Why isnt the Ps3 selling well?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SpinoRaptor24
SpinoRaptor24

10316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#101 SpinoRaptor24
Member since 2008 • 10316 Posts

A couple of reasons. Mainly price and the fact that Sony does poor marketing.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
Ha ha am I the only one who understands that? Its wrong because $199 is NOT greater than $399. Quite the opposite infact. $399 > $199. The maths is really quite simple...Spankyqwerty
In internet language, ">" means "better than", not "greater than" on a mathematical sense.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

1. It is the most expensive console on the market.

2. Blue-Ray was not the impact it was supposed to be.

3. You can get 90% of its library on a console that costs $200 less.

4. The overall critic agrees that the 360 hs the best game library.

5. Poor marketin.

Avatar image for SeanDiff
SeanDiff

933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#104 SeanDiff
Member since 2007 • 933 Posts
If you take into account the extra year that the 360 has it sold more on average.
Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts

1. It is the most expensive console on the market.

2. Blue-Ray was not the impact it was supposed to be.

3. You can get 90% of its library on a console that costs $200 less.

4. The overall critic agrees that the 360 hs the best game library.

5. Poor marketin.

IronBass

I agree with the first one

I agree with the blue ray but if the PS 3 lowers it's price that will help it in the long run having the added blue ray

90 % I think not Solid Snake, Uncharted 1 and 2, Kratos, Sackboy and many others would like a word with you

Most awards were given to PS 3 Gears wasn't even a contendor for GOTY while in most sites MGS 4 and Little Big Planet won

I agree with the poor marketing

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"]

1. It is the most expensive console on the market.

2. Blue-Ray was not the impact it was supposed to be.

3. You can get 90% of its library on a console that costs $200 less.

4. The overall critic agrees that the 360 hs the best game library.

5. Poor marketin.

tek91

I agree with the first one

I agree with the blue ray but if the PS 3 lowers it's price that will help it in the long run having the added blue ray

90 % I think not Solid Snake, Uncharted 1 and 2, Kratos, Sackboy and many others would like a word with you

Most awards were given to PS 3 Gears wasn't even a contendor for GOTY while in most sites MGS 4 and Little Big Planet won

I agree with the poor marketing

Um Sony's in house games do not make up more then 10% of the PS3 library hate to break it to you.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#107 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

Because it's nearly twice the price of the competition.

It's not rocket science.

Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts
It still costs a lot of money right slap bang in the middle of a global economic crisis :| do we really need these threads?
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="tek91"][QUOTE="IronBass"]

1. It is the most expensive console on the market.

2. Blue-Ray was not the impact it was supposed to be.

3. You can get 90% of its library on a console that costs $200 less.

4. The overall critic agrees that the 360 hs the best game library.

5. Poor marketin.

I agree with the first one

I agree with the blue ray but if the PS 3 lowers it's price that will help it in the long run having the added blue ray

90 % I think not Solid Snake, Uncharted 1 and 2, Kratos, Sackboy and many others would like a word with you

Most awards were given to PS 3 Gears wasn't even a contendor for GOTY while in most sites MGS 4 and Little Big Planet won

I agree with the poor marketing

You are being too specific with your examples. You are talking about Gamespot only and about Gears only. The 360 exclsive or shered-with-the-pc library goes far beyond that. And Gears 2 has been critically adored, more than MGS4 (by Gamerankings). And I havent denied the fact that the PS3 has some very interesting exclusives, but they are not more than 10% of its whole library.
Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts

You are being too specific with your examples. You are talking about Gamespot only and about Gears only. The 360 exclsive or shered-with-the-pc library goes far beyond that. And Gears 2 has been critically adored, more than MGS4 (by Gamerankings). And I havent denied the fact that the PS3 has some very interesting exclusives, but they are not more than 10% of its whole library.

Gamespot, VG Chartz, Spike tv, n4g, giantbomb etc

can you list me one site where Gears 2 beat out any PS 3 game for GOTY

And if you wanna talk about game ranking Little Big Planet outranked Gears 2

LBP - 94.4 % Gears of war 2 - 93.6%

10% more like 50

MGS 4, LBP, Twisted Metal, Valkyre Chronicles, Gran Turismo, Uncharted, Resistance 1 and 2, Killzone 2, Motorstorm, Final Fantasy XII Versus, Haze, Lair, inFAMOUS, White Knights Chronicles, Heavy Rain, L.A. Noire, God of War 3, Ratchet and Clank, a rockstar exclusive title coming, Warhawk

the list goes on ill just leave it at that for now

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="tek91"]

You are being too specific with your examples. You are talking about Gamespot only and about Gears only. The 360 exclsive or shered-with-the-pc library goes far beyond that. And Gears 2 has been critically adored, more than MGS4 (by Gamerankings). And I havent denied the fact that the PS3 has some very interesting exclusives, but they are not more than 10% of its whole library.

Gamespot, VG Chartz, Spike tv, n4g, giantbomb etc

can you list me one site where Gears 2 beat out any PS 3 game for GOTY

And if you wanna talk about game ranking Little Big Planet outranked Gears 2

LBP - 94.4 % Gears of war 2 - 93.6%

10% more like 50

MGS 4, LBP, Twisted Metal, Valkyre Chronicles, Gran Turismo, Uncharted, Resistance 1 and 2, Killzone 2, Motorstorm, Final Fantasy XII Versus, Haze, Lair, inFAMOUS, White Knights Chronicles, Heavy Rain, L.A. Noire, God of War 3, Ratchet and Clank, a rockstar exclusive title coming, Warhawk

the list goes on ill just leave it at that for now

There again, when did I say that Gears 2 has became more wards than MGS4? I just said that the critic adored it, and that on Gamerankings it was ranked higher. And I'm perfectly aware of the PS3 exclsuive lineup, but considering how many multiplats are out there, that's not even 10%.
Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts
the question is pretty funny, asking why the PS3 isn't selling well is like asking why a car that gets 10 mpg isn't selling well when gas was above $4 a gallon..........it's pretty obvious. You want the PS3 to sell better, the answer is not to release better games....they have done that and surprise, surprise.....it's done nothing for them. Year over year sales are down considerably and everyone agrees that the PS3 has a better selection of games than last year. So what's the problem.....cost is wayyyyyyy to high. Consider this, the PS3 right now over two years old has had ONE price drop and is still $399. That is the problem, specially in an ecomomic climate where people are losing their jobs and those that have one are too scared to buy things so expensive. Drop the price of the PS3 to $299 and you will see an explosion in sales. IT's probably not going to happen anytime soon and that's why the PS3 is going to fall flat on it's face the rest of the year no matter what 1st party titles they shovel out. The longer the price is unchanged for the PS3 the bigger the more dirt MS and Nintendo is shoveling on them.
Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts

1. It is the most expensive console on the market.

2. Blue-Ray was not the impact it was supposed to be.

3. You can get 90% of its library on a console that costs $200 less.

4. The overall critic agrees that the 360 hs the best game library.

5. Poor marketin.

IronBass

I disagree with two things and want to clarify one other. First off, Blu-ray had the BIGGEST impact on PS3 sales than any other thing. If it wasn't for Blu-ray being included in the PS3 (assuming the price of the PS3 was the same) it would have lost millions of sales. I know more people who bought the PS3 because it was the cheapest Blu-ray machine than for the games. So saying Blu-ray hurt the PS3 hardware sales, no....it actually made the sales look better than they really should have been.

Secondly, anyone saying the 360 has the best game library are either fanboys (and there are a lot of them for MS) or you are quoting from last year when that statement was 100% accurate. This holiday season Sony has made up the ground IMO and has just as good of a library to offer. Anyone saying otherwise is just blind or a fanboy.

Thirdly, I agree with the 90% of the library can be found on the X360.......but again the same thing can be said about X360's library. It's the exclusives that are supposed to sway people one way or another. Do people go for Halo, Gears, Mass Effect, Forza, ect..... or do they want KillZone, God of War, Gran Turismo, Little Big Planet, MGS4, ect....

Bottom line, the only reason why the PS3 is doing so bad in sales is because it's the most expensive as you stated in your number one reason. Everything else really has nothing to do with it and the 4th qtr sales prove that.

Avatar image for kweeni
kweeni

11413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#114 kweeni
Member since 2007 • 11413 Posts

only real reason why is because of its price tag

and the no game argument is dead btw

Avatar image for kevbo77
kevbo77

656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 kevbo77
Member since 2003 • 656 Posts
No games, and too expensive. Plus the controller is 13 years old. No innovation. Basically, because aside from name recognition there's no compelling reason to buy a PS3.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

Secondly, anyone saying the 360 has the best game library are either fanboys (and there are a lot of them for MS) or you are quoting from last year when that statement was 100% accurate. This holiday season Sony has made up the ground IMO and has just as good of a library to offer. Anyone saying otherwise is just blind or a fanboy.

darthogre

I didn't said the 360 library was better, I simply said the overall critic considers it better. A look at Metacritic, Gamerankings or simply here at Gamespot shows that.

Thirdly, I agree with the 90% of the library can be found on the X360.......but again the same thing can be said about X360's library. darthogre

True, but the difference is that those games can be played on a 360 for $200 less, that's why that arguments benefits the 360 more than it does the PS3.

Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts
No games, and too expensive. Plus the controller is 13 years old. No innovation. Basically, because aside from name recognition there's no compelling reason to buy a PS3.kevbo77
the no games argument is dead the only reason is price alone that's why the last price drop PS 3 embarrassed m$ so much in desperation it changed it's price to $199
Avatar image for SupremeLegacy
SupremeLegacy

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 SupremeLegacy
Member since 2008 • 113 Posts
Price.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="kevbo77"]No games, and too expensive. Plus the controller is 13 years old. No innovation. Basically, because aside from name recognition there's no compelling reason to buy a PS3.tek91
the no games argument is dead the only reason is price alone that's why the last price drop PS 3 embarrassed m$ so much in desperation it changed it's price to $199

And then PS3 will drop price and then 360 will drop price and then the Wii will keep selling at $250 so whats your point?

Avatar image for Cole-Protocal
Cole-Protocal

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Cole-Protocal
Member since 2008 • 681 Posts
sony got too cocky. hope they get whats coming to them. Well they allready did (PS3 is in third place), but they deserve more punishment.
Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts
it cost too much and lacks appealing games that aren't on the xbox 360.
Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#122 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"]

1. It is the most expensive console on the market.

2. Blue-Ray was not the impact it was supposed to be.

3. You can get 90% of its library on a console that costs $200 less.

4. The overall critic agrees that the 360 hs the best game library.

5. Poor marketin.

darthogre

I disagree with two things and want to clarify one other. First off, Blu-ray had the BIGGEST impact on PS3 sales than any other thing. If it wasn't for Blu-ray being included in the PS3 (assuming the price of the PS3 was the same) it would have lost millions of sales. I know more people who bought the PS3 because it was the cheapest Blu-ray machine than for the games. So saying Blu-ray hurt the PS3 hardware sales, no....it actually made the sales look better than they really should have been.

How would you know that the fact that the PS3 has Blu Ray contributed millions of sales? Anecdotal evidence (ie "I know people who bought the PS3 for the Blu Ray player") is not enough to support such a claim. You'd need some factual evidence. Plus, the PS3 hasn't had the advantage of being the cheapest Blu Ray player on the market for quite a while now, as prices have dropped significantly since the format debuted.

Secondly, anyone saying the 360 has the best game library are either fanboys (and there are a lot of them for MS) or you are quoting from last year when that statement was 100% accurate. This holiday season Sony has made up the ground IMO and has just as good of a library to offer. Anyone saying otherwise is just blind or a fanboy.

Anyone who says the Xbox 360 has a better library than the PS3 is either blind or a fanboy? Are you serious? According to Gamerankings, Metacritic and, yes, even GameSpot, the Xbox 360 has more exclusive A, AA and AAA games. This is a fact. The only category the PS3 wins in is AAAA exclusives since they have MGS 4. Given that one AAAA does not overrule every game on the Xbox 360, believing that the Xbox 360 has the best library of the two is a perfectly reasonable assertion.

Thirdly, I agree with the 90% of the library can be found on the X360.......but again the same thing can be said about X360's library. It's the exclusives that are supposed to sway people one way or another. Do people go for Halo, Gears, Mass Effect, Forza, ect..... or do they want KillZone, God of War, Gran Turismo, Little Big Planet, MGS4, ect....

I don't know if you've ever had the displeasure of working in retail but if you haven't, allow me to tell you that you're giving consumers too much credit.

The average real world consumer doesn't think like the average System Wars poster. The casual consumer (which makes up the majority of any system's consumer base) doesn't do research and compare exclusive libraries before they buy. They just want a console that they can play Call of Duty, Grand Theft Auto or Madden on and many people are going to see that $199 or $299 Xbox 360 and buy that as opposed to paying $100 or $200 more for the PS3, as evidenced by the Xbox 360's higher sales.

Yes, there are going to be some consumers who do adequate research before they buy and those who want the PS3 for LBP, MGS 4 and Killzone 2 but they are far from making up the average.

Bottom line, the only reason why the PS3 is doing so bad in sales is because it's the most expensive as you stated in your number one reason. Everything else really has nothing to do with it and the 4th qtr sales prove that.

Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="darthogre"]

[QUOTE="darthogre"]

True, but the difference is that those games can be played on a 360 for $200 less, that's why that arguments benefits the 360 more than it does the PS3.

But that goes to the Price argument, it has nothing to do with games. I already said the price of the PS3 is the one thing that is hurting the PS3, saying the X360 being $200 cheaper is saying the same thing. It's like you are using the same reason twice. [QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="darthogre"]

Secondly, anyone saying the 360 has the best game library are either fanboys (and there are a lot of them for MS) or you are quoting from last year when that statement was 100% accurate. This holiday season Sony has made up the ground IMO and has just as good of a library to offer. Anyone saying otherwise is just blind or a fanboy.

I didn't said the 360 library was better, I simply said the overall critic considers it better. A look at Metacritic, Gamerankings or simply here at Gamespot shows that.

And like I said, Metacritic and Gamerankings will include a lot of fanboy sites that lean one way or another. That's like saying Halo 3 is better than any game Sony has on the PS3 because it's overall gamerankings proves it.....not it doesn't. Just because you have a bunch of fanboys that love the Halo series thinks it's perfect doesn't make it so. Overall MS and Sony offer the same experience with their exclusvies IMO.....the key difference is price.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

But that goes to the Price argument, it has nothing to do with games. I already said the price of the PS3 is the one thing that is hurting the PS3, saying the X360 being $200 cheaper is saying the same thing. It's like you are using the same reason twice. darthogre

Games have nothing to do with that? Are you serious? If the PS3 lineup were considered far better than the 360's, havinf far more exclusives etc etc, (like the PS2) a lot more of people would buy it.

Look the PS2 again. The GC was cheaper, but the PS2's lineup blew the GC's (according to the critic) out of the water. And the people bought more PS2 than GC, even if it was more expensive.

And like I said, Metacritic and Gamerankings will include a lot of fanboy sites that lean one way or another. That's like saying Halo 3 is better than any game Sony has on the PS3 because it's overall gamerankings proves it.....not it doesn't. Just because you have a bunch of fanboys that love the Halo series thinks it's perfect doesn't make it so. Overall MS and Sony offer the same experience with their exclusvies IMO.....the key difference is price.darthogre

That's completely offtopic. Why the critic says one thing or another should be saved for another topic. Fact is, that the overall critic agrees that the 360 lineup is better. Of course, that's not a fact, and everyone of us may disagree.

I was just quoting the critic's opinion.

Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts

Games have nothing to do with that? Are you serious? If the PS3 lineup were considered far better than the 360's, havinf far more exclusives etc etc, (like the PS2) a lot more of people would buy it.

are you serious ? look at the wii the wiis killing both systems in sales wii sports is the best selling game of all time now does that mean wii sport is better than any PS 3 /360 game. alot of people are buyng the wii that does not mean it's games are better.

Look the PS2 again. The GC was cheaper, but the PS2's lineup blew the GC's (according to the critic) out of the water. And the people bought more PS2 than GC, even if it was more expensive.

the GC wasnt cheaper by much, like I said before the 8 months is what you need to see

people want a PS 3 when PS 3 dropped it's price and was still more expensie than the 360 it managed to outsell it for 8 months.

If as you say it's the games when that price cut happened the xbox would have outsold the PS 3 for those 8 months and would not be forced to change it's price to $199.

those 8 months speaks for themselves.

That's completely offtopic. Why the critic says one thing or another should be saved for another topic. Fact is, that the overall critic agrees that the 360 lineup is better. Of course, that's not a fact, and everyone of us may disagree.

I was just quoting the critic's opinion.

Most critics gave PS 3 games higher ratings than 360 and most PS 3 games like LBP and MGS 4 got GOTY

Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts

[QUOTE="darthogre"]But that goes to the Price argument, it has nothing to do with games. I already said the price of the PS3 is the one thing that is hurting the PS3, saying the X360 being $200 cheaper is saying the same thing. It's like you are using the same reason twice. IronBass

Games have nothing to do with that? Are you serious? If the PS3 lineup were considered far better than the 360's, havinf far more exclusives etc etc, (like the PS2) a lot more of people would buy it.

Look the PS2 again. The GC was cheaper, but the PS2's lineup blew the GC's (according to the critic) out of the water. And the people bought more PS2 than GC, even if it was more expensive.

I respectfully disagree with your point. AGain, games don't matter in this case because the exclusives are relatively equal in terms of strength (for the moment). How can I prove it, look at the facts. Last year PS3 was outsold by X360 (in NA) but it was much much much closer than this year. Last year the PS3 has poor exclusives compared to X360's lineup. There is no denying it, that is fact. The one thing the PS3 had going for it in spite of the sorry lineup of games is the $100 price cut. They saw a huge lift in sales despite the lack of software because of the price cut. Fast forward to this year, they have the best lineup of exclusive software........so why did they basically retract in hardware sales compared to last year? Because the PRICE is that important. All of you might think that hardware sales have something to do with software.........it really doesn't anymore (GTA4 proves that again). Remove MGS4, LBP, Resistance 2 and replace it with $100 or $150 price cut instead.....the PS3 would have probably outsold the X360 this holiday season. Again, looking at the fact of what has happened with a price cut / no software and what happened with software / no price cut......it's obvious which was more important because as you said, they share 90% of their software anyways. As for your comparision to the GC and PS2...lol. Yes the game Gamecube was cheaper but the games were flat out crap. There is a difference between PS3/X360 sharing 3rd party games and the GC non-existant library. Yes in that case software does matter because you actually do want to play SOMETHING. The reason why it's not a valid comparision is because as you have said, PS3 and X360 share 90% of their titles. PS2 and the GC did not share 90% of their titles.....if they did GC would have won IMO because it was the cheaper of the two as well as equal strength in 1st part titles.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#127 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Whyats more appealing?

A $199 console with 700 games or a $399 with 350?

Of course PS3 isnt selling well. Its not as good as the others competitors :?

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#128 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
it's expensive and isn't much different from the 360. bluray is it's biggest weapon but it hasn't really helped the PS3 as much as the PS3 has helped bluray.
Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts

Whyats more appealing?

A $199 console with 700 games or a $399 with 350?

Of course PS3 isnt selling well. Its not as good as the others competitors :?

PAL360

it's not about the games most of those 700 are not even in the shelves anymore at gamespot or youll find them in the box where it has all the used games which no one pays mind to.

it's all about the price the months before m$ did it's price cut proves this.

Poeple need to ignorantly stop spreading things that are so wrong.

it's like someone right now telling me the water color is pink

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#130 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
I'm sure my addition to the thread is unnecessary at this point, but it's because of price. Nintendo have slapped the crap out of Sony this gen because their console was less than half the price of the PS3 when they launched. At this point it's just over half, or exactly half the price if you count the 160GB model. Nintendo must be enjoying their revenge, they did to Sony what Sony did to them a decade ago.
Avatar image for Cole-Protocal
Cole-Protocal

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Cole-Protocal
Member since 2008 • 681 Posts
[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Whyats more appealing?

A $199 console with 700 games or a $399 with 350?

Of course PS3 isnt selling well. Its not as good as the others competitors :?

tek91

it's not about the games most of those 700 are not even in the shelves anymore at gamespot or youll find them in the box where it has all the used games which no one pays mind to.

it's all about the price the months before m$ did it's price cut proves this.

Poeple need to ignorantly stop spreading things that are so wrong.

it's like someone right now telling me the water color is pink

its about price and games.

right now, 360 has both over PS3.

simpel as that.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#132 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts
[QUOTE="tek91"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Whyats more appealing?

A $199 console with 700 games or a $399 with 350?

Of course PS3 isnt selling well. Its not as good as the others competitors :?

it's not about the games most of those 700 are not even in the shelves anymore at gamespot or youll find them in the box where it has all the used games which no one pays mind to.

it's all about the price the months before m$ did it's price cut proves this.

Poeple need to ignorantly stop spreading things that are so wrong.

it's like someone right now telling me the water color is pink can't you see of course it's pink

Sorry but i desagree! I wouldnt get a $199 PS3 over a &199 360 because it has a weaker lineup! But this is just me ;)
Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts
[QUOTE="tek91"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Whyats more appealing?

A $199 console with 700 games or a $399 with 350?

Of course PS3 isnt selling well. Its not as good as the others competitors :?

Cole-Protocal

it's not about the games most of those 700 are not even in the shelves anymore at gamespot or youll find them in the box where it has all the used games which no one pays mind to.

it's all about the price the months before m$ did it's price cut proves this.

Poeple need to ignorantly stop spreading things that are so wrong.

it's like someone right now telling me the water color is pink

its about price and games.

right now, 360 has both over PS3.

simpel as that.

no price the months before 360 desperately came in price to $199 is proof

Case Closed

Avatar image for Guybrush_3
Guybrush_3

8308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Guybrush_3
Member since 2008 • 8308 Posts
It's cheapest model is $150 more expensive than the wii which comes with a game and $200 more expensive than the 360 arcade.
Avatar image for Cole-Protocal
Cole-Protocal

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 Cole-Protocal
Member since 2008 • 681 Posts
[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"][QUOTE="tek91"] it's not about the games most of those 700 are not even in the shelves anymore at gamespot or youll find them in the box where it has all the used games which no one pays mind to.

it's all about the price the months before m$ did it's price cut proves this.

Poeple need to ignorantly stop spreading things that are so wrong.

it's like someone right now telling me the water color is pink

tek91

its about price and games.

right now, 360 has both over PS3.

simpel as that.

no price the months before 360 desperately came in price to $199 is proof

Case Closed

however u spin it, 360 >>>> PS3 in the real world.

Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts
P
[QUOTE="tek91"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Whyats more appealing?

A $199 console with 700 games or a $399 with 350?

Of course PS3 isnt selling well. Its not as good as the others competitors :?

PAL360

it's not about the games most of those 700 are not even in the shelves anymore at gamespot or youll find them in the box where it has all the used games which no one pays mind to.

it's all about the price the months before m$ did it's price cut proves this.

Poeple need to ignorantly stop spreading things that are so wrong.

it's like someone right now telling me the water color is pink can't you see of course it's pink

Sorry but i desagree! I wouldnt get a $199 PS3 over a &199 360 because it has a weaker lineup! But this is just me ;)

dude lol if the PS 3 where to have it's PS 3 for $199 it would be flying of the shelves so fast your head would be spinning
Avatar image for Cole-Protocal
Cole-Protocal

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Cole-Protocal
Member since 2008 • 681 Posts
P[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="tek91"] it's not about the games most of those 700 are not even in the shelves anymore at gamespot or youll find them in the box where it has all the used games which no one pays mind to.

it's all about the price the months before m$ did it's price cut proves this.

Poeple need to ignorantly stop spreading things that are so wrong.

it's like someone right now telling me the water color is pink can't you see of course it's pink

tek91

Sorry but i desagree! I wouldnt get a $199 PS3 over a &199 360 because it has a weaker lineup! But this is just me ;)

dude lol if the PS 3 where to have it's PS 3 for $199 it would be flying of the shelves so freaking fast

keep dreaming......not gonna happen for years.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"][QUOTE="tek91"] it's not about the games most of those 700 are not even in the shelves anymore at gamespot or youll find them in the box where it has all the used games which no one pays mind to.

it's all about the price the months before m$ did it's price cut proves this.

Poeple need to ignorantly stop spreading things that are so wrong.

it's like someone right now telling me the water color is pink

tek91

its about price and games.

right now, 360 has both over PS3.

simpel as that.

no price the months before 360 desperately came in price to $199 is proof

Case Closed

Spin it anyway you want. But its hilarious to me that you confuse great business decisions with acts of desperation. Didn't the Ps3 have like the fastest price drop for any of the three major consoles?

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

dude lol if the PS 3 where to have it's PS 3 for $199 it would be flying of the shelves so fast your head would be spinningtek91

When you're only argument is a big speculatory "IF" its pretty much time to stop. The PS3 is not $199 and nothing you say is going to magically drop it by $200 atm.

You're only argument is that of a price war. A war the PS3 can never win. 360 is turning profit on hardware that is selling well cheaper then the PS3. There is no reason that as soon as PS3 drops its price that MS once again drops its price and there for we are back at square 1 again aren't Wii.

People like you just yelling "WAIT UNTIL THE PRICE DROP!"

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#140 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts
P[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="tek91"] it's not about the games most of those 700 are not even in the shelves anymore at gamespot or youll find them in the box where it has all the used games which no one pays mind to.

it's all about the price the months before m$ did it's price cut proves this.

Poeple need to ignorantly stop spreading things that are so wrong.

it's like someone right now telling me the water color is pink can't you see of course it's pink

tek91
Sorry but i desagree! I wouldnt get a $199 PS3 over a &199 360 because it has a weaker lineup! But this is just me ;)

dude lol if the PS 3 where to have it's PS 3 for $199 it would be flying of the shelves so fast your head would be spinning

And what does it have to do with the fact that 360 has a far better lineup? I buy consoles to play games but i agree with you. At that price the PS3 would oversell the 360 by far. Thats what happen when ppl buy a logo and not a gaming system!
Avatar image for Derek240
Derek240

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Derek240
Member since 2004 • 842 Posts
[QUOTE="tek91"][QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

its about price and games.

right now, 360 has both over PS3.

simpel as that.

Cole-Protocal

no price the months before 360 desperately came in price to $199 is proof

Case Closed

however u spin it, 360 >>>> PS3 in the real world.

No, 360 >>>> PS3 in your world. I would love so much for the 360 to become the only hardcore console on the market. You would learn something that you would never forget. Let's just put it this way, I (as well as many others) would quit gaming entirely.

Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts

When you're only argument is a big speculatory "IF" its pretty much time to stop. The PS3 is not $199 and nothing you say is going to magically drop it by $200 atm.

hmm I don't know could it be because I was responding to a question where somebody was talking about what would happen if the PS 3 was $199 ?

You're only argument is that of a price war. A war the PS3 can never win.360 is turning profit on hardware that is selling well cheaper then the PS3. There is no reason that as soon as PS3 drops its price that MS once again drops its price and there for we are back at square 1 again aren't Wii.

I explained before already why m$ can't drop it's price it already reached every systems sweet spot it can't go cheaper while PS 3 can

People like you just yelling "WAIT UNTIL THE PRICE DROP!"

yea you have to wait for a PS 3 price drop is that news to you ? every1 knows this

Avatar image for Cole-Protocal
Cole-Protocal

681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 Cole-Protocal
Member since 2008 • 681 Posts
[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"][QUOTE="tek91"] no price the months before 360 desperately came in price to $199 is proof

Case Closed

Derek240

however u spin it, 360 >>>> PS3 in the real world.

No, 360 >>>> PS3 in your world. I would love so much for the 360 to become the only hardcore console on the market. You would learn something that you would never forget. Let's just put it this way, I (as well as many others) would quit gaming entirely.

my world is Earth......where 360 holds a comfortable 2nd place lead over the 3rd place PS3. What world do u live on???????

if that beautiful scenerio were to happen and ppl like u were to quit gaming....so long. Funny thing is, human beings grow up fast. Some kids will take your place.

Avatar image for Derek240
Derek240

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Derek240
Member since 2004 • 842 Posts
[QUOTE="Derek240"][QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

however u spin it, 360 >>>> PS3 in the real world.

Cole-Protocal

No, 360 >>>> PS3 in your world. I would love so much for the 360 to become the only hardcore console on the market. You would learn something that you would never forget. Let's just put it this way, I (as well as many others) would quit gaming entirely.

my world is Earth......where 360 holds a comfortable 2nd place lead over the 3rd place PS3. What world do u live on???????

if that beautiful scenerio were to happen and ppl like u were to quit gaming....so long. Funny thing is, human beings grow up fast. Some kids will take your place.

I guess kids like you never learn untill it's too late.

Avatar image for Derek240
Derek240

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Derek240
Member since 2004 • 842 Posts
[QUOTE="Derek240"][QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"]

however u spin it, 360 >>>> PS3 in the real world.

PAL360

No, 360 >>>> PS3 in your world. I would love so much for the 360 to become the only hardcore console on the market. You would learn something that you would never forget. Let's just put it this way, I (as well as a legion of other blind fanboys) would quit gaming entirely.

fixed

You don't get it....but then again, you are too young to have taken economics yet. FYI, I could care less about the PS3 or any other console this gen since they are all trash compared to ANY other gen. This gen has been a disgrace of the utmost degree. I can't imagine what it would be like if there was only 1 console.

Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#147 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts


I explained before already why m$ can't drop it's price it already reached every systems sweet spot it can't go cheaper while PS 3 can

tek91

You're mistaken. The *arcade* has reached it, the Pro and the Elite? They can drop the price on those whenever they like and unless the PS3 is about to drop to the price of an Arcade Microsoft can remain competitive against them. Your argument is flawed, you're determind to prove your opinion as correct yet you have no proof other than "IF THEY WAS THE SAME PRICE THE PS3 WOULD OUTSELL THE 360" yeah, IF, in *your* world but the reality is kid it's NOT the same price, it wont EVER be the same price because it can't match the price of an Arcade and the Pro and Elite are more than capable of dropping in price and insuring the PS3 looks extremely over priced.

Time to face reality, give the thread up. You lost about 5 pages ago.

Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts

You're mistaken. The *arcade* has reached it, the Pro and the Elite?

It's not going to make a difference as long as PS 3 has a low price more people will choose it over the xbox look at the months before the 360's $199 price drop

They can drop the price on those whenever they like and unless the PS3 is about to drop to the price of an Arcade Microsoft can remain competitive against them. Your argument is flawed, you're determind to prove your opinion as correct yet you have no proof other than "IF THEY WAS THE SAME PRICE THE PS3 WOULD OUTSELL THE 360" yeah, IF, in *your* world but the reality is kid it's NOT the same price, it wont EVER be the same price because it can't match the price of an Arcade and the Pro and Elite are more than capable of dropping in price and insuring the PS3 looks extremely over priced.

It's not IF the PS 3 outsold the 360 for 8 months because of price and price is what will make the PS 3 outsell the 360 again.

Time to face reality, give the thread up. You lost about 5 pages ago.

yea I lost because a fanboy says so lol

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#149 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts
[QUOTE="Cole-Protocal"][QUOTE="Derek240"]

No, 360 >>>> PS3 in your world. I would love so much for the 360 to become the only hardcore console on the market. You would learn something that you would never forget. Let's just put it this way, I (as well as many others) would quit gaming entirely.

Derek240

my world is Earth......where 360 holds a comfortable 2nd place lead over the 3rd place PS3. What world do u live on???????

if that beautiful scenerio were to happen and ppl like u were to quit gaming....so long. Funny thing is, human beings grow up fast. Some kids will take your place.

I guess kids like you never learn untill it's too late.

Let me guess...you're one of those folks who assumes that, should Sony drop out of the race, Microsoft would destroy gaming and monopolize the market, right?
Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="Derek240"]

No, 360 >>>> PS3 in your world. I would love so much for the 360 to become the only hardcore console on the market. You would learn something that you would never forget. Let's just put it this way, I (as well as a legion of other blind fanboys) would quit gaming entirely.

Derek240

fixed

You don't get it....but then again, you are too young to have taken economics yet.

And as for you, the guy strutting about calling people kids when hes clearly some angsty teen..Let me take a guess WHY you're so angsty: You're trying to hit out at the evil Microsoft empire for it's terrible terrible ways and convinced blindly that if Microsoft push sony out they'll form an evil dominance and not allow competition.

Am i on the money? For the record: You're wrong.