Xenos vs. Hollywood vs. RSX

  • 107 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Banjo_Kongfooie
Banjo_Kongfooie

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Banjo_Kongfooie
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts

[QUOTE="Tigerrus"]So after reading this page it appears that it is more so a compettion imbetween the 360's Xenos and the PS3's Cell Than the 360's Xenos and the PS3's RSX. I Think one of us should really kill either sony or nvidia for putting the RSX into the PS3. The only 3 reasons I can see why people would vote for hollywood would be: A) They are Nintendo/WII fanboys B) They like GC/PS2/Xbox graphics better than 360 or PS3 graphics C) they think it is funny to vote for it. If I liked FPS/TPS a lot I would consider getting a 360. But since I don't and I co-own a PS3 with my brother I don't think I need to get a 360. And I can't bring myself to go back to last gen graphics on the wii.

ronvalencia

Sony could have selected ATI Radeon HD X1900 based part i.e. a PS3 with two Fold @ Home clients capable processing units.

ATI RV570 also supports DX10's 3DC+ texture compression format, Lossless Z Compression (up to 48:1), Hierarchical Z-buffer with Early Z test, Full speed 128-bit(32bit/32bit/32bit/32bit) floating point processing for all shader operations, Dedicated branch execution units for high performance dynamic branching and flow control, Dedicated texture address units for improved efficiency.

What if

PS3 with IBM PPE, SPE X6, ATI RV570 (with cost-cutting 8 ROPs and 128bit external bus)

vs

Xbox 360 with IBM PPE X3, ATI Xenos.

Why did they not select the ATI HDx1900

Avatar image for Sandvichman
Sandvichman

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Sandvichman
Member since 2010 • 4006 Posts
[QUOTE="a_simple_gamer"]

[QUOTE="2mrw"] Rage will also run at 60 fps on the PS3, and a keyword i mentioned is "Sync" it's not about features, games like DA proves that all ur features can be nothing if the dev. didn't use them properly, it scored lowered on the X360 making it an 8.5. So features will never garauntee better game. why not looking at games like U2 since we need to talk about the top on each system? so far RSX and Cell is proved to be better combo when used properly.2mrw

If Uncharted 2 was an open world like RDR, i would agree, right now i see PS3 doing better in closed games and worst in open ones

Also Rage proves 360 can fdo far better than Uncharted 2

Fdo ?!!

You are the last person in the world to be questioning someones grammar or typos.
Avatar image for olart4618
olart4618

478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 olart4618
Member since 2010 • 478 Posts

Xenos, it had more power and have a friendly. I thing xbox in general is best for the industry, the cost of making a game is lower than a ps3 game.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

Why did they not select the ATI HDx1900

Banjo_Kongfooie



There would have been a lot of factors in play in Sony's decision:

1. How much would it cost to license it?
2. Would ATI have been willing to license it at all?
3. What were the power/heat characteristics relative to a G70?
4. How quickly could ATI integrate the GPU with FlexI/O + Cell? (most signs point to Sony deciding at the last minute to go with a traditional GPU)
5. Was R520 complete and finished early enough that it would have even been an option for Sony?

Avatar image for XboximusPrime
XboximusPrime

5405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 XboximusPrime
Member since 2009 • 5405 Posts

Xenos is the better GPU.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Xenos! This is not even an opinion so i assume those who vote Hollywood or RSX, do it just for fun!

Diviniuz

Well in the Infamous topic PS3 fans were telling me it was better because it worked with the CPU... lol

we are not comparing CPU's this was solely about GPU, if you are including CPU then the RSX/CPU combo is better, but if we are looking at solely gpu Xenos is obviously a better gpu

Oh ok, so then the graphic threads back when EA was not even using any spu's of the cell was right on target of what ps3 games are capable of. Just because another gpu can't run in unison with its cpu, we shouldn't hold back the gpu that can. That is the true beauty of the rsx and the cell processor, is that they do and can work hand and hand.

Yall are like saying which is better a 4870 or 2 4850's in xfire mode, oh but we can't talk about xfire mode. That is just irrelevant to this discussion lol.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

Xenos, it had more power and have a friendly. I thing xbox in general is best for the industry, the cost of making a game is lower than a ps3 game.

olart4618
So what you get in general is games that are rushed out for the 360 and not pushing anything. While time is needed anyway on the ps3, so its one of those since we are here lets add this.