xbox 1 and wii comparision spiderman!!

You picked the worst you could find for the Wii and the best one for the Xbox. Atleast pick the best for both. Still the game does look pretty bad for the Wii.

 

XxLoStxX

If you look at the date that gamespot posted that up, it was early April, a month before it's release. This is the same kind of thing that happened with Red Steel... beautiful looking pics before release, but it rears its ugly head (in comparison) when the real game comes out.

The bad Wii pictures that the people are posting are from IGN, and they are dated May 4, 2007. IGN also has the nicely rendered pics that Gamespot has, but they posted those up about a month ago just like Gamespot.

ok, even the sheep have to admit defeat on this one. Those flat sided building models are downright hilarious.whoisryanmack

I dont think anyone thinks the graphics are good on this. 

[QUOTE="BrooklynBomber"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="palaric8"]poor sheeps ,got a 5 year old machine for 250...sodafountan

How much would you pay for a machine that offered Wifi, Flash RAM, SD card slots and Bluetooth functionality back on 2001? $600? $800?

The wii is not worth $250 everybody that buys electronics would know that.

Yeah it's worth more than $600 just on the blu-ray player alone anybody with 1/2 a brain knows that. 

If you take a look at this picture (also from IGN)

you notice that the buildings in the vicinity have windows and other details. However, if you look at the last few buildings in the far back of the screen, those buildings look like blocks with no details.

It looks like the Wii has a draw distance limitation when it comes to displaying detail.

mahjustin

You can't say it's the Wii's fault for such sloppy programming geez. I never based the PS3's power off of FEAR did I? Anyhow lots of jealous fanboys in this thread. Go look at the new vid of Mario Strikers it looks great. 

[QUOTE="xXMercenariOXx"]

[QUOTE="LINKloco"]I see no difference.LINKloco

Wii is a "nex-gen game system" :roll: and Xbox1 is a last-gen game system and Spider Man looks the same or worst on Wii....this is the difference

[QUOTE="LINKloco"][QUOTE="xXMercenariOXx"]

[QUOTE="LINKloco"]I see no difference.jonesy1911

Wii is a "nex-gen game system" :roll: and Xbox1 is a last-gen game system and Spider Man looks the same or worst on Wii....this is the difference

Spider-Man 2 for the Game Boy Advance

That isn't the Wii's fault, it's the fault of those idiots who made the game! What were they thinking?!

 Edit: D'oh! Good thing it doesn't really look THAT bad. Still not good enough for 2007, but at least the game doesn't look as bad most of the time as it does in those first screenshots!

I believe in fairness, so we'll put wii against an equal competitor.

Spiderman Wii...

VS......

BUBSY 3D!!

Close call, but Bubsy has better textures.

I believe in fairness, so we'll put wii against an equal competitor.

Spiderman Wii...

 

VS......

 

BUBSY 3D!!

 

Close call, but Bubsy has better textures.

 

whoisryanmack

I agree, Bubsy is a more colourful game, rather than gray untextured buildings. But lets be fair, all the processing power of the wii has gone into rendering that spiderman model. 

the draw distance is abysmlsolidgamer

Who cares just shake the wii-mote and it will look golden lol. 

This is a shot from my SD tv:

And this is an even crapper shot.

=( 

I'm ashamed to be a wii owner.... but the swinging controls are good at least. 

Corruption, Galaxy, Brawl, BWii . . . Fall 2007

Find myself just saying that over and over for some reason.

Oh, what's that? 

Spider-man 3? Who f'n cares. LOL, some people are just silly. 

Anyways, what was I saying again? Oh yeah . . . 

Corruption, Galaxy, Brawl, BWii . . . Fall 2007

hahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

i thought it had same graphical power than xbox.

seriously those buildings are descrafefull.

oh well the gameplay better be amazeing.