Zoran Lazarevic vs. Bane

Who do you consider the more badass warlord?

vs.

Bane kicked Batman's ass... he wins by default.

Bane kicked Batman's ass... he wins by default.

GreenGoblin2099

And that wraps it for this thread.

Bane would break Lazarevic.

Bane would brake Lazarevic.

Sun_Universe

[QUOTE="Sun_Universe"]

Bane would brake Lazarevic.

BPoole96

also who the hell is the other guy?

also who the hell is the other guy?

BrunoBRS

TDKR Bane would murder Zoran. Hell, every version of Bane would win except perhaps this one:

Bane wins, by far.

Zoran was still a really great villian though, especially for my favorite game.

This is not a SW thread.

seriously what's with all the Uncharted themed threads today? is there a union where you all thought it would be funny to post a new thread on it one after another?

What does this has to do with System Wars?

This is not a SW thread.

super600

You jelly because you don't have UC2 :cool:

The answer is in my sig.

It's not even a competition, Bane is way more badass.

18-0 Bane. BatmanSpot confirmed. Blabadon

Only because Lazarevic is a stupid cliched stereotypical villain with the motives of a paper towel. Bane is a much more fleshed out character overall and he beat Batman. Hard to top that

well since The Dark Knight Rises Bane is pretty much Lazarevic there's not much of a difference.

Arkham Asylum/City Bane (aka True Bane) however.

Bane would make Lazarevic cry like a baby. He would break him.

Pity vote for Lazarevic....

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Blabadon"]18-0 Bane. BatmanSpot confirmed. Mozelleple112

Only because Lazarevic is a stupid cliched stereotypical villain with the motives of a paper towel. Bane is a much more fleshed out character overall and he beat Batman. Hard to top that

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Bane is a 100 times more bad a$$ Shame they messed up the film though.

1. Catwoman shouldn't have been in there

2. Bane shoulda kicked Catwoman's arse

3. Bane should've done more chaotic things

4. Batman should've have just "all of a sudden" become strong enough to take down Bane

5. BANE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE A MEER PAWN

6. CATWOMAN SHOULD NOT HAVE "JUST SHOT HIM OFF" WITH A CANNON.

Pathetic way to finish of Bane, should've been a well thoughout and epic battle between Batman and Bane.

princeofshapeir

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Bane is a 100 times more bad a$$ Shame they messed up the film though.

1. Catwoman shouldn't have been in there

2. Bane shoulda kicked Catwoman's arse

3. Bane should've done more chaotic things

4. Batman should've have just "all of a sudden" become strong enough to take down Bane

5. BANE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE A MEER PAWN

6. CATWOMAN SHOULD NOT HAVE "JUST SHOT HIM OFF" WITH A CANNON.

Pathetic way to finish of Bane, should've been a well thoughout and epic battle between Batman and Bane.

princeofshapeir

He's absolutely right though... with the exception of point number 1.

Lazarevic is suffering. He now has my permission to die.

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Only because Lazarevic is a stupid cliched stereotypical villain with the motives of a paper towel. Bane is a much more fleshed out character overall and he beat Batman. Hard to top that

BrunoBRS

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Bane is a 100 times more bad a$$ Shame they messed up the film though.

1. Catwoman shouldn't have been in there

2. Bane shoulda kicked Catwoman's arse

3. Bane should've done more chaotic things

4. Batman should've have just "all of a sudden" become strong enough to take down Bane

5. BANE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE A MEER PAWN

6. CATWOMAN SHOULD NOT HAVE "JUST SHOT HIM OFF" WITH A CANNON.

Pathetic way to finish of Bane, should've been a well thoughout and epic battle between Batman and Bane.

GreenGoblin2099

He's absolutely right though... with the exception of point number 1.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Bane is a 100 times more bad a$$ Shame they messed up the film though.

1. Catwoman shouldn't have been in there

2. Bane shoulda kicked Catwoman's arse

3. Bane should've done more chaotic things

4. Batman should've have just "all of a sudden" become strong enough to take down Bane

5. BANE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE A MEER PAWN

6. CATWOMAN SHOULD NOT HAVE "JUST SHOT HIM OFF" WITH A CANNON.

Pathetic way to finish of Bane, should've been a well thoughout and epic battle between Batman and Bane.

GreenGoblin2099

He's absolutely right though... with the exception of point number 1.

2. Bane never fought Catwoman.

3. Blowing up the football stadium, murdering the mayor of Gotham, breaking Batman's back and locking him in his former prison, freeing the inmates of Blackgate and establishing his mercenaries and thugs as Gotham's intermi government, and threatening the city with a nuke to keep them contained so everyone in Gotham is killed isn't enough for you? Besides, wanting Bane to be "chaotic" isn't what his character's about--he's working for Talia, he wants to destroy Gotham in an orderly and controller manner. The Joker is about chaos and anarchy--Bane is about power and control.

4. If you paid attention to the movie you'd know that Batman lost to Bane the first time because he didn't fear death. The old blind man in the prison cell told Bruce that the child who escaped the pit did so because she feared death and valued her own life, as symbolized by making the climb without a rope. When Bruce did the same thing, he came to fear death and realize his life was too precious to throw away. Besides that, his dedication to freeing Gotham was intensified over the course of three months of watching Bane's antics on television, and he trained his body extensively in the meantime.

5. Bane isn't a "mere pawn"; if you think he's less of a villain simply because he answers to Talia, you apparently think the movie would be better off without Talia, in which case you actually believe that having Bane be the son of Ra's al Ghul is acceptable. If you've read the comics you know it's not, and this way it's much more faithful to the established lore.

6. Bane was already beaten the moment Bruce climbed out of that pit. If you think his demise was "anticlimactic", I suppose you think Harvey Dent's death was too. At its essence, The Dark Knight trilogy isn't about cliched "epic battles"--it's about the symbolism and deeper meaning behind Batman. [/spoiler]

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Only because Lazarevic is a stupid cliched stereotypical villain with the motives of a paper towel. Bane is a much more fleshed out character overall and he beat Batman. Hard to top that

BrunoBRS

It's a well known fact bane breaks batmans back in the comics and beats him forcing him to learn how to be batman again

[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] As an MGS4 fanboy you have no right to criticize TDKR's story. You don't know what makes a good plot.princeofshapeir

He's absolutely right though... with the exception of point number 1.

2. Bane never fought Catwoman.

3. Blowing up the football stadium, murdering the mayor of Gotham, breaking Batman's back and locking him in his former prison, freeing the inmates of Blackgate and establishing his mercenaries and thugs as Gotham's intermi government, and threatening the city with a nuke to keep them contained so everyone in Gotham is killed isn't enough for you? Besides, wanting Bane to be "chaotic" isn't what his character's about--he's working for Talia, he wants to destroy Gotham in an orderly and controller manner. The Joker is about chaos and anarchy--Bane is about power and control.

4. If you paid attention to the movie you'd know that Batman lost to Bane the first time because he didn't fear death. The old blind man in the prison cell told Bruce that the child who escaped the pit did so because she feared death and valued her own life, as symbolized by making the climb without a rope. When Bruce did the same thing, he came to fear death and realize his life was too precious to throw away. Besides that, his dedication to freeing Gotham was intensified over the course of three months of watching Bane's antics on television, and he trained his body extensively in the meantime.

5. Bane isn't a "mere pawn"; if you think he's less of a villain simply because he answers to Talia, you apparently think the movie would be better off without Talia, in which case you actually believe that having Bane be the son of Ra's al Ghul is acceptable. If you've read the comics you know it's not, and this way it's much more faithful to the established lore.

6. Bane was already beaten the moment Bruce climbed out of that pit. If you think his demise was "anticlimactic", I suppose you think Harvey Dent's death was too. At its essence, The Dark Knight trilogy isn't about cliched "epic battles"--it's about the symbolism and deeper meaning behind Batman. [/spoiler]

This x100000. Very well said, there are many misunderstandings about the movie. Most of the flaws I've seen people talk about were really minor, hardly anything to hate about. The movie was still very good overall.

Bane is a 100 times more bad a$$ Shame they messed up the film though.

1. Catwoman shouldn't have been in there

2. Bane shoulda kicked Catwoman's arse

3. Bane should've done more chaotic things

4. Batman should've have just "all of a sudden" become strong enough to take down Bane

5. BANE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE A MEER PAWN

6. CATWOMAN SHOULD NOT HAVE "JUST SHOT HIM OFF" WITH A CANNON.

Pathetic way to finish of Bane, should've been a well thoughout and epic battle between Batman and Bane.

Mozelleple112

The only thing I hated about Bane in the Movie was the fact that he wasn't powered by some chemical and be all Hulk like.

Felt like a completely different Villian all together.

Though It was still enjoyable. I will watch it again.

[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] As an MGS4 fanboy you have no right to criticize TDKR's story. You don't know what makes a good plot.princeofshapeir

He's absolutely right though... with the exception of point number 1.

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Bane is a 100 times more bad a$$ Shame they messed up the film though.

1. Catwoman shouldn't have been in there

2. Bane shoulda kicked Catwoman's arse

3. Bane should've done more chaotic things

4. Batman should've have just "all of a sudden" become strong enough to take down Bane

5. BANE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE A MEER PAWN

6. CATWOMAN SHOULD NOT HAVE "JUST SHOT HIM OFF" WITH A CANNON.

Pathetic way to finish of Bane, should've been a well thoughout and epic battle between Batman and Bane.

LegatoSkyheart

The only thing I hated about Bane in the Movie was the fact that he wasn't powered by some chemical and be all Hulk like.

Felt like a completely different Villian all together.

Though It was still enjoyable. I will watch it again.

Remember, Nolan went for a more realistic and gritty look with the series. Having a chemical-induced hulk isn't very realistic :P.

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]

[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]

He's absolutely right though... with the exception of point number 1.

XVision84

2. Bane never fought Catwoman.

3. Blowing up the football stadium, murdering the mayor of Gotham, breaking Batman's back and locking him in his former prison, freeing the inmates of Blackgate and establishing his mercenaries and thugs as Gotham's intermi government, and threatening the city with a nuke to keep them contained so everyone in Gotham is killed isn't enough for you? Besides, wanting Bane to be "chaotic" isn't what his character's about--he's working for Talia, he wants to destroy Gotham in an orderly and controller manner. The Joker is about chaos and anarchy--Bane is about power and control.

4. If you paid attention to the movie you'd know that Batman lost to Bane the first time because he didn't fear death. The old blind man in the prison cell told Bruce that the child who escaped the pit did so because she feared death and valued her own life, as symbolized by making the climb without a rope. When Bruce did the same thing, he came to fear death and realize his life was too precious to throw away. Besides that, his dedication to freeing Gotham was intensified over the course of three months of watching Bane's antics on television, and he trained his body extensively in the meantime.

5. Bane isn't a "mere pawn"; if you think he's less of a villain simply because he answers to Talia, you apparently think the movie would be better off without Talia, in which case you actually believe that having Bane be the son of Ra's al Ghul is acceptable. If you've read the comics you know it's not, and this way it's much more faithful to the established lore.

6. Bane was already beaten the moment Bruce climbed out of that pit. If you think his demise was "anticlimactic", I suppose you think Harvey Dent's death was too. At its essence, The Dark Knight trilogy isn't about cliched "epic battles"--it's about the symbolism and deeper meaning behind Batman. [/spoiler]

This x100000. Very well said, there are many misunderstandings about the movie. Most of the flaws I've seen people talk about were really minor, hardly anything to hate about. The movie was still very good overall.

[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] As an MGS4 fanboy you have no right to criticize TDKR's story. You don't know what makes a good plot.princeofshapeir

He's absolutely right though... with the exception of point number 1.

2. Bane never fought Catwoman.

3. Blowing up the football stadium, murdering the mayor of Gotham, breaking Batman's back and locking him in his former prison, freeing the inmates of Blackgate and establishing his mercenaries and thugs as Gotham's intermi government, and threatening the city with a nuke to keep them contained so everyone in Gotham is killed isn't enough for you? Besides, wanting Bane to be "chaotic" isn't what his character's about--he's working for Talia, he wants to destroy Gotham in an orderly and controller manner. The Joker is about chaos and anarchy--Bane is about power and control.

4. If you paid attention to the movie you'd know that Batman lost to Bane the first time because he didn't fear death. The old blind man in the prison cell told Bruce that the child who escaped the pit did so because she feared death and valued her own life, as symbolized by making the climb without a rope. When Bruce did the same thing, he came to fear death and realize his life was too precious to throw away. Besides that, his dedication to freeing Gotham was intensified over the course of three months of watching Bane's antics on television, and he trained his body extensively in the meantime.

5. Bane isn't a "mere pawn"; if you think he's less of a villain simply because he answers to Talia, you apparently think the movie would be better off without Talia, in which case you actually believe that having Bane be the son of Ra's al Ghul is acceptable. If you've read the comics you know it's not, and this way it's much more faithful to the established lore.

6. Bane was already beaten the moment Bruce climbed out of that pit. If you think his demise was "anticlimactic", I suppose you think Harvey Dent's death was too. At its essence, The Dark Knight trilogy isn't about cliched "epic battles"--it's about the symbolism and deeper meaning behind Batman. [/spoiler]

DARK KNIGHT RISES SPOILERS Mozelleple112

^^^^ For the sake of those who haven't seen the movie, remove the spoilers man :P. [You too carl, someone might read the quote]

And there won't be a 4th batman movie, Nolan said he's done with the series.

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]

Bane is a 100 times more bad a$$ Shame they messed up the film though.

1. Catwoman shouldn't have been in there

2. Bane shoulda kicked Catwoman's arse

3. Bane should've done more chaotic things

4. Batman should've have just "all of a sudden" become strong enough to take down Bane

5. BANE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE A MEER PAWN

6. CATWOMAN SHOULD NOT HAVE "JUST SHOT HIM OFF" WITH A CANNON.

Pathetic way to finish of Bane, should've been a well thoughout and epic battle between Batman and Bane.

XVision84

The only thing I hated about Bane in the Movie was the fact that he wasn't powered by some chemical and be all Hulk like.

Felt like a completely different Villian all together.

Though It was still enjoyable. I will watch it again.

Remember, Nolan went for a more realistic and gritty look with the series. Having a chemical-induced hulk isn't very realistic :P.

[QUOTE="XVision84"]

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

The only thing I hated about Bane in the Movie was the fact that he wasn't powered by some chemical and be all Hulk like.

Felt like a completely different Villian all together.

Though It was still enjoyable. I will watch it again.

carljohnson3456

Remember, Nolan went for a more realistic and gritty look with the series. Having a chemical-induced hulk isn't very realistic :P.

Yep, I agree. Only I'd say it's more like TDKR > TDK > Batman Begins. Each of them are good in their own respects, they each have their own ups and downs. Nolan ended it off perfectly.

[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="XVision84"]

Remember, Nolan went for a more realistic and gritty look with the series. Having a chemical-induced hulk isn't very realistic :P.

XVision84

Yep, I agree. Only I'd say it's more like TDKR > TDK > Batman Begins. Each of them are good in their own respects, they each have their own ups and downs. Nolan ended it off perfectly.