Will Crysis 2 take the FPS graphics king crown from Killzone 2?????

  • 99 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Blazerdt47
Blazerdt47

5671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Blazerdt47
Member since 2004 • 5671 Posts

On consoles? From what I have seen so far, it still looks like Killzone 2 looks better but that's just my opinion.

Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
That tech demo at GDC with the disco lights looked stunning.
Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

How many times has this been discussed? Anyone keeping count?

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

On consoles? From what I have seen so far, it still looks like Killzone 2 looks better but that's just my opinion.

Blazerdt47
Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.
Avatar image for kittyloaf69
kittyloaf69

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 kittyloaf69
Member since 2009 • 1023 Posts
It'll be the best looking average shooter available.
Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

On consoles? From what I have seen so far, it still looks like Killzone 2 looks better but that's just my opinion.

lowe0

Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

On consoles? From what I have seen so far, it still looks like Killzone 2 looks better but that's just my opinion.

Mystic-G

Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gdc-10-cryengine-3/63096

Bad Company 2 looks good...but not that good.

Avatar image for 88mphSlayer
88mphSlayer

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 88mphSlayer
Member since 2010 • 3201 Posts

i dunno but Crysis 2 will probably have better gameplay (although online gameplay is up in the air, Killzone 2 had decent online, can't recall Crysis mp ever being outstanding)

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

On consoles? From what I have seen so far, it still looks like Killzone 2 looks better but that's just my opinion.

Mystic-G

Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

Factoring in destruction - yes. On top of that, I don't have any faith in Crytek's abilities working with fixed hardware - and let's not forget that their console team previously brought us the masterpiece known as HAZE (their last game as Free Radical).
Avatar image for -ScorpionKing
-ScorpionKing

433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 -ScorpionKing
Member since 2008 • 433 Posts

so on PC Crysis 1 > Crysis 2 ??

Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.lowe0

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

Factoring in destruction - yes. On top of that, I don't have any faith in Crytek's abilities working with fixed hardware - and let's not forget that their console team previously brought us the masterpiece known as HAZE (their last game as Free Radical).

I think you should look at the latest Cryengine 3 demo on consoles,it also has destruction,and yes it blows BC2 out of the water.Free Radical is not the team that made Cryengine 3 neither it makes Crysis 2,dont mistake that.

Avatar image for FallenAngel-
FallenAngel-

252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 FallenAngel-
Member since 2009 • 252 Posts

In my opinion, Crysis 2 looks better than Killzone 2 already.

Avatar image for KingsMessenger
KingsMessenger

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 KingsMessenger
Member since 2009 • 2574 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.lowe0

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

Factoring in destruction - yes. On top of that, I don't have any faith in Crytek's abilities working with fixed hardware - and let's not forget that their console team previously brought us the masterpiece known as HAZE (their last game as Free Radical).

Crytek UK is not their console team... How many times must this be repeated for people to understand?

Crysis 2 is being done at Crytek Frankfurt. All 3 versions of it. Crytek UK is doing bits and pieces, assisting on the project(as are ALL of Crytek's studios), but Crytek UK is NOT the primary developer for the console versions.

also, let me remind you that the tech is not even partially being built at Crytek UK. The original tech demo for CE3 was shown a mere month after Crytek acquired Crytek UK. If you think 1 month is enough time for any developer to produce a workable tech demo and engine, then you know nothing about game development. Crytek UK has its own project, which hasn't been shown yet.

Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.lowe0

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

Factoring in destruction - yes. On top of that, I don't have any faith in Crytek's abilities working with fixed hardware - and let's not forget that their console team previously brought us the masterpiece known as HAZE (their last game as Free Radical).

You're also forgetting they the fact that they made Timesplitters. :P Yes, Haze was horrible, but lets sweep that under the carpet. :lol:

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#15 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
It'll be the best looking average shooter available.kittyloaf69
Crysis? Average? :lol:
Avatar image for DEATH775
DEATH775

4216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#16 DEATH775
Member since 2005 • 4216 Posts
Maybe, I hope so.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61997 Posts

We have an FPS graphics king now? :P

In all seriousness, I fully believe Crysis 2 will look better than KZ2.

Avatar image for BubbyJello
BubbyJello

2750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 BubbyJello
Member since 2007 • 2750 Posts
I don't know, but who really cares? Really?
Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
yeah, but it's not gonna take the prestigious title of "exclusive console graphics king that rhymes with pillzone blue" and no one ever will ;)
Avatar image for peaceoutmedusa
peaceoutmedusa

2130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 peaceoutmedusa
Member since 2010 • 2130 Posts
It'll be the best looking average shooter available.kittyloaf69
I agree, Crysis is the best average looking shooter available.
Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
It'll be the best looking average shooter available.kittyloaf69
Average shooters don't score 9.5 out of 10.
Avatar image for aka_aj03
aka_aj03

5911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 aka_aj03
Member since 2004 • 5911 Posts
till KZ3 comes out :)
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.peaceoutmedusa
I agree, Crysis is the best average looking shooter available.

If Crysis is average so is nearly every FPS released this gen.
Avatar image for aka_aj03
aka_aj03

5911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 aka_aj03
Member since 2004 • 5911 Posts
I still think KZ2 gives us best theater like experience... you take the HUD off the screen, and man it all different experience.
Avatar image for tupapi006
tupapi006

2980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 tupapi006
Member since 2003 • 2980 Posts

battlefield bad company 2>>>>>>>>>>>>> Killzone 2

Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts
[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

On consoles? From what I have seen so far, it still looks like Killzone 2 looks better but that's just my opinion.

lowe0
Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.

Bad Company 2 looks MEH graphically. For such big maps it looks good, but not in comparison to the majority of games. The graphics lack a lot of polish. MW2's GFX are definitely superior from an objective standpoint.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I think yes, there is something on killzoen that lowers the graphics quallity to me, it looks like....hmm that god of war gif you have? See the character's skin? Well thats how the entire world looks to me in killzone 2, like the shaders are kinda weak in comparison with crysis 2.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.Brainkiller05
Average shooters don't score 9.5 out of 10.

Yeah but neither halo games worth their ratings or should i speak about gta iv? So i have to say i also found it average in terms of gunplay which is for me everything in an fps.
Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts
You mean TF2 (MP) rip :P
Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts

That tech demo at GDC with the disco lights looked stunning.Ravensmash

admit it, you wanted to jump in there with some glowsticks and rave it up.

Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts

battlefield bad company 2>>>>>>>>>>>>> Killzone 2

tupapi006
Are ppl around here on drugs? KZ2 is arguably the best looking game on consoles period, better then UC2.
Avatar image for Superbored
Superbored

1187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Superbored
Member since 2008 • 1187 Posts

Crysis is average. Graphics are nice but campaign is lacking.

Avatar image for Jipset
Jipset

2410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Jipset
Member since 2008 • 2410 Posts
[QUOTE="peaceoutmedusa"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.AAllxxjjnn
I agree, Crysis is the best average looking shooter available.

If Crysis is average so is nearly every FPS released this gen.

You're right, nearly every FPS has been average this gen.
Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts

[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.Brainkiller05
Average shooters don't score 9.5 out of 10.

tech + graphics = awesome. truely awesome.
gunplay + gameplay = not awesome.

if it's so awesome then why do I choose a 9 year old game as my multiplayer fix of choice day after day?

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#35 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts
[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.dakan45
Average shooters don't score 9.5 out of 10.

Yeah but neither halo games worth their ratings or should i speak about gta iv? So i have to say i also found it average in terms of gunplay which is for me everything in an fps.

Let me guess,you think MW2 gameplay is better?
Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts

mw gameplay is a joke. pick a spray n pray gun. spray n pray. rinse repeat.

Avatar image for Scar_Finger
Scar_Finger

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Scar_Finger
Member since 2010 • 197 Posts
crysis 2 is meant to be played on PS3 not PC or 360 i dont care what the graphics look like because ps3 dishes out all the graphics kings anyways so im not worried about that. what i am worried about is what they do with most multiplats, and that is to tone it down to meet the needs of the 360.
Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

crysis 2 is meant to be played on PS3 not PC or 360 i dont care what the graphics look like because ps3 dishes out all the graphics kings anyways so im not worried about that. what i am worried about is what they do with most multiplats, and that is to tone it down to meet the needs of the 360.Scar_Finger

Can you give us some of that kool aid you are drinking?PC is the way its meant to be played Crysis and there is NO port.Every platform gets the ground up treatment.

Avatar image for Evz0rz
Evz0rz

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Evz0rz
Member since 2006 • 4624 Posts

crysis 2 is meant to be played on PS3 not PC.Scar_Finger
:lol: :lol: :lol: wait are you serious... :|

Avatar image for Scar_Finger
Scar_Finger

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Scar_Finger
Member since 2010 • 197 Posts

[QUOTE="Scar_Finger"]crysis 2 is meant to be played on PS3 not PC.Evz0rz

:lol: :lol: :lol: wait are you serious... :|

were not talking about crysis 1, this is crysis 2
Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

[QUOTE="Evz0rz"]

[QUOTE="Scar_Finger"]crysis 2 is meant to be played on PS3 not PC.Scar_Finger

:lol: :lol: :lol: wait are you serious... :|

were not talking about crysis 1, this is crysis 2

Sooooo...your point?

Avatar image for KingsMessenger
KingsMessenger

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 KingsMessenger
Member since 2009 • 2574 Posts

[QUOTE="Evz0rz"]

[QUOTE="Scar_Finger"]crysis 2 is meant to be played on PS3 not PC.Scar_Finger

:lol: :lol: :lol: wait are you serious... :|

were not talking about crysis 1, this is crysis 2

Yeah... And it is still made by Crytek which not only has a heavy PC gaming heritage, but comes from the PC dominated Germany. It will be designed like a PC game and it will certainly be best on the PC.

Avatar image for Scar_Finger
Scar_Finger

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Scar_Finger
Member since 2010 • 197 Posts
[QUOTE="KingsMessenger"]

[QUOTE="Scar_Finger"][QUOTE="Evz0rz"] :lol: :lol: :lol: wait are you serious... :|

were not talking about crysis 1, this is crysis 2

Yeah... And it is still made by Crytek which not only has a heavy PC gaming heritage, but comes from the PC dominated Germany. It will be designed like a PC game and it will certainly be best on the PC.

but they are talking up the ps3 alot in interviews so they are obviously more pleased with their PS3 product
Avatar image for Evz0rz
Evz0rz

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Evz0rz
Member since 2006 • 4624 Posts
[QUOTE="Evz0rz"]

[QUOTE="Scar_Finger"]crysis 2 is meant to be played on PS3 not PC.Scar_Finger

:lol: :lol: :lol: wait are you serious... :|

were not talking about crysis 1, this is crysis 2

Okay...you're point being?
Avatar image for KingsMessenger
KingsMessenger

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 KingsMessenger
Member since 2009 • 2574 Posts

[QUOTE="KingsMessenger"]

[QUOTE="Scar_Finger"] were not talking about crysis 1, this is crysis 2Scar_Finger

Yeah... And it is still made by Crytek which not only has a heavy PC gaming heritage, but comes from the PC dominated Germany. It will be designed like a PC game and it will certainly be best on the PC.

but they are talking up the ps3 alot in interviews so they are obviously more pleased with their PS3 product

More like they are emphasizing the strength of the Multiplatform engine... Most other multiplatform engines have significant issues with the PS3, or at the very best are absolutely painful to work with on the PS3.

Crytek is making sure to let possible licensees know that their engine doesn't suffer from those issues.

Quit trying to read into statements to suit your fanboyish opinions.

Avatar image for Scar_Finger
Scar_Finger

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Scar_Finger
Member since 2010 • 197 Posts
[QUOTE="KingsMessenger"]

[QUOTE="Scar_Finger"][QUOTE="KingsMessenger"]

Yeah... And it is still made by Crytek which not only has a heavy PC gaming heritage, but comes from the PC dominated Germany. It will be designed like a PC game and it will certainly be best on the PC.

but they are talking up the ps3 alot in interviews so they are obviously more pleased with their PS3 product

More like they are emphasizing the strength of the Multiplatform engine... Most other multiplatform engines have significant issues with the PS3, or at the very best are absolutely painful to work with.

Crytek is making sure to let possible licensees know that their engine doesn't suffer from those issues.

Quit trying to read into statements to suit your fanboyish opinions.

pretty sure them talking about maxing hardware out and getting premium results has nothing to do with "significant issues"
Avatar image for KingsMessenger
KingsMessenger

2574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 KingsMessenger
Member since 2009 • 2574 Posts

[QUOTE="KingsMessenger"]

[QUOTE="Scar_Finger"] but they are talking up the ps3 alot in interviews so they are obviously more pleased with their PS3 productScar_Finger

More like they are emphasizing the strength of the Multiplatform engine... Most other multiplatform engines have significant issues with the PS3, or at the very best are absolutely painful to work with.

Crytek is making sure to let possible licensees know that their engine doesn't suffer from those issues.

Quit trying to read into statements to suit your fanboyish opinions.

pretty sure them talking about maxing hardware out and getting premium results has nothing to do with "significant issues"

They aren't having issues... Also, Crytek has said on multiple occassions that the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions will be pretty evenly matched graphically, and that the PC version will be leaps and bounds ahead of the console versions.

Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
At least they got the 360 version to work in that tech demo :P
Avatar image for kittyloaf69
kittyloaf69

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 kittyloaf69
Member since 2009 • 1023 Posts
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.jg4xchamp
Crysis? Average? :lol:

Yes. Besides the graphics, I really didn't like Crysis at all.
Avatar image for kittyloaf69
kittyloaf69

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 kittyloaf69
Member since 2009 • 1023 Posts

[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"] If Crysis is average so is nearly every FPS released this gen.Brainkiller05
No, the graphics are awesome, I Think the gameplay is average.
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.Brainkiller05
Average shooters don't score 9.5 out of 10.

My bad for having my own opinion :roll: