This topic is locked from further discussion.
Wow, this game isn't even out yet and look at all the damage control. :lol: Does another PC AAAE scare you guys that much?
Seriously DIablo 3 Beta is on normal on the first few starting areas...play nightmare then come back,oh wait you can't cause the game is not even out yet..Play the full game THEN comment on its difficulty...
Blake135
Why stop at Nightmare, beat the game in Inferno difficulty and then come back complain about its easy ^^
The truth is that a lot of these people haven't even downloaded the beta and are just talking out of their asses because they're scared of the AAAE status Diablo 3 holds. :PSeriously DIablo 3 Beta is on normal on the first few starting areas...play nightmare then come back,oh wait you can't cause the game is not even out yet..Play the full game THEN comment on its difficulty...
Blake135
It would be like playing Den of Evil and Blood Raven in Diablo 2, you would get hardly any real impressions from the game.. Not to mention it was facerollingly easy..Seriously DIablo 3 Beta is on normal on the first few starting areas...play nightmare then come back,oh wait you can't cause the game is not even out yet..Play the full game THEN comment on its difficulty...
Blake135
[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]OP is right, Diablo 3 is incredibly dumbed down. At least the combat is a ton of fun. They need to crank up the difficulty a lot though. I don't care about other difficulty levels - the "normal" difficulty isn't hard enough. I don't recall my health ever even dropping...GiveMeSomething
Lol dude, I never played any diablo before and I am pretty much solo'ing on full teams with lvl 1 chars. The difficulty needs to go up by A LOT. I liked the game but its just too easy to the point it's boring. It needs to be tuned up so bad that it scares u to walk further without ur party. It needs to be so hard that u actually need some strategy (even if basic).
In case no one saw it.
[QUOTE="Blake135"]The truth is that a lot of these people haven't even downloaded the beta and are just talking out of their asses because they're scared of the AAAE status Diablo 3 holds. :P Have you downloaded the beta? I wasn't impressed by it at all, but I also understand its just the beta. I'm still waiting for the game to come out first before I reserve full judgement because I really do want it to be awesome.Seriously DIablo 3 Beta is on normal on the first few starting areas...play nightmare then come back,oh wait you can't cause the game is not even out yet..Play the full game THEN comment on its difficulty...
Frostbite24
[QUOTE="Blake135"]
Seriously DIablo 3 Beta is on normal on the first few starting areas...play nightmare then come back,oh wait you can't cause the game is not even out yet..Play the full game THEN comment on its difficulty...
aroxx_ab
Why stop at Nightmare, beat the game in Inferno difficulty and then come back complain about its easy ^^
EXACTLY !, there are no words to describe how WTF worthy the comments are about how easy it is..
[QUOTE="GiveMeSomething"]
[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]OP is right, Diablo 3 is incredibly dumbed down. At least the combat is a ton of fun. They need to crank up the difficulty a lot though. I don't care about other difficulty levels - the "normal" difficulty isn't hard enough. I don't recall my health ever even dropping...GiveMeSomething
Lol dude, I never played any diablo before and I am pretty much solo'ing on full teams with lvl 1 chars. The difficulty needs to go up by A LOT. I liked the game but its just too easy to the point it's boring. It needs to be tuned up so bad that it scares u to walk further without ur party. It needs to be so hard that u actually need some strategy (even if basic).
In case no one saw it.
You played the beta, and basically played what amounted to a small portion of the first act of the game.. On the lowest difficulty on top of that..Longtime Diablo fan. Loved Diablo1, Diablo2 and its expansion pack.
The beta for D3 is good, but its just the very very begining, pretty much the tutorial, there is ALOT more to the game then what you can play in the beta.
Diablo2 also took awhile to get going.
I get the same addicting feeling in D2 beta as I did in the previous Diablo games.
The only real difference if there is alot mroe color in D3 and the animations/movements are alot better. I feel like its more Diablo, you will either like it or not like it. Hack n Slash games are not for everyone.
Cannot wait to try more of the game when it releases. Try it on nightmare difficulty and the later acts and im sure people will be blown away. I didnt liek Diablo2 much at first until ACT2 to be honest. It almost started slower then D2 did.
The atmospher and feel of Diablo is still there, the loot is still there, its just not quite as dark as the previous ones.
We shall see next month how the final version is. but what ive played in closed and open beta, we are in for a pretty great hack n slash game.
You guys seriously complaining about the difficulty right now? You realize the Beta is on NORMAL and its 1/3 of the FIRST ACT. You basically played the tutorial of the game. Of course its easy! You think D2 is any harder? Go play the game right now up to blood raven. You can literally do it with your eyes closed. The begining is not meant to be hard. Come back when u beat inferno. Personally I think the artstyle is perfectly fine and he lore/story to be totally awesome.
[QUOTE="Frostbite24"][QUOTE="Blake135"]The truth is that a lot of these people haven't even downloaded the beta and are just talking out of their asses because they're scared of the AAAE status Diablo 3 holds. :P Have you downloaded the beta? I wasn't impressed by it at all, but I also understand its just the beta. I'm still waiting for the game to come out first before I reserve full judgement because I really do want it to be awesome. I was given access back in Feb. I understand the beta has very limited, linear, and introductory content so I don't go, "Like OMG! The beta is the suxxorz, LOL! No challenge, looks like WoW, where's mah Imershun? Kinectimals is more hardcore than this."Seriously DIablo 3 Beta is on normal on the first few starting areas...play nightmare then come back,oh wait you can't cause the game is not even out yet..Play the full game THEN comment on its difficulty...
exiledsnake
Congratulations...you've finished the portion of the game that Blizzard has stated is supposed to be "so easy your grandmother can beat it"...Finished playing the beta and it just confirmed every fears I had about this game. Game is so streamlined and feels dull. 4 player max, dedicated portals, no pvp, non-existent skill trees, cluttered UI and COD-like reward messages splattering all over the screen, etc. Everything looks cartoonish, lacks detail, and technically outdated. It even animates like a cartoon, in a bad way. This looks like something that could've been built on the warcraft 3 engine and released back in 2003. Worse is that there is no dark forboding atmosphere, let alone any. Gameplay is quite mechnical and it just keeps throwing you a mundane list of things to do. Can't believe it took them 12 years to make this.
runbleduck
Um, don't you know? Tutorials are supposed to be challenging, duh!You guys seriously complaining about the difficulty right now? You realize the Beta is on NORMAL and its 1/3 of the FIRST ACT. You basically played the tutorial of the game. Of course its easy! You think D2 is any harder? Go play the game right now up to blood raven. You can literally do it with your eyes closed. The begining is not meant to be hard. Come back when u beat inferno.
argetlam00
Onet hing I really hope with the animations, specifically with the monk.. Is that the weapons are used int he attacks.. Last I played the attacks had the monk just barehanding his specials with the weapons put away looked real stupid.. My main concern is the fact of the sheer lack of a talent tree, no real decision making with any consquences just doesn't seem to be great.. But its a beta so we really can't tell how much of meaningful choices you will get down the road or the depth in character development.Longtime Diablo fan. Loved Diablo1, Diablo2 and its expansion pack.
The beta for D3 is good, but its just the very very begining, pretty much the tutorial, there is ALOT more to the game then what you can play in the beta.
Diablo2 also took awhile to get going.
I get the same addicting feeling in D2 beta as I did in the previous Diablo games.
The only real difference if there is alot mroe color in D3 and the animations/movements are alot better. I feel like its more Diablo, you will either like it or not like it. Hack n Slash games are not for everyone.
Cannot wait to try more of the game when it releases.
kozzy1234
[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] Yeah D2 sure as hell was cartoony, the characters were sprites! And I am sorry but what? Hvae you played Diablo 2 as of late? How is the atmosphere weaker..sSubZerOodiablo 2 to diablo 3 is like comparing dark souls to kingdom of amalur sprites does not equate to cartoony... the atmoshpere is broken by the cartoony tone, The characters are actually DRAWN LOL in Diablo 2.. and Diablo 3 is actually MORE graphic in violence then Diablo 2 thanks to improved physics.. People are talking out of their asses, have you even played Diablo 2 recently? Because the first thing that comes to mind is hardly what I would consider dark and menacing.. I actually thought Diablo 3's beta areas such as the dark forest was far more menacing than anything coming close in Act 1's area, except maybe the Jail and Catacombs.. Even then it was just dark.. People need to get their heads out of their asses if they some how think Diablo 3 is lighter then Diablo 2.. They are different, your comparing a 2d game more or less that used 3d.. To a fully 3d game, D2 was not ultra realistic.. It was colorful and had its own artwork in which the characters did look cartoony.. This chest pounding of wanting ultra realistic stuff or other dribble is nasuating, so basically people want all games to look the same. whats it matter if they were drawn in diablo 2, that doesn't change the fact that diablo 3 is more cartoony, the physics makes it more cartoony http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8Z_Stdn2N4
and I never said I wanted ultra realistic stuff, I said I liked the original where it was a more serious atmoshphere, you got things in d3 that look like it was pulled from a disney movie
[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] The characters are actually DRAWN LOL in Diablo 2.. and Diablo 3 is actually MORE graphic in violence then Diablo 2 thanks to improved physics.. People are talking out of their asses, have you even played Diablo 2 recently? Because the first thing that comes to mind is hardly what I would consider dark and menacing.. I actually thought Diablo 3's beta areas such as the dark forest was far more menacing than anything coming close in Act 1's area, except maybe the Jail and Catacombs.. Even then it was just dark.. People need to get their heads out of their asses if they some how think Diablo 3 is lighter then Diablo 2.. They are different, your comparing a 2d game more or less that used 3d.. To a fully 3d game, D2 was not ultra realistic.. It was colorful and had its own artwork in which the characters did look cartoony.. This chest pounding of wanting ultra realistic stuff or other dribble is nasuating, so basically people want all games to look the same.Frostbite24whats it matter if they were drawn in diablo 2, that doesn't change the fact that diablo 3 is more cartoony, the physics makes it more cartoony http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8Z_Stdn2N4 You're right, that is so unrealistic! I mean, what's with all these demons and stuff anyway. Does Blizzard know what real life is like? well never said it was unrealistic, just said it was cartoony, and not following the same tone as diablo 2, reading comprehension is an essential part of life you know.
[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] The characters are actually DRAWN LOL in Diablo 2.. and Diablo 3 is actually MORE graphic in violence then Diablo 2 thanks to improved physics.. People are talking out of their asses, have you even played Diablo 2 recently? Because the first thing that comes to mind is hardly what I would consider dark and menacing.. I actually thought Diablo 3's beta areas such as the dark forest was far more menacing than anything coming close in Act 1's area, except maybe the Jail and Catacombs.. Even then it was just dark.. People need to get their heads out of their asses if they some how think Diablo 3 is lighter then Diablo 2.. They are different, your comparing a 2d game more or less that used 3d.. To a fully 3d game, D2 was not ultra realistic.. It was colorful and had its own artwork in which the characters did look cartoony.. This chest pounding of wanting ultra realistic stuff or other dribble is nasuating, so basically people want all games to look the same.sSubZerOowhats it matter if they were drawn in diablo 2, that doesn't change the fact that diablo 3 is more cartoony, the physics makes it more cartoony http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8Z_Stdn2N4 My god what were we thinking.. Diablo 2 spews realism with its whirlwinding barbarians, guy who controls skeletons.. And enemies that have 1 death animation inless you shatter them into ice chunks.. I can't believe people are actually basing their point around this when the physics and dismemberment actually make Diablo 3 a far more graphically violent game then Diablo 2 ever was.. reading comprehension for you too! I never said it was unrealistic, I said its cartoony, there's a difference
http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-too-cartoony/
producerof diablo 2 thinks its too cartoony as well
.. And? Yet again define what cartoony means. And tell us how in the world Diablo 2 does not fit in that very same definition.http://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-too-cartoony/
producerof diablo 2 thinks its too cartoony as well
savagetwinkie
Hey guise, better than D1 and D2 while still in beta lololololololol. I'll make my decision in ~3-4yrs once I've put a couple thousand hours into it.[QUOTE="caughtjoo"][QUOTE="XaosII"]
Nope. Diablo 3 is easily the best Diablo game. Theres nothing dumbed down about it.
XaosII
Easily. Both Diablo games are fillled with annoying, outdated, frustrating, and stupid mechanics. D3 fixes nearly all of them.
Diablo 3.. I hope isn't too dumbed down like the TC said, I still haven't played it to tell.. . First I couldn't install the beta client, kept freezing on loading, then it wouldn't finsih downloading and said that "A memory peice can't be written to another memory piece"... arrgh, I finally tricked it by playing before it was finished downloading and can get to login ,but now I have "Server error 37" .... This is the worst beta EVER!!!! i can't even try the damn thing out!!!
[QUOTE="caughtjoo"][QUOTE="XaosII"] sure.,...you sound like one of those bioware appologist that said dragon age 2 was the best game ever. "who needs strategy and tactics when you have great graphcal death scenes and non stop action." or "Who needs inventory, thats so outdated and doesn't work well on consoles.." (me2-3) ... just how it sounds. The mechanics were perfect on Diablo 1 and 2 and other games like Sacred 1 & 2, and titan quest made them great too. Diablo 3.. I hope isn't too dumbed down like the TC said, I still haven't played it to tell.. . First I couldn't install the beta client, kept freezing on loading, then it wouldn't finsih downloading and said that "A memory peice can't be written to another memory piece"... arrgh, I finally tricked it by playing before it was finished downloading and can get to login ,but now I have "Server error 37" .... This is the worst beta EVER!!!! i can't even try the damn thing out!!! My faith in this product is not good at this rate! And blizzard isn't addressing any of these problems on their boards.
[QUOTE="XaosII"][QUOTE="tagyhag"]I heard that the skill points are automated, I understand why they would want to do that in an "appeal-to-the-masses" sort of way but personally I'm not too fond of that. :( Hopefully Grim Dawn will be more hardcore.tagyhag
Why? The skill point system in Diablo 2 sucked? Every class had the exact same distribution: Just the minimum Str amd Dex to equip end-tier gear and the rest is dumped into Vit. Hell, even the Sorceress was the same - you didnt need to spend a single poitn into upping magic. There wasnt any customization; only the illusion of customization.
The option was still there, you could do whatever you wanted with your character. I know some people like hand holding but I personally don't. guy sounds like a bioware appologist when they took out inventory, took out loot, took out stats and made their games multiplayer to appease the cod console players...blah..[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"].. And? Yet again define what cartoony means. And tell us how in the world Diablo 2 does not fit in that very same definition. the diablo 3 world has a funnish/exagerated tone and design to where diablo 1/2 were more serious about the world design. I'm not asking for realism, but diablo 3 is goofyhttp://www.maxfreak.com/diablo3/archives/diablo-3-too-cartoony/
producerof diablo 2 thinks its too cartoony as well
sSubZerOo
[QUOTE="XaosII"]
Nope. Diablo 3 is easily the best Diablo game. Theres nothing dumbed down about it.
arto1223
From what I played of the beta (and that the beta basically represents less than 0.01% of the game), this sentence is true. DIII will be amazing.
Not really lol. Depending on how you look at the game (and some people WILL play the game to only run through the story once on normal, as disgusting as that is), then that may account for a decent chunk of the first act..and there's 4 acts in total. I hope each act is quite lengthy, though. Anyone got more info on that? Like, how much of ACT1 did the beta cover?Why blizzard games always attract these "veterans" (I doubt they realy are).
In wow's case minutes after expansion is announced before they even give proper information "LOLX!!11! (X=mainvillain/mainraces)", "This expansion will suck, its for casuals".
Diablo's case "Why colors! this isnt unicorn game!" "dumbed down for casuals!".
Im not sure about sc2, but I think there where whiners too.
Why blizzard games always attract these "veterans" (I doubt they realy are).
In wow's case when expansion is announced before they even give information "LOLX!!11! (X=mainvillain/mainraces)", "This expansion will suck, its for casuals".
Diablo's case "Why colors! this isnt unicorn game!" "dumbed down for casuals!".
Im not sure about sc2, but I think there where whiners too.
Nohtnym
People whined SC2 was a reskin. When blizz makes changes people whine that Diablo isn't Diablo. Gamers are a whiny bunch, and they don't complain when they really should.
I was interested in getting this title and I probably still will. I agree with a lot of posts up here. Diablo has a pretty basic format, which is fine by me. I still love the original Baldurs Gate.
Blizzard is so funny
First they destroy the atmosphere and art, then they use a PS1 like engine and now totally destroy the gameplay too
What a joke, this game could be the biggest dissapointment of all time
then its released on 360 and is an insta 10/10 with controls better by miles and with a more cinematic feel.Blizzard is so funny
First they destroy the atmosphere and art, then they use a PS1 like engine and now totally destroy the gameplay too
What a joke, this game could be the biggest dissapointment of all time
loosingENDS
Blizzard is so funny
First they destroy the atmosphere and art, then they use a PS1 like engine and now totally destroy the gameplay too
What a joke, this game could be the biggest dissapointment of all time
loosingENDS
Says the guy who was so hyped for it that he thought rumors were confirmation of a console version. Oh my how your attitude has turned.
Gotta say that I'm disappointed. Diablo 3 isn't an action RPG anymore. It just an action game. They took out all the small RPG elements Diablo franchise had. I can't choose the skills I want nor I can't decide myself how to spend points on attributes. I couldn't even finish the beta, it was so boring. Got to level 10 before stopping.
Errr, what? You can't choose the Skills ure going to use? Honestly have you even played it or are you making stuff up? Some people.... *facepalm*Gotta say that I'm disappointed. Diablo 3 isn't an action RPG anymore. It just an action game. They took out all the small RPG elements Diablo franchise had. I can't choose the skills I want nor I can't decide myself how to spend points on attributes. I couldn't even finish the beta, it was so boring. Got to level 10 before stopping.
Icarian
[QUOTE="Icarian"]Errr, what? You can't choose the Skills ure going to use? Honestly have you even played it or are you making stuff up? Some people.... *facepalm*Gotta say that I'm disappointed. Diablo 3 isn't an action RPG anymore. It just an action game. They took out all the small RPG elements Diablo franchise had. I can't choose the skills I want nor I can't decide myself how to spend points on attributes. I couldn't even finish the beta, it was so boring. Got to level 10 before stopping.
PurpleHaze89
Yes I can choose what to use, but I can't choose what skills to pick. The game makes that choise for me. There are no skill trees like D2 had. So, yes I agree with TC on some level. D3 is simplified.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment