[QUOTE="Cloud_Insurance"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Lacking. The overall game lacked horror, while it was being billed as a horror game. It boiled down to a third person shooter with unique enemy designs. Vandalvideo

Try playing it on impossible when you are forced to conserve ammo and face more necromorphs. True the game is not that scary in the way that fatal frame or clock tower is, but nothing about the game is lacking. Easily one of the 10 best games of the year.

Dead Space is a truly amazing game. For people who don't live in their parents basement playing games all day, this game will definitely prove to be a challenge on hard/impossible. I'm doing my second run through on impossible with only the plasma cutter; very fun.

I forgot it was the time of the years where activision launch their milking machine of the years. So how much this time? 180$ for the game and the drum?+non stop publicity like a dairy Queen drum or a doctor house guitar?Franko_3

If you think Guitar Hero milks their customers you should play a real instrument and see how bad almost every guitar manufacturer milks their customers, it's waaaaaay worse.

I'm really disappointed GH scored so poorly. I guess it's Rock Band 2 for me.

How's the saying go?

"No matter what you name it, or how well you polish it, a turd is still a turd."

heretrix

Right, because something that isn't good for you isn't good for anyone. Too much ignorance on this forum.

[QUOTE="Saturos3091"]Looks good, however I wish more people had things like this, making it a level playing field and giving me something new to try out. True_Gamer_

IMO people should mature and get off that tit sucking "level play" life aint level: stand up...

Yeah, video games, serious business.

[QUOTE="0bscurity"][QUOTE="mingo123"][QUOTE="0bscurity"]

Read my last post.

mingo123

well whatever, cod3 was great and was actually different from cod2 and 4, treyarch actually did something different unlike IW who took cod2 and slapped modern theme on it + cod3 was 24 players with tanks and jeeps+ bigger maps. if cod3 was hyped as much as cod4 then it would have been as much successful but it wasnt hyped coz it was made by treyarch and treyarch = teh bad. Nowsince everyone loves cod4 thats why treyarch is copying it but also adding new stuff like tanks etc etc, i guarantee if co5 was being made by IW then they wouldnt even improve it as much as treyarch has.

Simply look at the scores, the sales, and the feedback, and you'll see CoD4 is ahead of CoD3 for more reasons then just hype:lol: .

majority of bad feedback comes from those who havent played the game, more sales dont make the game better, if they do, then 50 Cent Bullet Proof is amazing. Scores, well COD3 recieved great reviews

How can you sit here and argue with me that CoD3 is better then CoD4? It isn't. Scores prove that overall it's a better game, sales prove that overall it's a more popular game, feedback proves the game was taken in high strides. Infinity Ward is much better at developing FPS then Treyarch, no way around it.

[QUOTE="0bscurity"]

Read my last post.

mingo123

well whatever, cod3 was great and was actually different from cod2 and 4, treyarch actually did something different unlike IW who took cod2 and slapped modern theme on it + cod3 was 24 players with tanks and jeeps+ bigger maps. if cod3 was hyped as much as cod4 then it would have been as much successful but it wasnt hyped coz it was made by treyarch and treyarch = teh bad. Nowsince everyone loves cod4 thats why treyarch is copying it but also adding new stuff like tanks etc etc, i guarantee if co5 was being made by IW then they wouldnt even improve it as much as treyarch has.

Simply look at the scores, the sales, and the feedback, and you'll see CoD4 is ahead of CoD3 for more reasons then just hype:lol: .