Will Final Fantasy Versus XIII come to 360?

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]

[QUOTE="JIT93"] But you are using your judgment, not common sense, that is not evidence, its just a definition and a list of games. Square needs to say it themselves, then it is official. Honestly, I don't see how you couldn't, it's really a question of common sense at this point :|JIT93

No. I'm not judging the past and definitions (the only thing I'm judging at this point is the person that thinks that SE didn't prefer Sony for two generations).

The past and what SE released and for what console is fact, and was provided in a link.

The definition of preference is fact and was provided in a link as well.

Square Enix doesn't need to say anything, ever hear of the saying "actions speak louder than words"? Further more here's a question for you. If SE to you (and let's make this very clear that it's your beliefs on this) didn't prefer Sony than who did they and what proof do you have to show?

Oh and your witty copy and paste was just great, LOL :lol:

What would you say right now if I wasn't serious in the last couple of post :|

I would say that's fine I've been here for such a long time that I don't really care either way. That ok with you (not to burst a bubble or anything)?

They don't need to say it (and I won't look to see if they did). The evidence was provided before you with two links, if you can put two and two together thats your problem and not mine. Honestly I don't see how you couldn't, it's really a question of common sense at this point but I regress...

[QUOTE="JIT93"][QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]

[QUOTE="JIT93"] But you are using your judgment, not common sense, that is not evidence, its just a definition and a list of games. Square needs to say it themselves, then it is official. Honestly, I don't see how you couldn't, it's really a question of common sense at this point :|-RPGamer-

No. I'm not judging the past and definitions (the only thing I'm judging at this point is the person that thinks that SE didn't prefer Sony for two generations).

The past and what SE released and for what console is fact, and was provided in a link.

The definition of preference is fact and was provided in a link as well.

Square Enix doesn't need to say anything, ever hear of the saying "actions speak louder than words"? Further more here's a question for you. If SE to you (and let's make this very clear that it's your beliefs on this) didn't prefer Sony than who did they and what proof do you have to show?

Oh and your witty copy and paste was just great, LOL :lol:

What would you say right now if I wasn't serious in the last couple of post :|

I would say that's fine I've been here for such a long time that I don't really care either way. That ok with you (not to burst a bubble or anything)?

are you talking about the links that i posted?desyple

Ummm can't say for sure or not since I didn't look at them, to be specific I was refering to the two links in the string of responses I had going. :)

[QUOTE="Iceman2911"]

Until SE says so no

/thread

desyple

I don't know why there arguing over something they can'

Square-Enix, Kitase, Toriyama, and Nomura (the director) have aleady stated that they are not changing policy on Final Fantasy Versus XIII. Its gonna be a PS3 exclusive. period.

Lets leave it at that. They are planning a worldwide release for the game and releasing it on both platforms would prolong it even more.

I believe that FF XIII would have gotten a worldwide release if it didn't go multiplatform also. S-E said they want to show some love to both sides. This plan seems kind of good, although i'd like to see some more PS3 support though.

Square-Enix, Kitase, Toriyama, and Nomura (the director) have aleady stated that they are not changing policy on Final Fantasy Versus XIII. Its gonna be a PS3 exclusive. period.

Lets leave it at that. They are planning a worldwide release for the game and releasing it on both platforms would prolong it even more.

I believe that FF XIII would have gotten a worldwide release if it didn't go multiplatform also. S-E said they want to show some love to both sides. This plan seems kind of good, although i'd like to see some more PS3 support though.

hayato_

[QUOTE="-RPGamer-"][QUOTE="JIT93"][QUOTE="-RPGamer-"]

[QUOTE="JIT93"] But you are using your judgment, not common sense, that is not evidence, its just a definition and a list of games. Square needs to say it themselves, then it is official. Honestly, I don't see how you couldn't, it's really a question of common sense at this point :|JIT93

No. I'm not judging the past and definitions (the only thing I'm judging at this point is the person that thinks that SE didn't prefer Sony for two generations).

The past and what SE released and for what console is fact, and was provided in a link.

The definition of preference is fact and was provided in a link as well.

Square Enix doesn't need to say anything, ever hear of the saying "actions speak louder than words"? Further more here's a question for you. If SE to you (and let's make this very clear that it's your beliefs on this) didn't prefer Sony than who did they and what proof do you have to show?

Oh and your witty copy and paste was just great, LOL :lol:

What would you say right now if I wasn't serious in the last couple of post :|

I would say that's fine I've been here for such a long time that I don't really care either way. That ok with you (not to burst a bubble or anything)?

And another potential strike. Much as Kingdom Hearts was a PS favorite, its target audience this generation is primarily orbiting around the Wii (KH series is rated E10), not to mention the Wii has more potential buyers of a KH game. Based on these two facts, there'd be little surprise if they decide to put KH3 on the Wii (that and a technical reason--the art style of KH isn't overly complicated and would not be too demanding on the Wii's hardware).

:lol: Logical fallacies out the ass in this thread.

Why does "brand loyalty" factor into every single argument that cows make? Don't you guys realize how weaksauce that is when talking about an industry?

And lol at the guy that's trying to deny that Square has had a clear Sony preference until now.

There's a very good chance that this indeed stays exclusive, but for people to act like 3rd party exclusitivity is not privy to change is just insane.

:lol: Logical fallacies out the ass in this thread.

Why does "brand loyalty" factor into every single argument that cows make? Don't you guys realize how weaksauce that is when talking about an industry?

And lol at the guy that's trying to deny that Square has had a clear Sony preference until now.

There's a very good chance that this indeed stays exclusive, but for people to act like 3rd party exclusitivity is not privy to change is just insane.

Tragic_Kingdom7

LOL, I agree %100

[QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"]

:lol: Logical fallacies out the ass in this thread.

Why does "brand loyalty" factor into every single argument that cows make? Don't you guys realize how weaksauce that is when talking about an industry?

And lol at the guy that's trying to deny that Square has had a clear Sony preference until now.

There's a very good chance that this indeed stays exclusive, but for people to act like 3rd party exclusitivity is not privy to change is just insane.

ArrancarVizard

LOL, I agree %100

it doesn't matter ffversus is exclusive this whole thread is pointless it is just fanboys making predictions like lems.

[QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"][QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"]

:lol: Logical fallacies out the ass in this thread.

Why does "brand loyalty" factor into every single argument that cows make? Don't you guys realize how weaksauce that is when talking about an industry?

And lol at the guy that's trying to deny that Square has had a clear Sony preference until now.

There's a very good chance that this indeed stays exclusive, but for people to act like 3rd party exclusitivity is not privy to change is just insane.

Iceman2911

LOL, I agree %100

it doesn't matter ffversus is exclusive this whole thread is pointless it is just fanboys making predictions like lems.

It appears to be exclusive.

You cannot say with absolute certainty that this won't come to 360.

[QUOTE="Iceman2911"][QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"][QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"]

:lol: Logical fallacies out the ass in this thread.

Why does "brand loyalty" factor into every single argument that cows make? Don't you guys realize how weaksauce that is when talking about an industry?

And lol at the guy that's trying to deny that Square has had a clear Sony preference until now.

There's a very good chance that this indeed stays exclusive, but for people to act like 3rd party exclusitivity is not privy to change is just insane.

Tragic_Kingdom7

LOL, I agree %100

it doesn't matter ffversus is exclusive this whole thread is pointless it is just fanboys making predictions like lems.

It appears to be exclusive.

You cannot say with absolute certainty that this won't come to 360.

it is I can say for 100 percent that it is exclusive until Se themselves make a anouncement that it is going to the 360

[QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"][QUOTE="Iceman2911"][QUOTE="ArrancarVizard"][QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"]

:lol: Logical fallacies out the ass in this thread.

Why does "brand loyalty" factor into every single argument that cows make? Don't you guys realize how weaksauce that is when talking about an industry?

And lol at the guy that's trying to deny that Square has had a clear Sony preference until now.

There's a very good chance that this indeed stays exclusive, but for people to act like 3rd party exclusitivity is not privy to change is just insane.

Iceman2911

LOL, I agree %100

it doesn't matter ffversus is exclusive this whole thread is pointless it is just fanboys making predictions like lems.

It appears to be exclusive.

You cannot say with absolute certainty that this won't come to 360.

it is I can say for 100 percent that it is exclusive until Se themselves make a anouncement that it is going to the 360

Yes, you can say you're a hundred percent sure its an exclusive right now, but what's the point?

In a thread that is speculating whether or not this could come to 360 at some point, your comments about it being exclusive right now are a waste of space. In theory, there is no such thing as an absolute exclusive, unless there's a binding legal contract.

If there was a thread speculating about whether Star Ocean could come to PS3, I would not come in trumpeting its current status because that misses the thread's focus.

My original comment was to address the logical fallacies coming from cows. "Brand loyalty" is a stupid way to make a point.