[QUOTE="OregonTrailing"]It looks like the vast majority of SW disagrees with you.
tomarlyn
You mean the entire sheep community?
Yes SW's is run by sheep, so why don't you go back to where you belong and leave them alone.
Wii Graphics Already PEAKED?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Ramadear"][QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="Ramadear"]The Gamecube was not on par with the xbox. In practice and in the right situations it could produce gorgeous games, but didn't have the oomph to produce anything close to Riddick or NGB. Wii is virtually the same song and dance as the xbox, as is the PS3 to the 360.Gamecube was on par with the xbox, the wii is better than both of them. BUT if you want to believe otherwise thats entirely up to you. This thread is full of fail anyway.
tomarlyn
This thread is full of the blind.
Thats why Rogue Squadron looks better than both of those, am I right?
There's a lot more going on in Riddick to handle than a bunch of starships flying around. Rogue Squadron looks great, like I said in practice under the right circumstances it could produce greatness. But not on the xbox's level.
But this isn't about the Cube.
Sure its about cube, since your basically stating that Wii is essentially a overclocked cube. Anyhow, back to the subject since you can't even bring evidence against what I'm saying. Riddick looks OK, rather decent. Rogue Squadron looks better, probably better than anything the xbox produced. Show me a game on xbox that runs at 60fps, with self shadowing, antialiasing and bump mapping? There is none and while you can say the game is just a bunch of star ships flying around, its not since it was made up of more than flying missions. I could easily counter your lackluster argument by saying Riddick was corridor based so instead of having open environments. Should we start posting screenshots then? Wait wait, I'll take the initiative.
Rogue Squadron 3:
Riddick:
Log in to comment