XBL = Paying three times for the same thing?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Well for me it doesn't matter so for me its no vastly superior in any way. The guy I responded to told me I was trolling because I said it has the same quality for me where that matters, why don't you jump on him then too? I know mine is an opinion an opinion doesn't make me a troll. Besides I made a poll some time ago asking if people would still pay for XBL if they could play online for free and the vast majority of people here said no, so I guess the vast majority agrees with my opinion thenclone01
When did I ever insinuate you were a troll? i just presented the argument that, the way you worded your post, it seemed like you were pressing your opinion as fact. Who are you to judge what is and isn't of value to someone?

The guy who quoted me told me I was a troll not you.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]

[QUOTE="Sgt_Crow"]

It's less than 5 bucks a month for a better online service, how is this a ripoff?

KevinnButlerNPK

It is a rip off since I can get an even better service on the PC for free. I for the things I use PSN then it has practically the same functionality with the same quality than Live and I also get it for free.

You won't be paying just $5 a month when other companies follow M$ example of ripping off people.

But you don't have an XBL account. How can you say the PC account is better if you don't have both services to compare?

So you are saying that XBL is better than having online play on PC? Well I bet many many people will disagree with you. And I know it because I have used XBL before and I laugh when lems say it is better than what you get on PC.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

XBL is a massive rip off imo. Thankfully I bought 2 cards for 40 each which is still too much considering I rarely play 360. The ads can be annoying. There seems to be more ads since MS announced the XBL price increase. Milkage at its finest.

Grawse

your not really paying to remove the ads, the ads are mostly there to give people notifications of **** they might care about, its not like playing a game an seeing pepsi ads all over the place....

at any rate they can charge for the online because they built the entire structure of it and made it its own platform that supports voice chat/match making. Not any either platform offers this, so live is upgradable without recompiling games.

Granted whether or not there is an actual added benefit is a different story... the only thing it really brings over PC or psn is consistency, upgradable, and maintainable. nothing that users would care about only dev's.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

Still far better in content, interactivity, intergration and online preformance then psn so I dont mind paying....I find it odd how others have a problem with me paying for it.

Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#106 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts

Still far better in content, interactivity, intergration and online preformance then psn so I dont mind paying....I find it odd how others have a problem with me paying for it.

WilliamRLBaker
No one has an issue with people paying for it. Most people have an issue with the reasoning behind MS even charging for it in the first place. I mean of course people are going to pay when you hold their online experience hostage.
Avatar image for ROFLCOPTER603
ROFLCOPTER603

2140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#107 ROFLCOPTER603
Member since 2010 • 2140 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Still far better in content, interactivity, intergration and online preformance then psn so I dont mind paying....I find it odd how others have a problem with me paying for it.

Jynxzor

No one has an issue with people paying for it. Most people have an issue with the reasoning behind MS even charging for it in the first place. I mean of course people are going to pay when you hold their online experience hostage.

MS charges because they can. Companies are out there to make money. Sony doesn't charge because no one would buy their service and they would go out of business. I don't know how anyone with a job doesn't understand this.

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
The first person to send me an advertisement via XBL will be deleted. MrSelf-Destruct
What about the second person? :3
The difference between Live and those products is that advertisment is how those products make money. The miniscule price we pay for a newspaper doesn't cover the cost of the copy you hold in your hand, let alone allow them to profit. Magazines are similar, though they are more expensive.Cable is actually similar to Live in that you pay the owner of the infrastructure, and not the content providers. The difference here is that, in the case of cable, content providers use advertising as their main revenue source, while with Live MS, the inrastructure owner, is also the one profiting from the advertisments.There are tons of free, ad-supported apps and websites. When you pay, the ads go away. If Live is so ad heavy, that model would be the only way to justify it. Pug-Nasty
I didn't know magazines worked the same way as newspapers and thought they made money off of their much higher price. I used to think Magazines were a ripoff too. :P I don't know about other people but I literally hate ads, it feels like they physically hurt me. I was okay with banners but they started getting worst; they float across the screen, they make noise and play music, they slow down the webpage, they give huge flash cookies that take up space (most of you probably don't even know what a flash cookie is), they force to watch them just before you can watch a video and etc. I now use Ad Block Plus, No Script, and better privacy, I block everything that a website doesn't need to run.
Avatar image for MrSelf-Destruct
MrSelf-Destruct

13400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#109 MrSelf-Destruct
Member since 2010 • 13400 Posts
[QUOTE="MrSelf-Destruct"]The first person to send me an advertisement via XBL will be deleted. Nerkcon
What about the second person? :3

Them too! :twisted: :P
Avatar image for AndersK
AndersK

396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 AndersK
Member since 2005 • 396 Posts

Playing your own game online, should always be free, unless we are talking about a subscription based game, such as an MMORPG.

The other features and things you can do on Xboxlive costing money, is fine. But playing a game online that you bought, is not.

This has nothing to do with Sony. Why does everyone of you console players get all butthurt and defensive as soon as even the other system is mentioned, or your own system is in question.

Is it ridiculous that LIVE costs money? Yes. Does this have anything to do with Sony? No.

Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#111 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts
without question its a ripoff.....no, its highway robbery. so why do i pay for it? because some of my friends and family who refuse to make the jump to another system continue to play on it
Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts
Sony doesn't charge because no one would buy their service and they would go out of business. I don't know how anyone with a job doesn't understand this.ROFLCOPTER603
Yeah...thats not totally wrong right there.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

How can any pro Sony gamer bash XBL's infastructure after the PSN hacker nonsense... seriously? :|

Avatar image for Megaflush24
Megaflush24

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#114 Megaflush24
Member since 2003 • 173 Posts
If you don't want to pay, there is an option not to. The 360 is successful because people like it. They pay because they like it. If someone doesn't like it they opt for a different system. If you pay for something you don't like or agree with then that is your own problem to sort out. Simple. I am an owner of the wii, 360, and ps3. The 360 clearly has the best online and I do not mind paying for it because of the significant advantages xbox live offers. Again if the service wasN't worth it, they wouldn't have millions buy it. Economics 101.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#115 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSk5DhxQHLo


You cannot defend this.

gc3n

I'm still waiting for Baker to defend this :P

Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts
XBL is a rip-off, yet it is still cheap. I think it's like complaining about buying a product for a dime, when you think it should be free. It's annoying and a cash in, yet shouldn't affect anyone to strongly financially. Especially since most gamers buy a dozen or so games a year, and a year of XBL costs about the same as the average game right?
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="Jynxzor"][QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Still far better in content, interactivity, intergration and online preformance then psn so I dont mind paying....I find it odd how others have a problem with me paying for it.

ROFLCOPTER603

No one has an issue with people paying for it. Most people have an issue with the reasoning behind MS even charging for it in the first place. I mean of course people are going to pay when you hold their online experience hostage.

MS charges because they can. Companies are out there to make money. Sony doesn't charge because no one would buy their service and they would go out of business. I don't know how anyone with a job doesn't understand this.

Who says that? where is your proof? I personally don't pay for XBL because I think it is a rip off and wouldn't pay for PSN either if they charged for it but clearly many people would pay for PSN if Sony charged for it too, there's nothing that says it would be different from XBL.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
Who says that? where is your proof? I personally don't pay for XBL because I think it is a rip off and wouldn't pay for PSN either if they charged for it but clearly many people would pay for PSN if Sony charged for it too, there's nothing that says it would be different from XBL.kuraimen
Yet you provide no proof of your own. Kind of counter-intuitive, if you ask me.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
If you don't want to pay, there is an option not to. The 360 is successful because people like it. They pay because they like it. If someone doesn't like it they opt for a different system. If you pay for something you don't like or agree with then that is your own problem to sort out. Simple. I am an owner of the wii, 360, and ps3. The 360 clearly has the best online and I do not mind paying for it because of the significant advantages xbox live offers. Again if the service wasN't worth it, they wouldn't have millions buy it. Economics 101.Megaflush24
That's actually a flawed view. People paid for pet rocks back in the day by millions. Is a pet rock worth what you paid for it? I'll say that hardly since it is basically a rock that you could find in your yard. People apparently were led to believe that they needed pet rocks for whatever reasons and those people made the guy who sold them a millionaire in 6 months. So people don't always pay for something that is worth it. Economics 101.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

No you don't pay for XBL because you don't own a 360 and are a Sony fanboy...

KevinnButlerNPK

Wasn't going to say it, but you kind of hit the nail on the head.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="ROFLCOPTER603"]

MS charges because they can. Companies are out there to make money. Sony doesn't charge because no one would buy their service and they would go out of business. I don't know how anyone with a job doesn't understand this.

KevinnButlerNPK

Who says that? where is your proof? I personally don't pay for XBL because I think it is a rip off and wouldn't pay for PSN either if they charged for it but clearly many people would pay for PSN if Sony charged for it too, there's nothing that says it would be different from XBL.

No you don't pay for XBL because you don't own a 360 and are a Sony fanboy...

And you pay for XBL cause you are a M$ fanboy. See? I can do completely irrelevant and unsupported claims too ;)
Avatar image for KevinnButlerNPK
KevinnButlerNPK

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 KevinnButlerNPK
Member since 2010 • 1145 Posts

[QUOTE="Megaflush24"]If you don't want to pay, there is an option not to. The 360 is successful because people like it. They pay because they like it. If someone doesn't like it they opt for a different system. If you pay for something you don't like or agree with then that is your own problem to sort out. Simple. I am an owner of the wii, 360, and ps3. The 360 clearly has the best online and I do not mind paying for it because of the significant advantages xbox live offers. Again if the service wasN't worth it, they wouldn't have millions buy it. Economics 101.kuraimen
That's actually a flawed view. People paid for pet rocks back in the day by millions. Is a pet rock worth what you paid for it? I'll say that hardly since it is basically a rock that you could find in your yard. People apparently were led to believe that they needed pet rocks for whatever reasons and those people made the guy who sold them a millionaire in 6 months. So people don't always pay for something that is worth it. Economics 101.

Yeah the installed user base of the PS3 proves that,,,,

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
And you pay for XBL cause you are a M$ fanboy. See? I can do completely irrelevant and unsupported claims too ;)kuraimen
When have you ever posted a non-biased claim?
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="KevinnButlerNPK"] No you don't pay for XBL because you don't own a 360 and are a Sony fanboy...

clone01

Wasn't going to say it, but you kind of hit the nail on the head.

Anyone who has seen me here fight against those who defend Sony in the OtherOS fiasco would disagree with you. I like Sony much more than M$ but I wouldn't pay them if I feel they are ripping me off by charging for PSN.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
No you don't pay for XBL because you don't own a 360 and are a Sony fanboy...KevinnButlerNPK
I'm pretty much a closet Sony fanboy but I wouldn't pay for PSN if Sony started to charge for it. In fact, PSN+ scares me because I think it's just Sony's way of testing the waters of forcing people to pay. :( by the way, how do you justify Microsoft charging to use Netflix? You still need to pay for Netflix itself and you can use it on the PS3 and the Wii for free.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] And you pay for XBL cause you are a M$ fanboy. See? I can do completely irrelevant and unsupported claims too ;)clone01
When have you ever posted a non-biased claim?

When have you ever posted a non-biased claim?
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Megaflush24"]If you don't want to pay, there is an option not to. The 360 is successful because people like it. They pay because they like it. If someone doesn't like it they opt for a different system. If you pay for something you don't like or agree with then that is your own problem to sort out. Simple. I am an owner of the wii, 360, and ps3. The 360 clearly has the best online and I do not mind paying for it because of the significant advantages xbox live offers. Again if the service wasN't worth it, they wouldn't have millions buy it. Economics 101.KevinnButlerNPK

That's actually a flawed view. People paid for pet rocks back in the day by millions. Is a pet rock worth what you paid for it? I'll say that hardly since it is basically a rock that you could find in your yard. People apparently were led to believe that they needed pet rocks for whatever reasons and those people made the guy who sold them a millionaire in 6 months. So people don't always pay for something that is worth it. Economics 101.

Yeah the installed user base of the PS3 proves that,,,,

Wut? :|
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="KevinnButlerNPK"] No you don't pay for XBL because you don't own a 360 and are a Sony fanboy...

kuraimen

Wasn't going to say it, but you kind of hit the nail on the head.

Anyone who has seen me here fight against those who defend Sony in the OtherOS fiasco would disagree with you. I like Sony much more than M$ but I wouldn't pay them if I feel they are ripping me off by charging for PSN.

Yep, sure, you are totally right.

Avatar image for Dr_Snood
Dr_Snood

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#131 Dr_Snood
Member since 2008 • 2547 Posts

WOW thanks Microsoft! You know the other day when I was surfing TV channels for great new ads I thought to myself, "You know I wish I could share this Coke ad with all of my friends who probably could give two craps about it in the first place". Now, thanks to Microsoft, I will finally beable to do this through a $150 dollar peripheral that could be replaced by the "A" button, but we all know waving our arms around is much much more fun. God screw the games, lets go ad surfing Xbox fans!

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] And you pay for XBL cause you are a M$ fanboy. See? I can do completely irrelevant and unsupported claims too ;)kuraimen
When have you ever posted a non-biased claim?

When have you ever posted a non-biased claim?

so you agree?
Avatar image for KevinnButlerNPK
KevinnButlerNPK

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 KevinnButlerNPK
Member since 2010 • 1145 Posts

[QUOTE="KevinnButlerNPK"] No you don't pay for XBL because you don't own a 360 and are a Sony fanboy...Nerkcon
I'm pretty much a closet Sony fanboy but I wouldn't pay for PSN if Sony started to charge for it. In fact, PSN+ scares me because I think it's just Sony's way of testing the waters of forcing people to pay. :( by the way, how do you justify Microsoft charging to use Netflix? You still need to pay for Netflix itself and you can use it on the PS3 and the Wii for free.

Irrealavent to me, I don't use Netflix. I did state earlier that HuluPlus is a ripoff based on limited content and charging after intrusive ads. I do like ZuneHD...

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#134 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="clone01"]

Wasn't going to say it, but you kind of hit the nail on the head.

clone01

Anyone who has seen me here fight against those who defend Sony in the OtherOS fiasco would disagree with you. I like Sony much more than M$ but I wouldn't pay them if I feel they are ripping me off by charging for PSN.

Yep, sure, you are totally right.

That is actually true.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="clone01"] When have you ever posted a non-biased claim?clone01
When have you ever posted a non-biased claim?

so you agree?

I think everyone is biased, whoever claims is unbiased is probably the one hiding its bias the most. I have never claim I'm unbiased. Yet that doesn't automatically make my claims invalid, when I say I wouldn't pay if Sony charged for PSN then I mean that I wouldn't pay if Sony charged for PSN. In fact I wouldn't buy their console.
Avatar image for KevinnButlerNPK
KevinnButlerNPK

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 KevinnButlerNPK
Member since 2010 • 1145 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] When have you ever posted a non-biased claim?kuraimen
so you agree?

I think everyone is biased, whoever claims is unbiased is probably the one hiding its bias the most. I have never claim I'm unbiased. Yet that doesn't automatically make my claims invalid, when I say I wouldn't pay if Sony charged for PSN then I mean that I wouldn't pay if Sony charged for PSN. In fact I wouldn't buy their console.

We can agree on the point about bias...

Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#137 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

Microsoft is just terrible...

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Megaflush24"]If you don't want to pay, there is an option not to. The 360 is successful because people like it. They pay because they like it. If someone doesn't like it they opt for a different system. If you pay for something you don't like or agree with then that is your own problem to sort out. Simple. I am an owner of the wii, 360, and ps3. The 360 clearly has the best online and I do not mind paying for it because of the significant advantages xbox live offers. Again if the service wasN't worth it, they wouldn't have millions buy it. Economics 101.Megaflush24
That's actually a flawed view. People paid for pet rocks back in the day by millions. Is a pet rock worth what you paid for it? I'll say that hardly since it is basically a rock that you could find in your yard. People apparently were led to believe that they needed pet rocks for whatever reasons and those people made the guy who sold them a millionaire in 6 months. So people don't always pay for something that is worth it. Economics 101 If you want to get technical... We could ask what we mean by worth. Sentimental, monetary, etc. My point is mr. Flawed pants is that people buy because they think it is worth it for whatever reason. Yea. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Well that's kind of obvious don't you think? nobody is putting a gun on their forehead to buy anything. Kind of a useless statement you made there then. My point is that, for me, paying for XBL is kind of like buying a Pet Rock AKA a ripoff. I don't deny people buy it though.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Xbox Live is under $4 per month. Are you guys all 12 or something and/or already forgot what happened to the PSN?
Avatar image for Megaflush24
Megaflush24

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#141 Megaflush24
Member since 2003 • 173 Posts
[QUOTE="Megaflush24"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Megaflush24"]If you don't want to pay, there is an option not to. The 360 is successful because people like it. They pay because they like it. If someone doesn't like it they opt for a different system. If you pay for something you don't like or agree with then that is your own problem to sort out. Simple. I am an owner of the wii, 360, and ps3. The 360 clearly has the best online and I do not mind paying for it because of the significant advantages xbox live offers. Again if the service wasN't worth it, they wouldn't have millions buy it. Economics 101.kuraimen
That's actually a flawed view. People paid for pet rocks back in the day by millions. Is a pet rock worth what you paid for it? I'll say that hardly since it is basically a rock that you could find in your yard. People apparently were led to believe that they needed pet rocks for whatever reasons and those people made the guy who sold them a millionaire in 6 months. So people don't always pay for something that is worth it. Economics 101 If you want to get technical... We could ask what we mean by worth. Sentimental, monetary, etc. My point is mr. Flawed pants is that people buy because they think it is worth it for whatever reason. Yea. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Well that's kind of obvious don't you think? nobody is putting a gun on their forehead to buy anything. Kind of a useless statement you made there then. My point is that, for me, paying for XBL is kind of like buying a Pet Rock AKA a ripoff. I don't deny people buy it though.

No becAuse you said the statement was flawed which it is not. You referred live as worthless as to having no value like a pet rock. It is a ripoff to you because you view it as so. Other people do not view it as so because they do see the worth for whatever reason (many reasons my friend). I have all systems and I do pay for it because I like what it provides. No I wouldn't pay for psn because it is lacking. It is a choice and you are not the all knowing gamer. Again people buy what they they like because it is worth it in some way to them. Not because it is a fad. Do you sniff what I'm poopin man? By the looks of your comments previously u do not .
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
Xbox Live is under $4 per month. Are you guys all 12 or something and/or already forgot what happened to the PSN?KC_Hokie
I'm 19 but I can't get a job. :( What happened to PSN was bad but its back up now and as far as I know no cyber-farmers got my credit info (I don't buy DLC) nor do I know anyone that lost theirs. If you haven't notice other websites are getting hacked as well and there is no proof that MS is safe nor that paying for Live makes it any safer.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Xbox Live is under $4 per month. Are you guys all 12 or something and/or already forgot what happened to the PSN?Nerkcon
I'm 19 but I can't get a job. :( What happened to PSN was bad but its back up now and as far as I know no cyber-farmers got my credit info (I don't buy DLC) nor do I know anyone that lost theirs. If you haven't notice other websites are getting hacked as well and there is no proof that MS is safe nor that paying for Live makes it any safer.

Well I have a job and gladly pay under $4 a month for the security and stability of Xbox Live.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="Megaflush24"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Megaflush24"] That's actually a flawed view. People paid for pet rocks back in the day by millions. Is a pet rock worth what you paid for it? I'll say that hardly since it is basically a rock that you could find in your yard. People apparently were led to believe that they needed pet rocks for whatever reasons and those people made the guy who sold them a millionaire in 6 months. So people don't always pay for something that is worth it. Economics 101 If you want to get technical... We could ask what we mean by worth. Sentimental, monetary, etc. My point is mr. Flawed pants is that people buy because they think it is worth it for whatever reason. Yea. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Well that's kind of obvious don't you think? nobody is putting a gun on their forehead to buy anything. Kind of a useless statement you made there then. My point is that, for me, paying for XBL is kind of like buying a Pet Rock AKA a ripoff. I don't deny people buy it though.

No becAuse you said the statement was flawed which it is not. You referred live as worthless as to having no value like a pet rock. It is a ripoff to you because you view it as so. Other people do not view it as so because they do see the worth for whatever reason (many reasons my friend). I have all systems and I do pay for it because I like what it provides. No I wouldn't pay for psn because it is lacking. It is a choice and you are not the all knowing gamer. Again people buy what they they like because it is worth it in some way to them. Not because it is a fad. Do you sniff what I'm poopin man? By the looks of your comments previously u do not .

I understand but my statement is not flawed either it actually depends on the definition of worth. I saw the definition of worth differently than yours. In this case we are both right then. But when people like me talk about worth here in reference to rip off we are talking about how a things value can translate into its price.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Xbox Live is under $4 per month. Are you guys all 12 or something and/or already forgot what happened to the PSN?KC_Hokie
I'm 19 but I can't get a job. :( What happened to PSN was bad but its back up now and as far as I know no cyber-farmers got my credit info (I don't buy DLC) nor do I know anyone that lost theirs. If you haven't notice other websites are getting hacked as well and there is no proof that MS is safe nor that paying for Live makes it any safer.

Well I have a job and gladly pay under $4 a month for the security and stability of Xbox Live.

That's nice for you but I doubt you have any hard evidence that Live is more secure and stable because of its fee.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"]I'm 19 but I can't get a job. :( What happened to PSN was bad but its back up now and as far as I know no cyber-farmers got my credit info (I don't buy DLC) nor do I know anyone that lost theirs. If you haven't notice other websites are getting hacked as well and there is no proof that MS is safe nor that paying for Live makes it any safer.

Well I have a job and gladly pay under $4 a month for the security and stability of Xbox Live.

That's nice for you but I doubt you have any hard evidence that Live is more secure and stable because of its fee.

Other than having great security, stability and overall performance since 2002...I suppose you're right. Don't use it for all I care.
Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

There has been some good deals of the week, but ever since I've subscribed at the beginning of the year there has been only 1 really good sale (Dead Rising Case Zero/West). It's one of the reason I even subscribed to gold but it's been disappointing so far.

Avatar image for Megaflush24
Megaflush24

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#148 Megaflush24
Member since 2003 • 173 Posts
[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Well I have a job and gladly pay under $4 a month for the security and stability of Xbox Live. KC_Hokie
That's nice for you but I doubt you have any hard evidence that Live is more secure and stable because of its fee.

Other than having great security, stability and overall performance since 2002...I suppose you're right. Don't use it for all I care.

Agreed... People are freaking out... Just don't pay for it. Problem solved. But there is no argument. Xbox live is better and worth it to those that pay for it.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"]That's nice for you but I doubt you have any hard evidence that Live is more secure and stable because of its fee. Megaflush24
Other than having great security, stability and overall performance since 2002...I suppose you're right. Don't use it for all I care.

Agreed... People are freaking out... Just don't pay for it. Problem solved. But there is no argument. Xbox live is better and worth it to those that pay for it.

If you guys didn't pay for it Microsoft would make it free and we all could be happier.... :(
Avatar image for 1stPlaceWinner
1stPlaceWinner

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 1stPlaceWinner
Member since 2010 • 1120 Posts
[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Well I have a job and gladly pay under $4 a month for the security and stability of Xbox Live. KC_Hokie
That's nice for you but I doubt you have any hard evidence that Live is more secure and stable because of its fee.

Other than having great security, stability and overall performance since 2002...I suppose you're right. Don't use it for all I care.

he was asking for proof of the great security though