1q3er5's forum posts

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts

ya that would be very cool maybe in the future

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts

I played through it recently along with the expansion.

Now I will say with the expansion it is better! If you get the complete edition of the game (I got it for $5) I had the original game a couple years ago, and while still fun, the expansion added in was better.

Great explosions, still the best I have seen in an RTS to this day.

Great performance as well. Easily out performs COH. Maxed at 1080p I never went below 40fps (only when Nukes and Carpetbombs hit) COH will drop below 20fps just by flattening out the camera in a lot of areas. Phenom II quad 3ghz, 4gb RAM, GTX570.

The gameplay was really fun. I really enjoyed it.

I would really like a successorl, (spiritual or direct)

Lach0121
what this guy said. amazing explosions/smoke effects/destruction. not too mention physics, sound, multiplayer, single player was short but sweet. just a really well polished game. you are never going to see a follow up :( the game has aged extremely well. actually i don't think the graphics for WIC has truly been surpassed yet. European Escalation doesn't really come close at all.
Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts
[QUOTE="IAmNot_fun"]Hardcore 1.6 lovers won't like anything other than 1.6starjet905
This. Even if the exact same game is released with a graphical overhaul that doesn't affect any gameplay, they still won't leave 1.6 for it.

wrong. alot of 1.6ers tried source and hated it. graphics upgrade was a plus but the gameplay suffered. Alot of 1.6ers don't even think 1.6 was the best but its better than source. I tried to like source i really did. hated the new flashbangs, hated how slow and unacrobatic the players seemed, hated how easy it was to be killed.
Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts
im glad about the complaining. DICE / EA have let PC gamers down. They deserve this. In their face. 24/7.
Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts
I'm considering getting World in Conflict. But I have a question about the New York level. Not that this matters, I'm just wondering, but can you destroy the Manhattan area. Because I see Youtube videos of the New York level and the players haven't even gone NEAR the Manhattan area.TheSuperMario1
Nope but u get to demolish all of Seattle ...YEAH! seriously just get the game its freakin amazing. you will be more than happy with the level of destruction / explosions in the game. Even to this day, the graphics are still amazing.
Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts

umm actually they were planning on making a new nexus game. They were trying to do some fundraising - unfortunately it failed to reach the money needed. Watch this and weep http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhZQEvg1V0Y&feature=relatedlooks like its not getting made :(

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts
[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

[QUOTE="Falconoffury"]

One thing I miss about CRTs was the flexibility on resolutions still looking good. I don't miss the awful headaches I used to get from the CRTs though.

^ This.

I used to get headaches after about 1 hour of being on a CRT.

the only reason your getting headaches is I bet your screen refresh rate was too low. If you get a decent CRT you should have a refresh of 75 or above, my old crt could to 640 x 400 at 120 hz (for counter-strike low res is good)
Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts
[QUOTE="twizzickle"]

I see people write reviews and complain about graphics.

Who cares!?

If its got good gameplay does it matter?Look at the retro and indy movement. There are tons of successful games with lo-fi graphics.

So really, are mediocre graphics really a reason to reduce a game's rating?

On the PC it is a VERY GOOD reason. PC is where limits are pushed. Don't bring old consolized garbage to the platform and expect praise. Understand?
Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts

Looks like World in Conflict. That's a good thing. The trailer looked absolutely awsome. Will propably buy after more feedback, unless it somehow turns out to be complete crap. Hopefully it doesn't.

QQabitmoar
MORE specifically it looks like a map from World in Conflict ...Farmland !! i haven't seen any other environments besides the freakin farm theme LOL. This game looks pretty pathetic next to World in Conflict honestly. Looks like they even tried to copy the story of WIC with the cold war theme. After being spoiled by WIC's explosions, physics and graphics it really is hard for me to take this game seriously. I don't think this game even has terrain deformations like WIC. I know its bad to compare but seriously, if you are making a NEW game in this genre, people are gonna compare it to WIC and from what I've seen so far it doesn't stack up graphically and environment wise and WIC is pretty old now too! There is no excuse really. I hope its good but ugh it doesn't look promising
Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

PC handling...

Wow, blatant fanboyism right there. Instead of just saying "other games" it had to be PC handling.

You can't take somebody serious when they are that biased.

LOL looks like your the one who's biased. PC racing sims are better. You won't find console games that pay much attention to tire physics the way PC sims do as an example.