why PS3 fans hate the 360. a Time Line of FAIL.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] ] It is not my argument is Google's argument. You haven't been paying attention :PKevinnButlerNPK

Google hacked into your account and posted that....

According to whois, the owner of the domain is Rob Foor, the guy who owns the wii60 domain. Fake site confirmed.

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

I do have faith Kinect will deliver a few good games because its stupid to think that it won't. Every system delivers atleast a few good games. As for announced titles they aren't on my radar because they aren't big enough to get talked about around here and I don't have a 360 like I said. As for titles that interest the gamer around here there won't be much but since when did gaming, quality and good titles revolve around what gaming forums think?

ActicEdge

That doesn't mean they aren't good titles. I don't see why that is such a difficult concpet for people to grasp. Just because something doesn't appeal to you specifically, it doesn't mean they are worthless and not worth acknowledging. As someone who is a fan of the Wii I feel pretty strongly about the idea that people need to get the hell off their high horses and understand that the world doesn't revolve around your tastes. I also don't care whether people want hardcore experiences because a hardcore experience is not the same thing as a quality piece of software worth acknowledging.

[QUOTE="KevinnButlerNPK"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] ] It is not my argument is Google's argument. You haven't been paying attention :Promans828_2002

Google hacked into your account and posted that....

According to whois, the owner of the domain is Rob Foor, the guy who owns the wii60 domain. Fake site confirmed.

I was just waiting for him to find that on his own but oh well :P

...

Michelle Obama's wondering why you're so mad?

[QUOTE="romans828_2002"]

[QUOTE="KevinnButlerNPK"] Well there you go you hated it, never have I seen such a hate movement against a console in my life. The lems and sheep were disgustingly hating on the PS3 for a long time and went to such extremes as to create whole organizations of fakeboys to give the PS3 a worse name (the Sony Defense Force). So you really can't blame cows now, you had it coming

Google hacked into your account and posted that....

kuraimen

According to whois, the owner of the domain is Rob Foor, the guy who owns the wii60 domain. Fake site confirmed.

I was just waiting for him to find that on his own but oh well :P

Sorry to spoil your fun! :) Actually, I wanted to know for myself.

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

I do have faith Kinect will deliver a few good games because its stupid to think that it won't. Every system delivers atleast a few good games. As for announced titles they aren't on my radar because they aren't big enough to get talked about around here and I don't have a 360 like I said. As for titles that interest the gamer around here there won't be much but since when did gaming, quality and good titles revolve around what gaming forums think?

SHR3DD3D

One question: let's assume Move was at least as successful than Kinect, if not more. Don't you think Sony would naturally have come up with a huge amount of Move games?

The fact that we may see only a few Move games in the short future, may be a result of the fact that Move was a terrible failure for Sony. :idea:

I never said Move was good or a success but the difference between Move and Kinect is that Move is much more complementary to the hardcore gamer. The software so far is absolute **** but I do see potential in the device because it suits my taste.

i call all this wii envy :P

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"] The thing is I don't think there will be quality software, not in the eyes of reviewers on sights like this. I have to admit I am ignorant of Kinect's titles but I can't see Kinect providing a decent number of AA/AAA games.Stevo_the_gamer

So according to him, the 360 has more high-quality games than PS3? What a shocker. :roll:

Considering ppl in this place only care about graphics i believe that´s the main reason 360 is so hated by PS3 fanboys. Tech wise PS3 hype was massive, 360 hype, on the other hand, was almost non existent. The fact 99% of this gen´s games look as good on the poor old 360 as they look on the almighty PS3 (some even look a bit better) may upset some.

...

Michelle Obama's wondering why you're so mad?

shinrabanshou

[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"] Because we're debating over the better libary, like you admitted these games won't impress anyone around here so it is stupid for people who wouldn't go near these games to try and use them as an advantage over the PS3, I don't think Kinect is capable of providing a hardcore experiance it just can't be done with waving your arms around.BigBoss255

One question: let's assume Move was at least as successful than Kinect, if not more. Don't you think Sony would naturally have come up with a huge amount of Move games?

The fact that we may see only a few Move games in the short future, may be a result of the fact that Move was a terrible failure for Sony. :idea:

I never said Move was good or a success but the difference between Move and Kinect is that Move is much more complementary to the hardcore gamer. The software so far is absolute **** but I do see potential in the device because it suits my taste.

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"] The thing is I don't think there will be quality software, not in the eyes of reviewers on sights like this. I have to admit I am ignorant of Kinect's titles but I can't see Kinect providing a decent number of AA/AAA games.Stevo_the_gamer

obvious;y!!!!! (rolls eyes)

Considering ppl in this place only care about graphics i believe that´s the main reason 360 is so hated by PS3 fanboys. Tech wise PS3 hype was massive, 360 hype, on the other hand, was almost non existent. The fact 99% of this gen´s games look as good on the poor old 360 as they look on the almighty PS3 (some even look a bit better) may upset some.

PAL360

The only reason why cows discuss graphics so much, is because that's the only aspect in which the PS3 appears to be beating the Xbox.

Gaming library? Fail.

Sales? Last place.

Software sales? Not quite on its level.

Graphics? Yes!

Considering ppl in this place only care about graphics i believe that´s the main reason 360 is so hated by PS3 fanboys. Tech wise PS3 hype was massive, 360 hype, on the other hand, was almost non existent. The fact 99% of this gen´s games look as good on the poor old 360 as they look on the almighty PS3 (some even look a bit better) may upset some.

PAL360

one last note and im done,

first and foremost this post needed to be put out there because of the insane level of denial out there.if anyone can argue any of those '' Assumptions'' then please do, but the truth in 2011 is that PS3 is still last, no matter what it does.

the truth is that 360 has outlived its own misteps and mistakes to wedge sony off of their perch, and the crazy thing is, Sony helped MS do it with arrogance, gloating, chest beating and a Hubris only seen by aging rock stars like the rolling stones, a great brand name that is too close minded and selfish to even notice that the playing field changed back in 2005. the denial in SW is shocking, its a denial that comes mainly from PS3 fanboys fellings of superiority who bring more devisiveness to discussions than actual points.

no one here is hating on the PS3. you dont purchace three systems thru the brands life cycle if you hated the product.its just i cant believe what a hard time the cows are having accepting their fates like xbox fans did last gen and dreamcast and gamecube fans did in years gone by.

its human nature i guess to hate on something thats made a complete mockery of you for 5 years.

i said my peace. the post speaks for itself. as far as 360 having no games i expect 360 only console owners ( if you only have ONE console you dont belong in here anyway ) to be intelligent ang go to IGN.com, look under Upcoming 360 releases and relaxe. remember, as with all Sony fanboy hype, believe half of what you see, and NONE of what you hear.

lastly as far as the state of PS3, here is one last article from 2009. it speaks VOLUMES more than i ever could. peace out.

you can all proceed with your witty comebacks now. but the truth hurts

LINK

http://www.destructoid.com/ms-halo-3-outsells-major-ps3-exclusives-combined-175996.phtml

Microsoft's Aaron Greenberg has come out with a huge brag, and what PS3 fans may consider a crushing blow. According to the latest NPD results, Halo 3 has managed to outsell every single major PS3 exclusive combined, including heavy hitters like Uncharted 2 and God of War III. Ouch.

"Just in from research team (NPD): Halo 3 has outsold Resistance 1 + 2, Uncharted 1+2, Killzone 2 and God of War III COMBINED ... wow," boasts the Microsoft demagogue.

Wow is the right word. Although nobody can deny the huge pulling power of the Halo name, to outsell the combined force of almost all Sony's major exclusives really does speak volumes about the company's situation right now. I've pointed out during our UK Chart listings that Sony's games never seem to stick to the chart as well as Microsoft's, and that's not an indictment on the quality of PS3 games, it's a simple observation that something has gone wrong.

It's a shame that PS3 exclusives don't perform as well as they should, especially given how ambitious some of them are. It does make one wonder just how worthwhile they are though. These developers pour obscene amounts of time and cash into making PS3 exclusives look amazing, with the very best graphics the home console market has to offer ... yet they can't outsell a game that doesn't even boast HD. That's kind of messed up.

my problem with the 360 is that it's been 5 or 6 years it's been out and i still haven't found 5 games that i'm interested in. to makes things worse those i was interested in were quite lack luster to me like allan wake or gears

one last note and im done,

first and foremost this post needed to be put out there because of the insane level of denial out there.if anyone can argue any of those '' Assumptions'' then please do, but the truth in 2011 is that PS3 is still last, no matter what it does.

the truth is that 360 has outlived its own misteps and mistakes to wedge sony off of their perch, and the crazy thing is, Sony helped MS do it with arrogance, gloating, chest beating and a Hubris only seen by aging rock stars like the rolling stones, a great brand name that is too close minded and selfish to even notice that the playing field changed back in 2005. the denial in SW is shocking, its a denial that comes mainly from PS3 fanboys fellings of superiority who bring more devisiveness to discussions than actual points.

no one here is hating on the PS3. you dont purchace three systems thru the brands life cycle if you hated the product.its just i cant believe what a hard time the cows are having accepting their fates like xbox fans did last gen and dreamcast and gamecube fans did in years gone by.

its human nature i guess to hate on something thats made a complete mockery of you for 5 years.

i said my peace. the post speaks for itself. as far as 360 having no games i expect 360 only console owners ( if you only have ONE console you dont belong in here anyway ) to be intelligent ang go to IGN.com, look under Upcoming 360 releases and relaxe. remember, as with all Sony fanboy hype, believe half of what you see, and NONE of what you hear.

lastly as far as the state of PS3, here is one last article from 2009. it speaks VOLUMES more than i ever could. peace out.

you can all proceed with your witty comebacks now. but the truth hurts

LINK

http://www.destructoid.com/ms-halo-3-outsells-major-ps3-exclusives-combined-175996.phtml

Microsoft's Aaron Greenberg has come out with a huge brag, and what PS3 fans may consider a crushing blow. According to the latest NPD results, Halo 3 has managed to outsell every single major PS3 exclusive combined, including heavy hitters like Uncharted 2 and God of War III. Ouch.

"Just in from research team (NPD): Halo 3 has outsold Resistance 1 + 2, Uncharted 1+2, Killzone 2 and God of War III COMBINED ... wow," boasts the Microsoft demagogue.

Wow is the right word. Although nobody can deny the huge pulling power of the Halo name, to outsell the combined force of almost all Sony's major exclusives really does speak volumes about the company's situation right now. I've pointed out during our UK Chart listings that Sony's games never seem to stick to the chart as well as Microsoft's, and that's not an indictment on the quality of PS3 games, it's a simple observation that something has gone wrong.

It's a shame that PS3 exclusives don't perform as well as they should, especially given how ambitious some of them are. It does make one wonder just how worthwhile they are though. These developers pour obscene amounts of time and cash into making PS3 exclusives look amazing, with the very best graphics the home console market has to offer ... yet they can't outsell a game that doesn't even boast HD. That's kind of messed up.

bryn8150

HALO3 is at 10 million sold WW. Uncharted 1 and 2 stand at 8 million WW. I think Greenberg is full of himself. (ofcourse its easy to say this when all you refer to is NPD data)

^^^^^ so in a nutshell

Sony fans have been in mad denial over the fall of the PS brand. (duh)

MS screwed up major but has still been doing well for themselves (duh)

Aron is such an arrogant cherry picking jerk (duh)

You wanted to start a really unnecessary argument and succeeded (duh)

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="BigBoss255"] The thing is I don't think there will be quality software, not in the eyes of reviewers on sights like this. I have to admit I am ignorant of Kinect's titles but I can't see Kinect providing a decent number of AA/AAA games.ActicEdge

obvious;y!!!!! (rolls eyes)

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]Aww, so assumptions is all you have :(marklarmer

[QUOTE="bryn8150"]

one last note and im done,

first and foremost this post needed to be put out there because of the insane level of denial out there.if anyone can argue any of those '' Assumptions'' then please do, but the truth in 2011 is that PS3 is still last, no matter what it does.

the truth is that 360 has outlived its own misteps and mistakes to wedge sony off of their perch, and the crazy thing is, Sony helped MS do it with arrogance, gloating, chest beating and a Hubris only seen by aging rock stars like the rolling stones, a great brand name that is too close minded and selfish to even notice that the playing field changed back in 2005. the denial in SW is shocking, its a denial that comes mainly from PS3 fanboys fellings of superiority who bring more devisiveness to discussions than actual points.

no one here is hating on the PS3. you dont purchace three systems thru the brands life cycle if you hated the product.its just i cant believe what a hard time the cows are having accepting their fates like xbox fans did last gen and dreamcast and gamecube fans did in years gone by.

its human nature i guess to hate on something thats made a complete mockery of you for 5 years.

i said my peace. the post speaks for itself. as far as 360 having no games i expect 360 only console owners ( if you only have ONE console you dont belong in here anyway ) to be intelligent ang go to IGN.com, look under Upcoming 360 releases and relaxe. remember, as with all Sony fanboy hype, believe half of what you see, and NONE of what you hear.

lastly as far as the state of PS3, here is one last article from 2009. it speaks VOLUMES more than i ever could. peace out.

you can all proceed with your witty comebacks now. but the truth hurts

LINK

http://www.destructoid.com/ms-halo-3-outsells-major-ps3-exclusives-combined-175996.phtml

Microsoft's Aaron Greenberg has come out with a huge brag, and what PS3 fans may consider a crushing blow. According to the latest NPD results, Halo 3 has managed to outsell every single major PS3 exclusive combined, including heavy hitters like Uncharted 2 and God of War III. Ouch.

"Just in from research team (NPD): Halo 3 has outsold Resistance 1 + 2, Uncharted 1+2, Killzone 2 and God of War III COMBINED ... wow," boasts the Microsoft demagogue.

Wow is the right word. Although nobody can deny the huge pulling power of the Halo name, to outsell the combined force of almost all Sony's major exclusives really does speak volumes about the company's situation right now. I've pointed out during our UK Chart listings that Sony's games never seem to stick to the chart as well as Microsoft's, and that's not an indictment on the quality of PS3 games, it's a simple observation that something has gone wrong.

It's a shame that PS3 exclusives don't perform as well as they should, especially given how ambitious some of them are. It does make one wonder just how worthwhile they are though. These developers pour obscene amounts of time and cash into making PS3 exclusives look amazing, with the very best graphics the home console market has to offer ... yet they can't outsell a game that doesn't even boast HD. That's kind of messed up.

BigBoss255

That's NPD, if I was as ignortant as you I could point out that GT5 has probably sold 20x what Halo 3 has in Japan.

Let's pretend that Japan is a bigger and more important gaming market than the U.S., shall we? :) Does that make us feel better in any way?

thats not proof, TintedEyes

^^^^^ so in a nutshell

Sony fans have been in mad denial over the fall of the PS brand. (duh)

MS screwed up major but has still been doing well for themselves (duh)

Aron is such an arrogant cherry picking jerk (duh)

You wanted to start a really unnecessary argument and succeeded (duh)

ActicEdge

Especially this

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"]

[QUOTE="bryn8150"]

one last note and im done,

first and foremost this post needed to be put out there because of the insane level of denial out there.if anyone can argue any of those '' Assumptions'' then please do, but the truth in 2011 is that PS3 is still last, no matter what it does.

the truth is that 360 has outlived its own misteps and mistakes to wedge sony off of their perch, and the crazy thing is, Sony helped MS do it with arrogance, gloating, chest beating and a Hubris only seen by aging rock stars like the rolling stones, a great brand name that is too close minded and selfish to even notice that the playing field changed back in 2005. the denial in SW is shocking, its a denial that comes mainly from PS3 fanboys fellings of superiority who bring more devisiveness to discussions than actual points.

no one here is hating on the PS3. you dont purchace three systems thru the brands life cycle if you hated the product.its just i cant believe what a hard time the cows are having accepting their fates like xbox fans did last gen and dreamcast and gamecube fans did in years gone by.

its human nature i guess to hate on something thats made a complete mockery of you for 5 years.

i said my peace. the post speaks for itself. as far as 360 having no games i expect 360 only console owners ( if you only have ONE console you dont belong in here anyway ) to be intelligent ang go to IGN.com, look under Upcoming 360 releases and relaxe. remember, as with all Sony fanboy hype, believe half of what you see, and NONE of what you hear.

lastly as far as the state of PS3, here is one last article from 2009. it speaks VOLUMES more than i ever could. peace out.

you can all proceed with your witty comebacks now. but the truth hurts

LINK

http://www.destructoid.com/ms-halo-3-outsells-major-ps3-exclusives-combined-175996.phtml

Microsoft's Aaron Greenberg has come out with a huge brag, and what PS3 fans may consider a crushing blow. According to the latest NPD results, Halo 3 has managed to outsell every single major PS3 exclusive combined, including heavy hitters like Uncharted 2 and God of War III. Ouch.

"Just in from research team (NPD): Halo 3 has outsold Resistance 1 + 2, Uncharted 1+2, Killzone 2 and God of War III COMBINED ... wow," boasts the Microsoft demagogue.

Wow is the right word. Although nobody can deny the huge pulling power of the Halo name, to outsell the combined force of almost all Sony's major exclusives really does speak volumes about the company's situation right now. I've pointed out during our UK Chart listings that Sony's games never seem to stick to the chart as well as Microsoft's, and that's not an indictment on the quality of PS3 games, it's a simple observation that something has gone wrong.

It's a shame that PS3 exclusives don't perform as well as they should, especially given how ambitious some of them are. It does make one wonder just how worthwhile they are though. These developers pour obscene amounts of time and cash into making PS3 exclusives look amazing, with the very best graphics the home console market has to offer ... yet they can't outsell a game that doesn't even boast HD. That's kind of messed up.

SHR3DD3D

That's NPD, if I was as ignortant as you I could point out that GT5 has probably sold 20x what Halo 3 has in Japan.

Let's pretend that Japan is a bigger and more important gaming market than the U.S., shall we? :) Does that make us feel better in any way?

No Japan isn't as significant as the US in the video game market but it suited my example perfectly fine. Neither Japan or the US are representative of the whole world.

I think its a bit excessive to show flagrant alliance to any console. Their just pieces of plastic, circuits and wires that play games. Its a matter of preference. There are things I like and dislike about all of them.

The funny part though is that none of that matters to people like me that can afford all consoles and play all kind of different games. People in sw need to evolve their mentality, but I ghess it's too much to ask(ups, I forgot these forums are mostly populated by kids).

I think its a bit excessive to show flagrant alliance to any console. Their just pieces of plastic, circuits and wires that play games. Its a matter of preference. There are things I like and dislike about all of them.

clone01

I never really saw why cows were so hated in SW until this past year where everyday there's a stupid thread talking about how the 360 doesn't have any games and Kinect will be the end of MS. Not to mention at all the outrage over every ps3 exclusive that didnt score a 9. The ps3 is much better now compared to 3 years ago but the PS dominance is long gone and in its place is a great rivalry between the Big 3 that as a whole, has benefited all console gamers.

exiledsnake

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]So in order for a game to be of quality, it has to get AA or AAA?BigBoss255

obvious;y!!!!! (rolls eyes)

What argument, lots of solid games don't score AAA or AA. AAA and AA are arbitrary labels we give games, they don't even mean anything. As for fair, the hell :? These aren't people, they have no feeling, who cares about being "fair"? There are better games obviously but how does that now mean we can't call other titles qauality? I feel like I'm wasting my time having this argument with you.

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

obvious;y!!!!! (rolls eyes)

What argument, lots of solid games don't score AAA or AA. AAA and AA are arbitrary labels we give games, they don't even mean anything. As for fair, the hell :? These aren't people, they have no feeling, who cares about being "fair"? There are better games obviously but how does that now mean we can't call other titles qauality? I feel like I'm wasting my time having this argument with you.

I don't want to hurt any fanboy faction but. The PS3 recently just flat out has more exclusive games (on consoles) to play. LBP 2 and Killzone 3 2morrow. I did enjoy the Dead Risng 2 exclusive DLC for the xbox 360. But in the end. None of the TC points matter at all to me. It is and will be about playing great exclusive and multiplat games that gets my attention. Not a silly time line of fail for a fanboy faction is important.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"] So now we're using the term "quality" loosely to suit our argument. I've got 2 A games in my libary right now, DCUO and Fable III calling either game quality would be unfair on better games. edo-tensei

What argument, lots of solid games don't score AAA or AA. AAA and AA are arbitrary labels we give games, they don't even mean anything. As for fair, the hell :? These aren't people, they have no feeling, who cares about being "fair"? There are better games obviously but how does that now mean we can't call other titles qauality? I feel like I'm wasting my time having this argument with you.

I wanna say fire emblem but I think that got a 6.

But yeah, lots of great games don't score amazingly well.

Well, when you have a console like PS2 which sold to an entire generation, its bound to have followers on the next iteration, but since many of those kids with PS2 never had another console, they feel its their obligation to defend sony and the PS3 to the death as the best. Sadly, Sony has fallen far by removing features both hardware and software on the PS3, enraging end users. Coming out of the gates as arrogant at the start of the PS3's life cycle only to find they are just on the same playing field as everyone else didnt help their cause either. Now they have an exec saying that game exclusives are bad for the developers, yet Sony has the most games locked up... which way is it sony?

Anywyas, this site gets a lot of threads daily stating "facts" about how bad the 360 is, rather than promoting what the PS3 has they feel its best to belittle the competition hoping others will follow, yet 360 sales still rise and sony's still fall. 2011 - one exclusive and still year of the 360.

perhaps the most pathetic part of all this are those that take things like this to heart. (to me atleast, this is all entertainment) plain and simple. (talking about the fanboy factionsfighting a pointless battle and yet entertaining battle).

Well, when you have a console like PS2 which sold to an entire generation, its bound to have followers on the next iteration, but since many of those kids with PS2 never had another console, they feel its their obligation to defend sony and the PS3 to the death as the best. Sadly, Sony has fallen far by removing features both hardware and software on the PS3, enraging end users. Coming out of the gates as arrogant at the start of the PS3's life cycle only to find they are just on the same playing field as everyone else didnt help their cause either. Now they have an exec saying that game exclusives are bad for the developers, yet Sony has the most games locked up... which way is it sony?

Anywyas, this site gets a lot of threads daily stating "facts" about how bad the 360 is, rather than promoting what the PS3 has they feel its best to belittle the competition hoping others will follow, yet 360 sales still rise and sony's still fall. 2011 - one exclusive and still year of the 360.

Phazevariance

your post is as mixed bag as they come. but i'll let you pick them out.

Well, when you have a console like PS2 which sold to an entire generation, its bound to have followers on the next iteration, but since many of those kids with PS2 never had another console, they feel its their obligation to defend sony and the PS3 to the death as the best. Sadly, Sony has fallen far by removing features both hardware and software on the PS3, enraging end users. Coming out of the gates as arrogant at the start of the PS3's life cycle only to find they are just on the same playing field as everyone else didnt help their cause either. Now they have an exec saying that game exclusives are bad for the developers, yet Sony has the most games locked up... which way is it sony?

Anywyas, this site gets a lot of threads daily stating "facts" about how bad the 360 is, rather than promoting what the PS3 has they feel its best to belittle the competition hoping others will follow, yet 360 sales still rise and sony's still fall. 2011 - one exclusive and still year of the 360.

Phazevariance

And their answer is exclusive DLC, which is just a terrible idea. Besides 3rd party exlcusives are non-existant at this point, and exclusive DLC hurts consumers.

I wanna say fire emblem but I think that got a 6.

But yeah, lots of great games don't score amazingly well.

ActicEdge

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]I wanna say fire emblem but I think that got a 6.

But yeah, lots of great games don't score amazingly well.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]I wanna say fire emblem but I think that got a 6.

But yeah, lots of great games don't score amazingly well.

Stevo_the_gamer

RE4 was such a sick game so no haha. I really am sad they didn't make a ground up RE for the Wii in the style of 4. I would have been all over that.

[QUOTE="edo-tensei"] And fire emblem deserves more, what's your point? Reviews stopped becoming relevant a long time ago.Stevo_the_gamer

Haha, stop trying to belong :P

But yeah, I mean my favourite Wii game got a 10 but in the same notion one of my favourite ones got a 5 :( (but it was an awesome game, I swear it!!!)

why do you think all ps3 fans care about graphics and that only that ps3 games are all about graphics? answer me this, have you ever played mgs4, lbp, resistance or infamous?

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]This must be about another great PS3 game Killzone 3 coming out tomorrow.AdamPA1006