[QUOTE="bowserjr123"][QUOTE="YoshiYogurt"] What was wrong with these games exactly?? I absolutely loved Diamond/Pearl when they came out! I had amazing team(for a 13 year old.) Finished the pokedex and ended up with 400 hours in Pearl. New Super Mario Bros. felt fresh in it's design after not having a new platformer for what must have been ages for some. Wario Land shake It was just alright, a pretty fun and cool game, nothing special.YoshiYogurt
1. I personally didn't like the Pokemon designs in Diamond, such as the evolutions of Pokemon from earlier generations. I also didn't like the story that much and the series felt stale at that point. I loved Ruby and Diamond felt inferior IMO. I did like the fact that they split attacks into physical and special categories though.
2. Wario Land was a good game but it felt underwhelming compared to the amazing Wario Land 3. The Wii controls felt like a gimmick and the overall gameplay felt too slow. It also was too short. Again, not a bad game, but inferior to Wario Land 3 and even 4.
3. New Super Mario Bros. DS was the worst main Mario game I've ever played. The fact that it was so short and easy was a big letdown to me. Also I wasn't a fan of the music either.
Everything seems agreeable except for splitting the attacks into physical and special was probably the greatest thing to happen to Pokemon ever. It's BS when a physical attacker can't even be used because all their moves are water or dark etc and vice versa. A lot of Pokemon were downright unusable because of that.Glad you can agree ;) I always did hate that water type moves were all special just because Gyarados always had a bad special attack but very high attack, even Dragonite too. It's too bad I really didn't like Diamond/Pearl as a game that much but HeartGold was great so it benefitted then.
Log in to comment