02152008's forum posts

Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="yo_foo"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="yo_foo"]

hint: this thread is about MGS4 will be more successful than GEOW2. We don't discuss SSBB here. Besides i don't think SSBB will move as many consoles seeing as the people who want the game have got wiis already.

:'(

yo_foo

And the people who want MGS4 don't already have PS3s? Where do you find these facts?

Nice to see you again Blackbond.

MGS4 gives people who have held off on buying a PS3 a golden opportunity to purchase the console because it is one of its marquee games. The fact of the matter is: MGS4 couldn't have come at a better time for Sony. With Blu Ray winning the format war, people will have no doubts in their minds of upgrading to a PS3 for MGS4.

:'(

So why doesn't GEOW2 give people who've been holding off on a 360 a golden opportunity to purchase a 360?

So why doesn't SSBB give people who've been holding off on a Wii a golden opporutnity to purchase a Wii?

Why is it that everyone who already wants GEOW2 and SSBB has already bought a Wii or 360 and is just waiting for the game while that is not the case for MGS4?

Why are people going to buy consoles for MGS4 but not buy consoles for SSBB and GEOW2?

Your reasoning is hypocritical. What's to stop me from saying that MGS4 won't move consoles because everyone who wants it already has a PS3? I mean thats what you are saying with SSBB and GEOW. That everyone who wants it already has a 360 or Wii.

1) GEOW2 will only appeal to those who have already got GEOW1. Therefore won't sell many consoles.

2) SSBB will not move consoles because everyone pretty much got a wii for SMG and that appeals to SSBB fans.

3) MGS4 is the first huge marquee game on the PS3. Because Resistance, albeit was a fantastic game, was not a sequel or anything like that, it wasn't really a marquee game. one that the general public know will be amazing. But these people would have held off getting a PS3 until it gets released. It truly is a mover of consoles. You fail to realise that people who want to play GEOW2 will have already bought a 360 for Gears 1!!!

:'(

Well, that doesn't mean that the sequel to Gears of War isn't going to transcend five million copies.

Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts
[QUOTE="saolin323"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]

How is Sandbox Editor 2 Pre-rendered when your playing while editing? X_x.

Fable 2 looks like a 360 release title, it barely goes beyond Half-Life 2 graphics.

It belongs on the Wii clearly.

Meu2k7

Ok, post a IN EDITOR pic then !!! But NOT an EXPORETD from editor pic, i want all editor menus shown, ok ?

You seem to be oblivious to all things graphical

When you EXPORT a pic from editor, can be ANY size, right ? All the great pics are taken in either 5000x200 resolution, or 3800x2000 resolution, then downscaled to get the pics you posted

Of course, as ANYONE (but you) could understand, you can't possibly display a 5000x 2000 image on your screen, because n a simple way, it does not have as many pixels, so the screen would be a resolution your screen supports, right ?

Meaning you can NEVER EVER play Crysis looking as crisp as downscaled 5000x2000 pics, EVER, unless there is some supersampling technique, to render internally in such resolutions and thenm downscale to native screen resolution

All in all, those are NOT in game pic, but exported PRE-RENDERED in editor pics, in vastly higher resolutions no pc could ever handle

Is there something you missed from the above ?

All inall, you people are posting FAKE pics, and say they look better than Fable 2. OF COURSE if took a pic from 3ds max, would look better than ANYTHING, right ?

The pictures above all have UI's.

And yea I agree those Fable 2 pics are ingame, it looks slightley better than Ocarina of Time, unfortunatly Ocarina of time had better character models, trees are about even.

Are they? I wasn't aware of that.

Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts
They should advertise the video game which will almost certainly be more prosperous.
Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts

[QUOTE="02152008"]This guy genuinely is beyond belief. I'm not interested in the amount of trees. I'm interested in trees of high quality. Let's forget about quantity in the blink of an eye. Let's pay particular attention to quality. At this point, Fable 2 manifestly doesn't look as realistic as Crysis. Besides, no one agrees with you. And that's because you're not interested in realism. Nevertheless, Fable 2 isn't a video game with graphics of higher quality. Period.saolin323

All i see from Crysis trees is a blurry mess, but i can make out EACH ONE leaf in Fable 2 trees, so why would Crysis trees seem betetr "quality" to me ? because you can't believe Fable 2 does so detailed trees ?

OH YES, Fable 2 does do stunningly detailed trees, you want to admit it or not

No, I don't think so.

Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts
This guy genuinely is beyond belief. I'm not interested in the amount of trees. I'm interested in trees of high quality. Let's forget about quantity in the blink of an eye. Let's pay particular attention to quality. At this point, Fable 2 manifestly doesn't look as realistic as Crysis. Besides, no one agrees with you. And that's because you're not interested in realism. Nevertheless, Fable 2 isn't a video game with graphics of higher quality. Period.
Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts

Yeah, i wasnt a huge fan of the one person dies, the other dies, part of the co-op, but in general the game was really fun. and this one will be great fun too. I for one do NOT regret buying GeOW 1 at all.Phazevariance

Yes, it may be relatively infuriating occasionally.

Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts
[QUOTE="02152008"][QUOTE="saolin323"]

What i see, is more bloom in Crysis forest, that makes it look strange, and far less detail, no grass ??? at all, not much more detail in trees too, and they look worst to me because they are confusing and bad in their art possibly

I give Crysis the bigger scale, the ground texture is a bit better, and the low vegetation very nice indeed, but they are 100% comparabel from those pics, if not an edge to Fable 2 because its trees can be SEEN, each leaf, there is grass and light beams behave much better IMO

saolin323

Nevertheless, the trees in Crysis look far more realistic than the trees in Fable 2. Moreover, in a general sense, Crysis looks far more realistic.

But that is debating art, and personally the realistic looking style is something i hate in games, i like games to look like games, not like a washed out reality, but that is just me

Well, then I comprehend why you say that Fable 2 is a game with finer graphics. And that's satisfactory. I understand, in the fullness of time. Nonetheless, you should have said that antecedently. I thought that we were talking about technical graphics. And that often puts me in mind of realism. Well, if that's what you have in mind about Fable 2's graphics, then you should have said it at an earlier time. As an alternative to that, you made everybody have negative opinions of you. Congratulations.

Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts

[QUOTE="02152008"]It's indubitably the ones about Fable 2's graphics.pro-nathan-07
agree, i think saolin is taking things a bit too far lol.

He doubtlessly is.

Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="_KenKittyragi_"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]

[QUOTE="jlh47"][QUOTE="Hyde006"]Eww RTS no keyboard support = instant fail._KenKittyragi_

worked very well with command and conquer...

Not really.

You've obviously never played C&C on 360, the controls were great.

Only because C&C3 is a popcorn RTS with little depth compared to a truly great RTS. Everything about the game is automatically handled for you.

LOTR had a lot of depth and it was a very fun game with great controls (minus the silverthorn arrows, lol)

Well, it's established upon Lord of the Rings, which makes it entertaining.

Avatar image for 02152008
02152008

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 02152008
Member since 2008 • 203 Posts
It's indubitably the ones about Fable 2's graphics.