-M117-'s forum posts

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

There is a thread on SW with people listing every console/handheld they EVER owned.

Some people had every console and handheld ever released. This suggestes deep pockets (either them or their parents).

So given that statistically a gamer spends hundreds of dollars every year on games, whining about paying $50 per year for a service is just ridiculous.......especially when its the #1 console service.

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

cost shoudlnt be a factor in quality.

with LIVE being better then PSN.........that should answer your question.

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

It would make me want to work harder to afford Xbox Live! Yeah!!! 8)

lolfaqs

just like the PS3 :)

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

no i draw the line at $50. 50 is the sweet spot for paying for the "better then PSN service"

Anymore then 50 and ill become the type of gamer I never want to be.............a MMO gamer who throws away money paying for monthly costs.

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

[QUOTE="lebanese_boy"]

Yeah Microsoft is afraid of a company behind them :roll:.

Trinners

then why is microsoft releasing so many FUD statements lately instead of letting their games do the talking for them like sony does?

using FUD tactics = weakness.

FUD tactics = kicking while they are down.

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

Yoy guys misunderstood the article it's not implying that Microsoft is literally afraid of Sony..... they are looking at it from buisness perspective..... with your competitor gaining so much momentum, as a company wouldn't you be concerned?.....

Bauer_24

PS3 is selling at year over year declines for months now :lol:

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

How are they afraid?

They are simply kicking Sony while there down. Thats why they attack them in interviews.

I think Sony is afraid of MS, hence their on last place.

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="SynisterGamer"]

We can wait for Alan Wake, we've been busy with Halo 3, Gears 1 and 2, Fable 2, Banjo: Nuts and Bolts, Lost Odyssey, and Tales of Vesperia. We chill.

SynisterGamer

and cows can't wait for GT5:roll:

Not saying they can't, they have Resistance 2, Little Big Planet, Uncharted 1, Infamous, Ratchet and Clank, and Killzone 2.

thats it? man u gusy are starved :P

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

[QUOTE="Banjo_Kongfooie"]Well they should put extra care into the FFXIII 360 version and make it have everthing the Ps3 one has.Trinners

but it won't. Nomura won't let that happen.

aside from having multiple disks, they will more or less be the same. Worst case scenerio its like Fallout 3 with PS3 and 360.

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

Playstation 3 by a landslide.

vdastampede

you do realize the title says "console exclusives"?

because you know.......the 360 has the most of those, by far.