will you purchase the PS4 eye?

[QUOTE="PS4TrumpsXbox1"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Except its not better. It may have a slight advantage in specs, but did the better specs in the Xbox make it a better console than the PS2? Nope.

When reality sets in and cows realise that maybe a third (and I'm being generous) of their exclusives actually take full advantage of them specs, then they'll see how truely gimped their console is. Actually thats a lie, cows think the higly gimped PS3 was the best console last gen, theres no saving them :lol:

Point being, the console war will be won on software next gen (Games and OS features), not having a 41.27 percent (or whatever the hell the number is) better GPU.

#dealwithit

:cool:

RR360DD

I respond to posts that are worth a response. Unfortunatley 99% of your posts are garbage

:cool:

ps. Most people are gonna have a PSN+ and Gold sub so its irrelevant.

[QUOTE="Giancar"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]Its pointless compared to Kinect. It'll get zero support just like the Move :lol:RR360DD

Nah I like gaming the way it works. Controllers, now and forever.

[QUOTE="Granny_Spanked"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]

Obviously it wasn't, or Sony wouldn't have decided to remove it. Maybe it wouldve been like $20 or $30 cheaper, but Sony were too scared of Microsoft to launch at such a close price.

:cool:

RR360DD

Except its not better. It may have a slight advantage in specs, but did the better specs in the Xbox make it a better console than the PS2? Nope.

When reality sets in and cows realise that maybe a third (and I'm being generous) of their exclusives actually take full advantage of them specs, then they'll see how truely gimped their console is. Actually thats a lie, cows think the higly gimped PS3 was the best console last gen, theres no saving them :lol:

Point being, the console war will be won on software next gen (Games and OS features), not having a 41.27 percent (or whatever the hell the number is) better GPU.

#dealwithit

:cool:

I don't even know if the PS4 Eye has a single function

[QUOTE="jsmoke03"][QUOTE="Tighaman"]if you not going to have the full experience of the console why buy it? Better graphics, because thats the only new experience you gonna see if you dont get the pseye. You might as well stay with the Ps3 it seems like you all still riding on the name and not how the console is evolving.

Tighaman

What games have you seen on Kinect that are worth while and none casual? Things like hand gestures and voice commands will ware thin after a while. Also The Wii and Move are superior in well needed areas. Not too many games require hands free motion gaming. Meanwhile, the touchpad is more funtional and none gimmciky (if handles properly). In reality Sony has an advantage with motion gaming and the touchpad. Persnoailly I would like to see Redsteel 3 on Move 2. I enjpyed  a few Wii titles like Red Steel, Metroid and No More Heroes but usually I wanted a normal controller. That is my deal with moion gaming in general.

I don't even know if the PS4 Eye has a single function

Ly_the_Fairy

Your mom.

(LOL I'm in a joking mood. Dont pay me any tention.)

Yes, but not straight away probably, thanks Sony for giving me the option to buy one later

Definitely not. You'd have to be on crack to purchase one. 

No

Nope... I genuinly trust sony not to spy on me while fapping but still ... no. Theres a reason why i take apart every new latop i get and perminantly disconnect the camera ribbon cable....

The vast majority of companies will take a mile if given an inch... cover your own arses 

Making it an optional add on has killed any chance of this succeeding. Nobody will buy it Nobody will make games for it Nobody will use it in core games Its dead before it launches, well done Sony. You complain about it being mandatory with Xbox One but in doing so:- Guarantees core games will use Guarantees games will be made for it Makes it cheaper for those that want it (separately it would cost more) Shows everyone how good it is (excluding the paranoid idiots who think the NSA want to watch them in their underwear dancing to Just dance), users will try it because they have it and actually think its pretty good. It does so much everyone will like something about it. It costs more now but keeping it mandatory means in the future with price drops it will be even more better value.tdkmillsy

The focus on Kinect was motion gaming now it's hand gestures and voice commands. It shows how flawed the techmology actually is. Why do you think Ryse did a 180? Name a single game on Kinect that a core gamer would enjoy over a normal controller. I mean fully fleshed games not linear paths and dance games. The reality is there are NONE. Devs are forced to dumb down gameplay because the tech is FLAWED hence the sudden focus on hand gestures and voice commands. I know people want something new but Kinect 2.0 isn't it neither is the Wii U gamepad. The real innovation is cloud, Oculas Rift and Project Spark not this silly over hyped Kinect BS.

[QUOTE="tdkmillsy"]Making it an optional add on has killed any chance of this succeeding. Nobody will buy it Nobody will make games for it Nobody will use it in core games Its dead before it launches, well done Sony. You complain about it being mandatory with Xbox One but in doing so:- Guarantees core games will use Guarantees games will be made for it Makes it cheaper for those that want it (separately it would cost more) Shows everyone how good it is (excluding the paranoid idiots who think the NSA want to watch them in their underwear dancing to Just dance), users will try it because they have it and actually think its pretty good. It does so much everyone will like something about it. It costs more now but keeping it mandatory means in the future with price drops it will be even more better value.Blazed

The focus on Kinect was motion gaming now it's hand gestures and voice commands. It shows how flawed the techmology actually is. Why do you think Ryse did a 180? Name a single game on Kinect that a core gamer would enjoy over a normal controller. I mean fully fleshed games not linear paths and dance games. The reality is there are NONE. Devs are forced to dumb down gameplay because the tech is FLAWED hence the sudden focus on hand gestures and voice commands. I know people want something new but Kinect 2.0 isn't it neither is the Wii U gamepad. The real innovation is cloud, Oculas Rift and Project Spark not this silly over hyped Kinect BS.

its nice to have a choice over peripherals like these, but i'll probably pick it up eventually. i had the ps eye which had a few fun games for it.

[QUOTE="tdkmillsy"]Making it an optional add on has killed any chance of this succeeding. Nobody will buy it Nobody will make games for it Nobody will use it in core games Its dead before it launches, well done Sony. You complain about it being mandatory with Xbox One but in doing so:- Guarantees core games will use Guarantees games will be made for it Makes it cheaper for those that want it (separately it would cost more) Shows everyone how good it is (excluding the paranoid idiots who think the NSA want to watch them in their underwear dancing to Just dance), users will try it because they have it and actually think its pretty good. It does so much everyone will like something about it. It costs more now but keeping it mandatory means in the future with price drops it will be even more better value.Blazed

The focus on Kinect was motion gaming now it's hand gestures and voice commands. It shows how flawed the techmology actually is. Why do you think Ryse did a 180? Name a single game on Kinect that a core gamer would enjoy over a normal controller. I mean fully fleshed games not linear paths and dance games. The reality is there are NONE. Devs are forced to dumb down gameplay because the tech is FLAWED hence the sudden focus on hand gestures and voice commands. I know people want something new but Kinect 2.0 isn't it neither is the Wii U gamepad. The real innovation is cloud, Oculas Rift and Project Spark not this silly over hyped Kinect BS.

Well thats precisely the problem. If you wanted to make kinect integral to your gameplay, you had to focus solely on kinect owners which means you had to cater to the kinect audience. Bundling a kinect solves that issue. allowing devs to incorporate kinect without fear of isolating the vast majority of the install base.

The problem is you are asking for proof of games that cant really exist when the kinect is an add on. With such a small userbase kinect games are forced to be low budget with dumbed down gameplay if they ever hope to turn a profit.

I have one pre-ordered right now. I'm not sure what purpose it will serve at launch other than interacting with the UI but hey I'll have it when ever they decide to do something with it. 

Seems rather pointless so no.

Yes. I already have two move controllers, so it's nice I already have some of the hardware. Looking forward to see some sporadic self published apps for it.