xbl Gold membership ****

[QUOTE="Zohluff"]

You guys are **** ridiculous.

Sure, MS isn't forcing you to shell out near the price of a new game a year for online. Sure, LIVE has in game chat. But do you guys realize that PSN offers the same experience in gameplay for free?

If a game is broken like Battlefield 1940-Whatever's chat system, it should be fixed. You shouldn't need to pay for an alternative.

I play HAZE, a PS3 game that bombed and "sucked", online and have a blast, similar to my experience on HALO. I played GTAIV online on PSN and, guess what, it was no different on LIVE. Not a difference in gameplay or experience. Why? Because the game's the game, LIVE doesn't change that.

I see that most fanboys don't mind throwing away 50 bucks on an unnecessary priced feature. Good for you. Ignorance is bliss. Meanwhile, I wont pay **** for online because I rather buy one more game a year. I like being able to go online when I want for free. I don't like being sold a gimped system and then being told if I want to enjoy the full experience it's going to cost me more. I paid for my **** I paid money up the ass for an online capable system and internet. Why do I need to pay to add 1 and 1 and get 2? I shouldn't. It should be free.

So, fanboys can suck on their XBOX LIVE all they want and give a million reasons to justify why they're being scammed. Meanwhile, I'll play some online and download a demo or two without spending an additional penny.

MizFitAwesome

So when you are buying BluRays (the king of an unnecessary overpriced feature) that makes you a fanboy? Better yet, the people that prefer XBL over pSN are now fanboys?

XBL is the best online service, so naturallyyou have to pay. Seriously it's not expensive.

Miyuki-Chan

I love my Xbox gold membership, but the main quarrel with the service is the fact that if you are offline, for whatever reason, you cannot play the titles that you previously paid for. That is ridiculous! At least on the PSN you get to play the games you pay for, whether online or off. My internet was disconnected last week, due to lack of $$, and it took me a week to get it back on, but the whole while I didn't have access to any of my downloaded titles or downloaded content. They went from full games to trial games. All my themes and gamer pics that I downloaded weren't available either. Microsoft should have adisclaimer that states, while you may purchase these titles they are never truly yours unless you continue to pay a Xbox Livemembership fee and stay connected to the internet. Microsot offers the best online experience in my book , but the PSN has two big things going for it, one, it is free and two, your titles remain yours once you download them.

Then don't pay for it and don't play online. Problem solved.

The__Havoc

Exactly, people complaining like this is absurd. The real complaint would be if Nintendo or Sony were offering better services for free and Microsoft was charging. that would actually be a valid argument. I would prefer to hear people complaining that they wished Sony and Nintendo started charging so they could have a good online service.

He's right though I own BF1943 and BFBC for both 360 and PS3 and there is no difference in online play and skill level. Hey MizFitAwesome just because you pay for Live does not mean it's better then PSN. Out of 20 PS3 games I own, 17 of them are online enable and there all populated. while on 360 I own 21 games 18 of them are online enabled, but only 4 of them are populated which is BFBC, BF1943, Marble Blast Ultral, and Halo 3. I own BF2:MC for the 360 EA had to take down the servers because only 30 people were playing daily. Which forced me to buy the PS2 version you know what there were over 100 people on and over 30 servers to chose from. For the record Blu Ray movies are more detailed then DVD movies.

IDeadlyReconI

ill be honest, when i play BFBC demo and BF1943 trial on ps3 i notice that ps3 players are a lot less skilled then 360 players. btw i didnt know EA took down BF2 MC servers, i used to play that game so much

[QUOTE="IDeadlyReconI"]

He's right though I own BF1943 and BFBC for both 360 and PS3 and there is no difference in online play and skill level. Hey MizFitAwesome just because you pay for Live does not mean it's better then PSN. Out of 20 PS3 games I own, 17 of them are online enable and there all populated. while on 360 I own 21 games 18 of them are online enabled, but only 4 of them are populated which is BFBC, BF1943, Marble Blast Ultral, and Halo 3. I own BF2:MC for the 360 EA had to take down the servers because only 30 people were playing daily. Which forced me to buy the PS2 version you know what there were over 100 people on and over 30 servers to chose from. For the record Blu Ray movies are more detailed then DVD movies.

sikanderahmed

ill be honest, when i play BFBC demo and BF1943 trial on ps3 i notice that ps3 players are a lot less skilled then 360 players. btw i didnt know EA took down BF2 MC servers, i used to play that game so much

[QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

[QUOTE="Zohluff"]

You guys are **** ridiculous.

Sure, MS isn't forcing you to shell out near the price of a new game a year for online. Sure, LIVE has in game chat. But do you guys realize that PSN offers the same experience in gameplay for free?

If a game is broken like Battlefield 1940-Whatever's chat system, it should be fixed. You shouldn't need to pay for an alternative.

I play HAZE, a PS3 game that bombed and "sucked", online and have a blast, similar to my experience on HALO. I played GTAIV online on PSN and, guess what, it was no different on LIVE. Not a difference in gameplay or experience. Why? Because the game's the game, LIVE doesn't change that.

I see that most fanboys don't mind throwing away 50 bucks on an unnecessary priced feature. Good for you. Ignorance is bliss. Meanwhile, I wont pay **** for online because I rather buy one more game a year. I like being able to go online when I want for free. I don't like being sold a gimped system and then being told if I want to enjoy the full experience it's going to cost me more. I paid for my **** I paid money up the ass for an online capable system and internet. Why do I need to pay to add 1 and 1 and get 2? I shouldn't. It should be free.

So, fanboys can suck on their XBOX LIVE all they want and give a million reasons to justify why they're being scammed. Meanwhile, I'll play some online and download a demo or two without spending an additional penny.

IDeadlyReconI

So when you are buying BluRays (the king of an unnecessary overpriced feature) that makes you a fanboy? Better yet, the people that prefer XBL over pSN are now fanboys?

The last poll GI had showed 75% of multiplat owners prefer XBL over PSN. Who do you suppose I should beleive? After, playing online on both, it's evident XBL is superior and MOST of the people posting in here agree...

your level 11 and didnt know you had to pay to play online on 360:shock:

whats worse is. if you have any brothers or systems sharing your 360. they also have to buy a card in order to play online.

[QUOTE="IDeadlyReconI"]

[QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

So when you are buying BluRays (the king of an unnecessary overpriced feature) that makes you a fanboy? Better yet, the people that prefer XBL over pSN are now fanboys?

MizFitAwesome

The last poll GI had showed 75% of multiplat owners prefer XBL over PSN. Who do you suppose I should beleive? After, playing online on both, it's evident XBL is superior and MOST of the people posting in here agree...

[QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

[QUOTE="IDeadlyReconI"] He's right though I own BF1943 and BFBC for both 360 and PS3 and there is no difference in online play and skill level. Hey MizFitAwesome just because you pay for Live does not mean it's better then PSN. Out of 20 PS3 games I own, 17 of them are online enable and there all populated. while on 360 I own 21 games 18 of them are online enabled, but only 4 of them are populated which is BFBC, BF1943, Marble Blast Ultral, and Halo 3. I own BF2:MC for the 360 EA had to take down the servers because only 30 people were playing daily. Which forced me to buy the PS2 version you know what there were over 100 people on and over 30 servers to chose from. For the record Blu Ray movies are more detailed then DVD movies.

IDeadlyReconI

The last poll GI had showed 75% of multiplat owners prefer XBL over PSN. Who do you suppose I should beleive? After, playing online on both, it's evident XBL is superior and MOST of the people posting in here agree...

To prove what? You basing all of your assumptions on 1 or 2 games? Its evident PSN players must be bored if they are still playing BF2...

[QUOTE="IDeadlyReconI"][QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

The last poll GI had showed 75% of multiplat owners prefer XBL over PSN. Who do you suppose I should beleive? After, playing online on both, it's evident XBL is superior and MOST of the people posting in here agree...

MizFitAwesome

To prove what? You basing all of your assumptions on 1 or 2 games? Its evident PSN players must be bored if they are still playing BF2...

[QUOTE="The__Havoc"]

Then don't pay for it and don't play online. Problem solved.

rp108

Exactly, people complaining like this is absurd. The real complaint would be if Nintendo or Sony were offering better services for free and Microsoft was charging. that would actually be a valid argument. I would prefer to hear people complaining that they wished Sony and Nintendo started charging so they could have a good online service.

Justgo on Ebay and pick up 13 months for $10 to $20. Not exactly going to break the bank is it. It's worth every penny in my book.

[QUOTE="The__Havoc"]

Then don't pay for it and don't play online. Problem solved.

Exactly, people complaining like this is absurd. The real complaint would be if Nintendo or Sony were offering better services for free and Microsoft was charging. that would actually be a valid argument. I would prefer to hear people complaining that they wished Sony and Nintendo started charging so they could have a good online service.

[QUOTE="fedor19820"]

[QUOTE="DethSkematik"]Think of it this way: You pay for Live because it blows PSN away. Kind of like paying extra money for faster internet...it's still internet, but you're shelling out more for better quality. Trmpt

thats true but when u pay for xbox live ur NOT getting faster interent

If you meant that in the literal sense then yeah, you dont.

But if you said that to actually mean that you dont get overall better quality with LIVE vs PSN then your wrong, you do get a better sevice with LIVE.

xbox live does have better service than psn but by service am talking about features content, dlc, and demos with that service xbox live IS THE SUPERIOR SERVICE

there are a few like me that dont care about those features i dont mind the slow update downloads because am not going to sit and wait for the update to complete i can do other things (i do own all systems), i dont care for the demos most of the time i know if want a game without playing a demo

so for someone that only cares about online gameplay there is no difference and those that care about features should get xbox live there is nothing wrong with the fee if it offers more features but if dont use the features why pay to play online when the other system has it for free

[QUOTE="DamageDamage"]If Microsoft didn't charge I probably wouldn't have Live because the special feeling would disappear. It's better to cost, because they take the money and make it better, unlike Sony, which has nothing. So I think it's a great think it costs.EmperorSupreme

Uh, no not really. All it's done is take features the 360 has had since launch. Even with copying it hasn't improved much.

[QUOTE="fedor19820"]

[QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

Yes he is because he is probably talking to his other friends while whipping up on his opponent and you're saying mo PSN games lag. Have they finally patched Fat Princess so they can play? BTW, are you enjoying those FREE trial versions of PSN games so you can see if you like the game?

MizFitAwesome

oh no little fat princess has lag issues for a new game and sure that never happend to a new xbox live game

because u pay for xbox live it guarantees u lag free play for EVERY GAME

and am sure gears of war 2 had no lag issues when it game out because its impossible to have lag issues when ur paying to play onlne

Nice to see cows still trying to justify their new PSN games because a 1 and a half year old 360 title had issues. Would you like to show a link of a new XBLA game scored low because of network issues?

am not trying to justify a psn game infact i dont care for any dlc on both xbox live and psn and as far lag well guess what both xbox live and psn have lag issues sometimes but only one charges for lag

if xbox live fee was only for its amazing content ,features, dlc, and demos and online play was free would u still pay for live?

because for me all the fee covers is the features not the online gameplay and am not going to pay for features i dont use or care for

and yes i can afford $30 a year but just cause its cheap does not mean u should have it

i will never say psn is better but xbox live is not better at actual online gameplay

[QUOTE="IDeadlyReconI"][QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

The last poll GI had showed 75% of multiplat owners prefer XBL over PSN. Who do you suppose I should beleive? After, playing online on both, it's evident XBL is superior and MOST of the people posting in here agree...

To prove what? You basing all of your assumptions on 1 or 2 games? Its evident PSN players must be bored if they are still playing BF2...

I make mad bank, yo. So $5 a month ain't no thang.shaggygrosser

[QUOTE="shaggygrosser"]I make mad bank, yo. So $5 a month ain't no thang.hoosier7

[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

[QUOTE="fedor19820"]

thats true but when u pay for xbox live ur NOT getting faster interent

fedor19820

If you meant that in the literal sense then yeah, you dont.

But if you said that to actually mean that you dont get overall better quality with LIVE vs PSN then your wrong, you do get a better sevice with LIVE.

xbox live does have better service than psn but by service am talking about features content, dlc, and demos with that service xbox live IS THE SUPERIOR SERVICE

there are a few like me that dont care about those features i dont mind the slow update downloads because am not going to sit and wait for the update to complete i can do other things (i do own all systems), i dont care for the demos most of the time i know if want a game without playing a demo

so for someone that only cares about online gameplay there is no difference and those that care about features should get xbox live there is nothing wrong with the fee if it offers more features but if dont use the features why pay to play online when the other system has it for free

The only feature I have found on XBL that PSN doesn't have is In Game Pirvate Chat, and where suppose to get that on the next firmware update. (thats what I heard don't if it's true) Content since you have a PS3 you need go to the PS Video store and compare the Movie's and Tv shows to the Video Market Place PS store clearly has more movies and tv shows. DLC sometimes PS3 gets DLC weeks,a day, same time or only on while on the 360 it is the same way. Don't belive me Mirriors Edge time trail map was only on the PS3, Need for Speed new game mode came out on the PS3 first then a few weeks later it was on the 360, BFBC Conquest game mode and Commuinty maps were on the PS3 a day before 360. Demos the new batman demo came out on the PS3 a week before it was on the market place. others a day later, because XBL market place updates a day before the PS Store the only demo I've seen that was on the Makret place for along time before making its way to the PS Store was the Call of Duty World at War demo. For quality the XBL is better, but it's not a big differnce. This is what I know If i'm wrong then prove it.

EDIT: At least PSN doesn't delete your downloads out of your download history. I can download GT HD still from my download history while it is no longer available in the PS store, but XBL deletes stuff out of your download history. Also you can't play the games you bought on another console. For example I bought UNO on my old launch 360 PRO console. Now on my new Refurbished 360 elite I made a new account and downloaded my old account to download all those old games I bought, on my old account uno just locks up and on my new account it shows up as a demo. I find it stupid that they don't show preview of $5 themes while on the PS3 there any were to 50 cents to a dollar and they show previews of the theme unless it on the PSP, but the 360 doesn't and it's a scam since the bottom of the Picture is cut off, because of the new **** interface. Back on the blades they showed the whole picture and on the web site they showed what you were getting now on the web site they hide what the theme looks like.

I don't get it why you guys defend xbl saying it's the best service out there.

what do they offer early demo's ?? wtf..... those things are even paid for by the distributors because it's advertisment for their game and hoping you will buy it.

so that would be a really stupid reason why to justify to pay for xbl.

let's see what do they offer....

omg you can chat even to people in a difrend game..... wow just wow what a briliant service this is.

wow nice microsoft points :) great then beside your xbl they can even get more cash out of you.....

to buy nice themes and avatars (that is really sad but hey you have to pay for them so they should be great.)

oh and a few small games. ( those are okay to pay for I guess )

srry as a pc gamer I can't see why you guys can justify paying for those things.

I agree it's nice they added a lot of features in one programm and that all games have to support it ( but that's normal being a console and not a open platform)

but I wouldn't want to pay for what they offer because I don't think they offer much anny way.

it's not like when you buy a xbox 360 you get a live card and you can plug and play ...... no you have to have a internetconnection through a provider 2.

so if you don't have a pc because you only want to play on that console you would also need a subscription at a internet provider ( so what does live really offer you ?? )

[QUOTE="kris9031998"]

Leave comments and tell me how YOU feel.

Yodas_Boy

don't judge me poorly because i spend $50 a year on xbl, judge me poorly because i spend $100 on shots of patron every time me and my friends go to a bar :lol:

Why do people who play on the psn network have to make threads about how people who pay for live are being ripped off. If you want to talk about features then stop complaining about what features are missing to make live not needed. Stop complaining about the fact that your network is slow as hell for updates for games that are needed to make the game play. I mean come on people PSN needs to have a way to get my downloads to me faster it needs to download while i look at my blu-ray movies instead of stopping the download until the movie is over. If i buy socom today i should not have to wait a hour and a half to download a 500MB+ update cause you released a game with crappy online that took MONTHS to correct unlike gears of war 2 which took at the most 3 and still is improving everyday. Free is great but when people say that the PSN is better than Live that is because it is based on everything Live has done right and will continue to do correctly while you still wait 6 months later for cross game chat which still has not come to pass yet. Again you will never hear anyone who pays for live say they dont wish it was free but i get my cards for cheap so why would i get mad at paying less than retail when i spend more on games. And for the love of god please stop saying after 3 years you spend X amount of money on it. I game i watch movies i build computers i do not want to think about that type of stuff cause if i did i would probably stop gaming cause it is a expensive hobby.Vipa37

The only time downloads quit downloading is when your doing somthing online enable it's the same way on XBL. I'm not trying to say PSN is better then XBL I'm trying to say there the same. Yes the big updates are anoying. The reason they are so big is because they come with a patch and add on's. What I wish they would do is make you download the patch when you start the game and get the add on content from the PS store. The only slow part up those big updates is downloading which has nothing to do with PSN but your internet speed and the server your downloading from. Installing is no porblem the 2905MB file that came with Socom only took about 2 mins to install.

[QUOTE="fedor19820"]

[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

If you meant that in the literal sense then yeah, you dont.

But if you said that to actually mean that you dont get overall better quality with LIVE vs PSN then your wrong, you do get a better sevice with LIVE.

IDeadlyReconI

xbox live does have better service than psn but by service am talking about features content, dlc, and demos with that service xbox live IS THE SUPERIOR SERVICE

there are a few like me that dont care about those features i dont mind the slow update downloads because am not going to sit and wait for the update to complete i can do other things (i do own all systems), i dont care for the demos most of the time i know if want a game without playing a demo

so for someone that only cares about online gameplay there is no difference and those that care about features should get xbox live there is nothing wrong with the fee if it offers more features but if dont use the features why pay to play online when the other system has it for free

The only feature I have found on XBL that PSN doesn't have is In Game Pirvate Chat, and where suppose to get that on the next firmware update. (thats what I heard don't if it's true) Content since you have a PS3 you need go to the PS Video store and compare the Movie's and Tv shows to the Video Market Place PS store clearly has more movies and tv shows. DLC sometimes PS3 gets DLC weeks,a day, same time or only on while on the 360 it is the same way. Don't belive me Mirriors Edge time trail map was only on the PS3, Need for Speed new game mode came out on the PS3 first then a few weeks later it was on the 360, BFBC Conquest game mode and Commuinty maps were on the PS3 a day before 360. Demos the new batman demo came out on the PS3 a week before it was on the market place. others a day later, because XBL market place updates a day before the PS Store the only demo I've seen that was on the Makret place for along time before making its way to the PS Store was the Call of Duty World at War demo. For quality the XBL is better, but it's not a big differnce. This is what I know If i'm wrong then prove it.

EDIT: At least PSN doesn't delete your downloads out of your download history. I can download GT HD still from my download history while it is no longer available in the PS store, but XBL deletes stuff out of your download history. Also you can't play the games you bought on another console. For example I bought UNO on my old launch 360 PRO console. Now on my new Refurbished 360 elite I made a new account and downloaded my old account to download all those old games I bought, on my old account uno just locks up and on my new account it shows up as a demo. I find it stupid that they don't show preview of $5 themes while on the PS3 there any were to 50 cents to a dollar and they show previews of the theme unless it on the PSP, but the 360 doesn't and it's a scam since the bottom of the Picture is cut off, because of the new **** interface. Back on the blades they showed the whole picture and on the web site they showed what you were getting now on the web site they hide what the theme looks like.

i stopped paying for live back in middle of 2008 and can tell u i dont miss it

i dont mind the download time for updates and patches with the ps3 because its free and i can do other things while they download

i know ps store has tons of movies and shows some from studios that sony owns and ms cant use lol

i have personally tested multiple games on both xbox live and psn and there is no difference with actual online gameplay but for some reason lemmings think that there online gameplay is lag free and faster because they pay for it but they dont think how that fee only covers its features and early demos, dlc paying for faster downlaods on patches and dlc is not worth the fee for me (yes i can afford $30 a year) but i know some people enjoy the features that xbox live has and also enjoy their drm protected content that only works on 1 xbox360

This kind of thread has never been done before.

coolnessmancool

No thats not true i have done it on my xbox 360 watched an hd-dvd movie (yes i still love the better format another arguement for another time) my downloads still kept going. On the PSN i was watching a Kingdom of Heavan directors cut and it stopped downloading (for whatever reason) that movie is long as hell and all i was downlaoding was the patch to street fighter hd remix and it resumed after logged back on. Bottom line is that the PSN should not have servers that take 80 years to download a game especially when its online only and you cant play unless you get the patch. Vipa37

Is that movie on Blu ray? if so blu ray is online enable thats why the game quit downloading.

The fee is certainly questionable, no matter how "cheap" it is. Unless they're maintaining dedicated servers and such for their games -- which they don't, other than the occasional MMO which requires a separate subscription fee -- playing online multiplayer should be the free aspect of Xbox Live. I'm sure they make more than enough from Marketplaces purchases and advertising to pay their bills.

Paying for extras is understandable. But if anything on Xbox Live is free, it should be the most basic of online gaming functionality: multiplayer.

xDimMaK

Yes PSN does not offer dedicated servers, but theres dedicated servers on PC that are free to play on. which proves my point XBL should be free.

I think MS is charging for live cause look at the news.......54% of people had the red ring of death and didnt buy another 360.So it could just be because of the xbox 360 decline.kris9031998

I don't get it why you guys defend xbl saying it's the best service out there.

what do they offer early demo's ?? wtf..... those things are even paid for by the distributors because it's advertisment for their game and hoping you will buy it.

so that would be a really stupid reason why to justify to pay for xbl.

let's see what do they offer....

omg you can chat even to people in a difrend game..... wow just wow what a briliant service this is.

wow nice microsoft points :) great then beside your xbl they can even get more cash out of you.....

to buy nice themes and avatars (that is really sad but hey you have to pay for them so they should be great.)

oh and a few small games. ( those are okay to pay for I guess )

srry as a pc gamer I can't see why you guys can justify paying for those things.

I agree it's nice they added a lot of features in one programm and that all games have to support it ( but that's normal being a console and not a open platform)

but I wouldn't want to pay for what they offer because I don't think they offer much anny way.

it's not like when you buy a xbox 360 you get a live card and you can plug and play ...... no you have to have a internetconnection through a provider 2.

so if you don't have a pc because you only want to play on that console you would also need a subscription at a internet provider ( so what does live really offer you ?? )

freakshowfreak

[QUOTE="freakshowfreak"]

I don't get it why you guys defend xbl saying it's the best service out there.

what do they offer early demo's ?? wtf..... those things are even paid for by the distributors because it's advertisment for their game and hoping you will buy it.

so that would be a really stupid reason why to justify to pay for xbl.

let's see what do they offer....

omg you can chat even to people in a difrend game..... wow just wow what a briliant service this is.

wow nice microsoft points :) great then beside your xbl they can even get more cash out of you.....

to buy nice themes and avatars (that is really sad but hey you have to pay for them so they should be great.)

oh and a few small games. ( those are okay to pay for I guess )

srry as a pc gamer I can't see why you guys can justify paying for those things.

I agree it's nice they added a lot of features in one programm and that all games have to support it ( but that's normal being a console and not a open platform)

but I wouldn't want to pay for what they offer because I don't think they offer much anny way.

it's not like when you buy a xbox 360 you get a live card and you can plug and play ...... no you have to have a internetconnection through a provider 2.

so if you don't have a pc because you only want to play on that console you would also need a subscription at a internet provider ( so what does live really offer you ?? )

Cloud567kar

It's the reason you pay that I have a problem with tbh... I pay money for no servers online? Except Left4Dead maybe....

Leejjohno

[QUOTE="Cloud567kar"][QUOTE="freakshowfreak"]

I don't get it why you guys defend xbl saying it's the best service out there.

what do they offer early demo's ?? wtf..... those things are even paid for by the distributors because it's advertisment for their game and hoping you will buy it.

so that would be a really stupid reason why to justify to pay for xbl.

let's see what do they offer....

omg you can chat even to people in a difrend game..... wow just wow what a briliant service this is.

wow nice microsoft points :) great then beside your xbl they can even get more cash out of you.....

to buy nice themes and avatars (that is really sad but hey you have to pay for them so they should be great.)

oh and a few small games. ( those are okay to pay for I guess )

srry as a pc gamer I can't see why you guys can justify paying for those things.

I agree it's nice they added a lot of features in one programm and that all games have to support it ( but that's normal being a console and not a open platform)

but I wouldn't want to pay for what they offer because I don't think they offer much anny way.

it's not like when you buy a xbox 360 you get a live card and you can plug and play ...... no you have to have a internetconnection through a provider 2.

so if you don't have a pc because you only want to play on that console you would also need a subscription at a internet provider ( so what does live really offer you ?? )

What big features is PSN getting that xbox is?

[QUOTE="IDeadlyReconI"]

[QUOTE="Cloud567kar"] Who DOESNT have a pc lmao? Also why dont you look up what live hast to offer before posting. Also how is talking to people on other game ok? What if you dont have the game they have for ps3? You can barely ever talk to them then on ps3.MortalDecay

Exactly... this explains why ps3 is better.sethman410

Oh Yeah!

Boy , you cows are still trying to reassure yourselves PSN is better?

1. An XBL gamer can verify another user by using their gamertag, they would know if that person owns a system and plays it. Anyone can fake a PSN gamertag, that is so weak. You PSN players can't prove yourselves, XBL players can.
2. EVERY XBLA game has a trial version so you can sample the game and see if you like it before buying. PSN, only a fraction do, but you get a nice cheesy video of the game.
3. EVERY XBLA has full acheivement support. So the game has enough replayability to attempt to get all of the Acheivements. Only a fraction of PSN games do and by far the most useless PSN game that has Trophy support is 'Linger In Shadows.'

Boy , you cows are still trying to reassure yourselves PSN is better?

1. An XBL gamer can verify another user by using their gamertag, they would know if that person owns a system and plays it. Anyone can fake a PSN gamertag, that is so weak. You PSN players can't prove yourselves, XBL players can.
2. EVERY XBLA game has a trial version so you can sample the game and see if you like it before buying. PSN, only a fraction do, but you get a nice cheesy video of the game.
3. EVERY XBLA has full acheivement support. So the game has enough replayability to attempt to get all of the Acheivements. Only a fraction of PSN games do and by far the most useless PSN game that has Trophy support is 'Linger In Shadows.'

MizFitAwesome

[QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

Boy , you cows are still trying to reassure yourselves PSN is better?

1. An XBL gamer can verify another user by using their gamertag, they would know if that person owns a system and plays it. Anyone can fake a PSN gamertag, that is so weak. You PSN players can't prove yourselves, XBL players can.
2. EVERY XBLA game has a trial version so you can sample the game and see if you like it before buying. PSN, only a fraction do, but you get a nice cheesy video of the game.
3. EVERY XBLA has full acheivement support. So the game has enough replayability to attempt to get all of the Acheivements. Only a fraction of PSN games do and by far the most useless PSN game that has Trophy support is 'Linger In Shadows.'

IDeadlyReconI

Reviews are only someones opinion.

[QUOTE="MizFitAwesome"]

Boy , you cows are still trying to reassure yourselves PSN is better?

1. An XBL gamer can verify another user by using their gamertag, they would know if that person owns a system and plays it. Anyone can fake a PSN gamertag, that is so weak. You PSN players can't prove yourselves, XBL players can.
2. EVERY XBLA game has a trial version so you can sample the game and see if you like it before buying. PSN, only a fraction do, but you get a nice cheesy video of the game.
3. EVERY XBLA has full acheivement support. So the game has enough replayability to attempt to get all of the Acheivements. Only a fraction of PSN games do and by far the most useless PSN game that has Trophy support is 'Linger In Shadows.'

IDeadlyReconI

So you're now saying an average PSN user would rather rely on someone elses opinion as opposed to actually sample the game? That's pretty weak...