Wii has one of the best looking games this gen... 360 and PS3 owners owned.

[QUOTE="gunswordfist"][QUOTE="samusarmada"] Weren't you the one who compared them in the first place :?samusarmada

[QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="gunswordfist"]Nope. Check my first post here and show me where I said graphics.gunswordfist

[QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="gunswordfist"]Nope. Check my first post here and show me where I said graphics.gunswordfist

It's a good looking game, but it's certainly not one of the best, and CERTAINLY is not ownage.

Odin Sphere on PS2 looks about the same.

[QUOTE="gunswordfist"][QUOTE="samusarmada"] You didn't mention anything specifc, merely that one would 'squash' the other. In a thread about graphics what the hell do you think people thought you meant?crazy-player

[QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="gunswordfist"]Nope. Check my first post here and show me where I said graphics.gunswordfist

[QUOTE="crazy-player"][QUOTE="gunswordfist"] Whoa its now illegal to compare gameplay on a game forum. I knew a sheep would pull that. It's not my fault you overreacted and got proven wrong.gunswordfist

[QUOTE="gunswordfist"][QUOTE="samusarmada"] You didn't mention anything specifc, merely that one would 'squash' the other. In a thread about graphics what the hell do you think people thought you meant?Grinning_Demon

[QUOTE="angry_fork"]It looks alright, some of the screens look blah, some of them look decent. I like the water one the most. It looks better in motion but honestly it just seems like an upgraded SNES game or something. Show me a Wii game with that artstyle that's 3D with a 360 degree camera and i'll be impressed.crazy-player

Of course it does, where are the shaders, the dynamic shadows, the physics, the HDR lighting, te particle effects? This game looks incredbly average, sorry sheep.(end sarcasm) I laugh at the people who thinks making a 2D game is easy and unimpressive and even harder at the fact he called it an upgraded SNES game.

Dnkey Kong Country 3

Yoshi's Island

These are nice looking games but :lol: seriously?

[QUOTE="crazy-player"][QUOTE="angry_fork"]It looks alright, some of the screens look blah, some of them look decent. I like the water one the most. It looks better in motion but honestly it just seems like an upgraded SNES game or something. Show me a Wii game with that artstyle that's 3D with a 360 degree camera and i'll be impressed.ActicEdge

Of course it does, where are the shaders, the dynamic shadows, the physics, the HDR lighting, te particle effects? This game looks incredbly average, sorry sheep.(end sarcasm) I laugh at the people who thinks making a 2D game is easy and unimpressive and even harder at the fact he called it an upgraded SNES game.

Dnkey Kong Country 3

Yoshi's Island

These are nice looking games but :lol: seriously?

One word...

Braid

Not owned...

[QUOTE="crazy-player"][QUOTE="angry_fork"]It looks alright, some of the screens look blah, some of them look decent. I like the water one the most. It looks better in motion but honestly it just seems like an upgraded SNES game or something. Show me a Wii game with that artstyle that's 3D with a 360 degree camera and i'll be impressed.angry_fork

Wow, do I really need to dig up developer comments on how much harder 2D is than 3D? And your first post is rediculous, upgraded SNES game? Someone pull up that HD super metroid picture that would basically explode the PS3 and 360.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="crazy-player"] So a game has to be 3D in order to impressive?crazy-player

Of course it does, where are the shaders, the dynamic shadows, the physics, the HDR lighting, te particle effects? This game looks incredbly average, sorry sheep.(end sarcasm) I laugh at the people who thinks making a 2D game is easy and unimpressive and even harder at the fact he called it an upgraded SNES game.

These are nice looking games but :lol: seriously?

You need to reread my statement. You misinterpreted what I said.

[QUOTE="angry_fork"][QUOTE="crazy-player"] So a game has to be 3D in order to impressive?ActicEdge

Wow, do I really need to dig up developer comments on how much harder 2D is than 3D? And your first post is rediculous, upgraded SNES game? Someone pull up that HD super metroid picture that would basically explode the PS3 and 360.

[QUOTE="crazy-player"][QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

Of course it does, where are the shaders, the dynamic shadows, the physics, the HDR lighting, te particle effects? This game looks incredbly average, sorry sheep.(end sarcasm) I laugh at the people who thinks making a 2D game is easy and unimpressive and even harder at the fact he called it an upgraded SNES game.

These are nice looking games but :lol: seriously?

ActicEdge

You need to reread my statement. You misinterpreted what I said.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"][QUOTE="crazy-player"] So a game has to have all those fancy things in order to look nice? Were are my high-res sprites, my complex hand-drawn colorful backgrounds, my fluid animations in a 3D game? See, I can do this too.crazy-player

You need to reread my statement. You misinterpreted what I said.

Its alright, no biggy. Plus you posted that HD metroid picture so plus 1 :P

This orobo game would be much more impressive if it was 3D angry_fork

Lol joke thread? or what because that game was horrible looking good artistic style but horrible graphics if you want a game with good graphics and artisitic style look at prince of persiaAll_that_is_Man

Very pretty... Wii should stick to 2D, it looks infinitely better than its 3D games.WAIW

It looks alright... For a 2D game. If you're trying to compare this to something like Resident Evil 5, Metal Gear Solid 4, or Killzone 2 you'll end up getting owned.princeofshapeir

Why is that? What about those games is so much more appealing, I'll be the first to admit those games look great technically, but art wise, Muramasa looks much better in my opinion. Further more, how many 2D games look better than Muramasa?

[QUOTE="All_that_is_Man"]Lol joke thread? or what because that game was horrible looking good artistic style but horrible graphics if you want a game with good graphics and artisitic style look at prince of persiacrazy-player

Its not because its 2d, the graphics arn't even good for a 2d game the graphics look pixelated and grainy, and if you gonna make a cheap 2d game at least make it look nice especially on the wii...its not that hard what did that game take a whole 10 minutes to make

[QUOTE="crazy-player"][QUOTE="All_that_is_Man"]Lol joke thread? or what because that game was horrible looking good artistic style but horrible graphics if you want a game with good graphics and artisitic style look at prince of persiaAll_that_is_Man

Its not because its 2d, the graphics arn't even good for a 2d game the graphics look pixelated and grainy, and if you gonna make a cheap 2d game at least make it look nice especially on the wii...its not that hard what did that game take a whole 10 minutes to make

Show me 10 2D games that look better than this. I'll be waiting.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]It looks alright... For a 2D game. If you're trying to compare this to something like Resident Evil 5, Metal Gear Solid 4, or Killzone 2 you'll end up getting owned.ActicEdge

Why is that? What about those games is so much more appealing, I'll be the first to admit those games look great technically, but art wise, Muramasa looks much better in my opinion. Further more, how many 2D games look better than Muramasa?

You'd have to be nuts to think that Muramasa looks more appealing than RE5. Heck, even BRAWL looks better than this 2D hack-n-slash.

If you told me Muramasa was for the DS or PSP, I'd believe you. The fact that they're putting out a side-scroller that would look good on a handheld is simply laughable.

[QUOTE="PS_John"]

Are the sheep just desperate or do they honestly think this game looks impressive?

I'm rather confused!

Grinning_Demon

This is just embarresing. Really...its sad!!!

No. What's embarrassing is that the TC thinks this game rivals games like Killzone 2, Uncharted, RE5 etc in the graphics department haha

I didn't even need to click the link to know the graphics would suck

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]It looks alright... For a 2D game. If you're trying to compare this to something like Resident Evil 5, Metal Gear Solid 4, or Killzone 2 you'll end up getting owned.princeofshapeir

Why is that? What about those games is so much more appealing, I'll be the first to admit those games look great technically, but art wise, Muramasa looks much better in my opinion. Further more, how many 2D games look better than Muramasa?

You'd have to be nuts to think that Muramasa looks more appealing than RE5. Heck, even BRAWL looks better than this 2D hack-n-slash.

If you told me Muramasa was for the DS or PSP, I'd believe you. The fact that they're putting out a side-scroller that would look good on a handheld is simply laughable.

Biohazard looks great and I like the look better than Muramasa but if I said the other way around I would not be nuts at all. Muramasa is visually stunning and its a complete insult to think anything like Muramasa could be acheived on any of the handhelds. Also, what does brwal have to do with this. You are comparing technical aspects and throwing away art. To achieve the look of Muramasa is incredibly difficult, you have no clue how hard it is. You're tryng to force your opinion down my throat by telling me I'm nuts to like bight colors and visual sway over hyper realism and steroid injected men in super dusty looking areas. Muramasa on a handheld, thats laughable.

[QUOTE="Grinning_Demon"] [QUOTE="PS_John"]

Are the sheep just desperate or do they honestly think this game looks impressive?

I'm rather confused!

PS_John

This is just embarresing. Really...its sad!!!

No. What's embarrassing is that the TC thinks this game rivals games like Killzone 2, Uncharted, RE5 etc in the graphics department haha

I didn't even need to click the link to know the graphics would suck

Its not because its 2d, the graphics arn't even good for a 2d game the graphics look pixelated and grainy All_that_is_Man

WAT?!?!?!

WAT!?!?!?!

WAT!?!?!?!?!

...its not that hard what did that game take a whole 10 minutes to make All_that_is_Man

O sorry 15 minutes, my mistakeAll_that_is_Man

[QUOTE="crazy-player"][QUOTE="All_that_is_Man"]Lol joke thread? or what because that game was horrible looking good artistic style but horrible graphics if you want a game with good graphics and artisitic style look at prince of persiaAll_that_is_Man

Its not because its 2d, the graphics arn't even good for a 2d game the graphics look pixelated and grainy, and if you gonna make a cheap 2d game at least make it look nice especially on the wii...its not that hard what did that game take a whole 10 minutes to make

[QUOTE="PS_John"][QUOTE="Grinning_Demon"]

This is just embarresing. Really...its sad!!!

crazy-player

No. What's embarrassing is that the TC thinks this game rivals games like Killzone 2, Uncharted, RE5 etc in the graphics department haha

I didn't even need to click the link to know the graphics would suck

[QUOTE="All_that_is_Man"]O sorry 15 minutes, my mistakecrazy-player

Im sorry but your living in a world of denial the game isn't that pretty