont understand why MS gets singled out

Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts
Micosoft doesnt even realize if all u have is multiplatform game's that are avalible on pc....why the **** even buy xbox360? the reason i bought xbox360 is to play game's that wouldnt be on the pc. i have so much more respect for sony than i will ever microsoft. microsoft has gears of war part 1# on pc halo 1#/2# are on pc perfect dark kameo forza banjo alan wake about it, and to me those games arent that great. ps3 has mag socom uncharted twisted metal killzone resistance fall of man gt5 motorstorm ratchet and clank only on ps3
Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts

[QUOTE="yodogpollywog"][QUOTE="magicalclick"] To be fair, MS OWNS, Lion Head, Rare, Forza in house team, and more. And the point of Xbox is not about MS killing its business partners such as EA, Activition, and etc.magicalclick

How a console is done is, u have quality exlusive games and then third party support. if all u have is multiplatform game's there's no point in even buying ur platform.

And obiously people are buying Xbox360 for those exclusive games.

halo and gears of war are xbox360's best exclusives and those games leave me wanting something better exclusive wise.
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts

I fully respect the Xbox360 as a console, what i don't like is how it came to be, and why its here. Please take the time to read

http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/01/Why-you-should-use-OpenGL-and-not-DirectX

This article shows microsofts business strategies and propaganda. I know it wraps around directx and opengl, but if you read the entire thing you'll understand the cycles that microsoft uses.

Zodetak
I hate their way of business to, im with ya. They do nothing for the industry.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="karasill"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]

[QUOTE="karasill"]

Interesting read, but that's what happens and it happens a lot..But to get a proper feel of the situation you need to read from various sources and from both sides of the coin.However I must sidetrack and start a mini rant.....

This line from the article: "It's common geek wisdom that standards-based websites, for instance, trounce Silverlight, Flash, or ActiveX." is incorrect and annoys me. I'm pretty sure the writerwas hinting that HTML based websites are "better" or "beat" websites that use Flash, etc....

There are things you simply can't do in HTML (and even HTML 5) that you can do in Flash or Silverlight...

HTML is a markup language, once the page is loaded that's it, you can't "inject" new code or variables.. With Flash for instance you don't have that problem.

Also, HTML 5 won't allow me to store variables and convert them to numbers, compute on those numbers and then deliver customized responses based on those numbers. HTML 5 won't allow me to program "If...Then" paths based on user feedback and decision making. I mean the lists goes on but you get the point.

/end mini rant

Eh I'm pretty sure you need to store variables and make "if then else" clauses on the fly to do something like this. And no you don't need flash.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyfu4OwjUEI&feature=player_embedded

HTML 5 is not a real language. And no you can't just make code on the fly or request new code. HTML doesn't work like that. If that game were made in Flash it would have been better, considering Flash now has access to your computer's GPU. Also, does that game run on other browsers?

HMTL5 is in its infancy I'm pretty sure it will catch up and surpass flash in no time. The game works in Chrome, Safari and Firefox 4 now.
Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="Zodetak"]

I fully respect the Xbox360 as a console, what i don't like is how it came to be, and why its here. Please take the time to read

http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/01/Why-you-should-use-OpenGL-and-not-DirectX

This article shows microsofts business strategies and propaganda. I know it wraps around directx and opengl, but if you read the entire thing you'll understand the cycles that microsoft uses.

Kokuro_Kun

I hate their way of business to, im with ya. They do nothing for the industry.

If MS does nothing for the industry than Sony sure doesnt

Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts
halo and gear of war are xbox360's top half ass exclusives basically. these games arent even really that good, xbox360 definitely need's some better exclusives than halo or gears. i feel like something higher quality is missing.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

I dont understand why MS gets singled out

gamer-adam1
Because no other company implements FUD tactics and plays such an active role to control the market with proprietary closed standards as them.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

i only use products that don't harm anyone in any way. that's why i'm in this cave with no electricty, running water food or clothing.

seriously the only way this message even got on this site is i bought carbon offsets for my smoke signals.

Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts
microsoft doesnt have any exclusive shooter with a iron sight like call of duty. halo resembles quake more than call of duty since no iron sight ...but hell microsoft even lacks games like quake fast paced shooters halo isnt fast or realistic type shooter exclusive only on 360.
Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts

[QUOTE="karasill"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]

Eh I'm pretty sure you need to store variables and make "if then else" clauses on the fly to do something like this. And no you don't need flash.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyfu4OwjUEI&feature=player_embedded

kuraimen

HTML 5 is not a real language. And no you can't just make code on the fly or request new code. HTML doesn't work like that. If that game were made in Flash it would have been better, considering Flash now has access to your computer's GPU. Also, does that game run on other browsers?

HMTL5 is in its infancy I'm pretty sure it will catch up and surpass flash in no time. The game works in Chrome, Safari and Firefox 4 now.

It's estimated that it will take 5 to 10 years for HTML 5 to be standarized. And do you honestly think Adobe will sit idle and allow Flash to die? They keep improving Flash al the time, just so you know.... I don't want to keep derailing this thread so if you want to debate more then send me a message.

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

I dont understand why MS gets singled out

kuraimen

Because no other company implements FUD tactics and plays such an active role to control the market with proprietary closed standards as them.

In one way or another all major companys are the same, everyone wants to control the market because it gets them more money. MS is no different from Sony, Google, ISP providers, Cell Phone providers, Facebook, Twitter, and the list goes no

Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

I dont understand why MS gets singled out

Because no other company implements FUD tactics and plays such an active role to control the market with proprietary closed standards as them.

I'm pretty sure that award goes to Apple...
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="karasill"] HTML 5 is not a real language. And no you can't just make code on the fly or request new code. HTML doesn't work like that. If that game were made in Flash it would have been better, considering Flash now has access to your computer's GPU. Also, does that game run on other browsers? karasill

HMTL5 is in its infancy I'm pretty sure it will catch up and surpass flash in no time. The game works in Chrome, Safari and Firefox 4 now.

It's estimated that it will take 5 to 10 years for HTML 5 to be standarized. And do you honestly think Adobe will sit idle and allow Flash to die? They keep improving Flash al the time, just so you know.... I don't want to keep derailing this thread so if you want to debate more then send me a message.

It's ok, it is late and I'm to tired to debate right now. I just have faith in HTML5 and WebGL but we should give them time to see if they become popular and developed enough. I hope they do.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="karasill"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

I dont understand why MS gets singled out

Because no other company implements FUD tactics and plays such an active role to control the market with proprietary closed standards as them.

I'm pretty sure that award goes to Apple...

Closed proprietary standards yes in controlling the market and FUD tactics Microsoft still takes the cake.
Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts

[QUOTE="karasill"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] HMTL5 is in its infancy I'm pretty sure it will catch up and surpass flash in no time. The game works in Chrome, Safari and Firefox 4 now.kuraimen

It's estimated that it will take 5 to 10 years for HTML 5 to be standarized. And do you honestly think Adobe will sit idle and allow Flash to die? They keep improving Flash al the time, just so you know.... I don't want to keep derailing this thread so if you want to debate more then send me a message.

It's ok, it is late and I'm to tired to debate right now. I just have faith in HTML5 and WebGL but we should give them time to see if they become popular and developed enough. I hope they do.

As far as video playback goes sure HTML 5might take over one day. However HTML 5 just can't do some of the cooler stuff that Flash can do. HTML 5 is just not near as good as it needs to be to even have a shot at taking Flash out, not to mention Flash will always be improving too. At the end of it all you will still see plenty of Flash based websites and games, no mater how popular HTML 5 gets, because Flash will always be the more powerful language.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

I don't understand why people don't realize every major company does this

tutt3r
No, they do not. And as a matter of fact, companies have a vested interest in open standards because they get things done. They provide them a much more serviceable platform that can suit their needs. The article even plainly said that OpenGL was maintained by representatives of vested corporate interests. People like Microsoft to the extent that they provide them with a good product, not the extent to which they lock everything down for their own benefit. It's completely uncooperative behavior and doesn't help anybody but Microsoft. Plus, if you take a peek over at Linux, it's an open standard and is supported by IBM. It's maintained by nobody, but some businesses, like Sun Microsystems, and Google. and Red Hat, release distributions of it that cost money to businesses, but which all use open standards, so that they're accessible to people and businesses to suit their needs, provide cross-platform standards, and make development less painful. Notably, the phone market has been besieged by Android, an open sourced OS distributed by Google, which has won the favor of many cell phone manufacturers who prefer it to a proprietary alternative. Apple's operating system is sadly closed source and the closest competitor to Android, but the two of them have closed Microsoft virtually completely out of the market. Not all businesses hate open software, that's bogus. Some people are interested more in business than in exploitation. Laying infrastructure, creating utilitarian software, and getting things done are on some people's agenda more than MickeySoft making a buck.
Avatar image for Vambran
Vambran

1921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Vambran
Member since 2005 • 1921 Posts

Im guessing the TC Owns a PS3 or Wii and does not have enough money to buy a xbox360. So he rants about how much he hates microsoft.

Avatar image for Fuhgeddabouditt
Fuhgeddabouditt

5468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Fuhgeddabouditt
Member since 2010 • 5468 Posts
personally, I wish Microsoft never entered the console market.
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

I fully respect the Xbox360 as a console, what i don't like is how it came to be, and why its here. Please take the time to read

http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/01/Why-you-should-use-OpenGL-and-not-DirectX

This article shows microsofts business strategies and propaganda. I know it wraps around directx and opengl, but if you read the entire thing you'll understand the cycles that microsoft uses.

Zodetak



That blog is a great big pile of sensationalist garbage that's full of misinformation and propoganda. It pains me to see it still being brought up and getting hits. People use Direct3D because OpenGL/Khronos completely dropped the ball, and MS made a D3D10/D3D11 totally awesome. There's not really anything more to it.