You have a PC. Why not upgrade it, instead of buying a console?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#151 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
]I said when it comes to games, not to the console... you don't experiance crashes when you are playing a console games, and if so it's due to the hardware... I've owned a PS2 for now 5-6 years, and no game has ever crashed on me. On the PC (dunno if it's vista) some games seem to crash randomly, gears of war crashes but not Unreal Tournement 3, NHL 08 crashes randomly, The witcher also. I mean it crashes once in a day-2 day, and it happens really randomly but it makes me mad when I lose a save etc. haris12121212
Console, games, I'm experiencing crashes while I play the games. Whether its the console or the game's fault, the crashes are happening DURING the game. The copnsoles are getting more and more bugs by the day, like I said. I rarely see any crashes with my PC anymore. Asl ong as you don't have Vista you shouldn't be seeing many crashes either, unless its user error.
Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#152 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts
Maybe because not all games that are on consoles are on PC? Duh.
Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts
[QUOTE="Arjdagr8"]

so whats the point in listening to the TC basing on what you said. he says why not upgrade it instead of buying a console. you say you do not need to max a game to play it.

edit: WTF i just realise you are the TC. what the hell contradiction much??!!!!

PandaBear86

has anyone realised the contradiction that just happened in these posts. yes im quoting myself because this is just really confusing.

With PC gaming, you have a choice between whether you want to stick with old hardware and save money, or if you want new hardware and get the best graphics. However, you do not NEED to have new hardware to play most new games. How is this a contradiction?

so wtf is the point in this thread. if you don't have to upgrade your pc, whats so wrong about people buying a console. thats where your contradicting yourself. you first tell people they should save up and spend money on upgrading their pc, but now your saying its alright because you do not need to have new hardware.

Avatar image for Gunraidan
Gunraidan

4272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 Gunraidan
Member since 2007 • 4272 Posts

No TBS, no RTS, no MMO, no simulation, no adventure ftl.Vandalvideo

....What exactly was the point of this post?

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#155 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]

No TBS, no RTS, no MMO, no simulation, no adventure ftl.Gunraidan

....What exactly was the point of this post?

Satire and to prove a point. It was a preemptive strike at anyone who would say the PC lacks variety.
Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#156 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts
Also, in terms of appeal to the general consumer, I think they find consoles more convenient. Accuse them of being ignorant if you want, but thats the way it is. They don't want the hassle that comes with upgrading and having to install games, download patches. Might seem like nothing to Hermits, but to the majority, it is something.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#157 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Also, in terms of appeal to the general consumer, I think they find consoles more convenient. Accuse them of being ignorant if you want, but thats the way it is. They don't want the hassle that comes with upgrading and having to install games, download patches. Might seem like nothing to Hermits, but to the majority, it is something. Quofan
Installing games is coming to consoles ever so slow, and so are patches as well. I still don't see whats so hard about pushing next and sitting there for 3 minutes.
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="Arjdagr8"]

so whats the point in listening to the TC basing on what you said. he says why not upgrade it instead of buying a console. you say you do not need to max a game to play it.

edit: WTF i just realise you are the TC. what the hell contradiction much??!!!!

Arjdagr8

has anyone realised the contradiction that just happened in these posts. yes im quoting myself because this is just really confusing.

With PC gaming, you have a choice between whether you want to stick with old hardware and save money, or if you want new hardware and get the best graphics. However, you do not NEED to have new hardware to play most new games. How is this a contradiction?

so wtf is the point in this thread. if you don't have to upgrade your pc, whats so wrong about people buying a console. thats where your contradicting yourself. you first tell people they should save up and spend money on upgrading their pc, but now your saying its alright because you do not need to have new hardware.

I never said there is anything "wrong" with buying a console. I have a PS2, Wii and 360, but PC gaming is my personal favorite. I am addressing this thread towards the people who play games primarily on their console while leaving their PC in the dust.

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts
Because something tells me nothing good will come from shoehorning a 9800GX2 into my laptop.
Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#161 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts

I find playing on a controller far more comfortable than playing on a mouse and keyboard.SpinoRaptor

I personally hate the idea of staring at a sea of keys and just thinking, no, just no. Give me something with just a few buttons and im happy. Ive never really gotten round to buying a gamepad for my laptop, though, and since don't like shooters, I doubt i'll have to use a k/b and mouse any time soon anyway, just the mouse.

Ah, the beauty of simplicity.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#162 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor"]I find playing on a controller far more comfortable than playing on a mouse and keyboard.Quofan

I personally hate the idea of staring at a sea of keys and just thinking, no, just no. Give me something with just a few buttons and im happy. Ive never really gotten round to buying a gamepad for my laptop, though, and since don't like shooters, I doubt i'll have to use a k/b and mouse any time soon anyway, just the mouse.

Ah, the beauty of simplicity.

Plug in your controller of choice for the PC. Mission solved.
Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="haris12121212"]

It does not have my favourite genre aka JRPGs... no FF, no KH, no Suikoden, no Tales of, No Disgaea, No Star Ocean... fail...

I only use the pc for mainly fps and rts games. Not to mention that consoles are more stable when it comes to games than PC...

haris12121212

Consoles more stable? Oh please, I've had far more problems with consoles like failure to be BC on tons of games for the PS3, my 360 has broken twice and its taken a combined total of 2 months in repairs, and my Wiimote isn't always responsive and leaves for extremely awkward moments of flailing around. Not to mention that bugs are becomming more common on consoles as well. Heck, the patch sheet for GRAW 360 (first patch) was about twice as long as the patch sheet on the PC version. Oh and the lack of JRPGs is one of the only reasons that I actually own a console.

I said when it comes to games, not to the console... you don't experiance crashes when you are playing a console games, and if so it's due to the hardware... I've owned a PS2 for now 5-6 years, and no game has ever crashed on me. On the PC (dunno if it's vista) some games seem to crash randomly, gears of war crashes but not Unreal Tournement 3, NHL 08 crashes randomly, The witcher also. I mean it crashes once in a day-2 day, and it happens really randomly but it makes me mad when I lose a save etc.

I take it you dont own a 360? because pretty much all my games have crashed at some point... even the Arcade ones a few times.

Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts
[QUOTE="Arjdagr8"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="Arjdagr8"]

so whats the point in listening to the TC basing on what you said. he says why not upgrade it instead of buying a console. you say you do not need to max a game to play it.

edit: WTF i just realise you are the TC. what the hell contradiction much??!!!!

PandaBear86

has anyone realised the contradiction that just happened in these posts. yes im quoting myself because this is just really confusing.

With PC gaming, you have a choice between whether you want to stick with old hardware and save money, or if you want new hardware and get the best graphics. However, you do not NEED to have new hardware to play most new games. How is this a contradiction?

so wtf is the point in this thread. if you don't have to upgrade your pc, whats so wrong about people buying a console. thats where your contradicting yourself. you first tell people they should save up and spend money on upgrading their pc, but now your saying its alright because you do not need to have new hardware.

I never said there is anything "wrong" with buying a console. I have a PS2, Wii and 360, but PC gaming is my personal favorite. I am addressing this thread towards the people who play games primarily on their console while leaving their PC in the dust.

so if theres nothing wrong why are you asking people to upgrade the pc instead of buying a console. they can play pc games and game on consoles.

Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#165 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts

[QUOTE="Quofan"]Also, in terms of appeal to the general consumer, I think they find consoles more convenient. Accuse them of being ignorant if you want, but thats the way it is. They don't want the hassle that comes with upgrading and having to install games, download patches. Might seem like nothing to Hermits, but to the majority, it is something. Vandalvideo
Installing games is coming to consoles ever so slow, and so are patches as well. I still don't see whats so hard about pushing next and sitting there for 3 minutes.

I think Medieval 2 Total War among other games disagrees with you there. Apparently upon release it could take up to half an hour. It would be silly to assume every game takes 3 minutes to install. Possibly the majority, but not all. And anyway, its not difficult, but most people just don't have the patience. What really bugs me is the nerve of Microsoft to give us Vista with the assumption its better because its a new OS, only for half my older games not to even run.

Again, minimum system requirements and recommended as well is a chore for most consumers who arent knowledgable about such things. At least I can say I know a little bit about it, but the average persn is not a gaming geek like 99% of these forums. On most PC game boxes it says "or equivalent" - how is a member of the general population supposed to know these things? How do they know if they are trying to run Civ 4 that the processor they have is "equivalent" to a 1.2 GHz Intel Pentium 4 processor or AMD Athlon, if they own neither an Athlon or a Pentium 4 1.2 GHz.

But back to my original point - most people want simplicity, they don't see PC gaming as simple compared to consoles. Look at the hassle people have trying to run games like Crysis.

Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#166 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts
[QUOTE="Quofan"]

[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor"]I find playing on a controller far more comfortable than playing on a mouse and keyboard.Vandalvideo

I personally hate the idea of staring at a sea of keys and just thinking, no, just no. Give me something with just a few buttons and im happy. Ive never really gotten round to buying a gamepad for my laptop, though, and since don't like shooters, I doubt i'll have to use a k/b and mouse any time soon anyway, just the mouse.

Ah, the beauty of simplicity.

Plug in your controller of choice for the PC. Mission solved.

It would be solved if I had any games I wanted to use a gamepad with the PC for :P

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#167 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Quofan"]Also, in terms of appeal to the general consumer, I think they find consoles more convenient. Accuse them of being ignorant if you want, but thats the way it is. They don't want the hassle that comes with upgrading and having to install games, download patches. Might seem like nothing to Hermits, but to the majority, it is something. Quofan

Installing games is coming to consoles ever so slow, and so are patches as well. I still don't see whats so hard about pushing next and sitting there for 3 minutes.

I think Medieval 2 Total War among other games disagrees with you there. Apparently upon release it could take up to half an hour. It would be silly to assume every game takes 3 minutes to install. Possibly the majority, but not all. And anyway, its not difficult, but most people just don't have the patience. What really bugs me is the nerve of Microsoft to give us Vista with the assumption its better because its a new OS, only for half my older games not to even run.

Again, minimum system requirements and recommended as well is a chore for most consumers who arent knowledgable about such things. At least I can say I know a little bit about it, but the average persn is not a gaming geek like 99% of these forums. On most PC game boxes it says "or equivalent" - how is a member of the general population supposed to know these things? How do they know if they are trying to run Civ 4 that the processor they have is "equivalent" to a 1.2 GHz Intel Pentium 4 processor or AMD Athlon, if they own neither an Athlon or a Pentium 4 1.2 GHz.

But back to my original point - most people want simplicity, they don't see PC gaming as simple compared to consoles. Look at the hassle people have trying to run games like Crysis.

Well when you have an extremely large game and an extremely small disc read speed of course its going to take forever to bloody install. However, drives have more than quadrupled in speed in the past few years. Games no longer take exhorbant ammounts of time to install. If you have a relatively new rig you can play ALL new games. you don't have to stare at the packet wondering if you can install the game unless you have ancient hardware.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#168 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
It would be solved if I had any games I wanted to use a gamepad with the PC for :PQuofan
I find it highly unlikely that on the platform with the most variety and the most high quality titles you can't find any games that interest you. Either that, or you're making a blanket statement without looking at the games available.
Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#169 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts

[QUOTE="Quofan"]It would be solved if I had any games I wanted to use a gamepad with the PC for :PVandalvideo
I find it highly unlikely that on the platform with the most variety and the most high quality titles you can't find any games that interest you. Either that, or you're making a blanket statement without looking at the games available.

Of course I can find games that ionterest me, there are plenty....but none I want need a gamepad. Most tend to be RTS or TBS.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#170 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Quofan"]It would be solved if I had any games I wanted to use a gamepad with the PC for :PQuofan

I find it highly unlikely that on the platform with the most variety and the most high quality titles you can't find any games that interest you. Either that, or you're making a blanket statement without looking at the games available.

Of course I can find games that ionterest me, there are plenty....but none I want need a gamepad. Most tend to be RTS or TBS.

TBS games control great with the gamepad, considering its not real time. I used the 360 controler to play CIV the other day.
Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#171 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts
[QUOTE="Quofan"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Quofan"]Also, in terms of appeal to the general consumer, I think they find consoles more convenient. Accuse them of being ignorant if you want, but thats the way it is. They don't want the hassle that comes with upgrading and having to install games, download patches. Might seem like nothing to Hermits, but to the majority, it is something. Vandalvideo

Installing games is coming to consoles ever so slow, and so are patches as well. I still don't see whats so hard about pushing next and sitting there for 3 minutes.

I think Medieval 2 Total War among other games disagrees with you there. Apparently upon release it could take up to half an hour. It would be silly to assume every game takes 3 minutes to install. Possibly the majority, but not all. And anyway, its not difficult, but most people just don't have the patience. What really bugs me is the nerve of Microsoft to give us Vista with the assumption its better because its a new OS, only for half my older games not to even run.

Again, minimum system requirements and recommended as well is a chore for most consumers who arent knowledgable about such things. At least I can say I know a little bit about it, but the average persn is not a gaming geek like 99% of these forums. On most PC game boxes it says "or equivalent" - how is a member of the general population supposed to know these things? How do they know if they are trying to run Civ 4 that the processor they have is "equivalent" to a 1.2 GHz Intel Pentium 4 processor or AMD Athlon, if they own neither an Athlon or a Pentium 4 1.2 GHz.

But back to my original point - most people want simplicity, they don't see PC gaming as simple compared to consoles. Look at the hassle people have trying to run games like Crysis.

Well when you have an extremely large game and an extremely small disc read speed of course its going to take forever to bloody install. However, drives have more than quadrupled in speed in the past few years. Games no longer take exhorbant ammounts of time to install. If you have a relatively new rig you can play ALL new games. you don't have to stare at the packet wondering if you can install the game unless you have ancient hardware.

Exactly what do you define as ancient though?

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#172 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Exactly what do you define as ancient though?Quofan
Most new games can run on last generation hardware older than the 360. Find me a regular XBOX that can run gears. People have double standards here.
Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#173 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts
[QUOTE="Quofan"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Quofan"]It would be solved if I had any games I wanted to use a gamepad with the PC for :PVandalvideo

I find it highly unlikely that on the platform with the most variety and the most high quality titles you can't find any games that interest you. Either that, or you're making a blanket statement without looking at the games available.

Of course I can find games that ionterest me, there are plenty....but none I want need a gamepad. Most tend to be RTS or TBS.

TBS games control great with the gamepad, considering its not real time. I used the 360 controler to play CIV the other day.

Don't think Ive ever tried TBH. Im used to playing Fire Emblem games but the pointer works better IMO with a mouse. Thats why I was hoping they might add a pointer function to the Wiimnote for the latest installment of the FE series, but sadly they didnt.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#174 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"]So, all it takes is an 8800GT, and suddenly I'm playing with better graphics than a 360?PandaBear86

Well I did say that you need 1-2 gigs of RAM and a mid-range dual core processor to compliment the 8800 GT. Most modern PCs should already have this. And yes, once that is done, you will easily beat 360 and PS3 graphics (remember, DMC4 is only 640p) :)

I have a p4 processor so I would need to get a new rig so how much would that cost, minimum? Would it be more expensive than a PS3? If the answer is yes then forget it. That makes pc gaming TOO EXPENSIVE for your average gamer.
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#175 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"]So, all it takes is an 8800GT, and suddenly I'm playing with better graphics than a 360?Bigboi500

Well I did say that you need 1-2 gigs of RAM and a mid-range dual core processor to compliment the 8800 GT. Most modern PCs should already have this. And yes, once that is done, you will easily beat 360 and PS3 graphics (remember, DMC4 is only 640p) :)

Like I said before I have a p4 processor so I would need to get a new rig so how much would that cost, minimum? Would it be more expensive than a PS3? If the answer is yes than forget it.

My dads PC has a P4 2.4ghz with a 7300GS graphics card (AGP 8x), and still runs many modern games, but not on max details.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#176 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"]So, all it takes is an 8800GT, and suddenly I'm playing with better graphics than a 360?Bigboi500

Well I did say that you need 1-2 gigs of RAM and a mid-range dual core processor to compliment the 8800 GT. Most modern PCs should already have this. And yes, once that is done, you will easily beat 360 and PS3 graphics (remember, DMC4 is only 640p) :)

I have a p4 processor so I would need to get a new rig so how much would that cost, minimum? Would it be more expensive than a PS3? If the answer is yes then forget it. That makes pc gaming TOO EXPENSIVE for your average gamer.

If you were looking for an experience on par with or slightly better than consoles, 650-750 bucks for a new rig. What you fail to realize is that over the span of the generation you can conceivably end up spending less on a gaming PC than consoles thanks to cheaper games. Heck, most of the high grade titles on the PC only cost 39.99. (Like SOASE)
Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#177 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts

[QUOTE="Quofan"]Exactly what do you define as ancient though?Vandalvideo
Most new games can run on last generation hardware older than the 360. Find me a regular XBOX that can run gears. People have double standards here.

What I mean is, I doubt your average consumer is the kind of person to build a specialised gaming rig. So yes, perhaps there is a fair chance they will have "ancient hardware". But they might necessarily know that. With a console, they don't have to know these things, thus its more convenient for them.

Avatar image for Quofan
Quofan

1606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#178 Quofan
Member since 2005 • 1606 Posts
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"]So, all it takes is an 8800GT, and suddenly I'm playing with better graphics than a 360?Vandalvideo

Well I did say that you need 1-2 gigs of RAM and a mid-range dual core processor to compliment the 8800 GT. Most modern PCs should already have this. And yes, once that is done, you will easily beat 360 and PS3 graphics (remember, DMC4 is only 640p) :)

I have a p4 processor so I would need to get a new rig so how much would that cost, minimum? Would it be more expensive than a PS3? If the answer is yes then forget it. That makes pc gaming TOO EXPENSIVE for your average gamer.

If you were looking for an experience on par with or slightly better than consoles, 650-750 bucks for a new rig. What you fail to realize is that over the span of the generation you can conceivably end up spending less on a gaming PC than consoles thanks to cheaper games. Heck, most of the high grade titles on the PC only cost 39.99. (Like SOASE)

To be fair though, when I buy games I wait til they are about half the normal retail price anyway. I think its maybe the reason I ended up with 51 GC games at trhe end of last gen. I got a lot of 4 for £20 or 2 for £20 deals. So long as you're smart, you can always get games for cheap. Online is always a good place to look as well.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#179 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"]So, all it takes is an 8800GT, and suddenly I'm playing with better graphics than a 360?Vandalvideo

Well I did say that you need 1-2 gigs of RAM and a mid-range dual core processor to compliment the 8800 GT. Most modern PCs should already have this. And yes, once that is done, you will easily beat 360 and PS3 graphics (remember, DMC4 is only 640p) :)

I have a p4 processor so I would need to get a new rig so how much would that cost, minimum? Would it be more expensive than a PS3? If the answer is yes then forget it. That makes pc gaming TOO EXPENSIVE for your average gamer.

If you were looking for an experience on par with or slightly better than consoles, 650-750 bucks for a new rig. What you fail to realize is that over the span of the generation you can conceivably end up spending less on a gaming PC than consoles thanks to cheaper games. Heck, most of the high grade titles on the PC only cost 39.99. (Like SOASE)

That's still too expensive to just play games. Also I rent most games and Gamefly don't rent out PC games. I've never spent more than $300 for a system and I'm not about to start now.
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#181 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

Windows is just too annoying to put up with anymore. It's bloated, too slow, and too vulnerable. I have no idea how I put up with it for so long.

Dos/linux and console gaming all the way!

farrell2k

Windows is not bloated by its nature, the reason why you can consider it bloated is because all of the hackers target it. The reason they target it is because of its high market share. If Linux had 90% market share, do you think hackers will just ignore that as well, or will they be unable to bloat Linux systems? Oh please. My laptop has Windows Vista, and it has been running fine since I bought it in April 2007. No security software on it at all, and it runs fine. I don't really see the point in Linux, seeing you cannot even watch DVDs or Blu-ray movies in it as well due to its open source nature (no DRM). Otherwise, you can MULTIBOOT.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#182 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
That's still too expensive to just play games. Also I rent most games and Gamefly don't rent out PC games. I've never spent more than $300 for a system and I'm not about to start now.Bigboi500
MISCONCEPTION! PC games can be rented online and be purchased used from a variety of different stores.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#183 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Quofan"]Exactly what do you define as ancient though?Quofan

Most new games can run on last generation hardware older than the 360. Find me a regular XBOX that can run gears. People have double standards here.

What I mean is, I doubt your average consumer is the kind of person to build a specialised gaming rig. So yes, perhaps there is a fair chance they will have "ancient hardware". But they might necessarily know that. With a console, they don't have to know these things, thus its more convenient for them.

Thats what Bestbuy is for. They will assemble and build your PC for you.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Arjdagr8"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]PC is probably the most social platform. We practically invented the lan, and they number in the thousands of players. Not to mention there are hundreds of communities on the PC.Vandalvideo

lol, most social platform...good one...

It sure is. Lans, parties, etc. The PC is a really social platform. Those who say otherwise I said misconception to joo. In the competitive community we form pick up teams for local tournies and get together to enjoy the three Bs.

That's not all true. Do you think there aren't many tournys,parties,lans...etc. for consoles either? There is no way in proving which is the more social platform.

The consoles don't have anywhere near the ammount of tournaments that PCs have. To say otherwise its a fallacy. Cevo, SOTF, WCG, CAL-I, etc. Everything I've said is entirely true. To say that the PC isn't a social platform is wrong.

its competely subjective to the user. most of my friends are on XBL. therefore, i regard the 360 as the most social. if was a PC gamer, and all of my friends were on PC, then that would be the most social platform for me.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"]its competely subjective to the user. most of my friends are on XBL. therefore, i regard the 360 as the most social. if was a PC gamer, and all of my friends were on PC, then that would be the most social platform for me.Vandalvideo
Actually, its not completely subjective to the user. It doesn't matter where your friends are, the PC has larger social circles, and can be conceivably more social. Your prenotions don't mean jack in here.

do you just come here to pick fights? why would i want to game with complete strangers, when i could game on a robust XBL friends list. seriously, stop it, you just annoy people. nobody is slagging your precious PC. i know i'm not. yet you just can't concede that maybe, just maybe, a few crazy people prefer console gaming.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#187 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="clone01"]its competely subjective to the user. most of my friends are on XBL. therefore, i regard the 360 as the most social. if was a PC gamer, and all of my friends were on PC, then that would be the most social platform for me.clone01

Actually, its not completely subjective to the user. It doesn't matter where your friends are, the PC has larger social circles, and can be conceivably more social. Your prenotions don't mean jack in here.

do you just come here to pick fights? why would i want to game with complete strangers, when i could game on a robust XBL friends list. seriously, stop it, you just annoy people. nobody is slagging your precious PC. i know i'm not. yet you just can't concede that maybe, just maybe, a few crazy people prefer console gaming.

Its not about who you want to play with, this is about whether or not the PC is a social machine, and for all intents and purposes, it is. It has large social circles, popular tournaments, huge conventions, and the ability to support people under the same roof playing lan.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="clone01"]its competely subjective to the user. most of my friends are on XBL. therefore, i regard the 360 as the most social. if was a PC gamer, and all of my friends were on PC, then that would be the most social platform for me.Vandalvideo

Actually, its not completely subjective to the user. It doesn't matter where your friends are, the PC has larger social circles, and can be conceivably more social. Your prenotions don't mean jack in here.

do you just come here to pick fights? why would i want to game with complete strangers, when i could game on a robust XBL friends list. seriously, stop it, you just annoy people. nobody is slagging your precious PC. i know i'm not. yet you just can't concede that maybe, just maybe, a few crazy people prefer console gaming.

Its not about who you want to play with, this is about whether or not the PC is a social machine, and for all intents and purposes, it is. It has large social circles, popular tournaments, huge conventions, and the ability to support people under the same roof playing lan.

don't care, i prefer console gaming, and its more than social enough for me. quit forcing your hermit cult down my throat.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#189 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
don't care, i prefer console gaming, and its more than social enough for me. quit forcing your hermit cult down my throat.clone01
Facts = "hermit cult"? Sorry for forcing facts down your throat. I didn't say PC gaming was better in any way, I was merely remedying your misconceptions.
Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="clone01"]its competely subjective to the user. most of my friends are on XBL. therefore, i regard the 360 as the most social. if was a PC gamer, and all of my friends were on PC, then that would be the most social platform for me.Arjdagr8

Actually, its not completely subjective to the user. It doesn't matter where your friends are, the PC has larger social circles, and can be conceivably more social. Your prenotions don't mean jack in here.

do you just come here to pick fights? why would i want to game with complete strangers, when i could game on a robust XBL friends list. seriously, stop it, you just annoy people. nobody is slagging your precious PC. i know i'm not. yet you just can't concede that maybe, just maybe, a few crazy people prefer console gaming.

don't worry about him, just dont feed him. hes an arrogant hermit that wont quit. he wont back down even when hes wrong so theres no point in arguing.

Why is he wrong?

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"]don't care, i prefer console gaming, and its more than social enough for me. quit forcing your hermit cult down my throat.Vandalvideo
Facts = "hermit cult"? Sorry for forcing facts down your throat. I didn't say PC gaming was better in any way, I was merely remedying your misconceptions.

funny, seems like your attacking someone for simply not being into PC gaming. and if you read any of my post, i said that social gaming is contextual to the user. all of my friends are on XBL, therefore, for me, the 360 is the most social gaming platform. i could care less about PC and the LAN, tourney, etc. cultures that surround it.

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#194 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
Because they're a lot of good games on consoles that PC doesn't have?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#195 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="clone01"]don't care, i prefer console gaming, and its more than social enough for me. quit forcing your hermit cult down my throat.clone01

Facts = "hermit cult"? Sorry for forcing facts down your throat. I didn't say PC gaming was better in any way, I was merely remedying your misconceptions.

funny, seems like your attacking someone for simply not being into PC gaming. and if you read any of my post, i said that social gaming is contextual to the user. all of my friends are on XBL, therefore, for me, the 360 is the most social gaming platform. i could care less about PC and the LAN, tourney, etc. cultures that surround it.

Giving you facts = attacking someone? Sorry for attacking you with facts. :s Where your friends reside has little to do with which is the "sociable" platform. What you chose to play doesn't mean its more sociable.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="Arjdagr8"][QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="clone01"]its competely subjective to the user. most of my friends are on XBL. therefore, i regard the 360 as the most social. if was a PC gamer, and all of my friends were on PC, then that would be the most social platform for me.Meu2k7

Actually, its not completely subjective to the user. It doesn't matter where your friends are, the PC has larger social circles, and can be conceivably more social. Your prenotions don't mean jack in here.

do you just come here to pick fights? why would i want to game with complete strangers, when i could game on a robust XBL friends list. seriously, stop it, you just annoy people. nobody is slagging your precious PC. i know i'm not. yet you just can't concede that maybe, just maybe, a few crazy people prefer console gaming.

don't worry about him, just dont feed him. hes an arrogant hermit that wont quit. he wont back down even when hes wrong so theres no point in arguing.

Why is he wrong?

he's not necessarily wrong, but he comes across as a very condescending troll. i have to admit, i rarely agree with anything you say, but you at least present it in a courteous fashion, which i can respect.

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="clone01"]don't care, i prefer console gaming, and its more than social enough for me. quit forcing your hermit cult down my throat.clone01

Facts = "hermit cult"? Sorry for forcing facts down your throat. I didn't say PC gaming was better in any way, I was merely remedying your misconceptions.

funny, seems like your attacking someone for simply not being into PC gaming. and if you read any of my post, i said that social gaming is contextual to the user. all of my friends are on XBL, therefore, for me, the 360 is the most social gaming platform. i could care less about PC and the LAN, tourney, etc. cultures that surround it.

Where is he attacking you?

I like these 1 liner questions, straight to the point.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="clone01"]don't care, i prefer console gaming, and its more than social enough for me. quit forcing your hermit cult down my throat.Vandalvideo

Facts = "hermit cult"? Sorry for forcing facts down your throat. I didn't say PC gaming was better in any way, I was merely remedying your misconceptions.

funny, seems like your attacking someone for simply not being into PC gaming. and if you read any of my post, i said that social gaming is contextual to the user. all of my friends are on XBL, therefore, for me, the 360 is the most social gaming platform. i could care less about PC and the LAN, tourney, etc. cultures that surround it.

Giving you facts = attacking someone? Sorry for attacking you with facts. :s Where your friends reside has little to do with which is the "sociable" platform. What you chose to play doesn't mean its more sociable.

so what are your quantitative statistics on social gaming platforms. you mean you have numbers? any sort of research evidence? no? just opinion, like me. wow, failure.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="clone01"]don't care, i prefer console gaming, and its more than social enough for me. quit forcing your hermit cult down my throat.Meu2k7

Facts = "hermit cult"? Sorry for forcing facts down your throat. I didn't say PC gaming was better in any way, I was merely remedying your misconceptions.

funny, seems like your attacking someone for simply not being into PC gaming. and if you read any of my post, i said that social gaming is contextual to the user. all of my friends are on XBL, therefore, for me, the 360 is the most social gaming platform. i could care less about PC and the LAN, tourney, etc. cultures that surround it.

Where is he attacking you?

I like these 1 liner questions, straight to the point.

earlier, he stated that my "misconceptions" don't mean jack. i guess that means my opinions. kind of a jerk thing to say, if you ask me.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#200 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
so what are your quantitative statistics on social gaming platforms. you mean you have numbers? any sort of research evidence? no? just opinion, like me. wow, failure.clone01
Qualitative statistics are just as viable. The PC has more tournaments, more conventions, lan support, multiplayer splitscreen support for some games, etc. I have not stated a SINGLE opinon yet.