[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]Because you say so? Get real.
Bigboi500
No, it's not just me. Even with low standards it still has a much worse overall library than the other systems. The Wii does have low standards, some of the high scoring games on Wii have terrible controls, bad graphics, lackluster online and would not be rated the same if they were a PS3, 360, or PC exclusive, reviewers realize the Wii has terrible, controls, graphics, gameplay, and online so they don't even factor these as a negative points unless they are truly terrible, they just don't rate Wii exclusives the same as games on other systems. Take Conduit 2 and Conduit for example, the first one was garbage, yet sheep still hyped it because maybe, just maybe the Wii would have at least one slightly good FPS... yet PS3 and 360 have hundreds. The Wii is the laughing stock of the video game industry...
Sorry but you're wrong again. The world is not full of bro gamers who only value graphics, shooters, and online multiplayer. The Wii has terrific niche games, hardcore games and casual games. It appeals to a larger group of people than just the demographic that you like and value.Yet it's overall library is worse in every way from the PS3, 360, and PC, despite it having low standards. The Wii consists mostly of shovelware and causal games. And, by the way, it's not just "bro gamers" who actually like good games, that actually have good controls, online, and graphics, I guess hardcore gamers such as yourself like having the archaic graphics, online, and gameplay of the Wii....
Log in to comment